Lenovo Allegedly Installing "Superfish" Proxy Adware On New Computers
An anonymous reader writes It looks like Lenovo has been installing adware onto new consumer computers from the company that activates when taken out of the box for the first time. The adware, named Superfish, is reportedly installed on a number of Lenovo's consumer laptops out of the box. The software injects third-party ads on Google searches and websites without the user's permission.
Another anonymous reader points to this Techspot article, noting that that it doesn't mention the SSL aspect, but this Lenovo Forum Post, with screen caps, is indicating it may be a man-in-the-middle attack to hijack an SSL connection too. It's too early to tell if this is a hoax or not, but there are multiple forum posts about the Superfish bug being installed on new systems. Another good reason to have your own fresh install disk, and to just drop the drivers onto a USB stick.
Also at ZDnet.
...to wipe the box and install some other OS.
The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination
- Douglas Adams
What were Lenovo thinking? People pay bills online you know. Easily can steal lots of information
As much as we bashed RMS here for being a lunatic he has a point with trusting a for profit entity making closed source software.
http://saveie6.com/
It's more likely that Lenovo installed this software because they were paid to do so (either directly or through kickbacks to Mike Hopkins or whatever VP) and they simply didn't vet the software to make sure that it wasn't malicious. So while some people in the organization may be guilty of negligence they would never get convicted on anything close to CFAA levels.
Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
You seem to believe that laws apply equally to corporations and people. You must not be American.
Richard Stallman is spot on regarding free and open source software (FOSS). He warns us about how proprietary, closed source software can be abused and that our dependency on it is a danger to civil society. In case you didn't see it the first time round: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Only an idiot would dismiss the concerns he raises.
Yes, that response was insufficient on a number of points. But what struck me about their statement was this:
The relationship with Superfish is not financially significant; our goal was to enhance the experience for users.
Why in the world do companies keep insisting that datamining and delivering ads "enhances the experience for users"? They can't possibly believe that. If they do, then they're hopelessly delusional. If they don't, then they're scumbag liars. Either way, it does nothing but make them look terrible.