Slashdot Mirror


Human DNA Enlarges Mouse Brains

sciencehabit writes Researchers have increased the size of mouse brains by giving the rodents a piece of human DNA that controls gene activity. The work provides some of the strongest genetic evidence yet for how the human intellect surpassed those of all other apes. The human gene causes cells that are destined to become nerve cells to divide more frequently, thereby providing a larger of pool of cells that become part of the cortex. As a result, the embryos carrying human HARE5 have brains that are 12% larger than the brains of mice carrying the chimp version of the enhancer. The team is currently testing these mice to see if the bigger brains made them any smarter.

193 comments

  1. welcome by itzly · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new rodent overlords.

    1. Re:welcome by halivar · · Score: 2

      "He dared to tamper... in God's domain..."

    2. Re:welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so quick, it all sounds a bit HARE5brained to me.

    3. Re: welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you read H.G Wells Food Of The Gods

    4. Re:welcome by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They are already our overlords. Mice are merely the protrusion into our dimension of hyper-intelligent pan-dimensional beings. This DNA only grows the brain further into our three dimensions.

    5. Re:welcome by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      I for one welcome our new rodent overlords.

      Well, I find it difficult to be so enthusiastic about our new Congress.

    6. Re:welcome by msmonroe · · Score: 1

      I up Vote!

    7. Re:welcome by BillTheKatt · · Score: 1

      Just curious, where is this quote from? I tried Googling for it, but no exact match. The Island of Dr. Moreau?

    8. Re:welcome by halivar · · Score: 2

      *I* got it from Mystery Science Theatre 3000. It was the closing line of (I THINK) a Harvey Corman flick, and it became a long running gag that Joel would say it whenever the bad guy died right before the credits.

    9. Re:welcome by BillTheKatt · · Score: 1

      Ahh, thank you!! Never saw that so I had to ask. Thanks!

    10. Re:welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it's Harvey and not Roger Corman? I remember Harvey as that famed Carol Burnett costar...

    11. Re:welcome by halivar · · Score: 2

      LOL you are correct and I always always get them mixed up!
      "Look, it's Hedy Lamarr!"
      "HEEEEDDDLY....!"

    12. Re:welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, where is this quote from? I tried Googling for it, but no exact match. The Island of Dr. Moreau?

      I think I remember it from "Bride of the Monster" 1955 Bela Lugosi, Tor Johnson. But it has been a long time.

    13. Re:welcome by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new rodent overlords.

      Yup, I saw this movie, doesn't end well for the humans. The human race should just get it over with and a third of us will work on building terminator like machines, another third giving animals super human intelligence and the last third photocopying our butts and sending those photos out electronically to the stars!

      Sooooooooooooooo....... We've already finished the photocopying. FYI, Uranus was jealous. Should we divide our group in half and start helping with the Terminators and the Super Intelligent Animals now?

    14. Re:welcome by werepants · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it was originally from an H.G. Wells story, but it was popularized by this Simpson's episode, in which Homer releases the contents of an ant farm inside of a space station, leading the TV anchor to 1. conclude that giant space insects were invading and 2. vow his allegiance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

    15. Re: welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were the mice with the HARE5 gene also observed to be 12% more wascally over the control group?

    16. Re:welcome by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

      "Let me introduce you," said Trillian. "Arthur, this is Benjy mouse." "Hi," said one of the mice. His whiskers stroked what must have been a touch sensitive panel on the inside of the whisky glasslike affair, and it moved forward slightly. "And this is Frankie mouse." The other mouse said, "Pleased to meet you," and did likewise. Arthur gaped. "But aren't they ..." "Yes," said Trillian, "they are the mice I brought with me from the Earth."

    17. Re:welcome by msmonroe · · Score: 1

      Yup, sounds good. Lets make it happen!

    18. Re:welcome by thieh · · Score: 1

      Well, or it can go to the other direction, like Pinky and the Brain.

    19. Re:welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, oh, I know! 42!

  2. Pinky and the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cue jokes in 3...2...

    1. Re:Pinky and the brain by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      "Yeessss!" - the brain.

    2. Re:Pinky and the brain by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      Pinky and the Brain? But what about the Rats of Nimh jokes?

    3. Re:Pinky and the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pinky and the Brain? But what about the Rats of Nimh jokes?

      Rats of NIMH? You must be old...like me...<sigh>

    4. Re:Pinky and the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid that there isn't anything funny about NIMH...

    5. Re:Pinky and the brain by azav · · Score: 1

      His name is the Brain, not the brain.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    6. Re:Pinky and the brain by azav · · Score: 1

      Isn't it NiMH?

      The Rats of Nickle Metal Hydride!

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    7. Re:Pinky and the brain by slew · · Score: 2

      I'm afraid that there isn't anything funny about NIMH...

      AFAIK, the "inspiration" for the secrets of NIMH was sadly this experiment...
      Not much funny about that...

      Although it does illustrate that Robert Frost's lamenting of the mending wall is bit idealistic, and perhaps there is a good reason to remember that sometimes, good fences do make good neighbors...

    8. Re:Pinky and the brain by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

      Poit!

    9. Re:Pinky and the brain by RandomAdam · · Score: 1

      His name is "Brain" not "the Brain"....as in "what are we going to do tonight Brain?". "The same thing we do every night Pinky; try to take over the world!"

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    10. Re:Pinky and the brain by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      NARF!

    11. Re:Pinky and the brain by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      I loved that book, when I was in 5th grade. The movie, the secret of NIMH was good, but not nearly as good as the book. I'd love to see a full 3d remake.

      --
      once more into the breach
  3. Of Mice Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, welcome our cheese loving overlords.

    1. Re:Of Mice Men by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The French have won?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Of Mice Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just when WAS the last war you won without their help?

  4. Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight? by robinsonne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Same thing as every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!!

    Does anything ever sound like a bad idea to scientists?

    1. Re:Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anything ever sound like a bad idea to scientists?

      Sure, Brain, but how are we going to get the zebra to wear trousers?

    2. Re:Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything that sounds as a bad idea to scientists sounds as a great idea to cartoonists.

  5. The Secret of NIHM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Prophecy. Pure prophecy.

    1. Re:The Secret of NIHM by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      The National Institute of Health, Mental?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  6. Creepy by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not going to complain about "playing god" but this definitely approaches immoral conduct. Change this gene in something with a larger brain and you could create animals smart enough to deserve human rights. At that point the only ethical course of action is to give them said rights. The problem is the lack of a proper legal framework for such. Our science is in the 21st century but our laws are 19th to 20th. It's practically a very small step from this to sheep or monkeys.

    We need to start defining legal rights for intelligent, non-human entities immediately.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Creepy by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      I am not to worried about this test on mice. Now if they tried it on Chimps then things get into the very creepy zone.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to start defining legal rights for intelligent, non-human entities immediately.

      "If you are made of meat and not human, we can eat you. If you are not made of meat and not human, you may server us."

    3. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whats the point in animal rights, rights are ignored by the government on a daily basis.

    4. Re:Creepy by itzly · · Score: 1

      At that point the only ethical course of action is to give them said rights

      Why? It's just a criterion that you made up.

    5. Re:Creepy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      smart enough to deserve human rights.

      Human rights are not based on intelligence. If they were, my brother-in-law would not be allowed to vote. Stupid people and smart people are considered equal before the law, and have the same rights to life and liberty. Even brain dead people with no hope of recovery have greater rights than chimps.

    6. Re:Creepy by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That would be problematic. Our notions are already inconsistent - the lowest-mental-capability humans (The brain damaged, the mentally disabled, the very young) are already far below the level of many animals on practically any scale you could come up with. It's impossible to come up with some 'you must be this advanced to qualify' definition for legal rights that a two-month old child could pass and an adult rodent couldn't. The current approach is to just assume humans are magical creatures and so deserve production just because they are human: It works right now, mostly, but it's not something that can be easily revised. If you aim for consistency you're going to have to either recognise legal rights for cats (Which would incur widespread ridicule) or classify babies as non-human expendables (Would incur widespread outrage and possibly violent protest).

    7. Re:Creepy by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Oblig Simpsons Quote.
      Dr. Zaius, Dr. Zaius!
      Dr. Zaius, Dr. Zaius!
      Dr. Zaius, Dr. Zaius!
      Oh, Dr. Zaius
      Dr. Zaius, Dr. Zaius!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they stay away from tiger sharks we should be OK.

    9. Re:Creepy by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Suffrage for animals!

    10. Re:Creepy by Defenestrar · · Score: 2

      Especially since bears already have the right to arms.

    11. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure what bears would do with weapons. How are they going to use them while we have their arms?

    12. Re: Creepy by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with me? "I think you're crazy." I want a second opinion! "You're also lazy."

    13. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even brain dead people with no hope of recovery have greater rights than chimps.

      They do more for society than most liberals, so why not?

    14. Re:Creepy by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I am not sure what bears would do with weapons. How are they going to use them while we have their arms?

      I guess you never read "Bears Discover Fire" (full text of the short story)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    15. Re:Creepy by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Human rights are not based on intelligence.

      They absolutely are. If we met non-intelligent aliens people would have no trouble treating them as having no rights, as pets, food source, or whatever. If we met intelligent aliens we would treat them as having human rights. Similarly, we may soon have to deal with the question of what sort of rights artificial intelligence have (both computer artificial intelligence, and biotechological artificial intelligence).

      The main reasons we give rights to the very young and comatose and mentally handicapped are (in no particular order) because we know better than to allow someone the power to decide who does or doesn't get human rights, because of empathy, because it sends a very clear message that certain things are unacceptable. Even so, less intelligent humans lose some of their rights (eg the right to sign binding legal contracts). And more intelligent (and cuter) animals get additional rights not granted to less intelligent animals, so eg kittens have more rights than spiders.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    16. Re:Creepy by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Just don't name him Caesar and mistreat him.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    17. Re:Creepy by dywolf · · Score: 1
      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    18. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      original source of linked comic

      http://dresdencodak.com/2009/09/22/caveman-science-fiction/

      few other good ones there...

    19. Re:Creepy by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      Change this gene in something with a larger brain and you could create animals smart enough to deserve human rights. At that point the only ethical course of action is to give them said rights. The problem is the lack of a proper legal framework for such. ...

      We need to start defining legal rights for intelligent, non-human entities immediately.

      Totally not necessary:

      1. Wait until animal brains improve some
      2. Have them pass the bar exam
      3. Now the burden is on them to define and argue the appropriate legal rights
      4. Continue to improve animal brains
      5. Legal framework is now in place once they reach the appropriate level of intelligence
      6. Prosper!
    20. Re:Creepy by Scottingham · · Score: 1

      My thoughts on this can be reduced down to: "You gotta root for the home team. Go 46ers!"

    21. Re:Creepy by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      What about politicians?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    22. Re:Creepy by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I'm with the GP post above, we don't know enough about what makes the human brain different from our animal brethren to go around making them more like us without some kind of legal and ethical framework to deal with the results in a way that doesn't make us monsters. Look at it this way, there have been human beings that lived full, healthy lives with average intelligence and only a fraction the brain tissue that typical people have. We simply don't know what it is about the brain that makes us human.

    23. Re:Creepy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we met intelligent aliens we would treat them as having human rights.

      Yet when Europeans encountered black Africans, they denied that they had intelligence, and did not recognize their rights. We did the same for chimps and other primates, which are far more intelligent than was recognized a few decades ago. If history is any precedent, we will give sentient aliens whatever rights are economically convenient, and then make up a post hoc rationale.

    24. Re:Creepy by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Is growing a non-human sapient any different from building a perfect artificially intelligent robot?

      Should we be okay with those possibilities, or should we artificially limit ourselves from making such things to begin with?

    25. Re:Creepy by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Chimps are really violent, strong, and just all around monstrous. I couldn't think of a worse animal to make sapient.

    26. Re:Creepy by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      If history is any precedent, we will give sentient aliens whatever rights are economically convenient, and then make up a post hoc rationale.

      Correct. Note, however, that no one makes up any excuses for eating broccoli. And for eating cows, "they're delicious" is a good enough rationale for most people. More advanced rationalization was necessary for black slaves and for Native Americans. Making up a post hoc rationale is only necessary because we implicitly acknowledge certain rights.

      Just because we acknowledge (implicitly or explicitly) someone as having human rights, doesn't mean we would treat them well. Back in the old days, raping, pillaging, genocide, and enslavement were common enough, as abhorrent as it would be to us now. People used to watch people fight to death in an arena, for fun. It's an "us" vs "them" thing, "they" are dangerous and can or maybe even should be treated badly. Serfdom was progress, and modern wage slavery is yet more progress. The "us" vs "them" distinction is active to a lesser extent among the classes and professions. As for aliens, they are definitely a "them".

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    27. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will give aliens whatever rights they have the ability to reserve for themselves. Hopefully they will be morally superior. Over and over again, western civilization has shown that if you don't have a gun, we will give you the short end of the stick.

    28. Re:Creepy by JasonGoatcher · · Score: 0

      You could also maybe use this type of information to figure out how to magnify the effect in people. How many intelligent people are actually smart enough to know the pitfalls of eugenics experiments?

    29. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they try it on Muslims may be we have fewer terrorists!

    30. Re:Creepy by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      More likely you'll end up with smarter terrorists, which is not a good thing.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    31. Re:Creepy by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      WESTERN civilization is the only bad one? The horrors imposed by the politically powerful are well-nigh universal, and currently the West is far more benevolent than Cuba, Venezuela, much of Africa, and anywhere that Islam is officially in control.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    32. Re:Creepy by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Macroscopic animals need to act in their own interest to continue existing. Robots can be turned off for years at a time and suffer no harm.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    33. Re:Creepy by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that Asia is no stranger to war & oppression either. "Western civilization" my ass, AC is talking about psychopaths in power.

    34. Re:Creepy by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to complain about "playing god" but this definitely approaches immoral conduct. Change this gene in something with a larger brain and you could create animals smart enough to deserve human rights

      Exactly! Any day now they could make a mouse as smart as the pig I ate for breakfast!

    35. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they take and cost society less than Republican retards.

    36. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never mind arms - your obese population is doomed when bears discover how to make running shoes.

  7. Or go the opposite direction... by bagboy · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for some spider genes and a bit of radiation....

  8. Enter... by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

    The Pinky and the Brain jokes.

    Seriously, if we enlarge their brains, are they enlarging their skulls at the same time? Will we soon have butt head mice like the little aliens in Star Trek's "The Cage"? Will they be telepathic???

  9. Which one will win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the scientific race to recreate Don Bluth movies, will The Secret of Nimh beat out The Land Before Time?

  10. They'll die. by cachimaster · · Score: 1

    I think I can predict what would happen to the mice.
    It's like when you upgrade a Commodore 64 to a Core I7 and try to run CPM on it. They'll crash and die.

  11. Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and men by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dogs are genetically disposed to imprint on their owners. Imagine a dog that really does understand human language... complete with grammar. Lassie, sort my mail then bring me bills and magazines.

    Consider a horse that isn't stupid. Able to know when it is needed, what it is to do, and when it is to leave. And possibly the damn things could be taught to take care of themselves a bit better so that the owners don't have to spend as much time fussing over them.

    Imagine cats that are not only bred by instinct to depopulate the rat population in the area but that understand that is why you keep them there. Possibly useful as lookouts etc in ways that they're not today.

    And then... people... perhaps this can be stimulated further in a human embryo. They've said our brains won't work much better if made larger but no one has put that little theory to the test. It is possible that a modified human could enjoy a qualitative advantage over normal humans comparable to the advantage normal humans have over chimps. And that sort of advantage is worth the swelled head and sore neck.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  12. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by digsbo · · Score: 1

    It is possible that a modified human could enjoy a qualitative advantage over normal humans comparable to the advantage normal humans have over chimps. And that sort of advantage is worth the swelled head and sore neck.

    Didn't they do a study that showed women would give up IQ for breast size? That sort of advantage, to them, being worth a swelled chest and a sore back?

  13. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1

    I'd settle for just training most things not to poop in my yard. Whatever that takes.

  14. Here I Come To Save The Day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Channelling Might Mouse via Andy Kaufman...

  15. Flowers for Algernon by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This reminds me of the novel by Daniel Keyes, who BTW died last year.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  16. shouldnt be legal by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    Ok, this stuff is just too creepy and fucked up. Frankenstienish. Definitely worthy of the whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag. Its just too dangerous for this kind of meddling to be legal.

    1. Re:shouldnt be legal by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Naw not frankensteinish at all. They didn't even use any bolts. It's more of A island of DR. Moreau kind of mad scientist experiment.

  17. Are you pondering... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...what I'm pondering?

    1. Re:Are you pondering... by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Probably, but wouldn't a bathtub filled with jello be all squishy wishy wooo? NARF!

  18. Does mouse DNA ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    enlarge human ears ? If so, Disney would sue!

  19. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by idontgno · · Score: 2

    Dogs are genetically disposed to imprint on their owners. Imagine a dog that really does understand human language... complete with grammar. Lassie, sort my mail then bring me bills and magazines.

    *wag*.... aroo?... grrrrrr....

    Translation: Yaay, I can help! Wait. Nooo! Dammit, I can't sort mail, I have no opposable thumbs! That thoughtless bastard, giving me physically impossible orders! I'm gonna crap in his slippers!

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  20. Gatacca - coming to a country near you! by burtosis · · Score: 1
    Voted #1 most realistic movie of all time, gatacca may become reality. http://news.moviefone.com/2011...

    Far from a fear of genetic tampering, bigger boobs and blonde hair will quickly devolve into less important things like health, lifespan, and more intelligence. But don't worry my non-augmented friends, while you won't be able to vote, hold a job, or hold any preferred life form rights, our kind masters still allow us to serve them. Isn't that enough?

    1. Re:Gatacca - coming to a country near you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voted most boring movie of all time. One 10 second action scene in a 2+ hour movie with an overly long drawn out plot. Might as well have read the book.

  21. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    And I'm sure a baboon would give up some intelligence for a bright blue ass.

    Greater intelligence could mean greater capability which could mean wealth and power. And nothing is sexier then wealth and power. Young women will happily jump into bed with a diseased old man if he's rich and powerful enough.

    Beyond which, the day is coming when you might just gestate your young in an artificial womb rendering the need to woo or romance or court your mate irrelevant.

    Strange days are coming, friend.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  22. Round Hole, Square Peg.. by mtippett · · Score: 1

    I'm not anywhere near knowledgable about medicine, but if the brain is larger, does the cranial cavity grow increase to the same level?

    I wonder if there a round hole, square peg kind (big brain, small cranial cavity) of issue coming. The brains might be smarter, but they may suffer from decreased mental abilities from intracranial pressure.

    1. Re:Round Hole, Square Peg.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the brain is larger, does the cranial cavity grow increase to the same level?

      It does in humans (and other later hominins) -- infant skulls have a lot of room for future expansion (the sutures between skull plates aren't fully connected). OTOH this is probably at least partly an adaptation to the fact that infant skulls are already nearly too big to pass through the mother's pelvis (and in some cases are too big, hence caesarians and a high childbirth fatality rate relative to other mammals).

  23. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Men without arms can do it with their nose. Food for thought.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  24. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dogs are genetically disposed to imprint on their owners. Imagine a dog that really does understand human language... complete with grammar. Lassie, sort my mail then bring me bills and magazines.

    Consider a horse that isn't stupid. Able to know when it is needed, what it is to do, and when it is to leave. And possibly the damn things could be taught to take care of themselves a bit better so that the owners don't have to spend as much time fussing over them.

    Imagine cats that are not only bred by instinct to depopulate the rat population in the area but that understand that is why you keep them there. Possibly useful as lookouts etc in ways that they're not today.

    So, basically, a new form of slavery, enforced by genetic programming that makes the slaves happy in their roles, and excused by the simple speciesist "Well, they're not human anyway."? What a monstrous suggestion.

  25. OSC Pathfinder series by trinaryai · · Score: 1

    Obviously not a completely original concept, but the first book I thought of was Orson Scott Card's Ruins and Visitors (books 2 and 3 of the Pathfinder series), probably being the most recent I've read. He took the concept quite a bit further with thousands of years of evolution after the initial DNA blending.

    1. Re:OSC Pathfinder series by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      "thousands of years of evolution" doesn't get you much. Different hair color maybe. Natural evolution takes millions of years.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:OSC Pathfinder series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "thousands of years of evolution" doesn't get you much. Different hair color maybe. Natural evolution takes millions of years.

      That really depends on the magnitude of the selection pressures. Natural evolution takes millions of years, if the current populations are in a state of relative equilibrium. Evolution happens rather fast during periods of mass extinction.

    3. Re:OSC Pathfinder series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most dog breeds are less than 200 years old.

  26. Wasn't this a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it was called the Secret of NIHM.

    1. Re:Wasn't this a movie? by xmousex · · Score: 1

      i just came here to make sure this fact was given proper observance. thank you.

  27. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Imagine cats that are not only bred by instinct to depopulate the rat population in the area but that understand that is why you keep them there.

    Massive analogy breakdown here. Cats are only out for themselves. If you could wave a wand and make them smart enough to have that level of self-awareness, it would not change the fact that they don't really care what we want. It would just give them the mental tools to be more effective manipulators of their humans. I for one don't find that an appealing idea.

  28. NARRRRRF! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's Pink and the Brain!"

    1. Re:NARRRRRF! by azav · · Score: 1

      Pinky*

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  29. What results for white vs black human enhancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would be the results?

    Why is science not allowed to answer this question?
    Is political correctness more important than facts?

    Why do you press -1 just because my question makes you uncomfortable?

    1. Re:What results for white vs black human enhancer? by azav · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod!

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  30. Nickel metal Hydlide by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Battery technology has improved. First it was The Secret of NiMH, then The Li-ion King, and then The Matrix.

  31. Lovely by imikem · · Score: 1

    Just another harebrained scheme.

    --
    Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
  32. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be much happier with pets if you could convince them to puke on the tile instead of the carpet. That does not a slave make.

  33. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    When given the hypothetical 'magic option' to 'be good at math, but have a fatter ass.' a tiny percentage of women said 'yes', Likely those who already had a fat ass and would not lose the ability to get what they want from men.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  34. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Men without arms can do it with their nose. Food for thought.

    Must resist ... urge ... to FTFY.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  35. For the love of god/shiva/allah... by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Do not ask for the videos of how they 'injected' human DNA into mice. Rule 34 and all...

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  36. How long would an animal by waspleg · · Score: 1

    as smart as you are take orders/be penned up/allow itself to be slaughtered en masse for food/etc? A different but familiar Orwellian outcome ;)

    1. Re:How long would an animal by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Remember where I said "lets make the cows, chickens, pigs, etc" smarter?

      Me neither.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:How long would an animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you just want some nice animals that are going to play right and help us, like in a fairy tale.

      If you make them as intelligent as we are, they will compete with us, it you make them just intelligent to be used better, some people will fuck them up and take them for a ride, some people may keep them as a pets and/or surrogate retarded children, basically what we have been doing for millennia but in this case the animals being even more aware of what's going on.
      do we need intelligent animals? no really, they are OK as they are IMHO
      Overdeveloping the human mind may be more interesting if we did live in a society that wish to share the benefit with all
      Artificial intelligence is a different matter, we may have no choice, we may find problems to difficult to solve by our puny brains or that we are too slow to dealt with, also we are in competition with each other, having the best tools obviously help and artificial intelligence may scale better than meat and if we can develop something more intelligent than us we will in the hope that it will play ball and solve our problems for us and that we will know how to keep it under control if needed, if everything eventually fucks up, well, there is no written law in the fabric of the universe that say that we will be top dog or live for ever

  37. Re: Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

    Dogs understand more than you think. They have been bred over a thousand years to better grasp human communication; they pay more attention than other canines to certain parts of the face, and pick up nonverbal cues that humans sometimes miss or ignore. They tend to be interested only in certain things, though, which some people mistake for lack of intelligence.

  38. Are you pondering by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    ... what I'm pondering?

    --
    That is all.
  39. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by digsbo · · Score: 1

    Once people can plug in and escape via totally immersive VR, only tax payers and some religious people will still bother with the real world.

  40. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by digsbo · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, there's a lot of overlap between that group and the group that's fun to hang out with.

  41. Just what we need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we really will need a smarter mouse trap!

  42. Smart mousie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what we need...a mouse smart enough to get that cheese without getting caught in the trap. What's next? Mice making Mousevilles and, ultimately, mouse nukes to shower upon us? I, for one, do not welcome the day of welcoming furry underlords.

  43. welcome by msmonroe · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new rodent overlords.

    Yup, I saw this movie, doesn't end well for the humans.
    The human race should just get it over with and a third of us will work on building terminator like machines, another third giving animals super human intelligence and the last third photocopying our butts and sending those photos out electronically to the stars!

  44. Someone needs to do a study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To see if donkey DNA will increase the size of mouse penises.

  45. Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight? by msmonroe · · Score: 1

    Nope. I guess not.

  46. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh... I thought you were going to say nothing is sexier than a bright blue ass. :(

  47. Rat Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mice given the human genes turned into alcoholics as they were forced to ponder their existence every night.

    Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

  48. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    I don't know ... there are so many people that act like they've been injected with extract of Mickey Mouse ...

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  49. Obviously by aaccurso · · Score: 1

    Well humans are larger than mice so.....

  50. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry about that. The only way VR is going to get that good is if we have full neural interlinks. And if we have that then the flow can go both ways. You can't have real VR without cyborgs. And cyborgs will be more then just VR users... they'll be drone commanders, neural programmers, and possibly mentally augmented with subordinate AIs.

    Till then... VR won't be an issue.

    A more credible problem might be people that get a wire put into their brains to stimulate the pleasure centers of their brain. Why by drugs when you can just tickle the part of your brain that makes you happy? That's all the drugs do anyway. It isn't the drugs that get you high but how they interact with the brain. Just force the brain electrically to do what you wanted anyway... Now that would be a problem. Imagine a drug that was cheap after the initial operation... and could put you in a state of complete bliss for days.

    The only real issue is that the glands that provide that kind of high aren't designed to operate continuously. So they could burn out and doubtless there would be other issues. But I'd worry about that before I worried about VR.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  51. Secret of nimh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew the mice in my house seemed smarter than usual.......

  52. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by digsbo · · Score: 1

    You pretty much just described an electrical version of MDMA (taken in unsafe doses). I agree, it's probably more of an immediate risk than believable VR. But even visuals plus rudimentary tactile feedback plus the pleasure stimulator you describe could pretty much be "close enough" to immersive VR to put many in a state of permanent incapacity outside the system.

    I'm reminded of the Logan's Run episode with the "joy" headsets.

  53. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by digsbo · · Score: 1

    Have you SEEN "Avatar"?

  54. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Humans likewise are opportunists... with intelligence they learn to cooperate for mutual gain.

    A cat smart enough to know why it is kept around is one that can be bargained with... deliver this many rats and you get this amount of whatever it is you want.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  55. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    I knew some PETA fool would show up to whine about my comment.

    As to slavery, you could make the same claim now with or without enhanced intelligence. And of course, that is what the PETA twits do... no one cares.

    Beyond that, I suggested pushing human intelligence further as well. Which if effective could make normal humans no more intelligent relative to the enhanced then animals are to normal humans.

    At which point going by your definition... would it be reasonable for an enhanced human to enslave regular humans if his intelligence were that far beyond them?

    And more to the point... if he were that intelligent... how could they stop him.

    Which is really what all this boils down to in the end.

    Further elaborating on your point, if the animals were capable of taking care of themselves within a civilized society, then I'd have no problem with liberating them. They could own property, have jobs, pay taxes, run for high office... I don't really care so long as they can hack it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  56. And Viagra Enlarges Their Cocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had to post it.

  57. Mous dna poot in mee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didna du nuthn ta mee.

  58. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Sure it wasn't a poll of their husbands?

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  59. Whole Gerbil Put In a Fag Will Enlarge His Prostra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    potentially.

  60. Gorillas by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0

    Gorillas have a bigger brain (than humans)...

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Gorillas by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Ok that was something I read being younger - but it seems it's actually wrong. Sorry my dear /.ers... we didn't have wikipedia at the time!
      List_of_animals_by_number_of_neurons
      Brain size

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  61. Flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Daniel Keyes comes to mind.

  62. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes let's give people genes that increase their neuron count, so they can get even more hopelessly confused about things. Or increase the branching factor and give them all autism!

  63. Prostrate??? You mean his PROSTRATE?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teehee.

  64. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Humans already have as big a skull at birth as is possible. Any larger and it simply wouldn't fit through the pelvis. If you want to try a larger-brained human, you'll have to get it out by caesarian.

  65. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Easy to regulate. Neurosurgeons are rare enough that the government could easily track them and watch for some under-the-table surgery, and the implant procedure would be prohibitively expensive. Now, a TMS rig might work. It's non-intrusive. Aiming would be tricky.

  66. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    A large number of births happen by caesarian already and we quite near to have effective artificial wombs. So... it doesn't especially matter.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  67. Forget Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reminded of quite a different story from my youth. As they say, if you give a mouse a gene, he'll ask for gamete too.

  68. Do birds next! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    They already have some very impressive abilities for their small brain size, and many are already natural mimics for sound. Some crow species even have tool use - and one step beyond, tool creation. Just a little bit of a boost and you might get a parrot that can understand what it's saying. The potential is there - Alex showed that, but Alex was a fluke, no other has come close.

  69. Re: Gorillas. That's Bullshit. Cite Your Referen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cite it.

  70. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    You say that but you haven't considered remote surgery. The US army is experimenting with drone surgeons. A soldier carries a backpack, a fellow soldier is wounded, he takes the backpack off and places it on the wound. He then switches it on. It links to a doctor somewhere in the world that controls the drone. With the assistance of the other soldier to act as an onsite nurse, the surgeon can remove bullets, stitch major arteries back together, and close wounds. Instead of a soldier having to wait possibly hours before he can be seen to at a field hospital he can get treatment NOW.

    A similar system is being tried in rural Alaska for much the same reason. Little towns in rural alaska and many places around the world can't sustain their own hospital. The population is just too low. They often have a nurse that can set broken bones and prepare people with more serious injuries for a trip to Anchorage etc where there are proper hospitals. But what if instead of doing that you have a surgical robot there that links to either the hospital in Anchorage or anywhere else in the world. Specialists from all over the world could look at the patient and treat him on site without having to fly him all over the world by plane.

    Now... consider that value of that on the black market?

    Criminal gets in a shootout with the police... he can't go to the hospital. The police are waiting for him there and the doctors report gunshot wounds to the police. Grab one of these things and all you need is some doctor somewhere in the world willing to pilot the thing for a price. No way that isn't going to happen.

    And if the doctor is patching up cop killers then he's probably not going to mind putting a wire in a junky's head either.

    You can't stop it. Don't even try.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  71. Natural selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we manage to tweak the human genome and modify our offspring with different generations that affect brain capacity we have no idea what the effects could be. The humans with larger brains could attain a higher state of thought or not. The brain is also very complex, so changing the brain mass could yield entirely new types of thought, emotions and behavior never before seen.

    Experimenting with this type of evolutionary behavior is not ethical. We change humans by design. Will our offspring be "humans"? What rights do they get compared to normal humans? I think this research should be scrapped immediately and banned by the UN. This sounds very like the making of the atomic bomb.

    1. Re:Natural selection by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I think this research should be scrapped immediately and banned by the UN.

      entirely new types of thought

      Experimenting with this type of evolutionary behavior is not ethical.

      Is there an Encyclopedia of Stupidity that you're studying, Anonymous Coward? Must be, you think the U.N. is an organization with moral authority and an ability to force things to happen without the backing of the U.S.A.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  72. Who the hell modded you +1??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gorillas do NOT have bigger brains then humans. Their bodies can grow (typically) to 3x that of the average human, but their brains are smaller.

    1. Re:Who the hell modded you +1??? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded you

      Name is enough or you need phone and address as well?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re: Who the hell modded you +1??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name, address and penis size please. Girth, not length.

  73. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    ""This cost a lot," she said, extending her right hand as
    though it held an invisible fruit. The five blades slid out, then
    retracted smoothly. "Costs to go to Chiba, costs to get the
    surgery, costs to have them jack your nervous system up so
    you'll have the reflexes to go with the gear..."

    The USA isn't the only place with surgeons.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  74. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    FWIW: I just read an article about a house cat's brain being more complex than that of a dog .

    The interesting thing to me about the link is the mice were tested with the human gene against the corresponding chimp gene in a mouse brain as a control.

    We have at least one allele for brain development identified in three species. Don't you just know experiments with the human gene inserted in the monkey is the next logical step? Hail Caesar...

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  75. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Howitzer86 · · Score: 2

    Consider a horse that isn't stupid.

    This kills the self-driving car. Seriously. A sapient horse could learn the city like a London cabbie, and at your command, take you where ever you want to go.

  76. fscking satanists took over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    humankind's demise. they breed human with animals.

  77. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    It would also be very green... running on apples and cuddles.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  78. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider how fast the military, the organized crime and all the nasties out there will put those animals to god use.
    Consider what those animals will think and feel when eventually they have to return to normal society, institutionalized and maybe put down, trying to figure out what they did wrong
    Imagine the elite taking advantage of the extra brain power making sure its put to good use to keep them in power and keeping the rest of us from even having a chance to compete with them
    Happy times

  79. Smarter Mice by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Would it make the mice any smarter? Not if the humans I interact with on a regular basis are anything to go by. If anything, I'd expect it to make the mice dumber.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  80. The mice will see you now by Trogre · · Score: 2

    That is all.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  81. Re:Cool I wonder what the effect is by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    How do you know that isn't what they did in this case?

  82. sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a HARE5 brained scheme to me.

  83. Intelligent Rodents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Robin might say, "Holy Mrs. Frisby [and the Rats of NIMH] !!!"

  84. look out ... by JeffElkins · · Score: 1
    --
    Why is all the good stuff already modded 5, when I have mod points?
  85. Let's do this on dogs next by JasonGoatcher · · Score: 0

    My dogs are so stupid they don't know how to open a door that's left ajar.

    My little dog will bark his ass off at me, then stare at me through the opening in the door because he's too stupid to put his paw in there and pull it open.

  86. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by bluegutang · · Score: 1

    Dogs are genetically disposed to imprint on their owners. Imagine a dog that really does understand human language... complete with grammar. Lassie, sort my mail then bring me bills and magazines.

    Consider a horse that isn't stupid. Able to know when it is needed, what it is to do, and when it is to leave. And possibly the damn things could be taught to take care of themselves a bit better so that the owners don't have to spend as much time fussing over them.

    Imagine cats that are not only bred by instinct to depopulate the rat population in the area but that understand that is why you keep them there. Possibly useful as lookouts etc in ways that they're not today.

    You mean, imagine having slaves?

  87. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    And?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  88. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    More peta people...

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  89. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Humans likewise are opportunists... with intelligence they learn to cooperate for mutual gain.

    People will do that, but it isn't all about sociopathic cooperation with us, as this implies. We are innately social creatures, and naturally seek to form groups together, even when there is no (non-emotional) personal gain. We have a word for people who cooperate with others only when it gains them something: "sociopaths".

    Dogs are that way too. Evolution crafted them to live and hunt in groups, and co-evolution with humans has further crafted them to watch and understand humans and want to please them.

    Cats simply are not innately social creatures. They are designed for solitude. That doesn't make them evil, just the creatures evolution has crafted them into. But this means that making them smarter would just make them smarter sociopaths.

  90. No they didnt get smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they were required to be come bigger and fatter basically they mutated into a more intelligent 'murrican' joe six pack!

  91. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

    If we can force genetics to make bigger brained people, we can force more of the growth to occur after birth. Think outside the box.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  92. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Now imagine Manhattan, with 2 million horses producing a total of 60 million pounds of manure a day, 22 billion pounds of manure a year. Think of walking across the East River on the sludge thus accumulated. And Oh, the lovely odor. London would be far worse, the Thames hardly flows in comparison.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  93. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Dogs are pack hunters and social animals. They submit to the leader of the pack. For domestic dogs, their owner is an ersatz pack leader. Saying that "Dogs are genetically disposed to imprint on their owners" is subtly inaccurate.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  94. mosquito and retro-virus are important to .... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    evolution. So many think that evolution occurred through random changes in our base pairs. Nothing could be further from the truth.
    Basically, retro-virus can cross many species, phylums, and even kingdoms. These days we only know the actively nasty ones. But, there are plenty of retro-virus that simply carry genes which mosquitos carry around.

    So, when I see Gates saying that he wants to kill off hurricanes or entire mosquito species, I have to wonder what the long term ramnifications are. Hurricanes bring loads of nutrients up from the depths that feed all sorts of life. And it is very likely that by gates killing off 1 mosquito species, he will slow down evolution, esp. human evolution. That means that we can not adapt easily to changes.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  95. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You want to hang around with big bottomed girls and do math together? I'd rather 'sink her with my pink torpedo.'

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  96. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    A horse smart enough to memorize a city, is smart enough to learn to use restrooms built specifically for them. The only issue would be expanding the existing sewage infrastructure to handle the extra load.

  97. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    ... the point is that even amongst sociopaths, they cooperate. So your point that cats if made intelligent wouldn't cooperate is incorrect. They'd simply need a beneficial relationship.

    And the problem with calling people sociopaths is that it has a moral stigma attached to it that is not entirely justified and certainly not relevant to this discussion. A different species isn't a sociopath simply for acting as it instinctually evolved to act. The moral stigma you're attempting to attach to this situation is misplaced.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  98. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    A distinction without meaning.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  99. The only goodmau5 is Fievel (or maybe Jerry) by tepples · · Score: 1

    Fievel Mousekewitz is not a Disney character. Nor is Jerry. Or were you referring to the trademark flap between Disney and Deadmau5?

  100. How big? by tepples · · Score: 1

    if the brain is larger, does the cranial cavity grow increase to the same level?

    It does in humans

    So are Precious Moments body proportions likely in humanity's future?

  101. Careful by ssufficool · · Score: 1

    They will learn to open their cages and take up residence in your rosebush while stealing your electricity.

  102. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dogs are pack hunters and social animals. They submit to the leader of the pack. For domestic dogs, their owner is an ersatz pack leader.

    This is Cesar Milan dog whisperer bullshit. Dogs are family creatures. Humans who try to assume the role a pack leader may cow dogs into doing what the humans want, but they end up damaged. This is an unethical way to treat dogs, and I hate that morons like you promulgate this nonsense.

    Like most people, I expect that fully half of what you "know" is just plain wrong.

  103. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by nut · · Score: 1

    Consider a horse that isn't stupid.

    Trust me, the only reason anyone can ride an animal that weighs more than 1,000 pounds and can kill us with a single kick is because they are stupid.

    --
    Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
  104. Re:Forget mice - consider dogs, horses, cats, and by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Your dog would let you ride him. Big dogs are happy enough with small children on their backs.

    What is more, most of the problem with horses is that they are so stupid. A smarter horse could be better trained. You might want to do some instinctual programming if you're that much of a genetics master... ideally make them imprint the way dogs do... but the intelligence alone would be interesting.

    Dolphins would be another fun one... Fisherman could use them. Some sort of symbiosis could be established. Or just raise the young in captivity so they don't know how to be wild.

    Could be useful.

    Really, I just like the idea of smarter animals. I value intelligence in everything. I like animals that are more clever and generally dislike animals that are stupid. I'd prefer for most animals to be smarter. Obviously not cows, pigs, chickens and other animals we eat. They if anything could have their intelligence toned down.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.