Slashdot Mirror


Draconian Australian Research Law Hits Scientists

An anonymous reader writes: The Australian government is pushing ahead with a draconian law placing "dual use" science (e.g. encryption, biotechnology) under the control of the Department of Defence. The Australian ACLU, Civil Liberties Australia, warns the law punishes scientists with $400,000 fines, 10 years in jail and forfeiture of their work, just for sending an "inappropriate" e-mail.

Scientists — including the academics union — warn the laws are unworkable despite attempted improvements, and will drive researchers offshore (paywalled: mirror here).

8 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. I must be reading it wrong by burtosis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because it seems to criminalize a wide swath of legitimate civilian research. From TFA
    high-performance, neural, optical and fault-tolerant, computers,
    electronics,
    wavelength research (remember, wi-fi was ‘invented’ in Australia),
    heat-shielding,
    telecommunications,
    information security research,
    robotics,
    human, animal and plant pathogens, both bacterial and viral,
    fibre optics,
    cryptography.
    satellite technology.
    sensor technology.
    signal and image processing.
    composite materials, andthe list could go on and on.
    This effectively criminalizes half of all science related activity at colleges. It's not just the best and brightest it's literally asking the A ark to sail in some kind of reverse HHGTG parody.

  2. The DSGL list contains processors 40 MHz !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The The Defence and Strategic Goods List includea :

    " “Microprocessor microcircuits”, “microcomputer microcircuits” and microcontroller microcircuits, manufactured from a compound semiconductor and operating at a clock frequency exceeding 40 MHz;

    Note: 3A001.a.3. includes digital signal processors, digital array processors and digital coprocessors."

    See http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2013C00051
    CATEGORY 3 — ELECTRONICS, 3A001

    I'm speechless :-(

    contains processor or

  3. Re:As an Australian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    False. Australia is quickly turning to shit.

    I say this as an Australian still living in Australia.

  4. Re:The stupid is strong with these people! by MrKaos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any chance we can talk about the meta data laws while there is still a chance to stop it? I know it's my submission but there is a slim chance that maybe we can do something if enough people know http://slashdot.org/firehose.p... please please let there be some hope

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  5. Re:Somebody in Australia wants a scientist exodus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    But the U.S. government is even more retarded than its Australian counterpart.

  6. Re:Wouldn't it be nice by Pi1grim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hei, Russia doesn't have second amendment, explicitly bans guns and yet, for some unknown reason they too have roving street gangs, political assasinations, gangs slaughtering entire households, but I'm pretty sure that if US were to cancel the second amendment and prohibit gun ownership, then school massacres and roving street gangs would dissapear. I mean, how can you buy a gun, if you are prohibited to own it. Gangs would be forced to use baseball bats and harsh language.

    Or, perhaps, it's not about gun ownership at all and much deeper problems are in play and prohibiting gun ownership is like slapping a plaster on a leper?

  7. Outraged x2 by countach · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm outraged by this law, sure.

    But I'm doubly outraged that I had to read on slashdot that this just passed the senate and there has been ZERO coverage of this in the mainstream media. Shame on you Fairfax, News Ltd and ABC. You went to sleep and betrayed us.

  8. Re:Same here in the USA by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1, Informative

    I guess you and I have different definitions of "conservative." What does conservative mean to you?

    Which of the two political parties in America want to roll back Imperial Washington?
    Which of the two political parties wants an ever larger, ever more powerful government and which one has a large percentage of people who want to go to a government with limited powers as enumerated in the US Constitution?

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond