Slashdot Mirror


Hobbyists Selling Tesla Coil Kits To Fund Drone Flight Over North Korea

An anonymous reader writes Imagine for a moment having at your fingertips the ability to send a small robotic messenger — a minion if you will — virtually anywhere in the world and back. Sure, you've seen those fun little drone toys at the mall and perhaps you have had a friend that likes to tinker around with model airplanes, but what you are about to see unfold here is genuinely an unprecedented work of good 'ol fashioned American ingenuity. Apparently a group of hackers has started a kickstarter to build and fly a small drone over North Korea and back and is selling mini tesla coils to do this. "All of the money from this project will be used to extend the distance our drone can fly, so the more backers we have, the farther it will be able to go," they say.

175 comments

  1. Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing helps ease tension in a hotbed area run by a bunch of crazies with cannons aimed at Seoul like tiny drones. Good on ya, you bunch of smarties!

    1. Re:Super idea! by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nothing helps ease tension in a hotbed area run by a bunch of crazies with cannons aimed at Seoul like tiny drones. Good on ya, you bunch of smarties!

      Even better, if you spend enough on the Kickstarter you can get your name on the drone that will crash land in N Korea after running out of batteries and be broadcast on State TV as a trophy of the regime.

    2. Re:Super idea! by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      yeah, at some point antagonizing the NK's veers into the ground of foreign policy, which is the exclusive province of the federal govt. This won't happen.

    3. Re:Super idea! by bobbied · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nothing helps ease tension in a hotbed area run by a bunch of crazies with cannons aimed at Seoul like tiny drones. Good on ya, you bunch of smarties!

      Yea, the government of NK gets pretty upset over some people in the south launching balloons with notes and money into their airspace, I'm thinking a "private" drone flying though their airspace might not be very welcome. Who knows what nutty reaction this might invoke from them... It might be a good time to tap the brakes on such private provocations... I'd sure hate to see the Korean war part II play out in my lifetime, complete with another installment of MASH to run nearly a decade on broadcast TV, Loretta Switt just isn't up to another tour of duty.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Super idea! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Good on ya, you bunch of smarties!

      Would you prefer a bunch of coffee crisp?

    5. Re:Super idea! by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except they work for us not the other way around;

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the sense a mafia don works for the businesses he protects, yeah the government works for you.

    7. Re:Super idea! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      foreign policy, which is the exclusive province of the federal govt. This won't happen.

      So you are saying that Seth Rogen works for the federal govt?

    8. Re:Super idea! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who knows what nutty reaction this might invoke from them... It might be a good time to tap the brakes on such private provocations...

      Anyone who has raised children can tell you that you don't prevent tantrums by caving in to them.

      I also disagree that their reactions are "nutty". I believe that they are very well thought out and effective. If they acted normally, they would be expected to treat their people humanely, and be "fair" in negotiations. But by behaving like psychotic kooks, they have conditioned the world to accept any demands that are even halfway sane. The Kim dynasty in NK has been in power for 70 years. That is longer than almost any other current dynasty (excluding those like the Windsors that wield no power), longer even than the Castro dynasty in Cuba. While the Castro dynasty looks shaky, and unlikely to survive the Castro brothers, the Kim dynasty appears to be as secure as ever.

    9. Re:Super idea! by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      yes they work for us, but in the contract between the federal govt and the citizens it says that foreign policy is done by the federal government.

    10. Re:Super idea! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Excactly, and so as he doesn't represent said government, he can't possibly be engaging in foreign policy no matter what he does or says personally.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    11. Re:Super idea! by bobbied · · Score: 3, Informative

      Who knows what nutty reaction this might invoke from them... It might be a good time to tap the brakes on such private provocations...

      Anyone who has raised children can tell you that you don't prevent tantrums by caving in to them.

      I have kids and I agree, you don't cave into an ongoing tantrum. However, that does NOT mean you don't go around avoiding situations that cause the tantrums.

      For example, if your kid throws a snit in the cereal isle of the store because they want the latest 90% sugar offering in the bright box at their eye level, and you don't need cereal today, you don't go down the isle. Or if the tantrums happen when they are tired, you make sure they get enough sleep and go to the store when they are well rested. Not that you walk on eggshells, but you don't go looking for trouble if you can avoid it.

      No need to poke NK with a private drone flight, so why provoke the tantrum?

      Actually, the issue with NK is more about the Kim dynasty and preserving the forces that keep Kim in power. Their external activities are just designed to enforce the dominance of the Kim in power and how they can spin the events to benefit Kim's grip on power. So, as long as the reaction can be couched in "Kim outsmarts the world" or "NK has the dominate military" they will react. So if they shoot the thing down, it will be billed as a glorious triumph of Kim's efforts to protect NK from the evil USA...

      Much of the "nuttiness" of NK's foreign policy revolves around the stuff going on INSIDE the country and less about actually dealing with foreign nations. It's about the Kim's staying in power and keeping up appearances to the internal audience and not really about constructively engaging with other countries. The problem with all this is that it's hard for people who are OUTSIDE the country to understand because we don't see the internal propaganda machine, or understand how the average NK citizen sees things.

      Actually, this really should scare everybody, but not for the obvious reasons. Once the Kim's loose their grip the resulting internal struggle will be extremely quick and bloody, and we will be lucky if the collateral damage is confined to just China and South Korea. It will be hard to keep the conflict under control, especially if NK really does have a nuclear device or two, because you can bet Kim won't be reluctant to use them to try and stay in power.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    12. Re:Super idea! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just like if you were to form your own personal army in the US and use it to invade Mexico, since you totally don't represent the US, you'd allowed to do that. Also, no one would ever think that the US government has any responsibility, nor any legal right to stop you from engaging in a private act of war.

      Oh wait....

      Invading the sovereign airspace of another country that clearly does not want you is in no way legal, and could be interpreted as an act of espionage at the very least. It doesn't matter if it is a private endeavor. Even if private enterprises like that were legal to execute, that doesn't prevent the North Koreans from interpreting it as a stunt that had the backing of the US government and presenting that as a cause for more misbehavior.

    13. Re:Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acted normally. Murdering 1/2 million Iraqis in other words?

    14. Re: Super idea! by Lynchenstein · · Score: 1

      This makes a little bit of sense, which is frightening.

    15. Re:Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thy use batteries? This guy (http://www.progressiveengineer.com/profiles/maynardHill.htm) made an autonomous diesel powered model airplane light across the Atlantic ocean in 2003.

    16. Re:Super idea! by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Actually, American citizens used to make a habit of sending their private armies to invade Mexico and other countries. Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W...

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    17. Re:Super idea! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      In this case the warning is, there is a very high likelihood that they will send an artillery shell back in the direction the drone came from, pretty much guaranteed and then bluff it out with nukes. Do not play with other people's lives, it is seriously not nice. North Korea is run by psychopaths, totally out of control psychopaths versus our own somewhat constrained political and corporate psychopaths. Change will come only via the elimination of those psychopaths, want fast change, than just put your own life on the line, sneak across that border and well, make those psychopaths go away, good luck with that. Patience, attempting to communicate with North Koreans, not letting any North Korean leaders out of North Korea, ever for any reason, and cutting off all luxury exports to North Korea (psychopaths must have their ego driven luxuries) are the only way to go. Either North Koreans achieve their own freedom or they will just lose it again, much the same as the rest of us. Fortunately most of the rest of us do not need to resort to violence to achieve a social democracy instead of a psuedo democracy but actually a corporatocracy. For North Koreans the choice is either bite the bullet or eat the bullet.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kicking in $250 to back the project is all it takes!
      What are you waiting for!

    19. Re: Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      american wars of intervention and agression since ww2 have caused beyween 11, 000, 000 and 30, 000, 000 casualties. We are basically hitler

    20. Re:Super idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will never forget the tragedy of the Korean war: All future generations will make sure that there will never be another MASH.

    21. Re:Super idea! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      But he is an american, the only thing illegal is to be charged with a crime by a prosecutor. He doesn't even need to do anything for that, shit, he could be killled for "resisting arrest" without even a reason for the original arrest, just that he "resisted" (having skin tension for the bullet to break probably enough resistance too)

      So does it really matter when we aren't even a nation of laws arguing what the law may or may not be? I mean its fun to pretend we have a justice system and laws but, lets be honest, they don't actually matter. If they want to kill you or imprison you they will whether you did anything or not, and if they don't want to imprison you, it doesn't matter if you tossed a flashbang in a childs crib....you are not guilty of anything.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  2. What could possibly go wrong??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This aught to be fun to watch...

  3. Sony, next Kickstarter by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

    The North Korean hackers have a new target!

    1. Re:Sony, next Kickstarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, this is really a proposal to fund the North Korean Airforce.

  4. Risks and Challenges by gatkinso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interesting that "Starting a War" does not appear in that section.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Risks and Challenges by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Interesting that "Starting a War" does not appear in that section.

      That's just a perk of the $1000 reward level:

      "Get all of the previous rewards and we will give you the opportunity to choose a payload to put in the drone as well (as long as the weight and size fit the constraints)!"

      Just cough up $1000, and ask they drop off a copy of "The Interview" in Pyongyang. That will likely start a war.

      Not because it was disrespectful towards Kim Jong Un, but because it was such a godawful terrible movie.

    2. Re:Risks and Challenges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are still at WAR

    3. Re:Risks and Challenges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had any common sense, they'd be renowned engineers or successful entrepreneurs, not hobbyists.

    4. Re: Risks and Challenges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's possible, though, that they are concert pianists and neurosurgeons, and this is just their hobby.

    5. Re:Risks and Challenges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who exactly? All the parties of the original war? I mean, technically speaking, is the US, UK, and South Korea at war with China, the Soviet Union, and North Korea, then?

      (Genuine curiosity of the techincal details.)

    6. Re:Risks and Challenges by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      Seth Rogan,

      truly a modern day Helen of Troy.

    7. Re:Risks and Challenges by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Is anyone here old enough to remember who Matthias Rust is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

      The wacky German young hobby pilot flew a Cessna from Finland to Russia in the late 80's . . . and landed it in Red Square. Of course, without any permission from Russia. Way back then, folks also thought that the stunt might have started a new, fresh and funky, World War.

      Well, the Russian military noticed the airplane, but figured that one little Cessna would not be the way that the decadent West would choose to attack them. Also, the Generals figured that the pilot or passengers were Soviet VIPS, who had had a few too many, and nobody dared to give the order to shoot it down.

      Gorbachev used the event to re-assign a bunch of Air Defense generals to latrine duty in Siberia.

      Anyway, I'm thinking that a swarm of drones descending on North Korea would result in a wave of confusion, but not another World War.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    8. Re: Risks and Challenges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not. I've been trying to start a war with Canada for years. They just keep apologizing and sending maple syrup.

    9. Re:Risks and Challenges by somename · · Score: 1

      Who exactly? All the parties of the original war? I mean, technically speaking, is the US, UK, and South Korea at war with China, the Soviet Union, and North Korea, then?

      (Genuine curiosity of the techincal details.)

      The armistice is between UN (represented US) and NK with China. US would be automatically involved if the armistice was broken by treaty between SK and US. China would automatically be involved also though I'd imagine they'd be in a very uncomfortable position.

    10. Re:Risks and Challenges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who exactly? All the parties of the original war? I mean, technically speaking, is the US, UK, and South Korea at war with China, the Soviet Union, and North Korea, then?

      (Genuine curiosity of the techincal details.)

      The armistice is between UN (represented US) and NK with China. US would be automatically involved if the armistice was broken by treaty between SK and US. China would automatically be involved also though I'd imagine they'd be in a very uncomfortable position.

      So you're saying that the UK and Soviet Union, who were parties to the war, were not part of the armistice? And that the US is technically at war with China, but are part of the armistice?

    11. Re: Risks and Challenges by LduN · · Score: 1

      Hey! Have you at least been sharing that with your friends and family, as per our note taped to the packages? Sorry for starting out with an aggressive word, eh

  5. Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, this won't end badly.. Vehicles crossing state boundaries without permission tends to irritate governments.

    1. Re:Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      orly? been to arizona or texas lately?

  6. sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    From FKP

    We do understand that the legality of sending a drone on an intercontinental flight may be dubious. We will work with authorities to try to make our flight happen.

    Good luck with that.

    All of the money from this project will be used to extend the distance our drone can fly, so the more backers we have, the farther it will be able to go!

    Ok, now I know it's a hoax/scam.

    Seriously, what is this doing on Slashdot? It's not even April 1st, yet

    1. Re:sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      11 backers
      666 dollars
      All backers at the $55 or more threshold
      All the shitty projects this dipshit started before: https://www.kickstarter.com/profile/654955049/created
      Sounds legit

      Seriously, how does rubbish like this make it to the front page? At least with other Kickstarter things that have made it here, there was some legitimacy and momentum already behind the project. However, this is pure shit.

    2. Re:sounds like a hoax by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Legally it is not a problem for most of the flight. Send it off from a ship in international waters and be sure to fly only over international waters. The legal problems start when you reach North Korean waters, of course.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:sounds like a hoax by discord5 · · Score: 1

      All of the money from this project will be used to extend the distance our drone can fly, so the more backers we have, the farther it will be able to go!

      Ok, now I know it's a hoax/scam.

      It's not a hoax, it's a hot air drone. Basically they're going to be burning all the money they got underneath the drone. If the pile is high enough and the wind is in the right direction, clearly it'll reach Pyongyang.

    4. Re:sounds like a hoax by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      All the shitty projects this dipshit started before:

      Two projects, one of which was cancelled? Hardly damning evidence, champ.

      I do agree that this project shouldn't have made it to /.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    5. Re:sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one can only hope that he attracts enough attention to get proper scrutiny for his other activity (soliciting for drug paraphenalia sales) http://thehomebrewguru.deviantart.com/

    6. Re:sounds like a hoax by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      It's just the result of a drunken mad libs game.

      OK, let's sell [noun] kits to fund a [noun] flight over [noun]

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    7. Re:sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.progressiveengineer.com/profiles/maynardHill.htm

    8. Re:sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of his other projects is selling 3D printed bananas which suspiciously look like sex toys.
      https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/654955049/banana-project

    9. Re:sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not damning, but it amplifies the ridiculousness of how this project made it here. Since there were only 11 backers by the time I saw it, and this is after the article appearing here, it seems highly suspicious of the why this is on Slashdot.

    10. Re:sounds like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gas prices are on the rise, that drone gonna need some of that xpensive gas

  7. Not a good idea by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    The North Koreans aren't really a fun loving bunch. Starting World War III for kicks isn't really the best idea. Maybe if you shot puppies across the DMZ using an air cannon would be a better idea.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Not a good idea by operagost · · Score: 2

      If Kim Jong-Un starts a war with the only world superpower and their allies over unarmed, unmanned aircraft launched by civilian hobbyists, he'll get what he deserves.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Not a good idea by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      What does he deserve?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:Not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only risk is from the USA or Russia. NK have ABSOLUTELY NO POWER to create a WWIII.

      YOU, however, DO.

      Worse, you have many people in power who think that this is "The End Times", where Jesus Christ comes back to earth and takes all the good people up to heaven (stopping on the way to look back at the distraught people left behind as some sort of holy in-flight-entertainment). You know, people like Shrub.

      YOU may claim not to look forward to it, but many in the USA are so convinced of their holiness that they WANT it to happen so they can see all the "bad people" get their comeuppance. Then again I'm not sure I believe in your claim.

    4. Re:Not a good idea by bondsbw · · Score: 1
      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    5. Re:Not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at least they could eat the puppies.

    6. Re:Not a good idea by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2

      Exactly. The last one has brought the USA out of the Great Depression and into prosperity all the way into the millennium.

    7. Re:Not a good idea by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Well his father and his grandfather are largely to blame for that. For all we know he may be trying to fix the system. ;-)

      I'm no fan of these idiots but the only reason China keeps propping them up is so they have a bargaining chip with the West.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    8. Re:Not a good idea by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      If Kim Jong-Un starts a war with the only world superpower and their allies over unarmed, unmanned aircraft launched by civilian hobbyists, he'll get what he deserves.

      No doubt, but the significant worry isn't about Kim Jong-Un so much as about all the other people he'd likely take with him. The population of Seoul, for example, would probably not appreciate getting shelled and/or nuked.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    9. Re:Not a good idea by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well his father and his grandfather are largely to blame for that. For all we know he may be trying to fix the system. ;-)

      I'm no fan of these idiots but the only reason China keeps propping them up is so they have a bargaining chip with the West.

      And a fairly large buffer between South Korea and them...

      Actually, I think China props them up to avoid the flood of refugees that would flow north if a war did start up again. They are embarrassed with NK and are stuck with the two bit tin pot dictator they helped get into power and stuck with having to defend NK, at least some, to keep their buffer with the south. But as in all things like this, the reasons are complex and hard to accurately explain in a few sentences.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:Not a good idea by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      Actually that time has already passed.

      China has more than enough capabilities to handle the flood of NK refugees.

      China's new leaders are not afraid of having a unified Korea, led by the south, right next to the border. They have no problem having U.S. military stationed next to it. Heck, they even invite U.S. aircraft carriers to occasionally park at ports in Shanghai and Hong Kong and encourage U.S. service members to spend their US dollars there (prostitutes or otherwise).

      As long as you are here for business and spend money and not stirring political troubles, the Chinese government don't really care.

    11. Re:Not a good idea by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you shot puppies across the DMZ using an air cannon would be a better idea.

      Yeah, they'd love a free meal or two.

    12. Re:Not a good idea by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Do you realise at all that people die in wars?

      Like, people who are not Kim Jong-Un?

    13. Re:Not a good idea by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you shot puppies across the DMZ using an air cannon would be a better idea.

      would they be imperialist dogs? or maybe that lost puppy from the super bowl commercial.

    14. Re:Not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The North Koreans aren't really a fun loving bunch. Starting World War III for kicks isn't really the best idea. Maybe if you shot puppies across the DMZ using an air cannon would be a better idea.

      Delicious puppies!

    15. Re:Not a good idea by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, I had absolutely no idea!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Not a good idea by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should shut your yapper instead of cheering for war, then!

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
  8. And in other news... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can buy "poke the bear with a stick" kits on Ebay, medical and political fallout insurance not included...

    1. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Crimean cousin bought one of those sticks. Putin showed up and kicked his ass.

    2. Re:And in other news... by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Excuse me good sir, how much for the 10,000 km bear-poking stick?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:And in other news... by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      Excuse me good sir, how much for the 10,000 km bear-poking stick?

      Ah yes, you must be interested in our Ukraine package!

    4. Re:And in other news... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      More like "poke the geopolitical equivalent of Justin Beiber with a stick." At best, the government will be like "knock it off, we've got this."

    5. Re:And in other news... by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Kit contents:

      One (1) bear-poking stick. Yew laminate with polyurethane coating.
      One (1) pair running shoes. New Balance model 990v3.

      Please specify shoe size in the ordering drop down menu.

    6. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea a bear? BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      It's more like, slap the midget and see how loud he yells.

      Please. NK is as much of a threat to world security as Canada.

  9. Great idea! by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not leave anything that could start a major diplomatic incident (at best) to the hands of amateurs!

    what could possibly go wrong...

    --
    bickerdyke
    1. Re:Great idea! by Idou · · Score: 2

      What could possibly be done to prevent this? You really do not need to announce something like this to the world (like through Kickstarter). Technology to do something like this exists now and is just getting cheaper and cheaper. People have been sending balloons over for years. . . just a matter of time until they start sending drones. . .

      It is simply the new reality we are living in. If NK starts killing people over it, it is only a testament to how out of touch with reality their regime is. . .

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    2. Re:Great idea! by gtall · · Score: 1

      The poor souls being killed will be the ones who have lost touch with reality.

    3. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like the south koreans will kill you in order to prevent idiots from starting a war

      that border is the most militarized in the world with a lot of eyes watching it 24 hours a day and anything that moves or flies around it.

    4. Re:Great idea! by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      It is simply the new reality we are living in. If NK starts killing people over it, it is only a testament to how out of touch with reality their regime is. . .

      . . . or how some people will try anything including poking a sleeping bear with a stick just to get 15 min of fame . . .

    5. Re:Great idea! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Should we limit our actions on the threat or assumption that some third party might do something nasty to another third party?

    6. Re:Great idea! by Idou · · Score: 1

      . . . or how some people will try anything including poking a sleeping bear with a stick just to get 15 min of fame . . .

      Yes. . . you do remember that thing they call the "Internet." Technology is just making the real world more like that. . . You can wish people were different all you want, but, for better or worse, it is what it is. You cannot change human nature. . . best to accept and move on.

      NK already kills people all the time for just being human. I think that is a problem with the NK regime, not human nature.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    7. Re:Great idea! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      No, but by the same token we should realize that when our actions are designed purely to cause others to do something nasty to a third party, we would be dicks to do it.

    8. Re:Great idea! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      the intent is good

      but the proposal fails a cost/ benefit analysis, that's all

      all that will happen is north korea gets free drone technology, like iran:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    9. Re:Great idea! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Why not leave anything that could start a major diplomatic incident (at best) to the hands of amateurs!

      Hey, we tried leaving the North Korea issue to Darth Albright and we got from that a long-range-missile-armed North Korea with a nuclear program and artificial grapefruits.

      Get Bezos to fund the drones and start delivering diaper wipes and we might actually do some good for these people.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Great idea! by Kobun · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even have to move! Menacing trees are cause for murder and mayhem! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...

    11. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like movie-making?

    12. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that any different the make Kerry SoS?

    13. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't meaning to only pick on Kerry...they do it all the time. They hand a foreign policy job (SoS, ambassador, etc.) to somebody they owe a favor. There is no requirement for spending several years on the ground in an embassy learning how to deal with that nation's customs. residents and leaders.

  10. Looks crappy by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    Is it actually necessary to the function that it look like random shit dug out of a junk heap, or was that a stylistic choice? And no, it absolutely does not have a fucking "cool N64 base". It looks like shit in a vaguely block shape.

  11. Film the death camps by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Some low-altitude footage of the death camps would be a good thing to do...so far there's only satellite imagery and witness reports to go on.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Film the death camps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think South Korean and US/Western intelligence don't already have such footage? Surely, you don't need to build an amateur drone and fly it around the world to get such photos even to the extent that such a thing is possible (it isn't).

    2. Re:Film the death camps by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Those aren't Death camps. Those are re-education facilities where the happy workers can become more productive and can work out some of their own personal problems. The PRK set those up as an experiment in mental health care and it's worked so well that they decided to continue it. ;-)

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:Film the death camps by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Some low-altitude footage of the death camps would be a good thing to do...so far there's only satellite imagery and witness reports to go on.

      If the evidence we have doesn't do the trick, I doubt that having low level, low quality armature drone footage will help anything.

      What MIGHT help is a bit more public awareness and some new reporting on the subject but whatcha gona do beyond making up some hair brained publicity stunt?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  12. Images by Roodvlees · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they can take some pictures or video's to show how things are going in North Korea.

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
  13. Why North Korea? by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not somewhere more appropriate or interesting like europe? India? Africa? Why of all places would you send this drone somewhere it would be detected, tracked and destroyed in all likelyhood upon arrival?

    Granted "drone" and "north korea" make a senasational headline for a project but outside of being a punching bag for failed american international policy North Korea doesnt seem to bring any intrinsic value to this project outside of the fact that between seth rogan, sony pictures, and our international sanctions America seems to have a morbid fascination with the place.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:Why North Korea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get all the photos of Europe, India and Africa you want on Google.

      Best Korea, not so much.

    2. Re:Why North Korea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea is a great example of successful American foreign policy. We have effectively kept them in the stone age.

    3. Re:Why North Korea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "...we want a drone to be *able* to fly from coastal California all the way to Pyongyang."

      You get a vote to which country to actually send the drone to as part of your rewards.

  14. A better idea... by MagickalMyst · · Score: 0

    Why not use drones to collect evidence against the criminals in our own government?

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    1. Re:A better idea... by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the FAA is so nervous about drones?

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
  15. Delusional or a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They can't design and build an intercontinental drone for ten thousand dollars. Nobody can. It’s total fantasy.

    1. Re:Delusional or a scam. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Why not? I could. I would be working for free, but it could be done.

    2. Re:Delusional or a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't design and build an intercontinental drone for ten thousand dollars. Nobody can. It’s total fantasy.

      I agree, and think they must have designs on an arc reactor to power the thing (which is a fictional device in the Iron Man comics) If they succeed at the Arc reactor though, drones would be a waste of time, they would be better off putting the petroleum industry out of business. Elon Musk is way ahead of them there.

      I am confused that they are funding this by selling Tesla Coils? Again makes me think they are hung up on some Tony Stark arc reactor fantasy. (The closest thing to an arc reactor in reality seems like it would be a tesla coil, but one that puts out gobs of energy instead of burning up gobs of energy.)

      If art imitates life, Tony Stark did almost get shot down by the US Air Force while exiting Afghanistan, so yes I see this fancy drone getting shot down by someone.

    3. Re:Delusional or a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk is cheap, show me your intercontinental $10k drone.

    4. Re:Delusional or a scam. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Design? Oh sure... $10,000 is plenty to get a capable design on paper and print up some blueprints.

      Build, develop software and test? Not going to happen... The engine(s) alone would burn half that....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Delusional or a scam. by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      Give me $10k and 6 months.

      Its not that dificult ofca concept. The electronics and guidance is almost plug and play, all you need is a glider with a small electric motor, dome solar cells, and use the prevailing wind fot modt of the propuldion. We've had balloons go intercontinental for years, we even started steering them and calling thdm blimpd.

    6. Re:Delusional or a scam. by Alioth · · Score: 2

      That wouldn't make it across the Pacific, simply because when the sun goes down your motor stops turning. You'd need solar panels enough to not only power it during the day, but with enough excess to charge batteries for the night, which makes the drone much heavier, which means bigger structures made with fancier materials and more energy use.

    7. Re:Delusional or a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not sure why you think staying aloft overnight is trivial, it wasn't done until 2010 and with a lot of military funding.
      link to zephyr project
      It has to be efficient enough to be able to charge the batteries in the daytime, and then be able to stay aloft overnight with just the charge on the batteries. The solar panels, batteries, and airframe must be extremely light to accomplish this.

    8. Re:Delusional or a scam. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Newfoundland to Ireland. 9th Aug 2003

      http://www.barnardmicrosystems...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Delusional or a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that difficult and was done almost 15 years ago.

      http://www.progressiveengineer.com/profiles/maynardHill.htm

    10. Re:Delusional or a scam. by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      Nice! Thanks for sharing :)

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  16. Can't satillites already do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are only going to get as close as this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjbkPNVnodc
    then satillites already have better resolution.

  17. Fox 1 by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Well that's not going to get shot down at all. No'siree.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  18. Why not just go there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know you can just simply visit North Korean don't you?
    http://www.tripadvisor.com/Tourism-g294443-North_Korea-Vacations.html

    It's not like Mars, we don't need to send drones. Sure its run by a dick, but its not some alien world that need to be visit by robots.

  19. Imagine sending it over the Whitehouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or over a USAF airbase. Or Langley.

    Hell,remember the pissy fit when Russia DARED to have nuclear missiles in a country friendly to them but uncomfortably close to the US mainland? Pissed off enough to dare human extinction.

    But "they're the bad guys" and that makes all the difference, right?

    1. Re:Imagine sending it over the Whitehouse. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1
  20. Great Move by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Now when South Korea and/or the USA send surveillance drones they will have "plausible deniability". I actually wonder whether they "kick started" this initiative.

  21. Funding of illegal activities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kickstarter's "prohibited items" page says this:
    "If your project involves something illegal, heavily regulated, or potentially dangerous for backers and it is not on this list, please contact us before starting your project. "
    The stated purpose of this fundraiser is a project which is clearly in violation of sovereign borders and international law.
    The creators of this fundraiser should not be surprised when Kickstarter cancels the project.

    Imagine if this was a fundraiser to perform the same activity against the U.S.A. These guys would never see the money. Hell, they'd be lucky if they didn't get a visit by shadow men and sent for extraordinary rendition.

  22. Let's see by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    For 10K they are going to build a drone that can navigate, on its own, the Pacific ocean, avoiding storms, accounting for winds, rough air, birds, etc and have enough fuel to fly 5,500 miles non-stop. Lets say the can do 20 mph, at that speed it's an 11.5 day trip. Even at a Predator speed of 135 mph it's still a 2 day trip. They may want to give it a try but the probability of success is zero. Of course, they could fly to South Korea and launch it from there, I'm sure the RSK wouldn't mind that. Then again, there's always the Aleutians...

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Let's see by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      As someone else here pointed out, Guam is even closer to NK than the Aleutians (and, probably, much easier to get to).

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    2. Re:Let's see by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      As someone else here pointed out, Guam is even closer to NK than the Aleutians (and, probably, much easier to get to).

      True, but it's still 3400 miles from Guam (and 2800 from Adak in the Aleutians) one way and they plan a round trip...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  23. Re: oh yea.. do you play basketball? by user.aaaaa · · Score: 0

    you can spend vacation in Spanish Harlem... or even in Quidad Juarez

  24. Cutbacks??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't think the CIA had funding issues...the more you know.

  25. FAA rules anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they had the skills to build an intercontinental UAV they would have realised that it will need solar power, overnight energy storage and high altitude flight capability. That's going to take it a long way over the limits for a model aircraft so they'll need FAA approval before their first test flights. Their target $10k might get them through that process but I wouldn't bet on it.

    1. Re:FAA rules anyone? by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      If they had the skills to build an intercontinental UAV they would have realised that it will need solar power, overnight energy storage and high altitude flight capability. That's going to take it a long way over the limits for a model aircraft so they'll need FAA approval before their first test flights. Their target $10k might get them through that process but I wouldn't bet on it.

      What limits for a model aircraft are those? The only "guideline" the FAA places on hobby aircraft is that they stay under 400 feet and within visual site. If you launched this thing from a beach or boat you probably could get it out of US airspace meeting those qualifications, and then of course you can do whatever the heck you want with it.

      The FAA guidelines aren't even legally binding, as much as the FAA has been protesting otherwise. As far as I'm aware, in the only court case to be decided so far the court ruled against the FAA because they never followed the rulemaking process when they issued the ban on commercial use, etc.

  26. Way to bury the lede by aaron4801 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "All of the money from this project will be used to extend the distance our drone can fly, so the more backers we have, the farther it will be able to go,"
    Power be damned, they invented a drone that flies on money!

    1. Re:Way to bury the lede by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone knows if you have money you can buy power.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  27. to be able to fly from coastal California all the by user.aaaaa · · Score: 0, Funny

    holly shit... we need to hire private geography teacher for that idiots... WHY CALIFORNIA??? because it is totallly gay?? what about Alaska.. Hawaii... or Guam? never heard about them?

  28. Who cares about the drone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cool tesla coil is probably worth the $50, and who cares what they do with their profits afterwards. What they do afterwards might even be good for a few laughs

    D.

  29. Propaganda at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it takes is blaming a country for hacking, put out a bad movie. And people will follow you in DROVES!!

  30. Why not launch from South Korea? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Why are they overcomplicating their project by trying to build a drone that can cross the Pacific ocean and back? Not that I'm confident that they'd even be able to build one that can even go a few hundred miles, but round trip from the west coast to the Korean Peninsula is gonna be 12 freakin' thousand miles, minimum.

    Yeah, good luck with that.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Why not launch from South Korea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are they overcomplicating their project by trying to build a drone that can cross the Pacific ocean and back? Not that I'm confident that they'd even be able to build one that can even go a few hundred miles, but round trip from the west coast to the Korean Peninsula is gonna be 12 freakin' thousand miles, minimum.

      Yeah, good luck with that.

      Simple.... this is an act of war and for all of the mouthing off the US and South Korea do i bet the idea of a war with the North scares the shit out of them.

    2. Re:Why not launch from South Korea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its actually a proof of concept for a N. Korean attack plan, they have nuclear weapons just no way of delivering them to the US and they can't test things by leaving N. Korean airspace or they will be noticed and shot down. So they hire a group of people to make a delivery system and then deliver it to them.

  31. Intercontinental flight?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You mean they're going to send it from the US, not South Korea?

    1. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean they're going to send it from the US, not South Korea?

      From TFA:
      In other words, we want a drone to be able to fly from coastal California all the way to Pyongyang. This is a feat that would make even Kim Jong Un jealous.

      Uh, yeah, that would probably make the US air force jealous if you're going to make it a round trip without refueling. I have no idea how far the big ones go but cross-pacific round trips without refueling generally involve spacecraft.

      If all you wanted was some pictures of NK, it would make far more sense to launch the thing from South Korea.

    2. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, yeah, that would probably make the US air force jealous if you're going to make it a round trip without refueling.

      The Global Hawk has a range of 8700 miles, and NK is only 5600 miles from CA. Being able to do this as a round-trip, no refueling, with a budget of a lot less than $10k[1], and before the end of 2015 is going to take some major amounts of magical unicorn shit, so I don't think that the USAF is going to be jealous anytime soon.

      My take is that this is pretty much a scam wrapped in an appeal to magical thinking.

      [1] KS project is for $10K. From that they need to build, package and ship the Tesla Coils. And I just saw that you don't actually get a Tesla Coil unless you pony up at least $55.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Well, this is a solved problem, but for $10k? Voyager used that much just for gas! Of course, Voyager carried two people...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      it makes no sense. if the goal is to fly over NK, why do they want to launch from CA? And if the goal is trans-pacific, why do they want to cross NK as well? The whole thing is bizaare. That being said, I suppose if you release a weather balloon into the atmosphere and it blows across the pacific that's technically a drone, because once you released it the thing traveled to the destination under its own control.

    5. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a solved problem, but for $10k? Voyager used that much just for gas! Of course, Voyager carried two people...

      Well, it is a solved problem in the sense of NASA-like experimental projects using top-of-the-line materials, engineers, budgets, timelines, etc.

      Kickstarter tends to be more about "hey, if we just use these commodity parts I can make a great $200 product." If I wanted to build a moon lander it wouldn't be the first time that it had ever been done, but it wouldn't exactly be a small project either.

    6. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it is a bunch of people who want to get free gear to play with drones, and they're trying to cash in on the whole NK thing.

      If they just said that they want to play around with high-endurance drones they wouldn't get people throwing money at them, unless they asked the US Air Force (and their procurement process is a bit more rigorous than kickstarter).

    7. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt that, with sufficient funds, these guys could build a mini-Voyager with GPS navigation and set it loose. It would cost a fraction of the original Voyager, since the aerodynamic design work has already been done and it does not need to hold men. That would also allow them to beef it up a bit - it was very delicate and had to be steered around weather.

      That said, $10k is a pipe dream. $200k might be possible with lots of unpaid labor and tons of time - but $10k? Pure fantasy.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Intercontinental flight?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an obvious scam. "Trevor Nestor"'s earlier failed projects reek of low effort scams too.

  32. Violating airspace is all the rage by Improv · · Score: 1

    It doesn't seem prudent to be figuring out ways to violate another country's airspace unless wants to actually be at war with them. I wouldn't want to comment on the merits of war with North Korea per se, but at least from the perspective of maintaining peace and a normal international order, nations generally expect to have their borders respected, and they take responsibility to control their citizens enough to make sure they don't violate the borders of their neighbours.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Violating airspace is all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Unless one is a bat-shit crazy neocon and is trying to provoke yet another war. It won't be their mess to clean up. In fact, they probably have financial interests in supplying the combatants.

  33. The Lloyd Act might make this illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the situation with N.K., flying a spy drone over them would probably violate the Lloyd Act.

  34. Lunatic gets a Kickstart. by westlake · · Score: 1

    OK, this was fun.

    But Kickstarter needs better quality control than this.

    What's next? Basement Cold Fusion? Brew Your Own Cure for Cancer?

    Trevor Nestor Creatorr

    1. Re:Lunatic gets a Kickstart. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Wow you haven't looked too hard. There are numerous free energy and reaction less thruster designs up - some even with tens of thousands pledged. http://www.reddit.com/r/shitty....

  35. It has "scam" written all over it! by FreelanceWizard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Beyond the obvious problems with the concept (the cost of goods sold for the coils themselves, the extreme improbability of a kerosene-powered drone built by college students being able to make intercontinental flights, the fact that there's no way in hell the FAA or the State Department would permit such a flight, etc.), there's several big red flags on this that scream "scam:"

    1. The creator of the project has put up two projects on KS before. The most recent, the "Banana Project," is either an attempt to troll or the sort of half-baked (pun intended) project I'd expect from someone who wants to get paid to buy a 3-D printer to screw around with. The earlier project, "Super Mario Bros. Z The Movie, was cancelled and pulled, presumably because Nintendo had an issue with some random guy creating what I can only imagine is an amateur animation project. This is not a good track record, especially since the more recent project is from just three months ago.
    2. The creator has no information on his bio, has not backed any other projects, and has no other real information available. Accountability seems non-existent.
    3. The photo of the putative tesla coil is a vague sketch. There's no other technical information on how they'll be built or what they'll look like. As for the drone, there's no information on how the drone will be built or how it will be controlled. There is no prototype, only hand-waving claims. This screams "vaporware." A good rule of thumb on KS is "never pledge to something unless there's at least a prototype."
    4. The submitter of this Slashdot article is an "anonymous submitter." Who wants to bet that the submitter is actually "Trevor Nestor?"

    This KS is an excellent example of a KS from which you want to stay far, far away. Most of the time, the KS community is pretty wise to these sorts of things, but I suppose the combination of "North Korea," "tesla coils," and submissions to Slashdot will lure people in. Don't be a sucker.

    --
    The Freelance Wizard
    1. Re:It has "scam" written all over it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the extreme improbability of a kerosene-powered drone built by college students being able to make intercontinental flights

      The Spirit of Butts Farm went 1888 miles.

      The distance from the island of Agrihan to Pyongyang is 1839 miles. Not impossible, especially if you go with a plane heavier than 11 lbs. It's not intercontinental, but is possible to launch from a US territory. Scale down one of the Rutan designs and it may be possible to have global flight range, especially if augmented with solar.

    2. Re:It has "scam" written all over it! by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      This KS is an excellent example of a KS from which you want to stay far, far away. Most of the time, the KS community is pretty wise to these sorts of things, but I suppose the combination of "North Korea," "tesla coils," and submissions to Slashdot will lure people in. Don't be a sucker.

      Noted!

  36. Missing the obvious (geek) connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we could find a way to extend the range of drones.
    I know, let's revive Tesla's idea of wireless power generation! Then we could fly drones over to N Korea no problem!

  37. better idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I wanted to start a kickstarter to simply bomb North Korea. If the US does it, then the US did it. If a bunch of random people from around the world fund it, who is there to strike back at?

  38. Hmm? Consider the wider picture. by ramriot · · Score: 2

    Putting aside for a moment that this KS is probably a scam, what are the ramifications of an act such as this.

    In the current climate, what would he US call it if citizens of another nation started drone flights of unknown purpose over US soil. I would suggest the T word would be used and as soon as the launch point is identified all extra-judicial efforts will be made to ensure the perpetrators are removed from the gene-pool.

    Would a state like "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" consider doing less if it were in their interest.

    Other states have done similar to citizens of other countries, located outside of their boarders for reasons of National Security, see:-

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
    AND
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/t...
    AND ALSO
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

    1. Re:Hmm? Consider the wider picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting aside for a moment that this KS is probably a scam

      Let's NOT put that aside. Discussing what would happen and such bullshit is just giving the scammer the attention he wants.

  39. Mod parent up:It has "scam" written all over it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This idiot Trevor Nestor is an obvious scammer - hustling kickstarter with his moronic dreams. A kerosene powered drone that'll fly 10,000 miles. Tesla coils that he can make and sell for $50 and have left over profits to support his plane. Collaborative - but unnamed - UC/Berkeley engineering students. A Kickstarter track record of zero wins and two fails.

    This clown is trying to be the next Richard Heene -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

  40. Genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is awesome! I doubt it would start a war, and flying a drone over N. Korea would possibly show the world some of their atrocities. As an added bonus, it would be like poking that whiny, baby-face, insecure tub-'o-lard ass Kim Jong-un in the eye!

  41. Re:Mod parent up:It has "scam" written all over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking of him pulling a David Braben...

  42. The Spirit of Butts' Farm by dtmos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to put this silliness into perspective, the current distance and duration records for a model aircraft are held by The Spirit of Butts' Farm, built by legendary modeller Maynard Hill. The model took 38 hours, 52 minutes, 19 seconds to fly the 1,881.6 mi (3,028.1 km) from Cape Spear, near St. John's, Newfoundland, to Mannin Beach, near Clifden, Ireland.

    This was their fifth attempt to complete the trip. The longer trip across the Pacific, against the wind one way (the proposal is a round trip!), would seem to be far outside the meager budget of the Kickstarter guys.

  43. Flyback coils by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    You can make a tesla coil out of an old CRT TV- the older the better. Once your grandmother dies, rip her TV apart and pull out the flyback transformer. The original primary coils can be ripped off and thrown out, but the secondary coil (the one that looks like a rubber tire, and has the lead that looks like a stethoscope attached to the glass CRT) is the one you really need. There are circuits that use a 555 timer, but the one I made had a self-tuning circuit with two primary coils (eight turns each) and two feedback coils (four turns each). Those connect to two power resistors (collector leads and gate leads respectively). The emitter leads were grounded, along with the ground clip of the secondary coil, and the other ends of all the coil windings were at 12 volts. (There were also resistors to keep the transistors from blowing out; I forget the details.) I made it in high school with a bunch of alligator clips, and it threw a high frequency spark about an inch long from the secondary lead. The spark hurt if it hit your finger. But you could hold the secondary lead, THEN turn it on, and a metal object in your other hand would throw a spark. You could hold a fluorescent tube by the middle, and move the other end near a grounded object until it threw a spark at it from the prong. Then the half of the tube between your hand and the prong would light up. And it threw off all kinds of RF crud. The North Koreans could probably make a drone crash with one of those things.

    1. Re:Flyback coils by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      You can make a tesla coil out of an old CRT TV- the older the better. Once your grandmother dies, rip her TV apart and pull out the flyback transformer.

      1. Both my Grandmothers have been dead for 20 years you insensitive clod!

      2. I have owned CRT TVs myself.

      Now get off my lawn, or I'll throw an LP at you, Frisbee style.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Flyback coils by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      If you now have both your grandmothers' TVs, you can make TWO flyback coils and set up a kickstarter to raise money for a drone that flies over your lawn and fires vinyl Frisbees at 33 RPM.

    3. Re:Flyback coils by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      In any case, Radio Shack just died, so you might want to head over there for parts.

    4. Re: Flyback coils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kiddos. Remember that CRT's contain huge capacitors which are potentially FATAL unless discharged. Read up on proper procedures before you open old school monitors and Tv's.

  44. Definitely a HOAX by Lluc · · Score: 2

    1. Bogus idea: They are going to build a UAV from scratch, fly it from CA to NK and back, all for $10K? They could barely afford the fuel they need for $10K! 2. Arbitrarily using the word "Tesla" -- might as well jump on the Tesla Meme Bandwagon promoted by The Oatmeal to get some popularity. 3. Going after a political hot topic, North Korea, to get some more press attention. 4. Yep, it's a bogus kick starter.

    1. Re:Definitely a HOAX by Lluc · · Score: 1

      damn forgot the carriage returns in my haste

  45. Unintended Consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great idea, fly a drone capable of crossing the pacific into the most openly hostile regime in the world who are trying to create delivery methods to bomb the us.

  46. missed their boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they really wanted to make a bundle with this thing, they should have implied but not actually stated that the drones are Tesla Coil POWERED!!!

    Scienec knows all about the Aether principles (Its Ionic !!!) which would definitely make this a new revolutionary investment in making the future happened.
    Their disclaimer that this is "For Entertainment Purposes Only" really should have been buried deeper into the fineprint if they wanted real success.

  47. Why get a drone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just book a trip from AMS to Osaka with KLM and you'll fly straight over it. No batteries required.

  48. Oh,I see by pbjones · · Score: 1

    I thought they were selling a suspension mod for an electric car, tesla coils, silly me.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  49. huge capacitors by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

    Yeah I always knew that. The charge leaks away after a couple days, but the first thing you do is find them and short them out. Then you remove them, charge them back up, and sneak up on other kids with your new disposable taser.

  50. Scarface by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Yes but once you get the power...
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

    I see what these geeks are thinking about now...

  51. I call bullshit by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I'll keep my money, but thanks for the laugh.

  52. Payload? by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Any chance it'll be able to carry a decent-sized payload.. like a tactical nuke? XD

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!