Slashdot Mirror


Radioshack Declares Bankruptcy

gemtech writes RadioShack has declared bankruptcy today. As reported Monday, the company has struck a deal to sell up to 2,400 of its approximately 4,000 stores to Sprint. From the article: "RadioShack said the remaining stores are expected to close. The company's franchise locations, as well as stores in Mexico and Asia, are not included in the deal. The bankruptcy announcement is no surprise. The New York Stock Exchange suspended trading of its shares on Monday. And RadioShack workers have told CNNMoney that some locations have already been converted to clearance stores."

59 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. So who's going to buy them? by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So you have a bunch of stores for sale in tech-sector-friendly locations, just when Amazon is starting to establish a physical presence... Hmm.

    1. Re:So who's going to buy them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amazon could just rent out a few of the soon-to-be-abandoned locations and not deal with RS.

    2. Re:So who's going to buy them? by zarthrag · · Score: 2

      No not outlaw Walmart, simply tax Walmart.

      FTFY

      Walmart is quite subsidized to the point that it makes the 30% Mom & Pop pay downright mean.

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    3. Re:So who's going to buy them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      and democrats only care about their bureaucratic fiefdoms. the two together create the hell we have.

    4. Re:So who's going to buy them? by towermac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You think you're enlightened, but you're a foot soldier for 'the people in charge'.

      Down with the rich eh? That's what the French did. The Russians did it too. They finally got fed up. I mean, that's what you actually have to do in the end, if you really want to take the rich people's money. You have to kill them all, and their families. Then, the next day, you and I report to new rich people, albeit with less taste.

      Did you really just envision a society without charity? Can you hear yourself?

      The answer is not to oppress everybody equally.

    5. Re:So who's going to buy them? by towermac · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's some weak sauce man, although the Forbes rebuttal is even weaker.

      They're counting the fact that dividends are taxed lower than wages. They're counting accelerated depreciation too. That's tax law, and it's no different for Wally World than it is for anybody else.

      The big number is the shit wages that make employees rely on food stamps, school lunch; all those Federal subsidies. That argument actually has some legs. But is that Wal-Mart's fault? All those Federal subsidies were already there, thus creating the environment that Wal-Mart could survive in. Then they move in, take advantage of it, and get rich. If not an Arkansas hillbilly, then somebody would have.

      Let me ask you this: On the day Wal-Mart opened in your town, there was still a hardware store, and an independent grocery store, clothing and shoe stores, ...
      Did you still go to those places, and never go to Wal-Mart? Myself, I resisted, but soon those stores were gone. And one by one those employees went to work at Wal-Mart for half the money.

      Maybe you didn't go in. Everybody else did. You sure it's just 'The Government' that's at fault here?

    6. Re: So who's going to buy them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI, Digi-Key will ship your order for free if you mail them a check or money order.

      * When a check or money order accompanies your order, Digi-Key pays all shipping and insurance (our choice for method of shipping) to all addresses in the U.S. and Canada.

      Section II.6

    7. Re:So who's going to buy them? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As it is, they are mostly spineless and beholden to the same moneyed interests as the Republicans, maybe a little less so but the result is still that the status quo is mostly maintained.

      Odd then that you seem to favor Democrats over Republicans. Democrats have handed out huge favors to the rich, to banks, to Wall Street, and to corporations.

      We shouldn't need charity in a society that takes care of its citizens.

      You're right: depending on private charity is demeaning and unreliable. Unfortunately, it turns out that depending on public welfare is even more demeaning and even more unreliable.

      I wish Democrats positioned themselves more as socialists.

      Me too. I mean, socialists are at least honest about the fact that they hate the middle class ("the bourgeoisie") and want to destroy it; Democrats are still pretending they want to help us.

      (I'm no friend of Republicans, but really, stop being so naive about Democrats.)

    8. Re:So who's going to buy them? by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Curiously, Radio Shack in Sunnyvale was basically empty a few days ago except for the electronic components section, which is all I care about anyway. Here's hoping they co-brand it with Sprint and keep that back section stocked as-is. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re: So who's going to buy them? by MSJos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, in lots of ways the Democrats are terrible, but the Republicans are far worse.

      So you have terrible government, which seems to be a reflection of the apathy towards politics enjoyed by the majority of Americans. You get the government you deserve. That doesn't mean all government is necessarily bad.

      Socialism as practiced in Western Europe doesn't seem so bad. At least they have decent health care. But of course the American system which spends way more and has worse outcomes is superior because Murikah, yeah!

    10. Re:So who's going to buy them? by houghi · · Score: 2

      Yes, it is the government at fault. Perhaps just the local one, but still. In Brussels there is a LOT of talk for a big shopping center. The reason is because it will suck away the local stores. That not only will mean less employment, but also a downwards spiral of the value of the area.

      I do not blame Wall-Mart for abusing the system. I blame the government for not changing the system when they see it is being abused.

      If employees need foodstamps, then there is clearly something wrong.

      And yes, I think it is good that a government tries to stop business practices when they will have clearly a negative influence on the rest of the population in how they live.

      What we see now is the opposite of what Ford did. Instead of making products cheaper and giving people more money so they can buy the products and more time to spend it, give them less money and fuck them.

      It is grab, grab, grab and the government doesn't do anything if not enhance the ability to do so.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re: So who's going to buy them? by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 2

      citations, please.

      Methinks you need to lay off the CNBC & MSNBC...

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    12. Re: So who's going to buy them? by dywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah yes. The idea that the rich create jobs and businesses out of the goodness of their hearts.....

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    13. Re:So who's going to buy them? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Down with the rich eh? That's what the French did. The Russians did it too. They finally got fed up. I mean, that's what you actually have to do in the end, if you really want to take the rich people's money. You have to kill them all, and their families. Then, the next day, you and I report to new rich people, albeit with less taste.

      As it turns out, people are not very smart, and rich people are not actually any smarter than the rest of us. What actually happens is that people who have advantages over others exploit them, often heedless of consequence to others, and they then get to remain in control of the system, with eventual ill effect for all. So what happens is, some people rise to the top regardless of merit, then they rest on their laurels and spawn inbred idiots, and then torches and pitchforks. Lather, rinse, repeat, up until we learn to become personally involved in politics by building systems of government which are powered by citizen involvement.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re: So who's going to buy them? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      That begs the question: Does a wealth gap inflict damage?

      Well, the answer is no. But that still doesn't mean everything is good. A wealth gap is the damage. A healthy society is mostly middle class. That's how you know it's serving the needs and desires of its citizenry: it enables success.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:So who's going to buy them? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      The customers get shittier products

      I fail to see how the Cheerios I buy at Walmart are any different than the Cheerios I buy at any other store, and they aren't any different than they were before Walmart even existed. Sure if you buy a $100 bike at Walmart then it will be terrible compared to the $400-$1000 bike at your local bike shop, but what did you really expect. That's not specific to Walmart, all large retailers sell the same junk.

      Wal-Mart pays some employees slightly above minimum wage, but most of them not. Once an employee has been there for long, they get a little more money, but most of them aren't there long enough for that to happen.

      At least at Walmart there is a slight possiblity of moving up in pay and even possibly up the ladder to something like manager. At the mom and pop, they have absolutely no ability to pay you more than minimum wage. And there is no chance of getting into management because the management is the sole function of the owners.

      People constantly complain about Walmart, I get that. And they aren't without their faults. But I don't see how they are any worse than any other large retailer. And personally, I would rather work at a place like Walmart than work for a mom and pop store. I think most of the complaints about Walmart are actually correct, but I don't see them being specific to Walmart, but rather just about every retail operation.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  2. consumerism wins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's what happens when nobody builds or repairs anything anymore ever. Throw it away, buy a new one. Luckily the corporate consumerists haven't adopted the same strategy yet, or we'd be seeing massive layoffs and turnover.

    1. Re:consumerism wins! by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      So where will I go now to get blank stares?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:consumerism wins! by mirix · · Score: 2

      It might be different in the US, but in Canada they always had terrible stock. So if your thing didn't have a broken lamp or speaker, or a dead battery - you were SOL, as they didn't carry anything else.

      There's so much different silicon now that it isn't really feasible to stock even a small portion of it in every mall anyway, so most anything you fix you'll have to order in parts for...

      It would have been more reasonable when I was a kid (and they only stocked a whopping 3 transistors and zero fets then, too).

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:consumerism wins! by dywolf · · Score: 2

      Radio Shacks problems stem in large part from migrating from a parts/geek store to a consumer store.
      Selling gadgets, phones, TVs, and such, and less of the stuff they were originally known for.
      They shifted markets, shifted their focus, and were unable to compete.

      Meanwhile their backstop, components and parts, they tried to still do, but now you had to order and wait, rather than having a stock in store. Problem was as they did this, the internet was making them irrelevant. Why go to a physical store and place an order when I can go to Mouser.com from home. RadioShack lost their components business to the online retailers like Mouser, because they failed to compete with them. Radio Shack -still- has a vastly inferior online presence for the parts and component market.

      RadioShack is dying because of a series of poor decisions on the part of its management: they tried to get into a market they couldn't compete in, and forsook their home turf allowing upstarts to steal their traditional market from them.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  3. they probably still want your name, address, and p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    they probably still want your name, address, and phone number in the clearance store

  4. Goodbye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Goodbye old friend.

    Although, I thought you had died years ago.

    1. Re:Goodbye by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Radio Shack of my youth did die years ago.

      I remember in the early 1980s the owner of the Radio Shack in my town would let me monkey around with the Color Computers, the Model 4s and the Model 100s. My grandfather bought me my first computer; a lowly Radio Shack MC-10, when I was 10 years old and I remember reading the manual from front to back about three or four times. My earliest programming experience was on that little computer, with 4k of RAM onboard and a 16k expansion module.

      Good memories, but that store went away a long time ago, replaced by an unremarkable stereo and cell phone dealer staffed by people who could barely read the sales brochures.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Goodbye by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I feel that way too... See also my other comment to this story (which links to my Jan 15 comment).
      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      Or, as it says here:
      ""This Is Why RadioShack Is in Trouble"
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...
      "Feb. 2 -- Radio Shack is in talks to close half it's stores and convert the other half into Spirit mobile shops. If that happens will anyone even notice? Bloomberg took to the streets of San Francisco to ask potential customers how much they really know about Radio Shack. The lack of knowledge or attachment to the brand illustrates just why Radio Shack is going broke."

      I'm still attached to the brand somehow from my memories of the 1970s and early 1980s though, and so I am saddened by this news, but I also felt for decades that the brand is no longer what I remember and so the 1990s-2010s RadioShack is not really *my* RadioShack. Although, since I also went to RS together with my father, if he is not around now, it can't ever be the same in that sense, and my own kid has different interests in any case, sigh.

      And of course there are also some bad memories from the 1970s-1980s of the difficulty of actually purchasing anything as they wanted your address and phone and so on for every tiny order; I guess it was a good exercise in eventually learning to say "no thanks" to such requests. :-) But even with that, it was a positive experience overall to have a place to go that somehow seemingly respected the tinkerer and the learner (even if it charged 2X for lesser components that what I later learned you could get mail order -- the cost of having a storefront I guess). Nowadays, makerspaces and online forums may be filling that need more. It's too bad RS could not connect better to that, even though they tried some at the end with Arduino and Raspberry Pi.

      Sears faced the same sort of challenge tracking changing needs. With the history of the Sears mail order catalog, one might have expected that Sears should have dominated internet sales, but Sear's web presence was poor, and they lost that emerging space to Amazon. Likewise, one might have expected that, in theory, Radio Shack's online presence could have been what Make Magazine, AdaFruit, and so on became. Or why did RS not make something like the Raspberry Pi? Or the BeagleBone (which is from that group working with *Texas* Instruments)? So, some missed opportunities in leadership (in retrospect, which is easy to say with 20/20 hindsight).

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    3. Re:Goodbye by anchovy_chekov · · Score: 3

      These are the comments I came to see.. the wistful memories from a time long gone by (not the harping about Obama, etc).

      I remember the day the dream died for me: walking into a store newly stocked with consumer goods and asking "Where are your ICs?". After a little confusion (and perhaps consultation with the old-beard I imagined locked up in the storeroom) I was directed to a small carousel containing LEDs and switches, but sadly not the ICs I was after.

      I walked away... never to return.

    4. Re:Goodbye by towermac · · Score: 2

      Stereos? Not anything of note for years now.

      In 1973 my parent's got a Clarinette 85. That stereo lasted forever. I'm still using the speakers. I gave away the receiver/8 track/phono to a poor lady in 1988, still working wonderfully. It was replaced by a 1988 Realistic, which I'm using now.

      That was a reason to go to Radio Shack. Why they got rid of their brands is beyond me.

    5. Re:Goodbye by RSanna · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Radio Shack was a revelation to this 12 year old in 1972. We live in a small rural town in Montana, USA. Once a month we would load up the car and go to the big city, POP +/-35,000, for groceries and other stuff. I noticed the new store, but only got to walk by the front window that first month. The parts I had to work with came from cast of TVs, radios and mail order catalogs. I saved every penny every day and dreamed ever night for the next month. Walking into that store was a pivotal moment in my life. There were so many components I knew, understood and well wanted to play with that I had never actually seen save in catalog drawing and white paper schematics. I aches my soul to know that something so visceral has been torn from the experience of today's youth. There is a vast difference between reading about something (web or catalog) and seeing touching and yes smelling it in person. R.I.P.

  5. The Canadian arm of the business is stil operation by Meshach · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several years ago they were bought by Bell and re-branded as The Source. They still operate in Canada.

    I wonder why they were able to survive in Canada and not in the US?

    --
    "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
    Aldous Huxley
  6. One less cellphone shop I guess by colin_faber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I stopped shopping there long ago because they stopped stocking anything useful. I don't need a cellphone from them, I needed parts, which they no longer carry.

    1. Re:One less cellphone shop I guess by N7DR · · Score: 3, Informative

      I stopped shopping there long ago because they stopped stocking anything useful. I don't need a cellphone from them, I needed parts, which they no longer carry.

      Some stores no longer carry parts, and some carry a reduced inventory. But some stores still carry a decent supply of components ans similar small, useful items. We have two Radio Shack stores in the closest city; one is essentially useless and simply directs me to the other store (but I frequently try it anyway, since it's the closer of the two). The other one isn't half bad, and almost always has what I need. I shall certainly miss it if it goes away.

  7. Re:The Canadian arm of the business is stil operat by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Different management team.

  8. Re:The Canadian arm of the business is stil operat by sjames · · Score: 4, Funny

    A management team capable of eating a salad without stabbing themselves in the eye?

  9. Re:The Canadian arm of the business is stil operat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indeed. Often, the failure of companies is simply due to bad management or sometimes cooking the books.

  10. I predicted this 30 years ago by eclectro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw this day coming after I worked there for a period. Treating their employees poorly was part of their business plan. I am surprised that it took so long though. Kornfield isn't around to see this, but he must have seen it on the horizon as well.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  11. Like Dick Smiths & Tandy in Aus by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

    They stopped carrying what their original customer base wanted. Tandy disappeared, Dick Smiths has got even worse and I don't know how they are still going.

    But then JayCar came along. Picked up all of their old customer base and have been making a killing ever since. Jaycar's buzz line is "Better. More Technical" you can go in there an they have bins of components - Love that shop - http://www.jaycar.com.au/

  12. Re:they probably still want your name, address, an by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    And I suppose monoprice.com are greedy for selling me a 2 dollars cable when the same one only cost 50 cents on eBay shipping included?

    Monoprice, however, sent me six replacement cables for free (including shipping) when I emailed them that the five I bought had failed in the last three years.

  13. You younglings don't get it! by the_skywise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before cell phones, before the internet, before computers... heck before REMOTE CONTROLS FOR YOUR TEEVEE!

    Radio Shack was THE place for geeks to hang out. Kinda like a micro-Fry's in every mall. My dad swore by the Realistic stereos (I never did but when the only other alternatives at the time were Sears or JCPenney's for stereo receivers... They held up pretty well.) I cut my teeth on a TRS-80 Model 1 (Of course I promptly pooh-poohed it for the TRS-80 Model II because it's still true that geeks don't handle obsolescence well! Christmas was asking for the 150 electronics project kits or other gadgets.

    Sure, it sucks now and we don't seem to live in a time where people play with electronics or chemistry sets anymore but a time where people are content to watch what the kardashians are up to and re-tweeting it on their phones because, gosh darn it, math is hard.

    And now I watch as Radio Shack sells off to the Undying Lands. It's better this way anyway, it was a lousy cell phone store and the last time I went in there to buy a pair of speaker stands, to match the set I had purchased in that store 5 years earlier, I was told by the new kid manager that they don't have *and never sold* speaker stands.

    yah... Fare thee well...

    NOW GET OFFA MY LAWN!!!!

    1. Re:You younglings don't get it! by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

      I have a "Realistic" 7 transistor radio my dad bought from the original Radio Shack store in Boston by mail order, around 1957-58. Its case is red leather with a large tuning dial and a smaller volume dial and a metal plaque that says "Realistic". It ran on a -now-obsolete- cylindrical 9 volt battery, since been modded to work with the current rectangular 9 volt batteries.. Darn thing still works, although the case is kind of beat up. I'm pretty sure he paid over $100 for it, although I was only 7-8 at the time...

      GET OFF MY LAWN YOU KIDS!!!

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  14. Re:I'll take an old computer, please by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of my first jobs was getting on a old Model 16 that had been upgraded to a Model 6000 (a whopping 1mb of RAM), with two 20mb hard drives, and five or six dumb terminals. We actually used the Radio Shack multi-user accounting software and worked on multi-department accounting. Did the job nicely, actually, and it's how I got my training as a sysadmin/bookkeeper/manager. I inherited the beast when the company closed down and I monkeyed around with it for a while; got a Usenet and email feed going via UUCP. In the end the 8" floppy drive crapped out, so I gave it to a friend of mine who got things up and running again and had a private BBS running for a few years.

    Tandy made some reasonably decent hardware. The 16/6000 was quite a machine: M68000 processor, Z80 coprocessor that could run CP/M, but under Xenix basically took care of all the I/O.

    I also had an MC10 a CoCo, CoCo 2 and a CoCo 3 (though I never upgraded the latter to 512k). Played around a lot in OS/2 and wrote an accounting program in BASIC-09 (which was a dialect that felt like a mix of BASIC, Pascal and COBOL). But in the end the PC one the computer wars, I went out and bought a 486, switched between Linux and Windows 3.1, and my old equipment finally got chucked during my last move about eight years ago.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  15. Re:...and nothing of value was lost... by harrkev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In all fairness, when you get an Arduino from Radio Shack, you are getting a REAL Arduino, and some money goes to support the project. When you buy from China, you are getting a clone and, while it works, the Arduino project (that makes the software) gets not a penny. I am not against clones, but I like to buy an original every now and then to help support the project.

    Or, you could buy a clone and donate $5 to the project to help support development.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  16. Re:The Canadian arm of the business is stil operat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, A one eyed manager in a kingdom of blind managers is CEO.

  17. A shame. Arduino kits and a better parts selection by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A shame. I was just starting to think it was making a modest return to its roots.

    When I visited one a few months ago, they had quite a decent little display of Makershed Arduino kits and books about the Arduino, and they had a kind of dense metal cabinet with shallow drawers filled with individual parts, a much larger selection than they used to have hanging on pegs in blister packs.

    I needed a new soldering iron and I bought one there.

  18. Better idea: Frys by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frys or Microcenter, or even NewEgg.

    Prime thing, though, they need to offer a small selection of electronics.

    RadioShack dabbled in Enthusiast PC hardware, but gave up on it. I found them to be fairly priced for getting stuff I needed "now"

    The business model needs to change, but RS was unwilling to be more than just another wireless retailer with a few toys and electronics added in the mix. If you have a B&M footprint, you have to give consumers a reason to come in. Providing goods that people usually can't wait for 3 days to get, or offering some sort of technical training for all the new tech, as well as easier returns (or pickup) for mail order goods is a start.

    Maybe a "tech of the month" display to show people what they won't see at Best Buy or Walmart, but can order through a kiosk on site after checking it out. Many consumers still like the personal treatment when buying big ticket items, but they don't like paying a premium, or dealing with clueless stockers when they have a question.

    1. Re:Better idea: Frys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fry's? Ha ha, they're in financial trouble, too. Only they're not being stupid about it. Distributors don't want to give them merchandise on credit these days, so a lot of the stuff on the shelves Fry's has already paid for. And if you've been in one lately, you'll probably notice a lot of shelves are now filled with cheap crap from China... low overhead, high profit, and best of all, keeps the place from looking empty.

  19. Been a long time coming by kencurry · · Score: 2

    Many years ago (like late 70's, early 80's) Radio shack was a place you could walk into, browse electronic components, and talk to and meet knowledgeable people to help with home brew projects. Then they expanded like hell, employed stupid corporate business policies like charging people to pay for store catalogs, ridiculous "i need all your personal info" so I can sell you a resistor, etc.

    Haven't been in one of their stores in probably 20 years, surprised that it took that long for them to fail. In retrospect, they were so poorly managed, they weren't even good at failure.

    Good riddance (and yes, I'm still pissed about the time you assholes tried to charge me money to send me a catalog of your stuff!!)

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  20. Re: 4k by transporter_ii · · Score: 2

    I remember typing in page after page of some game programmed in basic, as found in some magazine, and then running out of memory with just a half a page left.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  21. Re:What if they'd stuck with it? by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Internet is killing a lot of the traditional retailers like Radio Shack and Sears

    IMO Sears is doing more to kill Sears than the Internet is. When you order an item that costs several hundred dollars, and not only does it not get shipped to the store for pickup but no one even follows up on the order, you can't expect to keep very many customers.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Clicks vs Bricks by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

    Radioshack squandered every advantage. There was nothing that would have stopped them creating an online business that really leveraged and complemented their highstreet presence and distribution network. But the management team apparently chose to plunder rather than innovate

    Really, how much would it have taken to recognize 5 years ago that they could allow someone to order their choice from a wide range of items before noon and pick it up in-store after 5pm same day, next day for more exotic items that had to come from an out-of-area warehouse. Not only would that be a faster way to order things, but would be a much better way to offer a returns policy and give a chance to sell cables and other accessories.

    For the geeky well endowed, could they really not have offered 3d printed parts on a similar delivery schedule (or even in-store) or small scale manufactured parts. Could they not have had a travelling maker demo that moved from store to store every Saturday hawking maker slide or raspberry pis or some such things.

    For the less geeky at heart could they not have let people order in-store as they consult with someone who can guide them - Amazon would sure get a lot more business out of my parents if they somehow improved their comfort levels with buying online.

    It's not like they would have had to stop selling cell phones if they didn't want to.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  24. Re: 4k by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That wouldn't be Softside, would it? When they first started to publish Basic games for the TRS-80, R/S threatened to sue for IP violations; only R/S, they said, had the right to say "Radio Shack" or "TRS-80" in print unless they paid royalties. So Softside began referring to them as "S-80 bus" games.

    R/S got their wish: nobody ever discusses Radio Shack computers in print any more.

  25. Darn by Brad1138 · · Score: 2

    I was hoping "Incredible Universe" would make a comeback...

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  26. Re:Yup by anchovy_chekov · · Score: 3, Funny

    No-one cares AC. Your pointless troll will disappear like mist on the side of a mountain. But sootman will still have his bargain T-Shirts and LEDs.

  27. Re:A shame. Arduino kits and a better parts select by LMariachi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm wondering if the variance in reported RS experiences reflects a difference in management between the company-owned outlets and the franchise stores. Maybe the one you went to was a franchise, where the owner is invested and thus takes an active interest in making a go of it, instead of simply following edicts from corporate.

  28. Mom-and-Pops don't survive in America by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because suburbanites and flyover folks won't shop in them. Mom and pop and competing national chain open on the same block, the entire crowd flocks to national chains, particularly in smaller communities. Hell, they're even proud to have them. Getting a Wal-Mart means they've arrived, it puts them on the map.

    The only place where Mom-and-pop shops still survive are in heavily blue urban areas, where they continue to do well. That's no accident.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  29. Yup, bewildering management. by aussersterne · · Score: 2

    They seem to have decided a number of years ago to try to be Best Buy, only in 1/20th of the floor space, with higher prices, and while ensuring that they rebadge any major brand products to bear their own, woefully antiquated and little-known brand badges instead, to ensure that consumers would gravitate to Best Buy instead, where said major brands with which consumers were familiar continued to remain on display.

    It started to make zero sense sometime in the late-1980s and it just got worse and worse from there.

    I still buy parts, diagnostic equipment, and accessories for many tech items in the house. Just now I buy them on Amazon.com. I just bought a pack of about 30 DPDT switches the other day for $5.00 or so. I don't need 30, I just need one. I'd have just as well paid Radio Shack $2.99 for a switch and had it the same day—only the local store doesn't carry that stuff any longer.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  30. Don't compete on price with Walmart by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let me ask you this: On the day Wal-Mart opened in your town, there was still a hardware store, and an independent grocery store, clothing and shoe stores, ...

    There is a Walmart 4 miles south of the downtown where I live. It sees plenty of business as does the Lowes right next to it. We don't have an independent grocery store in our downtown but we do have a Kroger there and two independent grocery stores within 3-4 miles of downtown. What do we have downtown? We have a hardware store, several boutique clothing stores, a shoe store, several good restaurants, a bakery, a coffee shop, and a bunch of other generally thriving small businesses. Walmart has hardly made a dent in their businesses because they aren't really competing with Walmart.

    What we don't have is a bunch of businesses trying to compete with Walmart head on. If you want cheap stuff from China that's fine and Walmart is the place to go and nobody does it better. If you want an actual high touch shopping experience, you'll go somewhere else. Walmart is only a death knell to small business that try to provide the same services for higher prices. We have a local grocery store that provides a MUCH different experience than Walmart. They have a high quality butcher, they sell far better quality produce, they have baked goods you wouldn't dream of finding in Walmart, they have a greenhouse, and cooking classes, etc. If you want cheap kraft mac-n-cheese, they might have it but you'll get a better price at Walmart. They don't compete on price because ultimately there can only be one winner if you compete on price. They sell stuff you won't and never will get at Walmart and they're doing fine.

    Did you still go to those places, and never go to Wal-Mart? Myself, I resisted, but soon those stores were gone. And one by one those employees went to work at Wal-Mart for half the money.

    Sounds like those stores were only thriving because they were capitalizing on the fact that there was no price competition pre-Walmart. I have no love for Walmart but they serve a purpose which is to be a place to buy basic merchandise cheaply. Why would I spend more on the exact same shampoo or dog food elsewhere? Honestly I buy plenty of stuff from Amazon which is even better for me because I don't have to go anywhere. It just comes to me. But I still go to my local stores because they provide me things I can't get through Walmart or Amazon.

  31. No reason to go there by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    RadioShack dabbled in Enthusiast PC hardware, but gave up on it. I found them to be fairly priced for getting stuff I needed "now"

    Really? I have bought some stuff I needed "now" though RadioShack in the last few years. I pretty much always felt like they were gouging me on price and their selection generally sucked. The ONLY reason I ever had to go to a RadioShack was when I needed something right this minute and there were no other convenient options. I have a Microcenter across town but it's a 45 minute drive to get there. I can order from Amazon if I can wait until tomorrow. But the number of times when RadioShack actually was the best available option has been very few.

    1. Re:No reason to go there by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      Radio Shack serves a need, it just doesn't serve it very well. I needed a 6' USB extension cable last weekend on short notice. I checked at Radio Shack, Staples and Office Depot. If i remember correctly the prices were:

      Radio Shack: $35
      Staples: $25
      Office Depot: $20

      I'm probably wrong about the specifics, but that was the general range. Meanwhile i could go online and get a cable from Monoprice for $3-4, and, rather insultingly, Office Depot's online store had one for $5-6.

      If Radio Shack had a cable for about $10 i probably would have given up and bought it there just for the convenience, even though i still would have considered that price gouging. But paying an order of magnitude more was just out of the question. This ought to have been exactly the case where Radio Shack came to the rescue, but instead they were the worst of the bunch.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  32. Apple is not going to buy RadioShack assets by sjbe · · Score: 2

    A deal with Apple makes total sense...b/c Radio Shack is so many places where Apple stores are not.

    It's not about quantity of locations its about quality of locations. Apple chooses the locations for their stores VERY carefully. They aren't in 2000 strip malls for a reason. They would have to seriously compromise a lot of about what makes their product and sales experience different. Honestly I cannot think of any value in RadioShack's rotting carcass to Apple.

    Amazon on the other hand... maybe. The biggest risk to Amazon is companies like Macy's or Walmart finally figuring out that stores can serve as warehouses. Amazon is building warehouses all over the place to get closer to customers but Macy's and Target and Walmart already have this. They just lack the back end IT that Amazon has. Amazon is working towards getting storefronts and if the price is right this might be a way to do it. Maybe...