I did not mean it was grammatically correct only that it was not particularly irritating. Grammar is not always appropriate. The expression "Yeah, right." is not grammatical and conveys a meaning opposite to the one that it would have were it correct.
That does not seem to be the case. You will function better with natural sounds than music. Try playing natural sounds like the sound of rain. You really will be able to concentrate better.
I play recorded thunder and rain sounds or "rainforest" sounds. This removes all disturbances with 'white noise' (very pink actually).
Music contains meaning and your brain will still pre-process it while white noise is ignored.
Music is meant, created, to be listened to. To use music as 'elevator' music is and insult to the musicians and their art even if you actually like it.
That is the last thing I would think of. I would first printout that Linux is emphatically not a microkernel and Linus would never, ever concede that he was wrong in the micro vs macro kernel argument so that will not change. No, the first organisations I would think of would be GNU (HURD), FreeBSD, Apple (OS/X) and others.
What? Are you new here? Your comment makes no sense.....
I am not new enough of silly enough to make a comment about "new" here. You do not seem to know enough to check a user id.
.... he is talking about FakeTimCook, where you can point to hundreds of posts of his cheerleading. He makes so many assumptions of how he thinks things work but doesn't know much. "Blindly" is fucking easily demonstrated by look at a dozen of his posts.
I do not follow anyone as I do not use twitter. So I comment only on what is in this thread. In this case (at least) the FakeTimCook is quite correct. "Hey Siri" is purely local. There is no traffic involved at that point (and this can be, and is) measured. So, not "blindly" at all.
In high school English, we'd only need to cite three examples to back a claim. With FakeTimCook, you have hundreds of examples.
Well, I didn't go to your high school and am probably relieved about that. I wouldn't want to go to a school that deems "Come with" as a sentence. But that is probably because I went to and English Grammar School where they actually taught English not the pidgin language that Americans falsely appropriate and declare as English. My English teacher would have told you that that 'three cites' rule was a bad joke. Far, far too rigid. There are many levels of speech and discussion and what is appropriate would vary vastly between them. Quality of cites makes a difference too.
All of this you ignore in attempt to "win" an argument, ignoring the fact that anyone who "wins" a discussion in the manner of attack/defend loses by default. But then, if you had anything valid ti say you would not be an AC.
1. Anything dormant was not what we were talking about, in fact it is the opposite of what we were talking about. Neither does the NSA have anything to with targeted advertisements. So strawman arguments.
2. Neither Apple nor NSA have the resources and knowledge to break laws of physics. Stretch them maybe, but not break them.
People are asserting traffic that does not exist. Show me the traffic or even indicate to me what possible mode of communication might be involved in such traffic and I might give some credence except; Why would Apple sell target information to google? If iPhones are leaking in that manner (and mine is not) then it most likely Facebook or some Google application that is doing it. I cannot see Apple having much to do with it.
Or if you are that stupidly paranoid you can buy a case that obscures the camera and puts a pad over the microphone. I mean do you really thing the misandroids would believe the switches worked? To the misandroids it would be "just another lie.
But they are not slowing down the phones and never have. When the battery has aged it cannot support an overload and will crash. Apple put software in to prevent this which dropped the CPU frequency (talking loosely here) momentarily to prevent the phone stopping and rebooting to allow it to continue running. It only drops that CPU frequency while in overload.. The phone in general is not slowed, only a single task for a brief moment.
Stop wanking yourself in public. Inserting the word "blindly" destroys your comment. You are asserting something you can have no knowledge of. I, for example, do not trust apple particularly as I think and I check for facts. Android? I have seen enough shit with Google and Android that I know they are trying to screw me. For Apple, there is nothing evidential (and I still check).
I still think running Facebook (et al.) on an iPhone needs to be examined (I don't use facebook etc) as I have not tested that.
Or in your case, perhaps blind and stupid antipathy for Apple? The evidence is in; Apple do not "listen". There is no traffic that suggests it does. Yet you are willing to believe that it does because someone tells you so. That is pretty blind and definitely stupid so your comment does nothing to show your quality.
For your information and for the education of spire661, I point out that the traffic you speak of is non-existent. Since the traffic does not exist apple does not do this. Simple, except to anti-apple factoid fuctards.
No. I will believe them because I know it to be true. I do not even need to check the code. Because technology is not magic. Where is this "listening" going? Where is the data? If you do not know where your traffic is going and what that traffic is you just are not even competent to manage your own bills.
If you want to make a liar and a fool out of yourself, all we'll and good. But you cannot be looking good to anyone with half a brain. Why didn't you check? Jesus, I hope you don't work in IT.
The Palestinian Genocide? The Gypsy genocide? The Cambodian genocide? The eternal pogrom against homosexuals? FWIW, from a historical perspective the Shoah was neither large nor significant.
Slashdot Mirror
"lesa fair". Right, you sure know what you are talking about don't you? You demonstrate little though and a vast ignorance.
Libtard? Sounds like a right wing twit to me.
I did not mean it was grammatically correct only that it was not particularly irritating. Grammar is not always appropriate. The expression "Yeah, right." is not grammatical and conveys a meaning opposite to the one that it would have were it correct.
Only problem I saw was. the use of different when difference was the appropriate word.
Very true and it is what I use. But is definitely not music but sound.
That does not seem to be the case. You will function better with natural sounds than music. Try playing natural sounds like the sound of rain. You really will be able to concentrate better.
I play recorded thunder and rain sounds or "rainforest" sounds. This removes all disturbances with 'white noise' (very pink actually).
Music contains meaning and your brain will still pre-process it while white noise is ignored.
Music is meant, created, to be listened to. To use music as 'elevator' music is and insult to the musicians and their art even if you actually like it.
So is financing them.
No, Apple did not introduce that standard. It existed before Apple did. I goes way back to early CRTs.
But it is not 5.6 inches 5.8 inches when you include the corners and including the corners is the industry standard.
While I agree with the sentiment in this post, it should not have been posted. Just feel sorry for the (CR)etins.
Yep. Linux started out as a terminal server. Ask Linus.
That is the last thing I would think of. I would first printout that Linux is emphatically not a microkernel and Linus would never, ever concede that he was wrong in the micro vs macro kernel argument so that will not change. No, the first organisations I would think of would be GNU (HURD), FreeBSD, Apple (OS/X) and others.
What? Are you new here? Your comment makes no sense.....
I am not new enough of silly enough to make a comment about "new" here. You do not seem to know enough to check a user id.
.... he is talking about FakeTimCook, where you can point to hundreds of posts of his cheerleading. He makes so many assumptions of how he thinks things work but doesn't know much. "Blindly" is fucking easily demonstrated by look at a dozen of his posts.
I do not follow anyone as I do not use twitter. So I comment only on what is in this thread. In this case (at least) the FakeTimCook is quite correct. "Hey Siri" is purely local. There is no traffic involved at that point (and this can be, and is) measured. So, not "blindly" at all.
In high school English, we'd only need to cite three examples to back a claim. With FakeTimCook, you have hundreds of examples.
Well, I didn't go to your high school and am probably relieved about that. I wouldn't want to go to a school that deems "Come with" as a sentence. But that is probably because I went to and English Grammar School where they actually taught English not the pidgin language that Americans falsely appropriate and declare as English. My English teacher would have told you that that 'three cites' rule was a bad joke. Far, far too rigid. There are many levels of speech and discussion and what is appropriate would vary vastly between them. Quality of cites makes a difference too.
All of this you ignore in attempt to "win" an argument, ignoring the fact that anyone who "wins" a discussion in the manner of attack/defend loses by default. But then, if you had anything valid ti say you would not be an AC.
1. Anything dormant was not what we were talking about, in fact it is the opposite of what we were talking about. Neither does the NSA have anything to with targeted advertisements. So strawman arguments.
2. Neither Apple nor NSA have the resources and knowledge to break laws of physics. Stretch them maybe, but not break them.
People are asserting traffic that does not exist. Show me the traffic or even indicate to me what possible mode of communication might be involved in such traffic and I might give some credence except; Why would Apple sell target information to google? If iPhones are leaking in that manner (and mine is not) then it most likely Facebook or some Google application that is doing it. I cannot see Apple having much to do with it.
Given the lack of actual facts supplied in your post it remains an unsubstantiated, unquantified allegation. ie. noise.
Please support your assertions or shut the fuck up.
Yep, if this is not sarcasm then it just is not rational.
Or if you are that stupidly paranoid you can buy a case that obscures the camera and puts a pad over the microphone. I mean do you really thing the misandroids would believe the switches worked? To the misandroids it would be "just another lie.
But they are not slowing down the phones and never have. When the battery has aged it cannot support an overload and will crash. Apple put software in to prevent this which dropped the CPU frequency (talking loosely here) momentarily to prevent the phone stopping and rebooting to allow it to continue running. It only drops that CPU frequency while in overload.. The phone in general is not slowed, only a single task for a brief moment.
Stop wanking yourself in public. Inserting the word "blindly" destroys your comment. You are asserting something you can have no knowledge of. I, for example, do not trust apple particularly as I think and I check for facts. Android? I have seen enough shit with Google and Android that I know they are trying to screw me. For Apple, there is nothing evidential (and I still check).
I still think running Facebook (et al.) on an iPhone needs to be examined (I don't use facebook etc) as I have not tested that.
Or in your case, perhaps blind and stupid antipathy for Apple? The evidence is in; Apple do not "listen". There is no traffic that suggests it does. Yet you are willing to believe that it does because someone tells you so. That is pretty blind and definitely stupid so your comment does nothing to show your quality.
Thank you!
For your information and for the education of spire661, I point out that the traffic you speak of is non-existent. Since the traffic does not exist apple does not do this. Simple, except to anti-apple factoid fuctards.
No. I will believe them because I know it to be true. I do not even need to check the code. Because technology is not magic. Where is this "listening" going? Where is the data? If you do not know where your traffic is going and what that traffic is you just are not even competent to manage your own bills.
If you want to make a liar and a fool out of yourself, all we'll and good. But you cannot be looking good to anyone with half a brain. Why didn't you check? Jesus, I hope you don't work in IT.
The Palestinian Genocide? The Gypsy genocide? The Cambodian genocide? The eternal pogrom against homosexuals? FWIW, from a historical perspective the Shoah was neither large nor significant.
Nonsense, one bit flip can ruin your day