Slashdot Mirror
Samsung Officially Unpacks Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge At MWC
MojoKid writes Today, at Mobile World Congress, Samsung took the veil off of its much-anticipated Galaxy S6, and also the Galaxy S6 edge. As has been heavily rumored, the S6 foregoes the plastic shell of its predecessor and integrates metal and glass instead, resulting in a far more premium feel, a thickness of 6.8mm, and a weight of 138g on the normal S6 and 132g on the edge. Samsung made it a point to mention that the metal it uses in the S6 is 50% stronger than other smartphones- a Apple bendgate jab, perhaps? Both the S6 and S6 edge share the same hardware, which includes a 5.1-inch Quad HD Super AMOLED display. That gives us a resolution of 2560x1440, and a high pixel density of 577 ppi. The new phones also include an octa-core processor (2.1GHz quad + 1.5GHz quad), 3GB of DDR4 memory, and LTE cat 6 (300/50Mbps) support. Also of note is the phone's rear 16 megapixel f/1.9 camera, which Samsung says will launch in less than a second (0.6 seconds, to be exact). The front camera is no slouch either, also boasting an aperture of f/1.9, and coming in at 5 megapixels. The company says that the phone can add 4 hours of battery-life after a mere 10 minutes of charging, and when compared to the iPhone, it charges up to full in half the time. The S6 also has built-in wireless charging as well.
No removable battery. Less space than an SD card. Lame.
In all seriousness, it does look like a very nice phone. And Samsung has gotten better about pre-loading less bloatware on their more recent releases. We'll have to see how the general public receives it though.
megapixels, GHz, bus speed, blah blah blah...I may be the only person on the planet who actually cares about this esoteric feature, but I'll ask anyway: How well does it function as a telephone? Are calls clear & loud? How much does the microphone collect sound? Is it sensitive to wind (noise)? etc. etc. etc. I ask because most cell phones sound dreadful -- like a 3rd generation mp3 played through an AM radio.
In these days of feature checklist pissing contests over most pixels and CPU power, it'd be good to know if a $700 phone can make a decent phone call.
as for thinness, I dont want that! Gimme a phone 2x as thick as current top tier phones (or about 1/2 as thick as old nokia candy bar phones) and give me 4X the battery life. I want some heft in my phone. not zach morris phone thick, but old candy bar phone thick
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
Gimme a phone 2x as thick as current top tier phones and give me 4X the battery life.
Simple solution: Get a USB power brick and tape it to the back of your phone.
The only reason to remove SD slots is to force people to buy higher level storage phones. On a business level, i get it if i can make someone buy the 64 instead of the 32 gig model, its more money in my pocket.
There are many ways to look at this, including a conspiracy theory I heard summer of 2013 that Samsung was sitting on a stockpile or memory chips and just wanted to milk selling 16gb models for as long as possible by not offering the higher storage models. That one seemed really plausible when you consider the Galaxy S5 32gb never arrived in the US and signs pointed to Samsung themselves completely withholding it from US carriers.
In this case I think you're looking at the wrong end of the sales chain. If Samsung and the carriers were really intent on selling higher storage capacities you'd think they would do a better job marketing them and get employees at all levels better training. I talked to a Samsung sales rep that happened to be in Costco one time and he only seemed to be interested in getting me to just buy the 16gb model, even though he himself had a 64gb.
The carriers stand to make far more money than the manufacturer by getting their customers to use cloud services so they have to sign up for larger, overpriced data plans. So I'm far more inclined to believe that Samsung's previous attempt at selling the S3 32gb in the US failed because of the carriers who largely only sold them online. When asked why they weren't sold in-store they sited inventory logistics as the reason, meanwhile carriers had no problem stocking higher capacity iphones in-store. Don't forget to factor in that the in-store employees are all on commission so why would bother trying to up-sell the device with higher storage when they can't get commission from an online sale.