Slashdot Mirror


What Does It Mean To Be a Data Scientist?

Nerval's Lobster writes What is a data scientist? "To be honest, I often don't tell people I am a data scientist," writes Simon Hughes, chief data scientist of the Dice Data Science Team. "It's not that I don't enjoy my job (I do!) nor that I'm not proud of what we've achieved (I am); it's just that most people don't really understand what you mean when you say you're a data scientist, or they assume it's some fancy jargon for something else." So how do Simon and his team define "data scientist"? In this blog posting, he breaks it down along several lines: solid programming skills, a scientific mindset, and the ability to use tools are just for starters. A data scientist also needs to be a polymath with strong math skills. "All good scientists are skeptics at heart; they require strong empirical evidence to be convinced about a theory," he writes. "Likewise, as a data scientist, I've learned to be suspicious of models that are too accurate, or individual variables that are too predictive." His points are good to keep in mind right now, with everybody throwing around buzzwords like "Big Data" without fully realizing what they mean.

17 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. It means you jumped on the latest bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just like how 10 years ago, suddenly everyone was an "Architect" and before that you were a "Developer".

    1. Re:It means you jumped on the latest bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And it means you're unemployed within 5 years.

    2. Re:It means you jumped on the latest bandwagon by davester666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, you jump onto the next buzzword.

      Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:It means you jumped on the latest bandwagon by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. The actual name for this is "Computer Scientist" or in some cases "Statistician". The nonsensical "Data Scientist" is just a marketing term, created solely to inflate the perceived worth of a product, that, by all credible accounts, is not very good.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:It means you jumped on the latest bandwagon by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not a "troll", I'm an Agitation Engineer.

  2. What Does It Mean To Be a Data Scientist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It means you get no women.

    1. Re:What Does It Mean To Be a Data Scientist? by seededfury · · Score: 2

      It means you get to be the second officer on the enterprise!

    2. Re:What Does It Mean To Be a Data Scientist? by hilather · · Score: 2

      It means you get no women.

      I think I really misunderstood the job posting that said "works with models" then.

  3. Score!!! by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe Slashdot managed to land an interview with someone from Dice! Time to make some popcorn, sit back, and enjoy the fireworks!

  4. A scientist??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It means you get to play with beakers and such. No self respecting scientist doesn't have lot of beakers, test tubes, and strange lab setups with tubes going in all directions.

  5. It means... by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You cant spell statistician and anyway were too embarrassed to put it on your business card.

    I think we should submit an Ask Slashdot where we ask data scientists precisely how they work in ways that they apply scientific method in their day to day life. Or does having a "scientific mind" now qualify as being a scientist.

    I have a scientific mindset, will I be a pornography scientist later tonight, am I a trolling scientist now?

    1. Re:It means... by gnupun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This exactly, except "data scientist" is actually a better way to describe what statisticians actually do.

      But there's a big difference between a scientist and a statistician. A scientist pokes around and discovers new theories or mathematical models (often out of thin air). A statistician OTOH, like an engineer, simply applies the theories of scientists to accomplish real world usable things like pie charts and bar graphs.

      So unless this guy is discovering or testing new theories, he's not a scientist. He's just a statistician.

  6. What does it mean? by Pete+Venkman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Absolutely nothing.

  7. Missing aspect: sociology by michaelmalak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without sociology skills (my blog) on a data science team, hypothesis formation and ability to model clients will suffer. It would seem particularly important for a people-focused company like Dice.com.

  8. Good Scotsman Fallacy by Demena · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Errr... You claim to be a scientist and yet you say "All good scientists are skeptics at heart; they require strong empirical evidence to be convinced about a theory," .

    Circular definition, circular argument. Also, false. Many scientists (like Darwin for example) form a theory and then look for empirical evidence to test that theory. Next time start that sentence with "In my opinion" and you get away with it. You didn't and you don't.

    Reading your article, it says nothing. I would not hire you on the basis of what you have written here.

    Pardon me if that seems rude but it was in my opinion, too superficial to ignore.

    Oh! By the way, what you do has had a title for a generation. You are an analyst doing what analysts do. Analyse data.

  9. It means you're lazy. by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure there are some good data scientists but most of the papers I've seen lately that are based on statistics or various data sets are extremely lazy. You have someone that just combs through data and then tries to make a novel association. Nearly always they just show correlation and never causation.

    I think that is one of the bigger problems. Because you're not collecting the data or structuring the experiments that collect the data, you can't isolate anything from the data. All you can do is say "well, this might be happening"... which is often completely useless. A more useful thing they could do is find that correlation and then see if they actually have causation by doing a follow up experiment or study that isolates for a specific variable under controlled conditions.

    That is, I think data scientists would be more useful if they used the study as a jumping off point to doing an actual study. And I'm not especially interested in reading or even hearing about anything they've done until they've concluded that secondary study.

    Absent that... it is lazy, boring, not interesting, and who cares.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  10. Re:Fellow data scientist doesn't know what he is, by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    it wasn't funny the first time this hoax was put out, it's not fucking funny today. Fuck off and die in a fire.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel