Oregon Residents Riled Over Virtually Staff-free Data Centers Getting Tax-breaks
An anonymous reader writes: The population of Hillsboro, Oregon is becoming vocal about the state's enterprise zone program offering enormous tax concessions to companies setting up data centers in the region — even though the five-year deals on offer only require data center operators to employ one person. That's exactly as many people as one DC plant, Infomart Portland, employs full-time, yet it gets more tax relief than highly-staffed enterprise zone neighbor Solarworld. The current influx of data centers to Hillsboro have only generated seven jobs to date. More installations are coming, and all Hillsboro residents are seeing is space taken up that might have gone to businesses that give something of benefit to the community.
Finally people are waking up to the fact that the digital revolution doesn't necessarily create jobs, jobs, jobs.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
and i can counter with just about that many MORE indirect jobs that the place employing say 25 people would generate (added to your list).
Food delivery folks
Supplies delivery folks
Clothing shops
car dealers
Entertainment venues
Schools (wanna see if you can make a team of folks that DON"T have kids without doing something actionable??)
Food shops
I live in Hillsboro and have no complaints, though I have hardware in one of those datacenters so I may be biased. I think these articles are failing to account for the jobs created indirectly. I know a few folks that work for companies that have hardware in one of these local datacenters, in addition to traditional sysadmin jobs their duties include being on-call for hardware failures and the like. A at least one of these companies is fairly large and chose to come to Hillsboro and hire techs here because of the space available.
I've actually lost count how many megachurches have been built on farm land in Upper Marlboro, MD. I assume the land must be cheap, as we have The First Baptist Church of Glenarden, which was built just 1.2 miles from Riverdale Baptist Church. And it's not to be confused with the First Baptist Church Upper Marlboro, which is about 8 miles away as the crow flies.
All of these are non-profits, so there will likely never be any more tax revenue from them, and unless they also have a school (which Riverdale does), it sits nearly empty for most of the week.
Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
If they want to put a rack in my flat in Beaverton this winter I would love the free heat
411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
The question isn't whether ANY economic benefit is brought to the community, but whether that benefit exceeds the ~750k per year of tax reduction given to the company mentioned in the article. Some people seem to think so, some not. Hard to tell who is right, but it deserves to be highlighted that communities simply paying corporations to establish isn't automatically a great deal.
... these local governments are still of the mindset that "industrial/technology" means factories, which means jobs. But as we all know, everybody that builds a datacenter wants as little staff as possible. A datacenter full of staff is seldom a good thing. When I walk past our datacenter on my way to work, if I even see the lights on or more than one car in the parking lot, I clench up, because I know it isn't going to be a good day when I get to my office on the other side of the campus.
and i can counter with just about that many MORE indirect jobs that the place employing say 25 people would generate (added to your list).
Food delivery folks
Supplies delivery folks
Clothing shops
car dealers
Entertainment venues
Schools (wanna see if you can make a team of folks that DON"T have kids without doing something actionable??)
Food shops
Versus how many people would be doing the above jobs if instead of a 25-person data facility, an old-time 1500-person factory was located there?
It's like the old trickle-down fallacy. If a CEO earns 400 times what the other employees do and lays them off, is he going to buy 400 times as much toilet paper?
Looks like summer around here.
Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
Food delivery/shops -> with only 25 jobs and thousands of unemployed I can pay those 25 people subsistence wage. They won't be buying food from restaurants. They can barely feed themselves. Same goes for clothing and entertainment. As for cars, hah! They can walk. Meanwhile we're cutting funding to schools. And besides, once they have kids they're dead weight. I'll just fire 'em and hire more young single people from the local tent city.
See, once you start racing to the bottom there's no end in sight. And all the trickle down (voodoo) economics in the world won't save you.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Instead we must think of population control. this planet can't susta more than 2.7-3 billion Homo sapiens any way.
Sure it can.
It *does*, therefore it can. Proof by example.