Slashdot Mirror


Major Museums Start Banning Selfie Sticks

An anonymous reader shares these articles about museums banning the dreaded selfie stick. "Selfie sticks, the logical 'extension' of an already irksome activity, were recently banned in Premier League soccer stadiums. Now museums around the world are starting to do the same over worries of accidental damage to artwork. The Smithsonian barred their use effective last week as a 'preventative measure to protect visitors and museum objects,' especially on crowded days. Meanwhile, a formal ban is pending at Versailles palace and Centre Pompidou in France, and visitors are now being told to stow their sticks by guards at the Louvre. Both Pompidou and the Louvre will continue to allow regular photography and selfies."

21 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Sure about the Louvre? by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On my visits there, I remember signs prohibiting photography...not that anybody paid any attention to them.

    It's been a while...maybe it was just flash photography.

    1. Re:Sure about the Louvre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, it's just flash. If you use flash, guards will tell you to not-do-that-again. Otherwise everyone walks around photographing.

    2. Re:Sure about the Louvre? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For museums in general, it depends on the exhibit and whether or not the works have been copyrighted. If so, no photography of any kind is allowed. For the Louvre, it seems like most exhibits should allow photography, although not necessarily flash. Even so, it seems like flash photography may not harm paintings after all...

      http://www.arthistorynews.com/...

    3. Re:Sure about the Louvre? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Harm to art or not, flash photography is also annoying. That is another reason for not allowing it in museums where people go to actually appreciate the artwork and would prefer to not be strobe lit all the time.

    4. Re:Sure about the Louvre? by mrbene · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The "I don't speak French" tactic was what my dad and I used when I visited a couple of decades ago. I seem to remember it being no flash photography at that time, as well.

      It was a legitimate language barrier. We later had a heck of a time getting our taxi driver to stop so that we could hop out and see the Shuttle being ferried over Paris on a big plane. Once he understood, he seemed rather happy that we had.

  2. Good Luck by coop247 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We visited the Sistene Chapel and the tour stops right outside the room and the guide is very clear "Be quiet and absolutely no flash photography" and then you walk in and its absolutely packed with people being loud and taking flash pictures.

    --
    //TODO: Insert catchy phrase
    1. Re:Good Luck by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      same with the statue of David. they should just make fake art for some of these museums that can be damaged by photos and save the real thing

  3. Re:"Dreaded"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who have to deal with a lot of them in moderately crowded spaces with multiple millions of dollars' worth of precious, irreplaceable, objects on display (objects that they are employed to protect), that's who.

  4. Selfies... by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now there is an illness that needs a custom disease to wipe out those who take them...

  5. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was in the Louvre last year, I was amazed at what was going on in front of the Mona Lisa. Most people had their backs to it.

    There were more people preoccupied with getting a photograph of themselves in front of it than there were people looking at the damn thing.

    Same story at Venus de Milo statue.

    An observation that I made (and this is nothing more than an observation) is that everyone wielding a selfie stick and not looking at the art was Asian.

    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In my experience, when visiting historic items of this nature, you have 30-60 seconds to stand in its presence, before getting crowded out, or being asked to move along. Why not get a photo of you and your friends to capture the moment? It is not like you are going to close enough, or the time to study it in any significant way. For better or worse, it is more about the journey than the destination.

    2. Re:Good. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would you waste time looking at the real Mona Lisa when you've seen it everywhere since you were a kid?

      You've seen reproductions. At best, printed photographs. It's not the same thing. Which, incidentally, is why taking a selfie with it exactly misses the point.

    3. Re:Good. by mean+pun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which, incidentally, is why taking a selfie with it exactly misses the point.

      Perhaps for you, but selfies are proof you've been somewhere. That's why I call them evidence photos. For the people in question collecting this evidence may have been the point. Just like the souvenirs that tourists and pilgrims have been taking home for thousands of years.

    4. Re:Good. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've seen reproductions. At best, printed photographs. It's not the same thing.

      Indeed. In comparison with how close you can get in the Louvre, the prints have a lot more discernible detail than the original...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Re:"Dreaded"? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is, People take shittons more photos now than they used to. The reasons are obvious. Moden technology has enabled cheap photography- where it wasn't too long ago that you had to bring around extra equipment, rolls of film, then get them developed, or even just the fact that SD cards were limiting. Now I can take more photos than I Have time to review- but that is the problem. People are spending more time taking pictures and less time actually experiencing life because of the status, The Facebook status. People aren't making memory books, they are trying to show their friends they are cool and hip and whatever.

  7. Re:Plans to 3D print a selfie stick? by SomeWhiteGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like the idea of the 3D printer mainly because I have 2 small kids and a dog, so toys are broken or chewed quite often. Being able to print new parts and figures overnight as a treat is a nice idea. My problem is the $4k price tag on one plus the plastics and other work once printed. I like it being popular because more and more things are being made for the hobby, but I'd like the demand to come down, and the price for the basics to get started.

  8. Priorities by Andy+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Selfie sticks, the only thing that can rival drones in their speed of being banned.

  9. Selfies are just a logical extension.... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... of asking somebody else to take a picture of you at some location.

    Some would argue that they have the added benefit of not requiring you to actually be in any way sociable with those around you.

    1. Re:Selfies are just a logical extension.... by Wycliffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your selfie stick is a lot less likely to run away with your phone than that oh-so-honest person you asked to take a picture of you in Italy.

      The odds of another tourist stealing your camera when you ask them to take a picture is pretty much 0%.
      The odds of a someone (especially a poor local) who asks YOU if you would them to take a picture of you
      stealing your camerais pretty much 100%. This is the same advice I give my kids. If you get lost, don't
      wait for someone to approach you, instead walk up to the first person you see and ask for help. Most people
      are normal law abiding citizens, if you play the odds and pick someone randomly then your chances of getting
      a criminal are very small. If instead you let them approach you then they are picking you which makes the
      odds of them being a criminal considerably higher.

  10. Good riddaance by EmagGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at the Museum of Natural History in DC a few weeks ago and got hit in the face more than once with those stupid things. I complained to the curator's office before I left, and I'm glad I'm apparently not alone in doing so.

    Nobody's going to run off with your camera. Just ask someone nearby to take a photo of you.

  11. Rightly so... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Informative
    The purpose of a museum is to showcase the exhibits of the museum, not the visitors of the museum.

    .