Slashdot Mirror


A Mars One Finalist Speaks Out On the "Dangerously Flawed" Project

superboj writes Dr Joseph Roche is one of the finalists to go on Mars One's much-hyped mission to the Red Planet. And yet he says he's never had an in-person interview, had to organize his own physical exam, was only tested on prepared questions, and is being encouraged to give more and more money to the group. That's why he's decided to quit.

169 comments

  1. It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, and many others, have been saying this was a scam from the start. It's not "dangerously flawed", because there will be no voyage. They're just preying on dreamers.

    1. Re:It's a scam by kelarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey, go die on (or en route to) Mars, what could possibly be flawed about that plan?

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    2. Re:It's a scam by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

      Duh! What part of "is being encouraged to give more and more money to the group" gives that away?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    3. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A fool and his money are easily parted -- and while it stinks that people are having to learn this the hard way, again, that's not the worst of it. No, the reaping of this bullshit seed will be when legitimate private industry actually seeks funding for space travel: "Mars One" will forever be referenced as the primary example of how "all" such ventures are "scams." This three-ring-circus will ultimately set back manned space exploration by decades, all in the name of profit.

      Frankly, I think the perpetrators, once proven to be the fraudsters that they are, should be dragged out into the street and shot for crimes against humanity, in the most earnest sense of the phrase.

    4. Re:It's a scam by Flavianoep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I, and many others, have been saying this was a scam from the start. It's not "dangerously flawed", because there will be no voyage. They're just preying on dreamers.

      It's easy to join the "told you so" bandwagon if you are an AC.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    5. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! What part of "is being encouraged to give more and more money to the group" gives that away?

      Did you know that before this article? He's talking about earlier, Mr. "Duh".

    6. Re:It's a scam by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, calling it 'dangerously' flawed is a bit much. 'pathetically' flawed might be closer. Outside some bank accounts and embarrassment, this will probably not injure anyone.

    7. Re:It's a scam by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Without the obligation to return them to Earth, they'll pretty much be considered disposable astronauts.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    8. Re:It's a scam by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

      Yea I knew it before the article. The "application fee" was pretty much a dead give away. What more proof? I bet that you don't know anybody that applied and wasn't selected as one of the 100 finalists and then hit up for more money.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    9. Re:It's a scam by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Duh! What part of "is being encouraged to give more and more money to the group" gives that away?

      Wait... Scientologists are going to Mars???

    10. Re:It's a scam by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      "Outside some bank accounts ...."

      "Outside of some bank accounts" is pretty much the same qualification that could be made for almost any scam that doesn't involve providing defective products. In this case there will clearly never be any "trip to Mars", so your statement is correct, but that does not make it any less of a scam.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    11. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I posted as AC because I'm at work and can't be bothered to log in. If I were going for the "told you so" angle, don't you think I'd want that associated with my identity?

      The only reason I posted at all, is that whenever this came up years ago, all the people calling it a scam were modded down, while the people comparing it to the Mayflower or Columbus were at +5 Insightful.

      Go back and look at the old threads if you don't believe me. It's amazing how many people were falling for it.

    12. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm at work

      It's easy to join the 'I have a job' bandwagon if you are an AC.

    13. Re:It's a scam by doc+d'X · · Score: 1

      It's not just that it's a scam, but that it's so obviously a scam. It has been disturbing to me that so much of the media parroted unquestioningly their press releases. Someday someone will go to Mars, but not anyone involved with Mars One. Not noway, not nohow.

    14. Re:It's a scam by MouseR · · Score: 1

      I'd gladly give my life for a one-way trip for at least the guarantee of take-off and journey to Mars. Safe landing would be a bonus.

      Jackpot would be a safe landing, lawn chair, 6-pack of beer fed through tube in the space suit.

      Extra points for some days of stay and "science" work or prep work for the next round.

    15. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      updated Kerbal Space Program Job Application

      Please indicate your level of the following qualities:
      - Courage 1-10
      - Stupidity 1-10
      - Disposable Income 1-10

    16. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! What part of "is being encouraged to give more and more money to the group" gives that away?

      Sounds like a church. Like that guy who's trying to get his church members to 'donate' money to buy a new $65million Gulfstream G650 jet.

    17. Re:It's a scam by idontgno · · Score: 2

      You didn't read TFS.

      There are no points for any of that. There are only points for raising money for their "non-profit foundation". (Yes, those are scare quotes.)

      It's like the hellish offspring of a multilevel marketing scheme and a particularly unscrupulous Kickstarter campaign.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    18. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait... Scientologists are going to Mars???

      Where can I donate money to that mission?

    19. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, watch out!
      We have an elitist over here.
      I'm sure you get off to posting on /. with a name like some sort of hard-core MF.

    20. Re:It's a scam by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Did read. Just saying, I would for a serious chance of at least making the trip.

    21. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strength 15
      Dexterity 18
      Intelligence 14
      Wisdom 12
      Constitution 14
      Charisma 17
      Money: 2 pp, 183 gp, 23 sp, 15 cp
      Encumbrance: 40

      Chaotic Neutral fighter/thief/monk reporting for Mars duty, broseph.

    22. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chaotic Neutral? Oh, fuck you. Fuck you in the face with a frying pan.

    23. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to jump on the "I'm not an elitist" bandwagon if you post as AC.

    24. Re:It's a scam by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Because "It's a scam" is so much more transparent and less cowardly than "AC"...? Says me! :)

    25. Re:It's a scam by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Except you left out your actual level noob! With that much money either you had a rich daddy, or you've actually killed a few rich daddies in the back alleys of...Waterdeep.

    26. Re:It's a scam by gweihir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like any good scam, this one offers something that some people want so badly that the little fact that the ones offering it cannot actually deliver gets overlooked. This works always the same, be it a Ponzi-scheme, political campaign promises, magic "health" products, etc. There is even research that shows that a certain percentage of the population (something like 10% or so) has a mental disability, where they lose all reason when something they want is offered to them.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    27. Re:It's a scam by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's a poser - monks must be lawful. And that multi-class combo never existed in any *real* D&D campaign setting! What a nub.

    28. Re:It's a scam by khallow · · Score: 1

      Called it. Now admittedly, I wasn't sure it was a scam till late last year, but I always strongly suspected it wasn't a serious project.

    29. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Understandable. I'm surprised at all the nay-sayers regarding manned Mars missions. People die from far more pointless endeavors every day (bungie jumping off a bridge, anyone?). If someone wants to take a one-way trip to Mars and end up in the history books, I say go for it!

    30. Re:It's a scam by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Anything for Jehova's Witnesses? I'd like to see them trying to wake people up on Sunday mornings

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    31. Re:It's a scam by plopez · · Score: 1

      I'd clear them for that mission any day

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    32. Re:It's a scam by cmdahler · · Score: 1

      That's about like crowing "called it" on reading a headline that says "Rossi's E-Cat Proven A Hoax".

    33. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, they are going straight to Xenu's birthplace. Not even stopping on Mars for a bbq party with Musk.

    34. Re:It's a scam by khallow · · Score: 1

      The original poster seemed to think differently. I don't know why.

    35. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were going for the "told you so" angle

      For god's fucking sake, that OBVIOUSLY EXACTLY what you were doing, you preening superior cunt.

    36. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see. Another one of those "I'm never wrong, and I'll keep twisting until you believe that" people.

    37. Re:It's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, go die on (or en route to) Mars, what could possibly be flawed about that plan?

      The flaw with that plan is that the one-way-astronaut's money and other resources are still on earth, possibly gifted to relatives and charities. The flaw will be solved if the foundation can manage to get hold of all that the astronaught won't need any more.

    38. Re: It's a scam by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      It's only a scam if the intention was to defraud or deceive. I don't think that applies here. It's been an opportunity to put the idea out there and see who gets behind it and sorted it with cash. I'm fairly certain that if they were on target to raising the funds we would see concrete things happening. It was always outrageously ambitious. Good on them for trying. But this is perhaps also an example of how private operations are relatively weak compared to governments.... Who do the heavy lifting everywhere. Governments are edging toward a Mars mission. The US$3 trillion Bush flushed down the toilet in Iraq would have been more than enough.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    39. Re:It's a scam by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I, and many others, have been saying this was a scam from the start. It's not "dangerously flawed", because there will be no voyage. They're just preying on dreamers.

      I make a point to make this comment every time I see a story about this. The number of people from all across the internet that jump on me and freak out is insane. Mars One is a cult.

    40. Re:It's a scam by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      I'd gladly give my life for a one-way trip for at least the guarantee of take-off and journey to Mars.

      Why? It's not like you'd be able to sit back and reminisce about it afterwards.

    41. Re:It's a scam by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      [......] I say go for it!

      Except there's no chance of it going anywhere.

    42. Re:It's a scam by magarity · · Score: 1

      There's no way anyone who believes Mars One is for real can have a wisdom over 5.

    43. Re:It's a scam by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you like your parting words to be "thanks for all the fish" rather than "ergh"?

    44. Re:It's a scam by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      I won't care at all once i'm dead!

  2. Old news by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people who follow space stuff already know that Mars One is either a scam or simply delusional... although I suppose it's nice that other people are starting to notice this too.

    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of the current Mars projects are just pie in the sky media stunts.

      It is going to cost well over a trillion to set up a colony there - probably a few trillion.

      Private investors won't do it because there is no way to recoup their investment. Does anyone actually think they'll recoup that money with space tourism? Any minerals or other resources that may be found there would be just too cost prohibitive to bring back - with current technology.

      And spending all that money for a one way trip for scientists to do what? Do some sort of experiments then die off?

      What a waste of resources.

      And we can forget about governments doing any of this - even a manned mission.

      Now, I am going to resist the urge to look up all the money - over a trillion dollars - that has been dumped into that sandpit called the Middle East. What a sad sick society we live in where spending money on space is looked upon with derision and going to war over bullshit is met with plenty of support.

      I miss the times when science and space were the coolest things to do and the best way to humble your enemy.

    2. Re:Old news by CODiNE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe it's like in the movie Contact there's a secret base out there they've managed to build without anybody noticing and they're just saving it up for the surprise reveal!

      But probably not.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    3. Re:Old news by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The guy that did that already had his own money to do it with..

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Old news by jythie · · Score: 1

      What would be nice is if media was more critical of such scams. It kinda seems like when their core audience is excited about something they avoid questioning it.

      I am also thinking back to that scam artist who got a bunch of media attention for 'finding' flight MH370 a while back by using magic xray film. Got time on CNN and everything, even though even basic journalism should have led them to ignore the guy. I have yet to see media outlets going over how wrong he was, they just sorta dropped it and pretended they were never supportive of him. I suspect a similiar thing goes on with stuff like Mars One, they either say something nice or nothing at all.

    5. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What blows my mind is that people are only just starting to notice this now?

      The entire Space Nutter mindset is one of delusion, grandiose self-importance and general teenage drama.

    6. Re:Old news by Some_Llama · · Score: 2

      The guy that did that already had his own money to do it with..

      No, they (the gov. in this case) built it by charging 2x more than they needed when the original site was built, aka cooking the books.

        S.R. Hadden: "First rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two at twice the price? Only, this one can be kept secret. Controlled by Americans, built by the Japanese subcontractors. Who, also, happen to be, recently acquired, wholly-owned subsidiaries..."

      S.R. Hadden: [Ellie Arroway:speaks with Hadden] ... of Hadden industries."

      S.R. Hadden: "They still want an American to go, Doctor. Wanna take a ride? "

    7. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think going to Mars to die might be a fun way to go. Plus, it would solve the assisted suicide problem...just put everyone who wants assisted suicide onto a space ship, and light it off into space. You don't have to bother with such niceties as oxygen, food, space suits, radios, etc.

    8. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man!, there should have been a spoiler alert.

      That was on my netflix list for next weekend!

  3. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not surprised it is a joke. Does anyone really think this is going to happen?

  4. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by burtosis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the timeframe and technical aspects of the project I'm guessing its either a pyramid scam or the best pitch for a survivor sequel ever. Only without the happy outcome of the original series.

    1. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by taustin · · Score: 1

      If Survivor had happy endings, it would be an infinitely better show. So would Survivor: Turkish Prison, where every week, a contestant gets voted in front of the firing squad.

      As to Mars, anybody who believed for one moment that NASA was going to participate in sending people to another planet to die is a moron.

    2. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      You are wrong about the reason this particular thing is a scam, one-way trip to Mars, when we do have the tech to accomplish such a thing, is not unthinkable. people who project their own cowardice or philosophy on others are amusing. We already do plenty of things that result in known body count for each percent complete of project.

    3. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by itzly · · Score: 1

      when we do have the tech to accomplish such a thing

      We don't. We don't even know how to land a multi-ton capsule on Mars in one piece.

    4. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Except that nobody that has rockets is going to give the Mars One assholes one of them. Yeah, I know they expect SpaceX to give them a bunch of Falcon Heavys, but why would Elon Musk want to have his name attached to something that is certainly going to kill people? SpaceX already has a NASA contract to put people in orbit, so they will be focusing on that.

      The reason they are assholes is because they know they literally have no chance of literally getting off the ground. It is just a way to suck money out of hopeful people. There is no way they will get enough money to buy a single super heavy lift rocket, let alone dozens of them.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Sadly my humor failed once again. I expect it wouldn't make it past the pilot episode due to a lack of 'survivors'.

    6. Re: Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because governments have never sent people to their deaths before. Ever. Not even one time has that happened.

    7. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      Yes we do, that's trivial. We've done it in one gee field

    8. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      With the timeframe and technical aspects of the project I'm guessing its either a pyramid scam or the best pitch for a survivor sequel ever. Only without the happy outcome of the original series.

      If they actually do produce a "Survivor: Mars", and actually do send a couple dozen reality TV contestants to the Red Planet - I'd consider it a win.

      Maybe, if we're really lucky, they'll include the Kardashians.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by itzly · · Score: 1

      Yes we do, that's trivial. We've done it in one gee field

      But we've never done it in Mars atmosphere. And that's certainly not trivial. The atmosphere is too thin for heat shields and reasonably sized parachutes to have much effect on massive payloads. On the other hand, the atmosphere is thick enough to become really annoying when trying to slow down using a rocket while hypersonic air is slamming straight into the nozzle.

    10. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by taustin · · Score: 1

      Except that nobody that has rockets is going to give the Mars One assholes one of them.

      Give, no. But the Russians will cheerfully sell one to anyone with enough money.

      The reason they are assholes

      I think you misspelled "con artists."

    11. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by taustin · · Score: 1

      Then how about Survivor: Baffin Island. Let's see those bikinis now, bitch.

    12. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      If you can reach orbit from a planet then you can reverse the process and land on a planet. It would require a lot of fuel in mars orbit, and some rocket engines, but that's just money not future tech at work.

    13. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by jandrese · · Score: 2

      This is what I've heard. They're turning the "training" into a reality TV show that's sort of a cross between Survivor and Biosphere 2. One thing they've never put any serious thought into is launching spacecraft or actually traveling to Mars, because that's way too far outside of their capabilities.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    14. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by itzly · · Score: 1

      If you can reach orbit from a planet then you can reverse the process and land on a planet.

      There's still a big difference between airflow going in the same direction as the rocket exhaust gases, or opposite directions.

    15. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      That's still easier, with rockets, than working in Earths. And we can model hypersonic flight with incredible precision these days. These are NOT the issues that stand in the way of manned Mars mission. Radiation, composition of Mar's soil, long term 0.38 g field, resupply, recycling, psychological issues of isolation far from earth...those are the hard problems.

    16. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by Livius · · Score: 1

      The first step will be sending the producers, writers, and all their marketing, legal, and accounting staff.

      We can call it a win at that point.

    17. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Yes we do, that's trivial. We've done it in one gee field

      No more trivial than just getting everybody back to earth with the data and samples. There are lots of tech not developed yet for a manned Mars trip. Long term space habitats for one as the trip there will take a long time. Landing is another as there is not enough air to air brake or parachute an too much to use rockets easily. There are articles on the subject by NASA people out there. That's why there are so many weird landing methods for past Mars missions and once you increase the landing craft to something people can land in, and the issues increase. Even then, any such attempt will require multiple landings that will all have to land with precision enough that they can support each other. Musk might get it done. But still, the issue is that a one way trip is just a red herring to make people think that it is possible. It's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist to lure people into thinking it's some magical solution. Simply put, getting the people back off Mars and to Earth is less of a problem than looking at any type of extended stay.

    18. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Name one peace-time project in which a 100% death toll was a certainty form the get-go.

      These things are extremely rare even in major wars (in fact I cannot think of any such missions).

      Remember - guaranteed death as the only option is very different from "high risk of death".

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    19. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      The reason they are assholes

      I think you misspelled "con artists."

      Con artists can be assholes too. In fact, most probably are.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    20. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by Some_Llama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If you can reach orbit from a planet then you can reverse the process and land on a planet. "

      Same with peeling an orange, if you can peel an orange you can reverse the process and put it back on.

      yep, makes sense no matter how many times i read it.

    21. Re: Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Meant to be ironic - but reveals idiocy just as the OP said. Good to remain anonymous, coward.

      With this "mission" the chances of death are certain - there is no other possible outcome. This makes it more dangerous than being a suicide bomber, since with that mission there is a chance the bomb will fail to explode (and this has happened many times).

      When has the U.S. government in peace time sent any civilian on a genuine, absolutely certain suicide mission? NASA certainly never has. You would be hard put to find any military missions that fit that description, even in wartime.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    22. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      If they actually do produce a "Survivor: Mars", and actually do send a couple dozen reality TV contestants to the Red Planet - I'd consider it a win.

      Maybe, if we're really lucky, they'll include the Kardashians.

      Hell let's just put the kardashians in the desert and tape over their mouths to simulate the atmosphere of mars, bind their arms and legs to simulate the restrictions of wearing space suits, starve and dehydrate them to simulate severe rationing, then pelt them with rocks to simulate typical dust storm conditions on mars.

      afterwards i guess we could do that survivor thing you were talking about as well.

    23. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Name one peace-time project in which a 100% death toll was a certainty form the get-go.

      Birth. 100% mortality rate.

    24. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one peace-time project in which a 100% death toll was a certainty form the get-go.

      Birth. 100% mortality rate.

      Exactly. Mars One is a scam, but let's not pretend it's pitched as a Laika/Sputnik 2 scenario where the voyagers are actively terminated.

    25. Re:Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one peace-time project in which a 100% death toll was a certainty form the get-go. These things are extremely rare even in major wars (in fact I cannot think of any such missions).

      Really? You've never heard of kamikaze missions? Planes without landing gear, packed with explosives, and pilots who deliberately tried to suicide by ramming their planes into ships in an innovative but ultimately self-defeating strategy?

  5. He's got a doctorate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    He should be used to having very little money and working his ass off for someone else's hunches.

  6. Just a $$$ scam - no physical danger by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only danger will be to someone's bank account. Anyone who couldn't tell this was a scam almost deserves to be separated from their money as a sort of fiscal Darwin award. There is not and never will be an actual mission to anywhere though this scam. Furthermore I'm tired of hearing about it and don't know why slashdot continues to give these scammers free publicity.

    I wish an attorney general with appropriate jurisdiction would get involved and put the people behind this in jail.

    1. Re:Just a $$$ scam - no physical danger by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Scientology, Amway, and Herbalife are still going strong and earning big $$$ for their founders. Government doesn't seem to care one way or the other. Why shouldn't the guy who dreamed up Mars One get a piece of the action?

    2. Re:Just a $$$ scam - no physical danger by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The only danger will be to someone's bank account. Anyone who couldn't tell this was a scam almost deserves to be separated from their money as a sort of fiscal Darwin award. There is not and never will be an actual mission to anywhere though this scam. Furthermore I'm tired of hearing about it and don't know why slashdot continues to give these scammers free publicity.

      I wish an attorney general with appropriate jurisdiction would get involved and put the people behind this in jail.

      Not necessarily, the world if full of people working on terrible start up ideas, why should Mars One be any different?

      The media is evidence of this, the Mars One project isn't exactly hiding much, sure there's a lot of BS around how well they're doing but they're not claiming they have a secret game changing tech or shadow billionaire who's going to change everything. The problems are there for everyone to see, the reason they're getting ignored is that the idea is so infectious that the traditional media is generally playing along, and if the even media is getting caught up then why do you think the founders would be immune? They're going to be drinking the koolaid harder than anyone.

      Most likely the founders thought this was the greatest idea ever, they figured if you got the ball rolling, maybe enticed a billionaire or two, then you could put together a crowd-funded project on a global scale. At that point the talent and money would start rolling in and you'd get a legitimate Apollo Mission style project with a real shot at Mars. It doesn't have a hope in hell of happening but it's an intoxicating idea.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Just a $$$ scam - no physical danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a sort of fiscal Darwin award

      This is why there are so many bullshitters in the world. They deserve to exist - you applaud it?

  7. Re:Systemd dangerously flawed? by djdanlib · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's already part of EMACS. Scientists just have not yet discovered the sequence of keystrokes to enter that mode.

  8. Re:Systemd dangerously flawed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Don't worry, the next systemd update will integrate the Mars One mission.

    Only if you paid in Bitcoin.

  9. clarification from the story. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mars one is a not-for-profit not-for-profit organizations may include a membership roster which does directly benefit from the income of the organization. its basically a way charities distance themselves from lawsuits or legal repercussions of outright greed in the face of a noble goal or humanitarian ideal.

    its been known for quite some time that Mars One is the equivalent of Kony 2012. The goal is great, but the project is a heel dragging competition to see how long investors and C-levels can jiggle a hotdog in front of a hungry public before disappearing into obscurity with close to a million in cash so far.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:clarification from the story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars One is a not-for-profit under Dutch law. Its legal form (foundation/stichting) specifically disallows membership. There can be a board which receives payment, but this is legally limited precisely to avoid the situation you suggest.

      That said, any good Dutch lawyer will tell you that the trick is to bill your own company. Just make sure that all expenses billed actually were made, i.e. don't double-book hours worked.

  10. Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonetheless by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most people who follow space stuff already know that Mars One is either a scam or simply delusional... although I suppose it's nice that other people are starting to notice this too.

    I think it's important that a possible change of heart internally is seen by any of the other members. A lot of time when I read about instances where people get sucked into, say, a Nigerian money scam or worse Scientology, it often becomes a serious issues because they were first tricked into giving a little bit of money and then a little more until it's a sizable sum in total. At that point it's very hard to get out because you're mentally holding yourself prisoner there with the logic that if you quit now, you've lost that investment and you're going to look like an idiot. But, through inaction, you maintain the outward appearance of knowing what you are doing and your investment is still good -- hell, it's even growing because they need another small to medium sized payment. And down down down you go into the trap. It takes a lot to not chase your bets and to say, "I fucked up by giving them the $99 applicant fee but better quit now than waste anymore time and resources. Lesson learned."

    And I think the fact that a DOCTOR (no matter what kind or what validity) says, "I paid the money, I saw they were preparing me for the biggest snuff film ever and I got out." Well, now the average person involved in this project can say, "He is right, I came to the same realization, I'm no stupider than this academic." This is why there are support groups out there for gambling problems and cults escapees. The ideafication of your exit is sometimes important than your ability to make your own decision ... because without that your decision only has one option and it's the wrong option.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  11. They missed the chance to capitalize on their fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a fantastic vision and they probably don't really see the problem here. I think they believe that the vision will eventually get investors to dump money on them.

    That time has come and gone. And it is clear now they are just smoke and mirrors.

    Unfortunately they never capitalized on their biggest supporters: their fans. What they should of done was open-source the whole damn project. Every challenge - open to the world. They outline the vision, highlight the unknowns, and let their fans sort it out. Would that work? Who knows. But the solution is really lots of grueling, hard, and PROFITABLE work.

    The obvious trouble is space is fucking expensive. Elon Musk understands this. He breaks the problem down into simple things like, "oh yeah, we have to MAKE money, first". But even when the rocket fleets arrive, someone will have to pay Space X for the trip. Musk plans to send about 80,000 people a year for $300K a ticket. That's a LOT of people and if only 2700 people world wide signed up with Mars One... then I must conclude... WE NEED MORE HYPE! Mars One could do this - if they actually build a community of Mars enthusiasts that are willing to help solve the problem, not write one way checks...

  12. It's a big scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The whole project is a money-grabbing scam. Nobody's going to Mars. Besides, when the Apollo astronauts first went to the moon aliens were right there, and after a few missions to the moon (by Apollo 17) the aliens finally said enough is enough..No more humans on the moon or anywhere else beyond Earth orbit. So nobody is going to the moon, Mars or anywhere else. Only robots are allowed. And probably any robot that starts drilling into or disturbing the life in the oceans of the Jovian and Saturnian moons will be stopped before it can do any damage.

  13. 'More and more money' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the scammers were going to satisfy themselves with their ill-gotten application fees. Now they're milking the poor souls like common 419 scammers.

    I wonder if net worth was one of their selection criteria.

    1. Re:'More and more money' by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you've got yourself a batch of suckers, why stop milking them before they leave? I think that would be a violation of the scammers code or something. Especially if you've got a choice situation where you haven't actually broken any laws while scamming them - all win, no risk.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  14. Finalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does it say about the finalists? All are purportedly the some of best and brightest of the human race....yet you can sell them up the river like a used car salesman. If humans are that fucking dumb, I'm in the wrong business.

    Kickstarter: Be one of the first people to colonize the Mariana Trench!!!!! Donate now!

    1. Re:Finalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the easiest ways to dupe people of low to middling intelligence is to claim you selected them for being among the "best and brightest".

    2. Re:Finalists by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Old Scam. - This offering is for "Sophisticated Investors" only. You should read this phrase as "Run Away Quickly", but a lot of people like to think they are smarter and more capable than they really are, and are sucked in. "Hell Yes I'm sufistikated, lets see what you got."

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    3. Re:Finalists by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Old Scam. - This offering is for "Sophisticated Investors" only. You should read this phrase as "Run Away Quickly", but a lot of people like to think they are smarter and more capable than they really are, and are sucked in. "Hell Yes I'm sufistikated, lets see what you got."

      You may be on to something there - it worked the same way for bitcoins - "Only smart people who can understand the math can see why BTC are a good idea. Can you see?"...

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  15. Re:Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonethel by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Is the Mars Society legit? They appear somewhat connected to Mars One, but seem to actually be doing a little bit more, like camping trips in the Arctic to test their... gear?

  16. Crowd*ing by MrLint · · Score: 1

    First crowd sourced funding, now crowd sourced logistics...

    I mean how could a trip to another planet possibly go wrong with this kind of strategy?

    I'm going to need $50 million dollars to build the landing pad on mars... I plan on deploying a bunch of down pillows... that'll work right?

    1. Re:Crowd*ing by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Down pillows would probably fail, as they depend on the air between the feathers. Air bags however should be sufficient, provided you pile them a few hundred meters high (and don't miss).

    2. Re:Crowd*ing by MrLint · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a perfect question for an xkcd 'what if'

  17. It sounds fraudulent by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    Also, who would have given these guys money? I mean... if there were REALLY a trip to mars happening that they wanted colonists for... I'd be one of those crazy bastards that would sign up for it. Yes. Send me to mars. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

    No really.

    But, why would I give "money" to something that isn't going to happen?

    I thought the whole point of this thing was to make it clear that there were a lot of people willing to travel right now to mars? That's a cool message to send. "Hey you earth loving pansies, WE are willing to go... even if we die... even if we can never come back!"

    And I thought that was a cool message because it really surprises a lot of people and gets them to think differently about space exploration. I mean, every manned mission assumes a return trip. What if there isn't one. What if its "you go and you spend the rest of your life where ever you arrived... possibly your short life with no food water or air." The thing is that there are volunteers for that.

    But to give these bozos actual money? *raises left eye brow spock fashion*

    That's illogical.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:It sounds fraudulent by slew · · Score: 2

      Also, who would have given these guys money?

      People give money to groups all the time. Groups claim they want to solve poverty, cure diseases, help the children (or perhaps just little girls and not boys), eliminate racism, promote suffrage (well maybe one if you vote for the correct political party) things that they can never accomplish with the resources available to them (but they want to help the cause). People pony up because they feel connected to the cause, not because the groups can expect to achieve the goal.

      These groups raise funds in order to pay staffers, hire consultants, give contracts to the their friends' companies for promotions, logistics and supplies (say like Interplanetary Media Group). If any money is left over, they sprinkle some of the spare change to the cause de-jure, and then call it a day. As long as it's considered a legal cause and is organized as a non-profit (or more recently, a type-B corporation), we have decided as a society that this is one way people are legally allowed to make a living redistributing income...

      And even when their cause becomes passé (e.g., the March of Dimes was originally founded to combat infant polio), they will simply change the game and take on a larger more grandiose goal (e.g., combat birth defects)...

      Move along, there's nothing to see here (unless you want to change these rules). Mars One is just one of many groups that exploit this niche in modern society ;^&

    2. Re:It sounds fraudulent by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I like to make donations closer to home and I like to see immediate results from the money donated. if it just goes off into some big fund then I question how much of it actually goes where it is supposed to go.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  18. like Lucy with a football by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    How's this any different that Barack Obama telling us we're going to Mars?
    Or George W Bush?
    Or George H W Bush?

    They know you're all a bunch of suckers.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:like Lucy with a football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... because he hasn't. None of them have. There's no official space policy of the US in regards to a mission to Mars. The Moon? -- yes. Mars? -- no. The most decisive thing any of them has said about it is Barack Obama saying that he expects "to be around to see it," and if you really want to twist that into a statement of policy on par with the "Humans on Mars by 2025" that Mars One is preaching loudly from the street corner, then you're a fucking hack.

    2. Re:like Lucy with a football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Obama telling us.. If you like your health care, you can keep your health care. Biggest scam is US history.

  19. Mr. Dollar says ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need a G650, Mars bitches. Donate!

  20. I thought they had at least their own thruster by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    I thought they had at least developed their own thruster - the world's first bullshit-powered thruster that can get you to Mars and beyond!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  21. Re:They missed the chance to capitalize on their f by jythie · · Score: 1

    The problems involved here are not really within the range of 'fans' to solve, no matter how many you throw at it or how included they are.

  22. Re:Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonethel by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    first tricked into giving a little bit of money and then a little more until it's a sizable sum in total. At that point it's very hard to get out because you're mentally holding yourself prisoner there with the logic that if you quit now, you've lost that investment and you're going to look like an idiot.

    This is commonly referred to as 'throwing good money after bad.' Very common in large business when people keep chasing that TCO that will never be realized due to being scammed into some crap project that should have never been approved, or should not have been approved as designed.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  23. Space Cadets by RDW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reports emerged that the contract with the TV production company Endemol - which Mars One claimed could bring in up to $6 billion in revenue - was no longer in place and that the companies had gone their separate ways.

    Interesting that they originally partnered with Endemol, who previously produced this:

    'Space Cadets': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    "The series described itself as the most elaborate hoax perpetrated in television history...A group of twelve contestants (who answered an advert looking for "thrill seekers") were selected to become the first British televised space tourists, including going to Russia to train as cosmonauts at the "Space Tourist Agency of Russia" (STAR) military base, with the series culminating in a group of four embarking on a five-day space mission in low Earth orbit...However, the show was in fact an elaborate practical joke...Unknown to the "space cadets", they were not in Russia at all...and the "space trip" was entirely fake, complete with a wooden "shuttle" and actor "pilots".

    In the last episode, I recall the presenter joking that the next series would be called 'Mission to Mars'...

  24. It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by pseudorand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mars One is most certainly NOT a scam.

    Technology has all but eliminated the need for a growing population and over-population is human's biggest problem. We need to eliminate some people, but we still need smart, useful people. If we used criteria like geography, race, religion and ethnic origin to choose who gets eliminated, we're as likely to eliminate too many of the smart people we still need. So what criteria do we use to identify people we want to get rid if?

    Mars is a cold, lifeless rock much to far away from earth to make even it's mineral content remotely economical. We are a species who can't even terraform the Gobi, Mohave or Sahara where there's an atmosphere and temperatures are (relative to Mars) reasonable. Anyone who thinks going to mars is anything other than ridiculous meets just the criteria we're looking for. And they'll voluntarily board a ship blasting off to nowhere, somewhat lessening the moral dilemma of the situation. And they're even offering to pay for the whole thing!

    Brilliant plan. Or semi-brilliant, because they simply haven't selected nearly enough finalists to address the overpopulation problem. But it's a start.

    Didn't Douglas Adam's predict this decades ago?

    1. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We need to eliminate some people,"

      If anyone ever needs some proof that Space Nutters are hateful, depressed little misanthropes...

    2. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by nealric · · Score: 1

      I assume this comment was in jest, but over-population is unlikely to be a serious long-term problem for humanity. We've already solved over-population with reliable and safe birth control. The only thing that keeps the population growing is that many people in the developing world don't have access to contraception. That is changing rapidly. Accordingly, most projections of human population have it peaking within at least some of our lifetimes and slowly declining thereafter.

    3. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I nominate some politicians to be selected for the "maiden" voyage? I can think of a LOT of them. Heck, let's even give them a "free ride", as losing them will probably lower our spending dramatically, more than enough to cover their costs.

      But there is something of value on Mars. Think of all those Mars bars they can eat!

    4. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developed world? If the 'publicans have their way in the states then contraceptives will be illegal here.

    5. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cyril Kornbluth wrote the idea in a story called "The Marching Morons" back in 1950. Doug Adams did something similar many years later.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    6. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gotta love the elitist tone of the comment while misspelling its/it's.

    7. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      In the department of removing access to birth control for population reasons. . . .

      Iran is ahead of the curve I think

    8. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Golgafrincham Ark B - This is the 3rd time I've posted that in the last month btw.

    9. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been written many times over in stories and novels by plenty of folks. Anthony Burgess wrote The Wanting Seed in 1962, with war being an effective means of population control. Step out of line and need discipline? Join the army (and never come back). Pit two groups of soldiers against each other until none are left.

      I suppose blasting yourself off into oblivion might be morally preferable to blasting each other into pieces.

    10. Re:It's NOT a scam, it's a semi-brilliant plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know, but if the 'crats have their way in the states then abortions will be mandatory here.

  25. Biosphere2, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the Biosphere2 fracas from the late 80s. Yep, another scam.

    1. Re:Biosphere2, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, how was Biosphere 2 a scam? The project ran into political/financial trouble eventually, but it was a pretty legitimate experiment. It also produced some useful results. One of the main useful results I can think of offhand was to beware of construction materials that continue to undergo chemical changes for years. Specifically, exposed concrete in the structure was responsible for sucking up a good portion of their oxygen. They learned how to combat that problem. They also went from constant hunger in the first year to producing plenty of food afterwards as they learned how to properly farm in the environment. Aside from that, they learned some valuable lessons about cohabiting with plants in an enclosed space regarding CO2 fluctuations between plant day and night cycles. If the Mars One project miraculously gets its funding and follows through, the lessons of Biosphere 2 will be valuable for Martian habitation.

  26. Concept itself is flawed by wired_parrot · · Score: 2

    The concept itself is deeply flawed. If you were a crewmember, would you entrust your safety to fellow crewmembers whose primary qualification is that they are willing to die (i.e. exhibit suicidal tendencies) ? There is a reason NASA carries out extensive psychological testing among its applicants. If you're going to entrust a multi-year multi-multi-billion dollar mission in the hands of a select group of people, you want those people to have strong survival insticts that will push them to do everything possible to overcome adversity to come out alive. You do not want people who are willing to give up on life.

    1. Re:Concept itself is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than that. You want astronauts who, when the reality of their situation is most bleak still do everything they can to transmit telemetry data and make accurate observations of the rock they will soon smash to bits upon.

      I love the Space Brothers anime for including just that.

    2. Re:Concept itself is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same logic applies in the military to the people who volunteer for suicide missions and hopeless last stands, and yet those have happened on a number of occasions, often to good effect, and always for a lesser cause than bringing humanity to a second planet.

    3. Re:Concept itself is flawed by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      The same logic applies in the military to the people who volunteer for suicide missions and hopeless last stands, and yet those have happened on a number of occasions, often to good effect, and always for a lesser cause than bringing humanity to a second planet.

      I notice that you did not cite any such cases. Do you actually know of any, of you just assuming based on... what?

      A "hopeless last stand" in which you find yourself facing near-certain death due to battlefield reverses (ambush, surprise attack, collapse of a defense perimeter, etc.) is not the same as a "suicide mission" in which someone who is not in imminent danger of being killed otherwise, is sent out to die on purpose. In fact, people survive "hopeless last stands" on occasion.

      Genuine suicide missions are also quite rare for Western societies even in wartime. These certainly happened during WWII, with the Japanese and Soviets at least, but a high chance of dying in a mission is quite different from a mission which has no other possible outcome. Even suicide bombers have a significant chance of not dying, given the failure rate of suicide bombs.

      This sort of "mission", sending volunteers to a certain death (no other possible outcome) without any necessity, in peace time, is unknown in any modern Western society as far as I am aware. Having a private organization do it makes it a criminal act.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    4. Re:Concept itself is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google "Forlorn Hope"

  27. Re:Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonethel by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I've known a couple of people who've been sucked into pyramid scams. And I mean classic, textbook examples of pyramid scams. In both cases they told me about this amazing new investment opportunity they're taking part in. I listened for a minute and then told them it was a pyramid scam, and they got hostile and defensive. I think they didn't like thinking they could be fooled into something like that. I never did hear how either of these turned out, though neither of the people involved did get to retire a year later as they'd hoped they'd be able to.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  28. Re:Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonethel by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1
    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
  29. Here is how I think it went: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here is how I think it went:

    Some small company with one or two guys says "Hey, let's do that Mars One thing, where we pretend to send people to Mars, create a lot of media buzz and get rich doing so. There's no real chance we send people away as some Goverment will stop us before we get anywhere serious. And hey, in CASE we are successful... we get even richer and everyone who dies signed up for it on free will. Awesome. Now, we're money greedy bastards with morals. Let's look for a media producer with no morals."

    In steps Endemol (media producer with questionable morals but a lot of experience) and says "Hey, uhh, sure. Give it a try, if it turns out to be a buzz, we help you."
    They go around, collect some supporters, create media attention, ignore the scientific world that says "Uhh... cool vision, but SERIOUSLY?"

    They start, create some buzz. But do not get 200k people but more like 2000. Endemol says "Ok, thanks. Nice try, but go away. But... hey, in case it DOES work out, give us a call. We'll just be silent, burning bridges... why should we? See you (suckers)..."

    Now, what do those two (?) immoral guys from the beginning do? They see how much they sqeeze from it as long as they can.

    Just check out they profile pictures of the "Top 100 contenders". Does that look professionally made for the "100 handpicked people who went through the rigorous process of evaluation"? No. Mars One consists of the guys in the middle and those top ten contenders who got they can make some money as well as long as this thing runs...

    1. Re:Here is how I think it went: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether those guys are really immoral or just stupid and naive. But how will you be able to fund such an expensive project with just reality TV? And boring reality TV on top of it. People who like reality TV often don't care for science or technology. People who like science and technology often don't care for reality TV. What's fun about watching a handful of people in a very tiny spacecraft, doing nothing for 2 years? And when they are on Mars, what's fun about watching people struggling to live in an environment that's not made for humans.

      Today there is reality TV with people trying to survive on an island or in a desert. But even that reality TV is too boring to watch life. It is directed and edited, dramatized and over-sensational television, put together in an one hour show.

      What can you put in such a reality TV show on Mars? It's a red desert, might give a few hours of television. It's freaking cold when the sun is gone, you have to hide for radiation when sun is up, we already know this, might give an hour of television. Footage from people living in a small caravan, another hour of television, maybe some more when someone starts to turn crazy and threatens to kill the others.

      You can watch an interview, like that interview with the astronauts in the ISS. But this time with a 10 minutes delay (depending on the distance between earth and Mars) between question and answer.

      Even when they succeed (which will not happen), how will you bring the news after a few months, that broadcasting has been canceled because the lack of interest? How will you bring the news, that funding has stopped because of this lack of interest. And how will you bring the news that there will be no new supplies because it's too expensive?

      It has happened before that space travel had become too boring to watch on television, and the same will is true for a travel to and a live on Mars.

  30. No real surprise there by kuzb · · Score: 1

    I had suspicions initially that it was an elaborate con, but this pretty much confirms it. The objective here was clearly to grab as much money as possible before the bottom fell out.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  31. Re:Mars Society by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The head of the Mars Society is Robert Zubrin, who is a well qualified and inventive aerospace engineer. I assume the rest of their work at least involves doing the relevant math.

    The Mars One project's problem isn't wanting to go to Mars, it's the missing step two in their plan:

    (1) Raise around a million dollars from crowdsourcing, tee shirt sales, and application fees
    (2) ???
    (3) Finish $6 billion worth of space hardware and launch it.

    Elon Musk/SpaceX also want to go to Mars, but they have actual rockets and customers, and his other businesses (Tesla and Solar City) both stand to make a lot of money, and are useful to the original goal. You will need electric rovers, batteries for power storage, and solar panels on Mars. It helps if you have companies that already make that stuff. So I rate the SpaceX Mars program way higher on the probability scale.

  32. It could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he could donate his money to Reverend Dollar (I did not make that up). As I understand the Rev needs a new top of the line private jet 'cause he can't be expected to fly commercial on his junkets, er, ministry trips, can he? Besides his current jet is needing some repairs. Can't you see your way to giving him $300?

    ow about this, we finance the trip with some money this Nigerian prince has kindly offered to share. All you got to is pony up the bank's wire transfer fee of $5000...

  33. The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    One-way missions have been a common feature of human exploration. In the nineteenth century, thousands of people signed up to settle California as a one way mission, with no idea of what awaited them. "California" in those days did mean what it means now; the settlers had to grow their own milk and honey, many died of miscellaneous causes, and a few ended up as the Donner Party.

    If this account is to be believed, the problem with Mars One is lack of control over the mission by those who signed up. If this projectis going to attract participants, it needs to be open about allowing those who sign up exchange information freely. If it hides information and gets coercive about financial contributions, it could be regarded as a cult. And if you're going to Mars, you wouldn't want your traveling companions to be members of a cult.

    1. Re:The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but going to Mars is NOTHING like going to California. You can be pretty well assured that wherever you go on Earth, you won't die of suffocation (except maybe from exposure to fumes from an active volcano). And food grows or is found almost everywhere on the planet (excluding Antarctica -- even most deserts have food available in them).

      The only way Mars would work is if machinery can be sent that digs a deep enough pit, so it can have a usable air pressure. From there it can be terraformed.

    2. Re:The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Of course going to mars is nothing like going to California. However, if you look at the success of very early north American settlement, it's possibly broadly similar, in that just about everyone died. People still wanted to go.

    3. Re:The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      But they had the promise of gold to die for back then. If they made it & got rich enough they could afford passage back to the old world, hell they could afford to buy an entire shipping line! Except 99.999999% of them never made it that far, eh.

    4. Re:The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another point: every migration of people assumes that people can either carry their own supplies, with their own work animals, without anyone "investing" in them. explorers are the exception, who did get some investment money (not millions though), but again, wherever they would go, they made the (ignorant, but true) assumption that if they werent killed by disasters, they could survive with the supplies they brought and whatever they could get from their environment (fishing off a ship, etc). once you are out in space, there are NO resources to live off of, unless someone has invested a few kilowatt hours of nuclear generators in your trip, at a huge transport cost, and its incredibly expensive to bring even the most minimal of supplies. there is simply no way that the economics of world exploration are at all comparable to manned space exploration.

      send robots to mars to build robot factories. stir, simmer for 100 years. then we can go there.

    5. Re:The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      as the Donner Party

      Or their dinner

    6. Re:The problem is not that it's a one-way mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the odds of someone travelling to the new world and making it rich enough to buy their own shipping line, while very slim, were actually better than the 1 in 100 million you claim.

  34. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this "one-way trip to Mars" thing is turning out to be shockingly amateur and/or an outright scam?

    I'm so surprised!

    No, I'm really completely surprised!

    Okay, I'm not even remotely surprised.

  35. Technical reasons why this isn't possible.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot will put these stories up about Mars One and it'll get a lot of comments but i'd honestly love to see someone comment on the technical aspect of why this trip wouldn't be possible. Not just about the money aspect of it and how expensive the mission would be but some technical and known FACTS of why Mars One is a joke...

  36. Mars One "Dangerously Flawed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know...
    The "reality television" part of the funding model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_One) for Mars One seems uncannily like the funding model in Terrry Bisson's "Voyage to the Red Planet":

    http://www.amazon.com/Voyage-Red-Planet-Terry-Bisson-ebook/dp/B00DOD58WU/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1426548926&sr=1-1-catcorr&keywords=terry+bisson+voyage+to+mars

  37. Earth reality TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least contestants can use it for exposure on reality TV! Earth reality TV. (The real reason for many applications, methinks.)

    This project will never get off the ground. But it may lead to terrestrial publicity for a few, and a small boatload of money for even fewer.

  38. So basically, Scientology by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    n/t

  39. Re:Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonethel by wxjones · · Score: 1

    Please send me their contact information!

    --
    My SIG is a P226
  40. relieving suckers of their money aint hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But here it is Elon Musk who is doing it right, skimming money off the government is more profitable and safer.

  41. Re:Very True But It Is a Useful News Item Nonethel by stoploss · · Score: 1

    This is commonly referred to as 'throwing good money after bad.'

    This is more tersely called sunk cost fallacy

  42. yep.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Yep a non-profit organization, the organisation itself doesn't make any profits, but the people in the organization get a hefty salary for doing nothing... It happens with a lot of non-profit organisations, a lot of money is going into the pockets of the ones who are in charge, and instead of profit, all extra's are going into the pockets in the form of a bonus or expense account, so no profit is made by the organisation..

  43. Re:Mars Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The head of the Mars Society is Robert Zubrin, who is a well qualified and inventive aerospace engineer.

    I'll agree with you about Zubrin being an inventive aerospace engineer. But, you also need to realize that he is slightly off his nut. Regardless of the ability to go to Mars, what do we as a society, or anyone for that matter, gain from it? The short answer is not much. It's just a pissing contest that only some marketing people will profit from.

  44. Re:Mars Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (1) Start
    (2) ???
    (3) Finish

    Underpants gnomes were ahead of the game all along?

  45. so it's interplanetary Scientology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pay up to get to those higher levels, reduce those thetans..err...go to Mars

  46. Re:Mars Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Finish $6 billion worth of space hardware and launch it."

    That's chump-change for Apple. Maybe they should just do the entire thing. Give 'em the entire Mars planet if they're successful. Might as well, pretty soon they'll own Earth anyways