Slashdot Mirror
Twitter Will Ban Revenge Porn and Non-consensual Nudes
AmiMoJo writes: Twitter has changed its rules to state it will forbid users from posting revenge porn and non-consensual nudes on its service. In the private information section of the site's policy list, the company added that users "may not post intimate photos or videos that were taken or distributed without the subject's consent." Twitter seemed to indicate that it would use some combination of automated and manual checks to decide whether a reported post is revenge porn or not before removing the post. "We will ask a reporting user to verify that he or she is the individual in question in content alleged to be violating our policy and to confirm that the photo or video in question was posted without consent." There will be an appeal process too.
In February, reddit made a similar rules change after the site was embroiled in controversy for allowing the posting of stolen nude celebrity photos in 2014. Banning "involuntary pornography," reddit urged victims to e-mail the site with details so administrators could remove the offending posts.
In February, reddit made a similar rules change after the site was embroiled in controversy for allowing the posting of stolen nude celebrity photos in 2014. Banning "involuntary pornography," reddit urged victims to e-mail the site with details so administrators could remove the offending posts.
Dudes, if you think this policy is oppressing YOU, you need to rethink your lives...
How do they prove it if the face is censored or missing?
Will they start by taking down all of those naked pictures of that poor blue bird?
Not quite. They only banned the practice for females(in practice). Males who petition to have their pictures to be removed have been ignored. SC2 streamer Destiny posted earlier this week about how reddit refuses to take down his leaked revenge nudes(which are still stored on reddit's servers as someone with a particular beef with Destiny has added the images to a custom CSS for a subreddit) and refuses to discipline those that continually post it.
This is similar to Gawker's avid posting of Hulk Hogan's stolen sextape versus their denouncement and refusal to host images of the leaked female celebrity nudes, known as the Fappening.
First reddit falls, and now twitter. The censorship brought on by the feminist menace has to be fought here and fought now, before the internet turns into some sort of PC "wimminspace".
So, what our options? Going on to TOR? I2P?
Chan's aren't an option, for obvious reasons -so post your suggestions in this thread.
The involuntary part if fairly straight forward. But isn't posting voluntary pornography at least as risky? How do you apply local community standards to the internet?
And who uses twitter? That is probably a greater offense.
God damn it Anita, stop down-modding while the big boys are talking. Stupid feminists!
Could it be that in one case, it was celebrity photos, and quite high risk getting hit by a horde of lawyers?
I recently posted a non-consensual photo of my newborn daughter, taken as she was brought out of the womb. Everybody congratulated us (for the baby, and for the photo, which was a great shot ;-) ).
I somehow doubt Twitter would have an issue with her image.
When they are at it they will also provide a free service to lock all the barn doors. In fact it will be automated. Any time anyone lodges a police complaint about their horses being stolen, twitter see the complaint in FBI database in real time, and it will spring into action and send shock troopers to lock the doors of their barns as soon as possible.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
I didn't think it was real. Can someone post a link to tons of amateur yumminess? Surely someone has collected this shit.
Maybe he's Ferengi?
There was a time when nicer words than either were used.
Hmm... Revenge porn you said? Do you have sample links?
Does this mean troll extraordinaire AmiMojo will be banned from posting sick, perverted shit like:
"You filthy slut, how dare you cum without my permission. Maybe I should gag that pretty mouth on my dick until tears are rolling down your face, or tie you up, blind fold you, and use your little ass all night (and deny that wet pussy completely, I don't think you've earned it). I'll have to decide when I get my hands on you, but don't think being far away makes you exempt from punishment either. You can expect your orders shortly."
More here.
Twitter - come for the banality, stay for the censorship!
Sugartits?
You seriously need to learn what "liberals" means. It is not a generic curse, like "asshole" or "fuckwad". It has actual meaning. Your constant misuse of it makes you look ignorant.
So, subjects in photographs other than the rightsholder now have veto power over when those works are displayed? We're just a couple court cases for anyone tagged in an unflattering Facebook photo to demand it be deleted from the Internet entirely, not just untagged.
Twitter should have a way to disable picture tweets altogether. One main reason I left facebook was the meme spam.
God spoke to me
The cover-up didn't work.
The week-long gaming press news blackout and ongoing user comment/forum censorship (in former free-speech strongholds such as 4chan and Reddit, no less) didn't work.
The coordinated, ongoing smear campaign that began with the "Gamers are Over" articles hasn't worked.
The doxxing and harassment of pro-GG folks hasn't worked.
The endless train of embarrassingly desperate counter-hashtags hasn't worked.
The Wikipedia and Nightline hit pieces only damage those outlets' credibility for short-term effect.
The SVU episode . . . hahaahhahaha WOW, where do I even begin . . . it is progapanda that couldn't be more precisely crafted to the corrupt press's specifications (i.e. "narrative"), and broadcast to a national non-gamer audience, much of which likely accepted it as reality. It was a wake-up call to quite a few previously unaware or neutral parties, especially game devs*.
Eurogamer is the latest games journalism site to update its ethics policy in the wake of Gamergate, joining PC Gamer, IGN, the Escapist, and of course Kotaku/Gawker (though in Gawker's case, they put up more of a fight and the Gamergate pressure to be ethical had to be routed through the FTC). And there are probably more I'm forgetting.
Gamergate also got Brad Wardell (CEO of Stardock) some long-overdue apologies for hit pieces run against him:
https://twitter.com/iamDavidWi...
http://www.gamepolitics.com/20...
http://www.zenofdesign.com/in-...
Ask yourself how much of this you've seen reported in the corrupt media (which at this point, sadly, clearly includes Slashdot). Of course none of it ever had a chance of appearing in the Wikipedia article. Nothing enrages anti-Gamergaters more than someone covering both sides of the story, and that should tell you something.
Their side thrives only in an environment of propaganda and censorship, and evaporates when faced with integrity and transparency. They prove the need for Gamergate every time they write an article based on the assumption that terrorism and child porn^W^W^W^W misogyny and harassment have become the root passwords to the Constitution^W^W journalistic ethics.
* like Mark Kern and Ken Levine, who had nothing to do with Gamergate, but were so disgusted by the SVU episode that they publically called on the gaming press to stop slandering gamers. Both were instantly swarmed by anti-GG on twitter, and VG24/7 ran a hit piece on Kern without even getting his side of the story, and refused even after he specifically asked them. I think Eurogamer saw exactly what happened to Kern, and it's no accident that that their policy explicitly includes a "right of reply" (perhaps a subtle message that they won't similarly treat game devs like shit).
I reported a tweet that was posted containing a picture of my personal information including my address.
About 6 months later I got a reply saying they had removed the picture and banned the user.
Kinda helpful I guess?
You seriously need to learn what "liberals" means. It is not a generic curse, like "asshole" or "fuckwad". It has actual meaning. Your constant misuse of it makes you look ignorant.
If it's not a generic curse... you're saying it's a specific one?
basically the law says you don't need peoples consent to take their photos. you can take their photos on the streets and in public areas. you can take photos all you want most of the time in your private residents. you don't need their permission to take a picture of them. also you are the owner of the content and basically have the copyright, so that means you should own it and be able to give your permission where it can and cannot be used.
the person in the photo should not have any say unless they have ownership of it and they are attempting to enforce their ownership/copyright.
this revenge porn stuff is retarded also because the act of photography is 1st amendment protected. and this shit is just trying to censor stuff and limit peoples 1st amendment freedoms to do with what they want with photos and videos of things.
obamasweapon.com
> basically the law says you don't need peoples consent to take their photos. you can take their photos on the streets and in public areas.
I am not sure if that's true.
Years ago, I took some undergraduate law classes. According to what I was taught at the time: "if it's public, you can't call it private." Anything out the public was fair game.
Today, I think there are laws about photographing police, even laws about photographing national monuments.
While it could be a coincidence, but it seems that these policies seem to share too many similarities in timing and direction.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.