Slashdot Mirror


3D Printers Making Inroads In Kitchens

mpicpp sends an article from Fortune about the tiny industry springing up around food-related 3D printing. While such devices are still too expensive and too special-purpose for home kitchens, professionals in restaurants and large cafeterias are figuring out ways they can automate certain time-intensive tasks. For example, pasta: "If the user is making a recipe for ravioli, for instance, the [device] prints the bottom layer of dough, the filling and the top dough layer in subsequent steps. It reduces a lengthy recipe to two minutes construction time and ensures that no one has to clean a countertop caked with leftover dough and flour." The companies developing these 3D printers hope they'll be this generation's version of the microwave, gradually finding a use in almost every kitchen.

91 comments

  1. New design by NotInHere · · Score: 2, Informative

    better than beta, worse than it was. HOWEVER, I'm patient and hope they sort out the bugs. I'm not "You are posting: as NotInHere Anonymously". I'm posting as NotInHere.

    1. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooooooooooooo wideeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! :D

    2. Re:New design by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah what the hell happened to the layout and no announcement?

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least your nick is not DÃrent because this website doesn't accept accents and converts "à" into Ã

    4. Re:New design by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      If it makes them discontinue beta, its a good change.

    5. Re:New design by Soulskill · · Score: 2
    6. Re:New design by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the report. We'll try to get that fixed ASAP.

    7. Re:New design by Threni · · Score: 1

      I can't read sig-files - the text is superimposed on the line of text below that.

    8. Re:New design by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Since you are taking bug reports with Firefox on Linux I am seeing sigs be overlapped by the reply parent and share buttons. But hey this is better than beta was thanks for taking community input this time and not sacrificing width

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    9. Re:New design by jmcbain · · Score: 0

      I'm posting in this thread to mark the day and time (2/26/2015) at 3:10pm PT when Slashdot's UI changed, perhaps for the worse. History will tell.

    10. Re:New design by idontgno · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the announcement Soulskill mentioned below:

      And effective today, we've jettisoned the Slashdot Beta platform out the side portal. Slashdot has always been a bit quirky, and "user friendly" is sometimes in the eye of the beholder. After heavily experimenting on the Beta platform and splitting traffic between Classic and Beta, we've made some decisions about which platform changes ultimately make sense: starting today, we're unifying users back on our Classic platform.

      That's right. Beta has surrendered. Sanity has prevailed. We, the users, actually won.

      It's oddly sad that you don't usually get to say that. But also reassuring that we get to say it of Slashdot.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we've moved to gamma.

      CAPTCHA: revolt (RESIST!)

    12. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't matter. You could have the perfect site design with the majority loving it and someone has to come in and change it for the worse. ALWAYS.

    13. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The margins are a problem. They've been significantly narrowed in this new design which means that text is significantly stretched out on a widescreen monitor, which (believe it or not) hurts readability. Take Ars Technica as an example of a modern approach that many other sites use. They have a fixed size for the body of their site - if the browser is wider than the body, padding is shown; if the browser is skinnier than the body, scroll bars are shown. Studies have shown that having very, very long strings of text on a single line (as now shown in Slashdot's new design) is harder to parse than the lengths shown in Ars Technica's and other equivalently designed sites.

      I guess it's not surprising that a open-source/free-software focused site like Slashdot would ignore established UI studies and conventions simply because geeks think they know better.

    14. Re:New design by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Hi Soulskill,

      Not sure if it is intentional or not, but none of the buttons are visible unless I am mouse over - ie the preview, quote parent but most importantly the Post and Load All Comments button are only visible on mouse over. The text on the Post and Load all is only marginally lighter than the green of the banner so it is very hard to see.

      System is Linux Mint 13 running Chrome - Version 38.0.2125.111

    15. Re:New design by weilawei · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to say thank you. This is a big improvement over beta.

    16. Re:New design by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Next one: I can't switch pages anymore on slashdot.org url.

    17. Re:New design by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      Nope, not intentional -- will probably do another code push tomorrow to fix that and a few other small problems. Thanks!

    18. Re:New design by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the top-level comments are missing a left margin and have a misaligned right marging versus the top block. Post and "Load All Comments" are the wrong color, etc.

      I think it's a damn sight better than Beta ever was, it just needs a few more tweaks here and there.

    19. Re:New design by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      At least you could get in. I had to change my resolution so I could find the edge of the login option. It was hidden under the search box.

      Now that I'm in I'm still seeing overlapping options along the top edge.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    20. Re:New design by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      See, progress as promised!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    21. Re:New design by killkillkill · · Score: 0

      I have text wrapping back over other text some places and text running off screen others. Buttons and links overlapping other content all over the place. Is it so hard to test this before you go live? Does the news for nerds site not have one person on staff that can handle a little css properly?

    22. Re:New design by killkillkill · · Score: 1

      I feel like they are trying to tick us by keeping the green bars and slowing moving in the direction of beta.

    23. Re:New design by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Ribbit

    24. Re:New design by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When you follow an external link or post a reply, and then go back, it takes you to the top of the page rather than where you were.

      This was temporarily fixed, and then unfixed.

      Firefox on Win and Linux.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:New design by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I have text wrapping back over other text some places and text running off screen others. Buttons and links overlapping other content all over the place. Is it so hard to test this before you go live? Does the news for nerds site not have one person on staff that can handle a little css properly?

      Opera 12 and 27, FireFox not 36 - no problem with any, FireFox did seem like it was running into problems then showed it.
      So not sure what to say. site:http://fortune.com/2015/02/26/3d-food-printing/

    26. Re:New design by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I have text wrapping back over other text some places and text running off screen others. Buttons and links overlapping other content all over the place. Is it so hard to test this before you go live? Does the news for nerds site not have one person on staff that can handle a little css properly?

      Opera 12 and 27, FireFox not 36 - no problem with any, FireFox did seem like it was running into problems then showed it.
      So not sure what to say. site:http://fortune.com/2015/02/26/3d-food-printing/

      http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1
      and
      http://slashdot.org/

      Also no problems - misunderstood at first - I run a HOSTS file and /. looks the same.

    27. Re:New design by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They have a fixed size for the body of their site - if the browser is wider than the body, padding is shown; if the browser is skinnier than the body, scroll bars are shown.

      You think horizontal scrolling is a good thing?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:New design by Anubis350 · · Score: 0

      Thanks Soulskill, there's definitely some bugs in this (seeing some odd inconsistent rendering on chrome in OSX at least) but it's massively better than beta, and also incredibly heartening that you guys listened to the community!

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    29. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe... you know... STOP USING EVERYTHING FULL SCREEN on your 4k monitor!!! Why do people insist on running ALL apps full screen? Just size your browser to something resembling say... A4/US Letter and enjoy.

    30. Re:New design by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Soulskill, thank you for letting us know, and for the effort.

      Some problems I am having:

      • I can't get to my account settings. Right now I get a pop-up of article category choices.
      • I can post to a story that I posted to yesterday. This has actually been true for some time. I get a "you can't post to this page" message. Perhaps it is due to some issue with the ISP's invisible proxy? This means I can't ever follow-up when I get a reply.
    31. Re:New design by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The "You may like to read" column overlaps the one to its right, even though there's a space big enough for it going unused.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:New design by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      this is still better than BETA.

      but somehow they managed to bork some css while doing the transition and somehow managed to not notice or mention it to anyone.

      at least the classic reply on new page works this time around

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    33. Re:New design by rHBa · · Score: 1

      I've seen other users complain of that but haven't noticed it myself (FF36 on Mint). The main annoyance for me (although it's certainly better than Beta and with a few tweaks could be great) is the complete lack of left hand margin. I mean I see 15px of grey and then first post has zero margin. I do see a right hand margin and other boxes further up the page (such as the summary) have left margin...

      In fact if the comments section was the same width/margin as the summary above, that would be fine.

    34. Re:New design by rHBa · · Score: 1

      For me, regards the preview, quote parent buttons, the text is visible but the button background only appears on hover.

      I can also confirm that the Post and Load All Comments buttons are barely visible.

      Also (I mentioned this below) no left margin inside the white container.

      This is the same on FF36 and Chrome 40 on LinuxMint 17.

    35. Re:New design by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      Would you mind sending a screenshot to feedback@slashdot.org? I can't seem to reproduce this one. Thanks!

    36. Re:New design by userw014 · · Score: 1

      Seeing layout problems on Chrome for Linux (Ubuntu 14.04, 32-bit) too.

    37. Re:New design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Coke, Old Coke - now with HFCS.

    38. Re:New design by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      Would you mind sending a screenshot to feedback@slashdot.org? I can't seem to reproduce this one. Thanks!

      What's happening is that it says:

      You are posting: as mdfst13 Anonymously O

      Replace the O with the widget that goes there (circle with eight protrusions added). Above "Anonymously" it has the checkbox and "Post". It looks like the column for "BOX Post Anonymously" is not wide enough. You could probably reproduce this by changing your screen to 800x600 (the preferred setting for those of us with bad eyes and/or small monitors).

      Note that if I click the box, it says

      You are posting: as Anonymous Coward Anonymously

      which is at least funny.

    39. Re:New design by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      That's right. Beta has surrendered. Sanity has prevailed. We, the users, actually won.

      We didn't win. They've hoisted the beta onto us under the guise of it being the old interface, but it's not. Tons of stuff is broken. Links are invisible. Sigs aren't working as expected. Widths of elements are all screwed up.

      If you think we won, you need to stop reading what they're saying and start looking at what they're actually doing.

    40. Re:New design by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I have text wrapping back over other text some places and text running off screen others. Buttons and links overlapping other content all over the place. Is it so hard to test this before you go live? Does the news for nerds site not have one person on staff that can handle a little css properly?

      I take back my other comments, another day another view, as of today I have to use Opera 12 to view /. .

      I can't post only reply, yes it's a mess, Firefox and Opera can't even find the login the search covers who knows what. Login could be a problem as only half shows up, so can't read what goes where ie: logging in, or signing up.

      It's unusable for me unless I go to Opera 12, even then posting isn't an option.

      I'm reminded of the BF4 release, doesn't anybody test these things before being released?

    41. Re:New design by zidium · · Score: 1

      It's been EXACTLY a year since Beta was forced down our throats and we staged the 2014 Valentines Day Slashcott!

      WE WON!!!!!! The new interface is *really* nice, too! So win/win after we convinced Upper Management to jettison their ill-conceived desires?

      WOOHOO!!!! As a 15+ year member of Slashdot, I look forward to the next 10 years now!!!

      I was so anti-Beta I helped organize the 2014 Slashcott and I also had my own personal slashcott this Valentines Week, too. just last week.

      I seriously doubt without our antics and loud voices that the corporate overlords of Slashdot would have seen the light, and the site would already have died of Betaitis months ago.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    42. Re:New design by zidium · · Score: 1

      I seriously think those are merely growing pains. Maybe they had a deadline to get it out before 2Q begins in April?

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    43. Re:New design by zidium · · Score: 2

      God dammit! UTF-8 support is still out! SMH!!! It's 2015 for crying out loud! 90%+ of the Net is already there!

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
  2. Really? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    What's that damn printer doing making roads in my kitchen?!?

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  3. Clean countertop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It reduces a lengthy recipe to two minutes construction time and ensures that no one has to clean a countertop caked with leftover dough and flour."

    On the other hand, it also ensures that someone has to clean the dough and flour out of the 3D printer.

  4. These are not the kind of plastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that you would want in your kitchen, and in particular not in your food.

  5. I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by buback · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Instead of having to clean a counter top, you only have to clean various hoppers and extruders, and the build plate. And all the prep tools and bowls. And you'll also have to program in all the steps. and it will only print one at a time.

    It's so much easier than that 'old fashioned' way!

    1. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Instead of having to clean a counter top, you only have to clean various hoppers and extruders, and the build plate. And all the prep tools and bowls. And you'll also have to program in all the steps. and it will only print one at a time.

      It's so much easier than that 'old fashioned' way!

      Obviously you've never made ravioli by hand. I have, and it's not the most fun thing to do. That's why I typically make a lot of them when I do, so I can freeze a bunch and thaw them out as needed.

      A lot of that stuff will need to be cleaned anyhow. Rolling pasta dough is not the easiest thing to get perfect either. Then if you put too much filling in, you can't get the edges to press together and hold when you cook them.

      I'm not sure how you think you make them by hand, but you can only put one together at a time that way too.

    2. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's why you don't make them "by hand"...you use the right tool for the right job.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      I own that one, and it's really not all that difficult or time consuming. And that's just a home quality tool. I'd have to imagine a professional chef in a restaurant would have to have an even better tool at his/her disposal.

    3. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason you don't make them by hand is that you can go to a place called a restaurant, and for a small fee have someone else make them for you. In that fee includes use of a table, chair and cutlery, ambient lighting and music, electricity, cooking, drink service and clean up. Even if I had a machine I still have the labour involved with buying storing and preparing ingredients, and all the other guff that makes this claim pretty ridiculous.

      You sound fat and lazy. Am sure you think Olive Garden is Italian.

    4. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who gets to fix the jammed 3D printer when it eats your great cookie dough. What about the food dye color catridge when it runs out of ink to draw those nice frosting lines. How many copies per minute can it make? What does the cookie dough roller pin cost and how many copies can it do before having to be replaced?

      I'd think for ravioli that it would be easy to just buy it ready made from the factory which is already pre-cut and just fill it with ones concoction and advertise it as hand made just like mom used to make.

    5. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the laser catridge version just dusts the top of the cookies with colored angel dust vs. spraying it on like the ink catridge.

    6. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a rather clumsy machine. It's a lot easier (and faster when you get a feel for it) using something like this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvjekJkzpV0

    7. Re:I can't wait for the Ron Popeil 3d printer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason you don't make them by hand is that you can go to a place called a restaurant, and for a small fee have someone else make them for you. In that fee includes use of a table, chair and cutlery, ambient lighting and music, electricity, cooking, drink service and clean up.

      I don't want to pay for all of that. I just want to pay for someone else to make the damned ravioli.

      So I buy them in a bag.

      Toasted ones, like God intended, you soulless east-coasters.

  6. Ummm - Use a commercial pasta machine.... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    There is no way this would replace a commercial pasta maker in any kind of large scale restaurant.

    For a start no one makes dough on a bench if you are making quantities of pasta. Either you buy the pasta in or you use a machine. You feed your mixer the ingredients and then collect the dough later. This goes double for you extruded pasta and your filled pasta. Have a look at a Raviolatrice. That is what you use if you are making large amounts of ravioli.

    If you want large quantities of extruded pasta you would use something like a Bottene PM80 which will make 15kg of pasta an hour.

     

    1. Re:Ummm - Use a commercial pasta machine.... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      If anything, my guess is that it may make possible the creation of unique dishes and designs that would be too time-consuming to create by hand, at least in the commercial market. It's probably only in the home market that you'd use it to create pasta or other dishes that commercial machines can already easily do, since an all-in-one machine may be more economical, both cost and space-wise.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Ummm - Use a commercial pasta machine.... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      They are probably going after the users who want more control & flexibility over the final output product that the existing commercial machines currently do not give them. The people that create customized food for parties or other special occasions will be some of the first adopters.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Ummm - Use a commercial pasta machine.... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like pasta in the shape your pet, or maybe your face...

      The possibilities!

      Certainly going to make the annual dickerdoodle contest at PA more interesting.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Ummm - Use a commercial pasta machine.... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Maybe - but the TFA talked about things like stadiums where it is all about volume.

      My experience of commercial kitchens has all been about doing your preparation early so you do as little cooking as possible at service time. So that means at 2 in the afternoon the junior chefs are doing one identical thing after another, be it making the pasta, or some fancy crystallised rose petals.

    5. Re:Ummm - Use a commercial pasta machine.... by O-Deka-K · · Score: 1

      Is this what's known as a "copypasta"?

  7. someone BROKE CSS for the old view again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    test before submitting slashcode please.

  8. OK, Ill bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now why why hell would I want a road in my kitchen and how in the hell is a 3d printer going to help me do that?

  9. Dough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a 3D printer make dough? Something that is made up of multiple ingredients and requires mechanical force (kneading) to develop the gluten proteins that hold it together doesn't sound like the job of a 3D printer. Unless the 'printer' is rolling out sheets of pasta from dough fed to it, in which case it's a ravioli machine which has been around for decades...

    1. Re:Dough? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "How can a 3D printer make dough? "

      I think Makerbot has already answered that one.

  10. Beyond fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really? You roll out the dough, spoon in the filling, put the dough on top, use cutter.

    What the fuck is it with this endless series of bottom of the barrel, idiotic 3D printing stories?

    1. Re:Beyond fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is it with this endless series of bottom of the barrel, idiotic 3D printing stories?

      It's all they have really.

  11. as a chef, yes. for the home cook? no. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    sheet cakes have already had printers for quite some time now, but its worth noting you still need to prepare the ingredients for this device. If i were at home this printer would be cumbersome, but I also work in a professional kitchen and as a chef, If im catering for 120, having a machine that would print gold leaf would be awesome. Petit fours are a pain in the ass, and every time i send my crew to make them i get a round of angry scowls. Having a rack of foodinis printing them off though? yes please. My prep work isnt of concern as most of the ingredients go through a hobart mixer or robot coupe. where this device would shine is tedious, labour intensive hand prep and finishing.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  12. That's actually not a bad idea by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    I cook pretty much every night (other nights being leftovers or dinner out with a friend), and never make things like ravioli because I hate spending an hour making the damn things for 5 minutes of eating pleasure.

    Give me a printer that can make me some ravioli, lasagna, etc, and then pop a couple pieces into the dishwasher and HurryUpAndTakeMyMoney.jpg.

    1. Re:That's actually not a bad idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I cook pretty much every night (other nights being leftovers or dinner out with a friend), and never make things like ravioli because I hate spending an hour making the damn things for 5 minutes of eating pleasure.

      Did you know there's such a thing as a ravioli machine? It's like a pasta machine, but it rolls out ravioli when you crank it. You do have to stuff stuff into it, but you could use any number of things which come in a tub or wrapper and are still more or less made out of food, like the finer processed cheese products.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:That's actually not a bad idea by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      You realise the printer simply forms the structure, even with a 3D printer you'd still have to do all the other painful steps (prep/cleanup etc). It's like those magic food mixer commercials. The magic isn't having a blender that works, it's all the prep and clean up that makes cooking your own food hard.

  13. Someone hand out some Pink Sombreros! by Khyber · · Score: 2

    Yay Beta is gone, but did you guys have to push to a live production server with these bugs?

    Where's your pink sombrero supply?

    And you still have a ton of whitespace.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Someone hand out some Pink Sombreros! by fisted · · Score: 1
  14. Chocolate & Sugar Work by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

    Of course, the dream would be able to 3D print chocolate/sugar sculptures, but I've been seriously considering how feasible it would be to create custom chocolate/sugar molds to create things like eggs, etc that go beyond what we can get from the usual suppliers and without having to fork out a few grand for a one-off custom design elsewhere. A couple paying jobs and I imagine a 3D printer would pay for itself for this particular aspect of my interests. :)

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Chocolate & Sugar Work by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      Rinikusu -- it's very easy! These folks offer food-grade mold supplies and videos on how to use them: http://www.makeyourownmolds.co...

      I made my own gamer dice molds with the putty-style old materials they sell. Very easy to work with.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  15. Re:as a chef, yes. for the home cook? no. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    LOL ... since when do chefs have time to hang out on Slashdot? (Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

    More on topic, I don't see how 3D printing pasta is going to work, for example. You're going to probably end up with some slime which comes apart when you cook it.

    It won't be an actual dough, it's going to be ... well, I don't know what exactly. I just don't see this retaining the properties of dough.

    I can see some of the molecular wizards like Wylie Dufresne or poeople like that, doing wacky things .. but the example of ravioli just seems like this wouldn't work at all.

    This sounds more like the domain of crap food made at commercial scales, than actual good food prepared by chefs.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  16. Printed food? by msobkow · · Score: 2

    The creators of the printed ravioli were very enthusiastic about their product. "It's almost as good as Chef Boyardee!", they exclaimed. :P

    *Blech*

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  17. Page view comments by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

    With mod points loaded, I'm having signatures viewing on top of 'Reply to this' link, and the mod dropdown box is positioned a few pixels low. I also don't see the Preview Options Cancel button controls until I mouse over them when I post the comment after mod points have been used (this may be intentional).

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  18. Re:as a chef, yes. for the home cook? no. by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    It won't be an actual dough, it's going to be ... well, I don't know what exactly. I just don't see this retaining the properties of dough.

    Why wouldn't it? I've used a cookie press for years. The dough that comes out of it acts like any other sugar cookie dough, and the cookies are much better than anything that comes in a plastic package. Dough in general is very amenable to be smushed, smashed, mushed, and extruded. Every kind of noodle made is extruded, after all.

    You didn't read the parent post very closely, either, or you would have noticed that chefs use a TON of machinery. Chefs have been using machines to make stuff for a couple of hundred years. Other posters have already pointed out that there are specialty ravioli-making machines, for both large and small scales. "3D printing" for food is more like "robot that assembles food" than it is like plastic 3D printing, and that's a very reasonable progression of a very long term trend.

    If you've ever watched one of those TV shows about catering, you would have a better idea of the possibilities. There are all kinds of things that a chef would be happy to assign to a robot, rather than a junior staff member, were a robot available. The OPs example of petit fours is one of many.

    Remember all those stories about robots taking low skill labor jobs? Remember Humans Need Not Apply? This is that process in action.

    Assuming, as other people have pointed out, that its programming interface is within the grasp of your typical chef and that loading and cleaning it is no harder than loading and cleaning a stand mixer. It will be a while before they reach that stage.

  19. I need to a new mod option... by MikeTheGreat · · Score: 1

    ... "Just Plain F***ing Awesome" :)

  20. Big talk, little "man" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you even lift, bro?

  21. Well Mr Smartypants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did they hide it? Surely this kind of thing should have been a front page post. Why put it in the damned journal?

    1. Re:Well Mr Smartypants by zidium · · Score: 1

      Why didn't they make the announcement of killing Beta SOONER!? like MONTHS ago when they decided to start working on this thing? POSSIBLY, it's because this could have been done out of a labor of love by one or more of the Slashdot devs and then they all ganged up on management and said, "Let us release this and kill Beta or we're all going to motherfracking strike, motherfackers!"

      I like this possibility! IT would be very epic and apropos given how Beta would have surely killed off Slashdot in a matter of weeks.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
  22. it solves the bit that isn't a problem by dominux · · Score: 1

    so you have to make the pasta, make the filling, then load the machine with dough and filling, then wait two minutes per ravioli, then apply pressure to each one to check it is sealed and waterproof then drop them in the water to cook them. Or, seeing as you have made the dough already, roll it out, pop it over a ravioli tray http://www.amazon.co.uk/World-... put a spoonfull of filling in each bit and roll over another sheet of pasta, job done 12 at a time.
    I can see 3d printing as being interesting for high end intricate and decorative chocolate/sugar creations. Most pasta is formed by extrusion anyway, and you probably could do something interesting with 3d printing pasta, but not ravioli.

  23. Re:as a chef, yes. for the home cook? no. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Dough in general is very amenable to be smushed, smashed, mushed, and extruded

    Specifically I was thinking of the fact that 3D printing tends to want to lay down a little layer at a time, instead of a continuous sheet as you need to have in ravioli. Otherwise the dough would simply all apart.

    You didn't read the parent post very closely

    Are you a condescending asshole in real life, or just the internet?

    I know a lot about food and cooking, as well as the machines used for it ... 3D printing, as it applies to food, a little less.

    So, if this machine is going to roll out a continuous sheet of pasta onto a tray with indentations, pass over that and put in the topping, and then roll out a continuous sheet on top .. well, that's not so much 3D printing as robotic assembly.

    If it's going to lay down a tiny little layer of pasta dough in successive layers ... well, you're not going to get a coherent dough, you're going to get the slime I alluded to when you try to boil it.

    I have no problem with the concept of a pasta making machine ... I've seen machines which make tortelloni. I've also seen machines which make ravioli. They're both really cool, and work with the pasta as a continuous sheet as you need to so that it stays together.

    But when you describe something as 3D printing, and all it's doing it rolling out a sheet of pasta ... to call it "3D printing" is to kind of abuse the term. There are already machines which make those pastas on commercial scales, has been for a very long time.

    What I'm skeptical about is if this is actually "3D printing" in any meaningful sense of the word.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  24. Little value for the home user by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    This device makes sense for situations where arranging the food is where the effort liesâ"delicate cookies shaped like snowflakes and portraits of the bar mitzvah boy sculpted in chopped liver. But for things like a pizza or ravioli or cookies that can be laid out in no time with a spoon or a pasty bag it's a waste of time.

    It's not like you load the thing with food elements like flour, eggs, cheese, and spices and ravioli comes out. It doesn't make food, it only squirts out food that's already made. The video's enthusiasm about how one is eating all sorts of wonderful fresh ingredients is irrelevant because one has to make that stuff anyway before it goes in the machine.

    I can see this being an interesting tool for fancy restaurants that would like to make breadsticks that look like coral and other instances where people pay for presentation for itself, but being adopted in homes like the microwave was? I just don't see the value.

  25. 3D Printing and abberant psychology by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    What the fuck is it with this endless series of bottom of the barrel, idiotic 3D printing stories?

    For all of recorded history, medical luminaries have done vivisection on things to learn by looking at cross sections. It takes a special type of person to do this calmly. Arby's has this hypnotic machine that renders part of an animal into perfect slices, exploding the animal-flesh surface area for maximum release of flavor, but we would not want it to happen to us. MRI machines produce animations that when played along the Z axis, look like your internal organs are morphing into some horrifying Cthulhu, your own kidneys become accusing eyes drilling into your soul. William Gibson imagines nanowire weapons that pass through objects with practically zero resistance, rending a man so completely in half that the upper half slides disgustingly down the bottom half as the doomed victim's face shows mere surprise. Trypophobia (fear of holes in places where holes should not be) is likely an ancient fear-response to help one recognize, imagine the possibility of and therefore avoid severe injury, disfiguring or flesh-eating diseases. So over the course of evolution up to the present level of sentience, the sight of cross-sections of things has made us feel uncomfortable.

    That is why the idea of building things up (somehow) from cross sections is oddly fascinating. We are crafting a process by which this instinctual horror is reversed. It is cathartic. Unlike horticulture, where you merely combine seed and shoot and watch as the life process does all the work, grows the result, 3D printing is a purely mechanical building process, one in which the inventor must realize the complete structure of a functional item.

    3D printing carries the potential to help us atone for the guilt of pulling so many helpless things apart over the years and cutting them into little bits. It helps us to imagine a karmic balance in the world, where on one hand people are running around with machettes slicing shit up, while in the laboratory (or the kitchen!) forward-thinking peoples are watching over intricate machines that reassemble, repair and "revivify" these things.

    I, for one, look forward to eating a beautiful juicy steak
    that tastes like glop the printer squeezed out of its cartridges.
    Slice it thick, Ma!

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>