Slashdot Mirror


Notorious 8chan Board Has History Wiped After Federal Judge's Doxing

AmiMoJo writes On Monday, imageboard site 8chan's "baphomet" subboard, an Internet destination known for hosting aggressive "doxing" posts, received a major history wipe the day after one of its users posted the personal information of a federal judge in the Silk Road case. A follow-up post by baphomet's "Board Owner" account stated that "HW," a reference to site founder Frederick "hotwheels" Brennan, deleted "the SSN posts" and told the baphomet board founder, previously identified via an associated Twitter handle as Benjamin Biddix, to "lay low." The same day baphomet's "Board Owner" announced a "doxing for hire" service due to "running low on funds."

3 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Doxxing is an act of intimidation by voss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trying to intimidate a federal judge is both a criminal act and a VERY bad idea.

    1. Re:Doxxing is an act of intimidation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He signed up to do something he believes is good. Generally the majority of the society it is good too.

      He didn't ask for this case, it was assigned to him. His decision to be a Judge was likely made decades before this case, so I am having a very hard time understanding your rational of "he asked for it."

      People sign up in the military to defend their country. They realize that it involves a risk of killing others and perhaps being killed. The government changes over time, and you find a lot of people in the military with personal reservations about the willingness of the current administration to do what they would personally prefer not be done.

      In both cases, just skipping town is not an option. If it were ever permitted, then we would never have Judges presiding over any cases were someone might get pissed off, nor servicemen fighting in any places where they could find some point of disagreement as to why they are there.

      You stated that "They do not care about your rights." which is wholly untrue to a Judge. The only thing a Judge cares about is your rights; but, your rights do not extend so far as to see you never get punished. Watch a Judge in action some time (not on TV). The first hint of circumstantial evidence, and they wake up an put an end to it immediately. Yes, they only will focus on the case at hand, and no they won't pander to emotion because they're not mental health counselors.

      You seem to be mad about bankers destroying the economy. I fail to see how attacking Judges solves your problem.

      You seem to be mad about unelected people in power. I fail to see how attacking Judges (who are elected) solves your problem.

      You seem to be upset about the simplistic focus on "good" and "evil". I fail to see how attacking a person dedicated to making sure people follow a set of rules (as opposed to consulting a good vs evil chart), aka a Judge solves your problem.

      I can hear your pain and rage. I just think that you don't see Judges for what they are. They are far less than what you esteem them to be.

  2. Re:Papers, please by Boronx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're living in the land of don't fuck with Federal Judges.