Slashdot Mirror


France Will Block Web Sites That Promote Terrorism

An anonymous reader writes In the first use of government powers enacted after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the French Interior Ministry on Monday ordered five websites blocked on the grounds that they promote or advocate terrorism. The action raises questions about how governments might counter groups such as the self-declared Islamic State on digital platforms.

13 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. How do they define "Terrorism"? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    THAT'S the relevant question here.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  2. Re:People by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where did they pick up the desire to do that? Who is poisoning their young minds?

    Maybe they feel alienated because their websites are censored, they are told how to dress, and so many Europeans think they should "go home". In America, Muslims are as free to speak as anyone else, they are welcome to wear their head scarfs to school, and they are well integrated into society. They are also a tenth as likely to join ISIS.

  3. Re:Necesary Censorship by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except that basically all extant religions feed on ANYTHING that can be construed as persecution. By trying to censor, you only strengthen their resolve. Same shit with Neo-nazis and Mein Kampf. Nothing could do more damage to that movement than exposing that Das Fuhrer had the language skills of a middle school American sleeping through their first semester German class.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  4. Re:People by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, you're saying that if we treat our fellow human beings like humans, they are less likely to try and murder us? That sounds ridiculous.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  5. Re:People by itzly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also, for best experience try to spend some time in Europe in a predominant Muslim neighbourhood, preferably as an attractive young woman.

  6. Containment by bhlowe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think if you want to support ISIS and fundamentalist Islam in a Western country, you should be given a one-way ticket to the Islamic country of your choice. Islam and Western civilization do not mix well. Trying to fight ISIS (or the 20% or so of Muslims who tacitly support it by wanting Sharia Law applied to all) is a terribly bloody idea. Better to let the people of a country run it the way they see fit-- and if that means a 7th century lifestyle, so be it. I am opposed to a "war on ISIS", but not opposed to expelling ISIS sympathizers from any country that doesn't want them. So.. Recruit away... and off ye go to an Islamic Utopia.

  7. Re:What about websites and paper magazines by digsbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Learn your 20th century history. Secular socialist/communist states were responsible for the murder of their own citizens in the high tens of millions, possibly topping over 100 million. If you include deaths through gross mismanagement of resources and criminal negligence, it goes higher, and easily eclipses the sum total of all those dead in religious wars through all of human history.

  8. Re:Necesary Censorship by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, glad that those misguided idiots now can't have access to content promoting hatred in the name of religion.

    Unless of course he goes to his local mosque. So let's shut down the mosques. Then they'll get together somewhere else.

    Face it. There's no way you can keep idiots from being caught by sects. What you can do, and best would be such a way as this, is to make this harder to observe by your security forces.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:Necesary Censorship by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously. If more people had read Mein Kampf, a lot of shit would have been spared from us. Simply because more people would have noticed just what a lunatic that guy was.

    Personally, I'd make it mandatory lecture for every neo nazi just to show them what kind of fucked up megalomaniac they idolize.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Re:Free speach == dead by itzly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    free speech doesn't mean you're allowed to insult and provoke at your leisure

    That's exactly what free speech means. If you could only practice free speech that wasn't controversial, it would be meaningless.

  11. Gotta love the irony... by bwcbwc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    of a bunch of politicians who were soap-boxing about freedom of the press and "je suis Charlie" engaging in this kind of censorship. All speech is free, but some speech is more free than others. I don't think there's anyone alive who is in a position to form an unbiased judgment of whether a terrorist site, a porn site or Charlie Hebdo is more offensive. Offense, like beauty, is in the mind of the beholder.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  12. Re:What about websites and paper magazines by itzly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Charlie Hebdo is actually anti-racist, left-wing, and will mock nationalist party National Front just as much as different religions, including Judaism and Christianity. They only seem to be anti-Muslim, because that's the only group that can't take a joke.

  13. Re:Sleeping through first semester German class by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's objectifying him. ;-)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20