Slashdot Mirror


Yik Yak Raises Controversy On College Campuses

HughPickens.com writes Jonathan Mahler writes in the NYT that just as Facebook swept through the dorm rooms of America's college students a decade ago, the social app Yik Yak, which shows anonymous messages from users within a 1.5-mile radius is now taking college campuses by storm. "Think of it as a virtual community bulletin board — or maybe a virtual bathroom wall at the student union," writes Mahler. "It has become the go-to social feed for college students across the country to commiserate about finals, to find a party or to crack a joke about a rival school." While much of the chatter is harmless, some of it is not. "Yik Yak is the Wild West of anonymous social apps," says Danielle Keats Citron. "It is being increasingly used by young people in a really intimidating and destructive way." Since the app's introduction a little more than a year ago, Yik Yak has been used to issue threats of mass violence on more than a dozen college campuses, including the University of North Carolina, Michigan State University and Penn State. Racist, homophobic and misogynist "yaks" have generated controversy at many more, among them Clemson, Emory, Colgate and the University of Texas. At Kenyon College, a "yakker" proposed a gang rape at the school's women's center.

Colleges are largely powerless to deal with the havoc Yik Yak is wreaking. The app's privacy policy prevents schools from identifying users without a subpoena, court order or search warrant, or an emergency request from a law-enforcement official with a compelling claim of imminent harm. Esha Bhandari, a staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, argues that "banning Yik Yak on campuses might be unconstitutional," especially at public universities or private colleges in California where the so-called Leonard Law protects free speech. She said it would be like banning all bulletin boards in a school just because someone posted a racist comment on one of the boards. In one sense, the problem with Yik Yak is a familiar one. Anyone who has browsed the comments of an Internet post is familiar with the sorts of intolerant, impulsive rhetoric that the cover of anonymity tends to invite. But Yik Yak's particular design can produce especially harmful consequences, its critics say. "It's a problem with the Internet culture in general, but when you add this hyper-local dimension to it, it takes on a more disturbing dimension," says Elias Aboujaoude." "You don't know where the aggression is coming from, but you know it's very close to you."

14 of 367 comments (clear)

  1. Baking political correctness in society by HBI · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The effect is to create something like this - an anonymous way for people to let out the aggressions and hatreds that they already had, and are just afraid to announce due to the attempted control of speech in any public, identifiable arena.

    Maybe leaving things alone was better? Sacrificing free speech for a better society was the argument. So now what? We're stuck with the bad with none of the good.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Baking political correctness in society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with something like YikYak is you loose the context if whatever is said. If someone says something in front of people then they also get to know stuff like: are they drunk; have they just been dumped; did they just get a bad mark; does it even look like they believe what they are saying. Put it on YikYak and all that is gone, and shorn of the context people have a tendancy to believe. THEN things can spiral out of control.

      Not saying its good or bad, but its not just a free speech issue.

    2. Re:Baking political correctness in society by HBI · · Score: 5, Interesting

      OK, Try listening to some television recorded in the 1970s or 1980s and then listen to today's equivalent. Back then, people would identify each other by ethnicity and criticize each other openly. Nada today. Demonstrates a clear censorship, and calling it 'self-censorship' is bullshit, it's a centrally mandated process. Everyone feels better, right? But when anonymity is achieved, as in trolls on the net and this service, people show their true colors.

      Being oblivious to the process doesn't mean it didn't happen.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Baking political correctness in society by blue+trane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The words are just symbols. The emotions you attach to them are your own. The problem is projection: "the only way I could say that is if I were a bad person. Therefore, the person who said it is a bad person." But that psychological logic forgets humor, lies, and bots.

      More free speech, leading to more virtual violence, should reduce the need for physical violence. We should be fighting ISIS's words on social media, not trying to ban them.

    4. Re:Baking political correctness in society by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wow, who is making the argument that we should "sacrifice free speech for a better society"?

      Pretty much every university in the U.S. and Europe at this point. Saying the wrong thing that offends someone on a college campus these days will get you kicked out faster than banging Dean Wormer's wife. You don't even have real free speech rights anymore in the few "free speech areas" that they've allotted. It's all-but-considered assault if you make a comment that can even be CONSTRUED as offensive.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    5. Re:Baking political correctness in society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anonymous speech's purpose is to be able to say things that might be harmful to YOU if you say them. Using anonymous speech to say things that are harmful to OTHERS is cowardly and generally speaking not protected by the First Amendment nor should it.

      And who gets to decide which is which? If I say "Black people commit most of the violent crime in this country and it's time we stop excusing them for it" that is certainly an opinion that could get a student expelled on almost any college campus (and quite likely, attacked or threatened by blacks). But a sensitive black student could also argue that it was "hate speech" that harmed him or her. So is that free speech? Or is free speech only speech that couldn't possible offend anyone?

    6. Re:Baking political correctness in society by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Liberal folks, this is your issue. The conservatives and libertarians are all over preserving the right to speech. Where is your support for the same?

      Liberals are by definition "all over preserving the right to speech".

      Authoritarian progressives are not.

      Authoritarian progressives have taken over some of the political and social organs often associated in popular thought with "liberalism". I think this can be traced back to the 1988 Presidential campaign, when Bush attacked Dukakis as a "card carrying member of the ACLU", and rather than pushing back with "yes, I support civil liberties as enshrined in the Bill of Rights -- you don't? Shame on you!", the Democrats began a retreat from those values.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:Baking political correctness in society by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That isn't really how people proejct though, a person seldom attributes his own actions to his own nature. Its more like "I said this because I was upset" or "I said that because he was an asshole and deserved to hear it." whereas "he said that because he is a racist" or "he said that because he is an asshole".

      That would be more how people tend to actually think about things.... I stole from the store because I ...was bored and seeking thrills or .... was hungry and needed money.

      You stole from the store because you think its ok to steal and you are entitled to it.

      See how different we can be. I do everything for exeternal reasons, everyone else just follows their nature.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    8. Re:Baking political correctness in society by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh hey, who'daguessed it, apparently the protocol is super-weak.

      What could I do with this API?

      Good question.

      You can do anything the Yik Yak app can do. You can post messages, upvote messages as well as downvote them. I must note that there's really no true verification that happens here, it's all crappy PHP scripts all hidden behind SSL.

      I'm sure you can figure out if I've used the API or not already, but I will say this is really abusable and can be used to do just about anything as well.

      Want a username on Yik Yak (a handle) without having to ask people to redeem your code? All you need to write some code to redeem your code 4 times from different user IDs and bam.

      Want to delete a comment or message off Yik Yak? You can downvote that comment/message so many times (with different user ids) and eventually it'll be ripped off the face of the earth.

      Want to know the top Yik Yaks posted in an area? You can exactly do that. I was planning on making an publicly available service that you were able to pin a specific area/location and get all the top messages in that area, but got too lazy.

      I'm giving you all the possibilities because I'm sure nobody will be utilizing this API anytime soon.

      --
      "Are you hungry? I haven't eaten since later this afternoon." -- Primer
    9. Re:Baking political correctness in society by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's much easier than that. Just call the cops. Cops get a subpoena, Yik Yak coughs up the details of the poster. The idiot who posts a threat on this kind of service is easier to find than someone who called one in from a pay phone or slipped a note under the admin building door.

      The article seems to be conflating actual threats and random idiot posts to try and claim that this thing is dangerous. It "creates a destructive environment." Personally, having YouTube and Slashdot -1 comments streamed direct to my phone sounds horrible, but I guess some people get off on that. If you don't, don't use the app.

    10. Re:Baking political correctness in society by ckatko · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except you have very tiny eyes.

      Are you completely unfamiliar with liberal's modern tactic of trying to get anyone they disagree with fired? By calling anyone they disagree with a bigot?

      How can there be freedom of speech when your means to provide for yourself might be attacked? Fear is their tactic for forcing self-censorship. Instead of debating your ideals on equal grounds, they try to get you thrown onto the street. Why? Because they can't defend their values on equal grounds because they're fucking domestic terrorists.

      Remember the ESA scientist with the "oppressive" shirt? The shy, introverted guy who contributed to space history who they made cry on national television because they convinced him he was sexist? Is that the kind of freedom of speech you want to live in? You may agree with everything they've done. But I ask you this: How long before they come for you?

  2. I think it's awesome. by Dins · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just downloaded the app. It lets you listen in on various different college campuses in case your area is boring (it is). I did a brief, extremely unscientific survey of a few colleges, and I didn't see anything specifically racist, homophobic or whatever. What I saw was college kids being college kids.

    Sure you're going to see a little bit of everything because there's a little bit of everything in society. I didn't see anything too bad, but I'm sure it's there. Political correctness and people trying to censor stuff like this are the problem. This is no different than a local (physical) bulletin board.

  3. False premise... by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Colleges are largely powerless to deal with the havoc Yik Yak is wreaking." This assumes that Yik Yak is wreaking havoc. So far, the article itself does not even give any real example to 'havoc' being wreaked by Yik Yak. This whole article can be summed up by "A new disruptive way of anonymous communication is catching on amongst college students. Naturally, a bunch of Orwellian-type people are worried about their lack of control over it." Further, if any actual violence happens because it was first announced on Yik Yak, it would be no different than if actual violence happened because it was announced via email, Facebook, or someone yelling and screaming it at a crowd.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  4. Randomness by Andy+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The trouble with Yik Yak is that you're hostage to other people's whims, and this app seems to attract people that prefer negativity. I tried a little experiment -- I posted one "funny" comment, one positive comment, and one negative comment. Both the funny and positive comments were quickly down-voted to -5 and removed, whereas the negative comment was up-voted and quickly became the most popular yak in my area. Most of the other top-rated yaks are people moaning about the town, the people, the night life, etc. Usually by the time you see a nice / positive yak it's already at -3 or -4 and when you refresh the list it's gone. I deleted the app.