Slashdot Mirror


Strange Stars Pulse To the Golden Mean

An anonymous reader sends this excerpt from an article at Quanta Magazine: What struck John Learned about the blinking of KIC 5520878, a bluish-white star 16,000 light-years away, was how artificial it seemed. Learned, a neutrino physicist at the University of Hawaii, Mnoa, has a pet theory that super-advanced alien civilizations might send messages by tickling stars with neutrino beams, eliciting Morse code-like pulses. "It's the sort of thing tenured senior professors can get away with," he said. The pulsations of KIC 5520878, recorded recently by NASA's Kepler telescope, suggested that the star might be so employed.

A "variable" star, KIC 5520878 brightens and dims in a six-hour cycle, seesawing between cool-and-clear and hot-and-opaque. Overlaying this rhythm is a second, subtler variation of unknown origin; this frequency interplays with the first to make some of the star's pulses brighter than others. In the fluctuations, Learned had identified interesting and, he thought, possibly intelligent sequences, such as prime numbers (which have been floated as a conceivable basis of extraterrestrial communication). He then found hints that the star's pulses were chaotic. But when Learned mentioned his investigations to a colleague, William Ditto, last summer, Ditto was struck by the ratio of the two frequencies driving the star's pulsations. "I said, 'Wait a minute, that's the golden mean.'"

37 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Wild guess, 5 stars by emacs_abuser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wikipedia says the golden ratio is related to 5 sided figures (pentagrams).

    Clearly, we're seeing 5 stars in mutual orbit.

    Yeah, wild guess.

    1. Re:Wild guess, 5 stars by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Clearly, we're seeing 5 stars in mutual orbit.

      With a six hour orbit?

      Yeah, wild guess.

      Very wild. The aliens are more plausible.

    2. Re:Wild guess, 5 stars by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Wikipedia says the golden ratio is related to 5 sided figures (pentagrams).

      Clearly, we're seeing 5 stars in mutual orbit.

      Quite clearly, we've found the gateway to Hell* if we're finding pentagrams in space. What in the world would make you think it had anything to do with stars?

      * Not to be confused with the Door to Hell

    3. Re:Wild guess, 5 stars by invictusvoyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The golden ratio has been observed in nature , in flowers etc . It could be a natural occurrence . One thing is for sure , the star must be one beautiful star .

    4. Re:Wild guess, 5 stars by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      As the next paragraph from the article would have explained, had it not been arbitrarily excluded from the copy-paste summary.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  2. Ok That's Pretty Freaky by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But this is sort of thing that was the reason behind all the early mathematicians being batshit crazy. Math is man's model of the universe and it's always been a good enough model that you start discovering all sorts of stuff in math that exactly mirrors the world around us. You start to think maybe there's some hidden power there, that maybe math can predict everything. Then you form a cult and start attracting followers and have to be put down by the government of the time. Er, or something. And that's just some one-trick hack with a lever or a screw or something. Imagine what would have happened if one of those guys had stumbled across hyperbolic geometry. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it was a very nice lever, but it didn't even go into the 4th dimension! I mean... er... what were we talking about again?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Ok That's Pretty Freaky by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pi (film), 1998

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Yeah, I'm a fan of Darren Aronofsky

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Ok That's Pretty Freaky by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Informative

      The difference between Pi and the golden ratio is that the golden ratio isn't transcendental, it's just irrational. In fact, you can state Phi perfectly as (1 + sqrt(5)) / 2.

      Yeah, I'm a fan of Darren Aronofsky

      He should pay his PAs better.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  3. Still marveling at by turning+in+circles · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It's the sort of thing tenured professors can get away with." I'm thinking I need to rethink my career path right away and become a tenured professor.

    --
    Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
    1. Re:Still marveling at by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whoa, dude. Tenured professor? I dunno, maybe you should aim for something more achievable -- like, an astronaut, or a world-famous basketball star.

      I'm only exaggerating a little. :b

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Still marveling at by symes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being a tenured prof facilitates blue sky thinking, but you are still expected to do all that other stuff such as sit on endless committees, do proper research, teach people, write papers and bring in research money. It is not all fairy lights and golden means!

  4. I don't get it by fisted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't the only noteworthy thing about the golden ration that it appears so often in our world? So what's surprising about it showing up in a different location of the same world?

    1. Re:I don't get it by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what's surprising about it showing up in a different location of the same world?

      It shows up in biological systems that are fractal, such as the spiral of a pine cone, or the distance between branches on a tree. But there is nothing (that we know of) that is fractal about a star.

      Btw, for an excellent introduction to the Golden Ratio, watch Donald Duck in Mathematics Land.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Livius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But there is nothing (that we know of) that is fractal about a star.

      Nothing that we know of... yet.

    3. Re:I don't get it by RJFerret · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually most systems are chaotic, not like this star, or the other stars also exhibiting this behavior. In fact researchers had been seeking such behavior somewhere, and produced it in a lab just to see it happen at all.

      One theory is that it's inherent stability is the result of self selection.

      I just skimmed the article as nighttime reading so forgive (and correct) misinterpretations please.

    4. Re:I don't get it by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Aliens with gigantic neutrino cannons is the obvious answer.

      Having said that, chaotic systems are often statistically very stable, mathematically a stable non-linear system is known as a strange attractor, a strange attractor is always a fractal. The golden ratio pops up in all sorts of fractals, especially spirals.
      It's said that our own sun has at least two internal spiraling magnetic fields that "wind themselves up into knots" for the peak of the 11yr sunspot cycle. Who said it I don't recall, but it wasn't the "electric universe" guy. ;)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  5. Non-Falsifiability by dorpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Similar claims have been made about how human anatomy allegedly conforms to mathematical constants. But when we make actual measurements of individuals, nobody fits the constants perfectly. What is the allowed margin of error? One can make just about any number be close to some "elegant" mathematical constant -- pi/2, pi^2, e/phi, whatever.

    Similarly, today I just judged a paper about childhood obesity submitted to a scientific journal. Childhood obesity is confounded with low socioeconomic status, so how do we separate the two? Of course, children of lower socioeconomic status have poorer outcomes in terms of health, occupation, and mortality. (Incidentally, the children with the worst outcomes in terms of future health, income, and mortality are the underweight kids who look like walking skeletons. Most scientific papers on obesity exclude that population.)

    1. Re:Non-Falsifiability by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Any machinery only works to a certain precision. The bigger the load (size or whatever) is, the lower is usually the precision. We can shoot electron beams at single atoms and build cranes that lift trucks, but those will never be able to drop those trucks within âengstroms to a target. So not-exactness may be an additional hint for artificial origin.

      Or it may be some more random noise with veeery low frequency.

      --
      bickerdyke
  6. Well it's better than blasting out a radio signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, a radio signal that's readily detectable by primitive civilizations like ours, assumedely the only reason to blast out a fantastically strong signal at all in all directions instead of a tightbeam, would take more energy than all of human civilization produces slammed into one radio transmitter just to be "heard" as it were. A huge engineering product just to say "Hello World" or "Hello Galaxy" as it were.

    On the other hand, we already look at stars as it is, and all they do is blast out radiation. If you could fluctuate it to a noticeable degree that would save a lot of energy versus actually producing all that energy yourself, and besides all the energy being flung out by the star is going to be lost as it is. Might as well use it for something.

  7. I propose a law by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A species that advertises its existence to the unknown is not an intelligent species.

    1. Re:I propose a law by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      As a general rule of thumb, a less intelligent thing does not possess the means to understand a more intelligent thing. Since anything with the ability to manipulate a star is clearly more intelligent than us, it would be foolish to even think you are in a position to judge their intelligence level.

    2. Re:I propose a law by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You presume that their reasons for doing so are benevolent.

      After all, species which have the ability to first of all see these stars and secondly understand their meaning are probably going to head in that direction as soon as they can, meaning they're young and not very scientifically advanced compared to a civilisation that can manipulate stars on an almost unimaginable scale. Scout ships get captured, their source traced, and rival civilisations extinguished in their infancy.

      It could be a megaengineered honey trap.

  8. One Conclusion by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

    That even with the ability to change a star's energy levels, that that civilization does not have FTL, yet.

  9. Re:Not too bad by TheDarkener · · Score: 2

    The golden ratio is connected to the Fibonacci sequence

    Thanks, I was about to say the same thing =p

    So I'm kind of surprised that this is thought of as coming from extraterrestial intelligence at all.

    That's what got me so excited, but then I realized it was just another manifestation of what already occurs in our universe all the time (golden mean, Fibonacci sequence). Doesn't rule out that ETs are using it for communication though - it's obviously caught OUR attention and interest, no? ;)

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  10. Thermodynamics of Stars by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    We are still trying to understand, model and measure the variables in Solar/Star processes. It is not surprising that variable star's energy producing systems have similar cycles to my way of thinking. You can imagine superimposing two sine waves of different frequencies that could yield a golden mean ratio.

  11. Sacred Geometry in action by TheDarkener · · Score: 2

    At first I was completely astonished that yet another (seemingly) natural phenomenon is related to the Golden Mean. It was a major epiphany in my mid-20's how nature follows the rule of irrationality, which still follows a pattern, and not simply rational numbers. It's sacred geometry in action.

    The more I read, the more I realised that this is 'just another' verification of what I realized about nature and our universe. It's everywhere.. the design of snail shells, seashells, seed patterns in Sunflowers and so many other plant formations, spiral galaxy formations (Fibonacci spiral!), and now star illumination patterns. It's everywhere. It's a key to helping understand the nature of reality. Thanks for posting this!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Sacred Geometry in action by Rick+in+China · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You may like to pick up and learn something of Cellular Automata, if you're astonished by and interested in the relationships between math and nature, it may help provide some concepts that fold the two together in extremely interesting ways.

    2. Re:Sacred Geometry in action by TheDarkener · · Score: 2

      You said, Nature follows the rules of mathematics.. NOT sacred geometry.

      I am giving the example in which nature follows sacred geometry (the Fib. sequence is related to sacred geometry, as in the Golden Ratio). No doubt sacred geometry is considered part of "mathematics". It's ok, I'll just assume you haven't had your coffee yet. ;)

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  12. Not really by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Neutrino beams used for stellar morse code does sound a bit desperate.

    Neutrino beams used on otherwise useless stars to serve as beacons doesn't, though.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Not really by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      If you really want to know if it's aliens figure out what stars brightening in that pattern would be useful for outside of signalling. Saying "I'm here" might be reasonable if neutrino beams and stars get cheap but doing something useful is more likely to get funded earlier.

      Yes and no. The most obvious pattern, just general brightening, might be the beacon, and a more subtle pattern, perhaps just in a few element lines changing or some other kind of modulation than amplitude could carry further information. But, if space travel is as difficult as it appears to be, with a single light year being a temporal and energetic obstacle to all the biology we know about, it could still simply be "you're not alone out there."

      On top of that, you're making an assumption that the source would be limited by a capitalist economy. It could be an economy of plenty, where there are enough resources for its constituents to do pretty much whatever they want. It might be something else entirely, like a military undertaking, or simply an experiment.

      From our perspective, as we can't get there or communicate with them, if this is an artificial signal, we benefit simply by knowing we are not alone; we could, potentially, benefit from more detailed information, but as they don't know who or what they are talking to nor the extant circumstances, what benefits they could offer seem to me to be very difficult to present... without context, what do you say? If anything, I anticipate more math.

      Given lots of materials resources, brightness modulation can be set up without high technology involved in the actual signaling. The initial cost would be high, but there would be almost no maintainance costs. Just set up a an orbiting series of spinning disks at considerable remove (deep space, slow orbit) from the source star. Into the disks, punch some large holes. As the disks spin, anyone looking at them will see a series of flashes as the star is occluded, then not. They would probably line the orbit up with the plane of the galaxy so the most potential worlds could be in line with the effect. The cost would seem to be staggering, but again, we have no reason to assume they don't have access to sufficient raw materials, automated workforces and manufacturing, and any amount of time you care to speculate on.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  13. Neither do I... by robbak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Golden ratios emerge wherever you have a relationship of T(n)=T(n-1) + T(n-2). Where the first two terms are 0 and 1, you have fibonacci numbers: but no matter what your starting numbers are, the ratio between T(n) and T(n-1) will approach phi (as demonstrated with 'brady numbers').

    So it is not at all surprising that phi might crop up in seemingly strange places.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  14. Not much of a coincidence by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The two numbers Phi and Pi are actually related by trigonometry, so it is hardly surprising that they would show up in a ratio concerning the rotation of stars.

    If you divide a circle into 5 sections of 2*Pi/5 each you will get the five points of a pentagon, whose dimensions are all based on phi relationships [i.e. the Golden Mean]. Thus one can state:

    2 * cos (Pi / 5) = Phi or
    2 * sin (Pi / 5) = sqrt ( 3 - Phi )

    or even better:

    Pi = 5 arccos (Phi / 2)

    that is,

    Phi = 1 - 2 * cos (3 * Pi / 5)

    So it is not entirely strange that the simple harmonic motion of a star could be expressed as some ratio of Phi.

    It's all numbers, numbers all the way down.

  15. Modulating the star energy production won't do. by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 2

    Even if it is possible, the energy still has hundreds or thousands of years to reach the surface. Killing all the "high" frequencies in the process.

  16. Contact! by aglider · · Score: 3, Informative

    An already seen movie
    Besides that, I just noticed that it's a 6+ years old article.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  17. He must be right by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    He seems to be coming from a long line of Learned men.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  18. Pulsars by gatkinso · · Score: 2

    Were they not also deemed as artificial at one point?

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  19. Re:Well it's better than blasting out a radio sign by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

    If you could fluctuate the luminosity of a star to announce your presence, then it would make more sense to make it flash prime numbers. Or encode such a message by varying the frequency, or by stopping and starting the device that produces the effect. Well, maybe they are doing just that, and I suppose that a pulsing star or the machine that makes it pulse doesn't exactly stop on a dime, so it may be worth keeping an eye on that thing for a couple of years, and watch for changes.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...