Slashdot Mirror


Some Biodegradable Plastics Don't Live Up To Their Claims

ckwu writes From bread bags to beverage bottles, many plastics now contain additives designed to make the materials biodegradable. But a new study shows that plastics made with such additives do not biodegrade in the environment significantly faster than those without the compounds. Researchers prepared films of commercial plastics with three different types of additives supplied by their manufacturers. The researchers then treated the film samples to mimic disposal of such plastics in a compost pile, a landfill, and soil. After about six months of composting, a year and a half of landfill-like conditions, and three years of soil burial, the plastics with additives did not show any more evidence of biodegradation than plastics without them.

98 comments

  1. Recycle and bioplastics by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    A real recycle program, not one where you have to pay to get the stuff taken away, combined with more use of bioplastics might help if combined with industrial composting. Trying to make the existing stuff doesn't solve the problem; namely that we simply throw it away and bury it.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      The problem is that the companies selling crap products like this don't care if they really work or if they're helping reduce plastic in landfills. They simply want a buzzword which makes their product appear more desirable, and possibly allows them to charge a premium price.
      They're terrified of the competition which makes actual, biodegradable plastic-replacement out of cellulose.

    2. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      > A real recycle program, not one where you have to pay to get the stuff taken away

      Or worse, a recycle program where you have to drive somewhere to drop it off. For instance, currently in my area, although we have curbside recycling for glass and some plastics and cardboard, there's currently no way to recycle CFLs that doesn't involve driving to a recycling center. Besides wasted fuel and emissions, the collateral damage of this is that most people just throw CFLs away and the mercury ends up in landfill. And groundwater.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A real recycle program

      That would be good. Even better would be to reduce the amount of plastic we use in the first place. When I receive shipments from Amazon, the packaging usually weighs more than the products. This is necessary because of the workers at UPS/USPS/FedEx that drop, throw, and step on the packages. When we replace these idiots with robots, a lot less packaging will be needed.

    4. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by nobuddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We had to separate glass, plastics, and paper. The a truck comes around and dumps all three bins and the garbage cans in to the same trash truck without any form of separator.

      And to induce more rage- they won't pick it up if it is not sorted properly.

    5. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by healyp · · Score: 2

      Second this, the only place to return CFLs for us is the Home Depot. The municipal transfer station doesn't accept hazardous waste, which they consider CFLs. They do a free county-wide recycling day ONCE A YEAR that you have to drive to in another town, but even still they don't accept CFLs.

    6. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually they don't actually recycle it. They have a fancy facility for giving tours, but most of the trash just winds up in an landfill (or in the ocean) like all the other trash.

      Recycling is still expensive enough that they only do it when someone is looking.

    7. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And to induce more rage- they won't pick it up if it is not sorted properly.

      Or you get a guy who suddenly decided not to pick up half the bins because they have something in it he does not like.

      My neighborhood went from an 90% recycle rate to sub teens in 2 weeks. Instead of leaving behind what he didnt like. He just left the whole bin and let us work it out and try to guess what is in or out. We just started dumping it in the other bin that they never looked into.

      He was gone pretty quickly after that and replaced had to replace it with a machine that picks it up and dumps it into the recycle truck. At least in my area they really do recycle the stuff. Some areas they just dump it all together and run a magnet over it. Its worth talking to the guys who run the trucks and go to your local dump to see what they do.

    8. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > A real recycle program, not one where you have to pay to get the stuff taken away

      Or worse, a recycle program where you have to drive somewhere to drop it off. For instance, currently in my area, although we have curbside recycling for glass and some plastics and cardboard, there's currently no way to recycle CFLs that doesn't involve driving to a recycling center. Besides wasted fuel and emissions, the collateral damage of this is that most people just throw CFLs away and the mercury ends up in landfill. And groundwater.

      Yup. Given the choice of an 80 mile round trip to a location that is only open M-F during normal business hours and tossing them in the trash guess which one gets picked? Ultimately I think one solution would be to require the manufacturer to take back and arrange for recycling or proper disposal. That would add to the upfront cost but eliminate a lot of back end problems. Of course, manufacturers will whine about the cost but I think bottle deposit laws are a good example of what may happen. Bottlers complained but when states tried to take over rte program they resisted because they were taking in more deposit money than they were paying out and spending to run the program.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    9. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Second this, the only place to return CFLs for us is the Home Depot. The municipal transfer station doesn't accept hazardous waste, which they consider CFLs. They do a free county-wide recycling day ONCE A YEAR that you have to drive to in another town, but even still they don't accept CFLs.

      And HD only accepts small CFL bulbs, not the long ones (2-3ft plus) that they also sell; at least that was the case recently when I had to replace some shop light bulbs and bought the replacements at HD and then tried to return for recycle the old ones.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    10. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A real recycle program

      That would be good. Even better would be to reduce the amount of plastic we use in the first place. When I receive shipments from Amazon, the packaging usually weighs more than the products. This is necessary because of the workers at UPS/USPS/FedEx that drop, throw, and step on the packages. When we replace these idiots with robots, a lot less packaging will be needed.

      In fairness to FedEx their sorting operation in Memphis already use robots that weigh and measure each package to minimize the forces used during sorting. the drivers, well that's another story. Given Amazon's size and volume manufacturers could package stuff more reasonably. Do I really need a tamper proof sealed plastic case for an item I buy through Amazon? Amazon already packages some of their Amazon labeled stuff more sanely in cardboard and I wish they'd push manufacturers to do something similar for what they sell via Amazon.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    11. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second this, the only place to return CFLs for us is the Home Depot. The municipal transfer station doesn't accept hazardous waste, which they consider CFLs. They do a free county-wide recycling day ONCE A YEAR that you have to drive to in another town, but even still they don't accept CFLs.

      And HD only accepts small CFL bulbs, not the long ones (2-3ft plus) that they also sell; at least that was the case recently when I had to replace some shop light bulbs and bought the replacements at HD and then tried to return for recycle the old ones.

      Well technically those are not CFLs, the "C" stands for "Compact". You're trying to recycle regular fluorescent tubes (not sure where those can go.)

    12. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Usually they don't actually recycle it. They have a fancy facility for giving tours, but most of the trash just winds up in an landfill (or in the ocean) like all the other trash.

      Recycling is still expensive enough that they only do it when someone is looking.

      ...or in some cases, on the side of the road. In our area, there are separate garbage and recycling trucks, so far so good, but as someone else said, they take the separated recycling and dump them all in the back end of an open truck. This is right on the edge of the urban zone, so there's lots of sparsely populated (former) farm roads, and as they travel at speed down these roads you'll see sheets of cardboard and empty milk jugs fly out of the back. After I moved here, I learned early on not to follow a recycling truck. Especially on the motorcycle.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    13. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Curbside recycling doesn't help much either when it's just for homeowners, as it seems to be most places. The homeowners around here have their recycling bins, but none of the apartments I've lived in have ever had any recycling options for any materials.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    14. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Second this, the only place to return CFLs for us is the Home Depot. The municipal transfer station doesn't accept hazardous waste, which they consider CFLs. They do a free county-wide recycling day ONCE A YEAR that you have to drive to in another town, but even still they don't accept CFLs.

      And HD only accepts small CFL bulbs, not the long ones (2-3ft plus) that they also sell; at least that was the case recently when I had to replace some shop light bulbs and bought the replacements at HD and then tried to return for recycle the old ones.

      I have a stack of long florescent bulbs in an unused corner of my garage, old bulbs from the fixture over my worktable, collecting there since I moved to this house in the early '90s. I never did figure out where to take them or how to safely dispose of them. I guess it'll be my descendants' problem.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by operagost · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Pennsylvania has a law that prohibits throwing electronics into the trash. While there are places that will take it for free, you have to either scrounge every newspaper, bulletin board, and poorly designed "community" website to find out when these "recycling fairs" are, or you have to pay someone to take it. Staples will also take some things. Either way, YOU have to drive somewhere to get rid of it. Until the ruling class stops imposing the cost of their feel-good activities on the poor and middle class, we're going to have these problems.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can one-up you. Our city has a curbside hazardous waste program. They tout it on flyers, bus benches, and everything else. They tell you how wonderfully convenient it is not to have to drive your used motor oil or batteries to a hazardous waste roundup (which only happens twice a year somewhere in the County). The kicker comes when you actually try to use the service: "No, we don't come out to your house unless you have more than 1 ton of waste" they'll tell you on the phone.

      Fuckin' pricks.

    17. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by michrech · · Score: 1

      Take your used motor oil and batteries (I'm assuming you're speaking of the automotive type) to your local auto-parts store. They will accept both (and, in the case of batteries, quote you a price for the new battery that includes you returning the old one). Oil collections are free, not sure about batteries, though I suspect it'd be free since they'd make cash selling back the lead.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    18. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Denver Airports wonderful fully automated system? Yeah, that was soooo much better than 'idiot' humans.

      Take your elitism and shove it up your ass. People are not idiots because they handle packages the way they are taught to.

    19. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Seattle (and King County, and possibly everywhere in Washington, I'm not sure) every building with trash has recycling. Apartments, houses, businesses, government, everyone. And they definitely aren't dumped into the same truck. They come around with three different trucks: one for trash, one for recycling and one for compost and yard waste. You can be fined as a homeowner for not sorting appropriately, but as far as I know they don't do that for apartments (wouldn't be fair to the owner I guess, and no way to fine the individual.)

      As far as electronics and CFL bulbs (and things like used oil, chemical waste, etc) yes you have to take them to a disposal/recycling facility yourself but I don't see how else it could work. It would mean having a fourth bin for electronics and I don't see how you could do anything for chemical waste.

      These stories of dumping everything into the same truck and only recycling "when someone is looking" are kind of hard to believe from my perspective, but I'm not going to call anyone a liar. Maybe someone needs to start a class action lawsuit. I'm sure there are environmentalist groups that would love to volunteer a lawyer or three for that cause.

    20. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Second this, the only place to return CFLs for us is the Home Depot. The municipal transfer station doesn't accept hazardous waste, which they consider CFLs. They do a free county-wide recycling day ONCE A YEAR that you have to drive to in another town, but even still they don't accept CFLs.

      And HD only accepts small CFL bulbs, not the long ones (2-3ft plus) that they also sell; at least that was the case recently when I had to replace some shop light bulbs and bought the replacements at HD and then tried to return for recycle the old ones.

      I have a stack of long florescent bulbs in an unused corner of my garage, old bulbs from the fixture over my worktable, collecting there since I moved to this house in the early '90s. I never did figure out where to take them or how to safely dispose of them. I guess it'll be my descendants' problem.

      You are doing the same disposal strategy I am.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    21. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I have a stack of long florescent bulbs in an unused corner of my garage, old bulbs from the fixture over my worktable, collecting there since I moved to this house in the early '90s. I never did figure out where to take them or how to safely dispose of them. I guess it'll be my descendants' problem.

      You are doing the same disposal strategy I am.

      Ditto. I've got that same stack of long fluorescents in my garage. And there they'll stay, I expect....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    22. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      http://shop.advanceautoparts.c...

      They'll also take your UPS batteries free but won't give you a gift certificate for them.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    23. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      I have this problem with must stuff shipped UPS ground. Not so much with Fedex or USPS. USPS is more likely to lose my package than damage it. I have had Netflix envelopes show up 10 months late (and undamaged!)

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    24. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      don't care if they really work or if they're helping reduce plastic in landfills.

      Biodegradable does NOT mean they degrade in landfills. Landfills tend to have very dry conditions, so almost nothing will rot. It is common for them to contain century old newspapers, and dessicated food. Biodegradability is important for plastic discarded along roadsides, or adrift in the ocean, not for landfills. It is arguable whether it is even desirable to have landfill material decompose. Decomposing releases CO2, methane, and other greenhouse gases. If the material remains intact, we can dig up and recover materials as recycling techniques improve. We are already doing this with some landfills. It is called Landfill Mining. The only rationale for decomposing landfill material is the myth that we are "running out of space", but that is nonsense. We have enough landfill space to last for centuries, even with our current wasteful practices.

    25. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by vonart · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm thinking of moving them up into the attic since it's empty. Out of sight, out of mind.

      --
      The American Dream has too much grinding and the leveling makes no sense. -GameboyRMH (1153867)
    26. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by swb · · Score: 1

      Ultimately I think one solution would be to require the manufacturer to take back and arrange for recycling or proper disposal.

      Which would tack on how much to the cost of CFLs? And involve how much carbon emission in the pickup and movement of used CFLs?

      The better solution is to not push ZOMG! GREEN! products which have a bunch of hazardous waste in them.

      I have no idea how many CFLs end up in landfills, but I do sometimes wonder if the environmental cost of that much mercury in the environment is worse than the CO2 emissions prevented by using them.

    27. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they also tried a compost pile? Food decomposes in compost piles.

    28. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone just got fired from UPS and/or the Denver Airport. I guess you ARE an idiot.

    29. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      I have stuff damaged by USPS all the time, thanks almost entirely to having a small delivery box. My neighborhood uses 25-year-old cluster boxes, and there are 9 houses to a cluster. Each house gets something about a foot deep and 6x4" across. The carrier will always try to cram something into the box rather than walking it to the door. Worse, the boxes each have a quarter-inch of rim around them, so something the carrier can insert easily from their side may be extremely difficult to remove from the other. I've had to tear apart boxes and padded envelopes to extract them. I'd love to know if there's some sort of way to get the cluster boxes upgraded to the ones that have dedicated package boxes.

    30. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      but they also tried a compost pile? Food decomposes in compost piles.

      How many people have a compost pile? You don't solve the world's problems by focusing on micro-niches. Of the people that compost, how many are willing to put plastic and other trash into compost that will be going into their vegetable garden, and then into their food?

    31. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Gizan · · Score: 1

      You failed to read the post... he said you have to separate the recyclables. Which means, 1 can for plastic, one for cardboard, 1 for glass ect. We used to have this too, and you would see 1 truck roll up and dump ALL the recycle bins into the same compactor. It was ridiculous that they made us separate them before they would dump them into the same truck..

    32. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Ultimately I think one solution would be to require the manufacturer to take back and arrange for recycling or proper disposal. That would add to the upfront cost but eliminate a lot of back end problems. Of course, manufacturers will whine about the cost but I think bottle deposit laws are a good example of what may happen.

      Yep. Bottled drinks cost a nickel more each, and the effort to return them is hardly offset by the cost, so I wind up throwing them away in the trash. A good solution to a recycling problem, I think.

    33. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Gizan · · Score: 1

      In california, you have to pay an e-waste fee when you purchase ANY electronics item. Also, you have to PAY a e-waste fee to throw it away, except for the, once every 2 moths its free to throw it away at designated centers between the hours of X and X when you KNOW you wont make it...

    34. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

      This seems willfully obtuse. If you live anywhere near a city there is a recycling center near you that will accept these. Even if you live 60 miles from a city you still make several trips a year into that city for other reasons. Not taking those old bulbs with you for the 10 minute detour to drop them off is being purposely stubborn.
       

    35. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      What makes more sense is to switch to hemp fibre rather than plastic. With so many pot heads and potential pot heads floating around, this is going to be a whole bunch of waste cannabis fibre floating about, so it would make sense to use it before just adding it to a landfills.

      PS if your landfills are dry, then you have shit head greedy cheap ass local government. You have to water them to keep the dust down (prevent infectious agents from spreading with that dust) and to aid compaction (you can not compact dry stuff). Also areas of landfills not being used should be covered with impermeable fabric to retain moisture and to enable collection of methane gasses which should not be released to atmosphere but burned to generate energy, methane is basically equal to natural gas.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    36. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Also, let's not delude people: no (petrochemical) plastic biodegrades. Nothing will eat the shit. It will chemically breakdown (albeit VERY slowly.) And it will photo-degrade, assuming sunlight can get to it and wasn't mixed with lots of UV stabilizer.

    37. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's even more idiotic when people freak out about the mercury in these bulbs "being released into the environment" as though mercury were some synthesized chemical and not a naturally occurring element. There is no more mercury in the environment after a CFL is thrown out than there was before that CFL was manufactured; true, there was less mercury in the environment for the short time in between, but that murcury wasn't exactly out raping babies before we trapped it in that bulb, was it? What makes people think it'll start now?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    38. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that many modern garbage trucks have more than one internal compartment, and you can't see which one is being used just by looking at it as a bystander from a distance? What you're saying is a common myth.

    39. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 for glass ect.

      "etc." Short for "et cetera", which is latin for "I'm a pretentous prick".

    40. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by swb · · Score: 1

      Well, I think most hazardous substances that exist in nature usually exist as some kind of stable mineral combination, not as a pure element in concentration.

      Mercury is found as cinnabar in nature, not as the liquid refined metal. The problem with the pure metal is that once in nature it combines with other shit or concentrates in the food chain, which is why its kind of a bad idea.

    41. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Everything else I've ever read about mercury states that it is not usually found in nature in its elemental form and that cinnabar is the most common, but not only, form in which mercury exists in nature. Other naturally occurring forms of mercury include mercuric sulphide, mercuric oxide, and mercuric chloride. Additionally, some microorganisms produce organic mercury, most typically methylmercury, in the presence of mercury salts (but not in the presence of elemental mercury).

      Mercuric chloride, which occurs in nature much more commonly than elemental mercury, is also much more harmful than elemental mercury. Your body will try to utilize mercuric chloride just like any other chloride, which is a key reason why chlorides (other than sodium chloride) are dangerous, in general, when ingested. Mercuric chloride poisoning, specifically, has syphilis-like symptoms (ironic, as it was once used to treat the disease) at much lower exposures than are required for elemental mercury to have any effect whatsoever.

      Facts are fun, aren't they?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    42. Re: Recycle and bioplastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single person I know in Germany has a "compost pile". Compostable material is collected in a separate garbage bins just like theres a separate one for plastics and bins for glass recycling (there are alway 3, one for white, one for green and one for brown glass).

      Thats regardless of whether they have a house with a garden and compost pile or in the city and on the 5th floor of a big apartment building.

      So what were you saying again? That Americans just don't care enough for this system to work? Well guess what, there are lots of people that don't care in Germany as well and they throw everything into the regular garbage but at least they have a really easy option to do the right thing (tm).

    43. Re:Recycle and bioplastics by vonart · · Score: 1

      The tubes are 8 feet long, and I have a small sedan. The fixtures and the spare tubes came with the house. How do you propose I actually get them anywhere? Rent a van?

      --
      The American Dream has too much grinding and the leveling makes no sense. -GameboyRMH (1153867)
  2. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way.

  3. I've never even heard of this nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm well aware of biodegradable plastic-like materials, but they are not plastic. They're typically cellulose and they DO biodegrade, and they are real decent and successful products. You can find cellulose grocery bags, containers and disposable dishes. These products are the real deal, and anything that's still actually plastic is a fraud.

    1. Re:I've never even heard of this nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why decide between cellulose and a plastic/polymer? Do both! http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/masy.19971230103/abstract

  4. My $0.02 by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    20 years ago I got a yellow rain jacket (the trash bag kind) once when on a cruise by Niagra falls. Written on the back in huge block letters was the word "Biodegradable". It is still usable today. I have little trust of biodegradable plastics until I see proof.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re: My $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is why do you have a plastic poncho from 20 years ago?

    2. Re:My $0.02 by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      20 years ago I got a yellow rain jacket ... It is still usable today.

      20 years ago, my house was made of biodegradable wood. It is still usable today.

      Biodegradable doesn't mean it just magically falls apart after a pre-programmed amount of time. It means it will rot under appropriate conditions. Bury your raincoat in your backyard, water well, and then go back and see if it is still there in 20 years.

    3. Re: My $0.02 by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      Because it still works would be my guess. Why buy a replacement when the one you have is perfectly good?

      My emergency kit in the car has a plastic poncho from DisneyWorld. It is very bright yellow and highly visible. So what if it happens to have Goofy on it. I have not been to DisneyWorld since 1992.

    4. Re:My $0.02 by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "20 years ago, my house was made of biodegradable wood. It is still usable today."

      +1 Funny
      Accidentally modded -1 Overrated.

      Drat.

    5. Re: My $0.02 by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      The real question is why do you have a plastic poncho from 20 years ago?

      The real real question: "Now is that a real poncho or is that a Sears poncho?"

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    6. Re:My $0.02 by marciot · · Score: 1

      Biodegradable doesn't mean it just magically falls apart after a pre-programmed amount of time.

      Let's get the MPAA involved with this. They can invent a plastic with DRM that make it unusable after a pre-determined amount of time.

    7. Re:My $0.02 by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      I think this is a good example of the problem of bad communication and expectation.

      When we are told that something is designed to be biodegradable, we expect it to be gone in a few years at most. But where do we get that expectation from? As a consumer, I've never actually heard a manufacturer say, "My plastic will biodegrade in six months," but somehow even I expected some kind of degradation after a few years.

      So maybe we need some better communication from the people who make the plastics, so that we, the public, can be more aware of what to expect.

      Or maybe we can stop using plastic for everything.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    8. Re: My $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because jandrese is not some sort of fashion diva that needs to buy the latest craze every year?

      If it still functions for the required purpose, why replace?

    9. Re:My $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If a word is not subject to specific regulation by the government, you can safely assume it's a lie.

    10. Re:My $0.02 by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Biodegradable does not mean that something will be gone in a few years. Biodegradable means that certain fungi or bacteria break it apart. If you keep it away from those things it will never biodegrade.

    11. Re:My $0.02 by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Biogradable, whether defined by the goverment or not, has a specific meaning. If a substance can be broken down by an organism (fungi or bacteria) it is biodegradable. If a substance can be broken down under 'natural' conditions it is compostable, which is not the same thing.

      I don't know how this guy stores his poncho, but chances are it has not been subjected to the bacteria or fungus needed to break it down. That in no way implies 'lying' by the manufacturer, just that the guy doesn't know what biodegradable means.

    12. Re:My $0.02 by russotto · · Score: 1

      20 years ago, my house was made of biodegradable wood. It is still usable today.

      Yeah. Because it was coated in plastic or some other non-degradable substance.

    13. Re:My $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the 'biodegradable' plastic shopping bags used by a local grocery store here disintegrate into a powdery mess after a year or so. a little longer than the claim printed on the bag, but still.... you can't keep them for very long for other uses.

    14. Re: My $0.02 by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      The real real real question: "Can you make that dynamo hum?"

      Saw Zappa once in Philly.....the most bras I've ever seen thrown on stage at one show :)

    15. Re: My $0.02 by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      ...probably during "Titties & Beer".

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  5. Sequester them by doconnor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would we want our oil produces biodegrading into carbon dioxide when they can be easily sequestered in the ground?

    They are spending a great deal of money trying to sequester the carbon dioxide from our other oil produces in the ground.

    1. Re:Sequester them by munch117 · · Score: 1

      Why would we want our oil produces sequestered in the ground when they can be easily burned for heating?

    2. Re:Sequester them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's okay. Biodegradable plastics don't really biodegrade. The UV in sunlight causes them to break down into tiny plastic dust which contains most of the carbon in the original product.

    3. Re:Sequester them by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Some plastics produce toxic fumes when burned. I'd guess that others produce residues like wood burning creates creosote.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:Sequester them by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      At sufficiently high temperatures most plastics don't produce toxic fumes. Only PVC and fluorcarbohydrates produce toxic fumes. However, I am talking about somewhere over 1000C. Not your average stove. Assuming a clean O2 source you'd have only CO2 and H2O in the exhaust. With air you'd also have various NO compounds, due to oxygen and nitrogen in a high temperature environment.

      Wood doesn't produce creosote at these temperatures either. Only fall ash, fly ash, CO2 and H2O (and probably NO compounds). Fall ash and fly ash are components of modern gypsum and concrete.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  6. Sunlight, not darkness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure these idiots know the proper way to biodegrade plastic is expose it to UV. Which makes me wonder what their motivation was for testing in other conditions? Granted, these are "normal" disposal methods, but if you read the products they usually say "biodegradable in sunlight".

    So crying that they don't biodegrade when buried is like buying solar panels and then complaining they don't produce power at night.

    1. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by nobuddy · · Score: 0

      BIODEGRADABLE --- in 300pt font across the entire object

      only in UV light --- in .0000015 point font on the bottom, on back, half covered by a seam, color matched to the material.

      That's why. they are pushing them as biodegradable but not being very forthcoming on the limitations of that ability.

    2. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Solar panels can produce power at night. All you need to do is install them on a rotary axis and move them 90 degrees every 6 hours.

    3. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by Livius · · Score: 2

      install them on a rotary axis

      That's called a windmill.

    4. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term generally used for this, and printed on those plastic grocery bags, is "photodegradable". And if you leave a plastic grocery bag in sunlight for a few weeks, they do indeed turn to useless fluff.

      So stop burying them in the ground!

    5. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, where is the test in fresh water (with current - river, without current - lake) and salt water without current (ocean)?

      Where is a test where it is sitting on the ground or in a bush?

      I think they should use compostable plastic if they were going to run the tests they did.

    6. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure these idiots know the proper way to biodegrade plastic is expose it to UV. Which makes me wonder what their motivation was for testing in other conditions?

      Maybe because as a society we don't want to spread out plastic waste out in a thin layer across the globe and wait for it to degrade?

    7. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think much, much bigger.

    8. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by Spazmania · · Score: 2

      We don't need it to degrade when it's buried 50 feet under the current surface of the town dump. It can stay substantially intact for the next 10,000 years, no problem. We need it to quickly biodegrade when, instead of finding its way into the town dump, it wanders into the streams and forests. Where it does stay at or close to the surface, subject to sun and weather.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    9. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure these idiots know the proper way to biodegrade plastic is expose it to UV. Which makes me wonder what their motivation was for testing in other conditions? Granted, these are "normal" disposal methods, but if you read the products they usually say "biodegradable in sunlight".

      So crying that they don't biodegrade when buried is like buying solar panels and then complaining they don't produce power at night.

      Well, in fairness, buried in a landfill is probably the most common use case. "Biodegradable if spread out in an even layer across desert sands with not too much wind so they'll stay put" is probably not a practical use case. That the biodegradable-ness provided by the additives isn't really practical in most cases is useful information, I think.

      Unless -- I just thought of this -- the intention of the additives is to hasten the degrade of coke bottles left on the side of the road. I guess that might be a practical use case, although probably not as great in numbers as the units in landfill.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      So... what happens to the useless fluff?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    11. Re:Sunlight, not darkness by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      A windmill wouldn't have an axis with a radius of 6371 km.

  7. Don't you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    break down to their claims?

  8. moronic by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    So even it goes to the landfill and turns into dirt, then you have heavily contaminated dirt that will never be used as dirt. It's still sitting in the landfill with practically the same volume and mass.

  9. Sunlight by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    It seems that sunlight will degrade plastics. Maybe not quick, but quicker than things that aren't outside in the sun and weather.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Sunlight by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I think Slashdot readers are made of plastic, that would explain a few things.

  10. And People are surprised about this Why Exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like a body the Mob buries once it is Buried there is no proof. Hence the Oil Companies tell this bold faced lie because lets be honest who is going to dig up a landfill to see if they are?

  11. standard fraud by memph · · Score: 1

    fire the engineers, hire good sales people.

  12. Still plastic by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing "oxo-biodegradable" on plastic bags but the problem is that it can be either regular plastic with additives (which is the worst idea possible - breaking plastic down into smaller pieces just means easier ground and water contamination) or cellulose.

    What we need is biodegradable plastics made from cellulose and we need to be able to know which is which.

  13. first security theater, now ecology theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now playing at your local airport and landfill

    1. Re:first security theater, now ecology theater by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You are wrong, ecology theater has been around MUCH longer than security theater.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:first security theater, now ecology theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even close. Security theater was around before the human race had the *concept* of ecology to build theater around.

  14. Who you jiving? by Holi · · Score: 1

    Don't you know, you could make more money as a butcher?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  15. No Surprise by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    For something they say takes hundreds of years to breakdown.

    On the other hand we are told about the plastics problem yet in the ocean they are surprised the plastics are breaking down as fast as they are. http://news.nationalgeographic...

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  16. Bayoudegradeable by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

    Just drop it in a bayou! That's what bayoudegradeable is. (needless to say I love this topic) Many folks in south Louisiana throw washing machines, boat parts and engines, enemies, etc in the bayou in hopes it will degrade. Would work for these plastics, too! However, I am not seriously suggesting that this junk get dumped in our bayous.... just a funny way to tout my userID.

    --
    Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
  17. what is significant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regular plastic degrades in 5 million years. Biodegradable plastic degrades in 10,000 years. Biodegradable plastics ftw!

  18. Oxo-degradable plastics should be banned, by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1
    because they break down to tiny particles in sunlight, and if those end up in water, they will keep many toxins like insecticides and fungicides in the food chain for much longer. Normally that stuff sediments, but in the presence of tiny plastic flakes from ox-degradable foils those toxic molecules will attach themselves to the plastic and stay suspended in water, to be digested by all aquatic lifeforms. This is long known, and burying these plastics is actually the second-best you can do to them after incineration. Once they end up in the water, however, they become an ecological nightmare.

    And there is nothing "bio" about this process. Those hoped-for microorganisms which are supposed to digest the plastic do not exist in nature.

    There are real biodegradable plastics, but they are not made of polyethylene, but from polylactic acid, starch or cellulose. There are even synthetic, biodegradable plastics which decompose just as well as the biopolymer-based sort. But they cost more, so this oxo-degradable variation of polyethylene was invented.

    --
    You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
  19. Change the Warranty Terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they want plastic to fall apart, warrant it to last 367 days. I can damn near gaurranty it'll fall apart at 368 days. Of course, you have those damn edge cases that fail in 30 days and the few that occur within the first seconds of use but the vast majority will survive 367 days without problem

    Captcha = satanic

  20. Still waiting for sanity by Cantankerous+Cur · · Score: 1

    I just don't understand why the US won't just burn the vast majority of its waste for power. Numerous other countries do it. Even burning plastic isn't particularly bad for the environment, especially when compared with the alternatives. And with only one exception (aluminum), recycling is just a energy sink.