Slashdot Mirror


Uber To Turn Into a Big Data Company By Selling Location Data

Presto Vivace sends news that Uber has entered into a partnership with Starwood Hotels that hooks accounts from both companies together. If you're a customer of both, you'll get a small benefit when chartering Uber rides, but the cost is that Uber will share all their data on you with Starwood. The article says, This year, we are going to see the transformation of Uber into a big data company cut from the same cloth as Google, Facebook and Visa – using the wealth of information they know about me and you to deliver new services and generate revenue by selling this data to others. ... Uber can run the same program with airlines, restaurants, nightclubs, bars – every time you go from point A to point B in an Uber, “A”, “B” or both represent a new potential consumer of your data. ... Uber knows the hot nightclubs, best restaurants and most obviously now has as much data about traffic patterns as Waze (which coincidentally trades data with local governments). Combining Uber’s data with the very-personal data that customers are willing to give up in exchange for benefits, means that Uber can, and is, on its way to becoming a Big Data company.

120 comments

  1. Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeeeenius.

    Super mega bait and switch for easy fast money.

    1. Re:Genius by Wootery · · Score: 1

      What's the solution to this? Have every company promise to behave? Decentralisation would work, but that's likely to be at odds with the business interest.

    2. Re:Genius by bulled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Easy, the solution is don't use Uber. I am surprised that this is surprising anyone.

    3. Re: Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont use uber but at&t forced it onto my phone as a non-removable system app... that can now track and sell my location. Fuck yeah, 'merica.

      The phone didnt have it when i got it. Do I hace any recourse here besides flashing a custom rom?

    4. Re: Genius by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yes. You can choose to live as a hermit in a cave. Civilization demands the right to sell your personal information for the benefit of others.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re: Genius by plopez · · Score: 1

      "Corporation demand the right to sell your personal information for the benefit of others"

      Fixed that for you. Remember, civilizations have long existed and thrived without corporations. The last few hundred years are an anomaly.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re: Genius by bulled · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up

    7. Re:Genius by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Fuck Uber. It's the only way to be sure.

    8. Re: Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I dont use uber but at&t forced it onto my phone as a non-removable system app.

      What the heck OS did that??

    9. Re: Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn the phone off on occasion? Leave at home or in the hotel?

    10. Re: Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sort of push isn't OS-dependant, it's carrier-dependant, just like carrier-branded TeleNav or carrier-branded app stores.

    11. Re: Genius by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but I've been on a custom rom and love having the less carrier ware crap. My next phone will probably be carrier free.

    12. Re:Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the solution to this?

      Give the driver a random destination. If you want to go to Brooklyn, tell him to take you to Staten Island. That's what he's going to do anyways.

    13. Re: Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "disable"

    14. Re:Genius by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Easy, the solution is don't use Uber. I am surprised that this is surprising anyone.

      This is my complete lack of surprise.

      I took one look at the permissions the app needed on Android and figured out that they were collecting data wholesale.

      I dont expect them to be nearly as meticulous as the likes of Google in anonymising it. They probably give out your phone number as part of the package and offer to determine your home address for a nominal fee.

      Sucks if you're already an Uber fanboy and have given them all your details.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. And now, things get Ugly. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember back when Uber's big privacy problem was 'God View?

    Well, they promised to cut back their sleazebag executives' personal access to that. They might even have been not-lying. Unfortunately, that just meant that they were growing up, and moving into the big-kid leagues of privacy violation. As I said then:

    "So, in a predictable (honestly, surprising they made it to this market cap without doing it already) part of the maturation process; Uber is claiming that they'll rein in discretionary access to personal information by their frat-bro-asshole management, and instead put full database access to all the data ever in the hands of their advertising and customer analytics weasels.

    That's the unpleasant flip side to a story like this. Yes, as it happens, Uber has some of the most punchable management shitweasels one could ask for. The very idea of one of them using 'god view' on you makes you want to take a hot shower and scrub yourself until the uncleanness is gone. However, while opportunistic assholerly is repulsive, it is also unsystematic. Once they grow up a bit, and put those data into the hands of solid, value-rational, systematic, people who aim to squeeze every drop of value out of it, then you are really screwed."

    Well, there we are: 'turning into a big data company' is pretty much the thermonuclear option when it comes to customer privacy; more or less the most invasive thing we yet have the technology to make cost effective. It'll take some real innovating for them to dig deeper.

    1. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by auric_dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once again you are the product.

    2. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and you don't get a dime for it.

    3. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, in essence, you become the cheapest possible whore.

    4. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

      This is not what big data is, this is just selling customers' information. And Google, despite being listed in the summary, never does it BTW.

      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    5. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good way for Uber to end up in a lot of courts. If they thought that the lawsuits for violating various taxi laws were bad, wait until they see the ones for violating every variant implementation of the EU data protection directive...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and you don't get a dime for it.

      Yes you do. You get discounts on other goods and services. Plus it is opt in, so if you don't want them to share your data then don't opt in.

    7. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's opt in for now. Already people don't like this, so it's only opt in at first. Maybe opt out next, and then there is no choice.

    8. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And Google, despite being listed in the summary, never does it BTW.

      I have never heard of them doing it. But why would they? They are the end users of it for their advertising. Businesses go to Google to target advertise and have their products and services appear in search results as thinly disguised real hits - really, how many times of you clicked on hit and just got advertising?

      Google's data is part of their business model. Selling it off is like selling their family jewels.

      Anyway, when I do research on the web, DuckDuckGo is the only way to go.

    9. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by DrXym · · Score: 2

      This is not what big data is, this is just selling customers' information. And Google, despite being listed in the summary, never does it BTW.

      No, and not for reasons for privacy either. They're simply holding onto it because it's more valuable for them to do so - for similar reasons that casinos and supermarket loyalty schemes might - to mine and profit from the information, layer services on top of it and deny that info to competitors.

    10. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The point of customer data, big or small, in the end appears to be to improve the ways companies can sell us crap (and doesn;t the whole world seem to revolve around that, sometimes?). Google does not sell the data to others directly because they can do so indirectly: they (claim to) provide advertisers on their network with a competitive edge by using customer data.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    11. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by DrXym · · Score: 3, Informative

      Starwood are a predominantly US chain but they and Uber had better be damned careful not to share info in the EU. It's not illegal for companies in the EU to do it, but they must obtain explicit consent and even then there are limits on the data they can share or aggregate and rules on how the data is managed.

    12. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Already people don't like this

      People don't like it because they didn't RTFA, and are basing their opinion on the idiotic misleading summary, and the knee jerk comments written by people that didn't RTFA either.

    13. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just a question:

            Would You agree to be used as product if:
            1) Price of the service is cut by half
            2) Anonymization of your data is really true

            There is a lot of good data to be used to improve traffic in big cities for instance, what about if You get benefited by the service as well?
            Can Big Data when properly regulated and anonymized be attractive ? Would You demand transparency as well, to find out when your data was used?

      Cheers.

    14. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you trust that they never will? Just like Uber likely never would? Or any other shitty "big data" company never will? Until they do of course.

      I long for the day when all private messages on Google and Facebook end up in a public searchable database. That will be fun.

    15. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's opt in for now.

      Unless Uber achieve actual, literal, world domination, using Uber will always be opt-in.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    16. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      2) Anonymization of your data is really true

      That has been shown to be increasingly difficult.

      There is a lot of good data to be used to improve traffic in big cities for instance.

      What does that have to do with a private taxi service collecting data on your movements? That's a matter for the municipal administration to solve.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by gnasher719 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is not what big data is, this is just selling customers' information. And Google, despite being listed in the summary, never does it BTW.

      That lame argument that Google doesn't sell out customer's data comes up again and again. And it is nonsense, every time. They don't sell the data, but they sell the use of the data. They place adverts based on the data, using their deep knowledge about you (the product).

      This is like arguing that an email spammer who doesn't sell his address list to other spammers, but sends spam emails as a service, is a good guy because he doesn't sell your address. Or arguing that a car thief doesn't do any harm as long as he drives around in my car himself, or rents it out, or uses it as a taxi, as long as he doesn't sell it.

    18. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by cinky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and I get that when it comes to google - I get to use their services for "free". But I pay uber and many other companies for their services and I feel I'm entitled to privacy of data they have about me...

    19. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by martin-boundary · · Score: 2
      No, he's not. He's a bystander in the deal between Uber and the advertisers. As a bystander, he can do whatever he wants. If he decides to shit all over the data Uber intend to sell the advertisers, that's fine. If he decides to sue the advertisers for wrongful access to his data, that's fine. If he decides to sue Uber for privacy violations, that's fine too. Basically, the sky's the limit, since Uber are illegally misusing his data (at least in the EU - where companies are only allowed to use personal data for the immediate business at hand - meaning getting you from A to B in the case of Uber).

      So go ahead, make Uber's day.

    20. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn data pimps I tell you.

    21. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yet i'm 99% sure my facebook newsfeed correlates to my google searches.

      With ghosty active and nearly 0 addons, am I missing something?

    22. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean 0 except for ghostery and abp

    23. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      Can you trust that they never will?

      Yes. Google's power over advertisers lies in Google's exclusive access to user information. Advertisers pay Google to figure out who would be good recipients of advertising, based on the belief that Google can identify those people better than the advertiser. If Google sells its collection of user data, then the advertiser will be able to make that determination for itself, and Google loses its main advantage over other ad-distribution networks. You do not sell the goose that lays golden eggs.

    24. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many times of you clicked on hit and just got advertising?

      Look at what the use of "could of" instead of "could've" or "could have" hath wrought!

    25. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Opt in, like the conduit.com PUP-ware that comes with Windows downloads and may or may not give you a checkbox to say "no"?

      Opt in like the advertising trackers in a phone that require root or a custom ROM to get rid of?

      Opt in like Verizon's tagging of every HTTP request with a custom identifier that marks you regardless of privacy settings?

      Opt in like how FB posts get graded and you get assigned a "credit score" where if you make a crack about "press 1 for English", you get flagged to potential employers as a racist?

      Fuck that "opt in". I hate local taxis, but at least I won't be worrying about who has what data, especially if I pay in cash on the barrelhead and turn off my phone.

    26. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by bulled · · Score: 1

      And how is Uber to work for?

      Is it knee jerk, or is it watching what other companies have done and seeing the inevitable path that a company run by, as another poster put it, some of the most punchable management shitweasels will take in the name of shareholder value?

    27. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They just won't give you any discounts if you don't opt in. They'll still share the data.

    28. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by Deagol · · Score: 1

      > shitweasels

      Stephen King fan?

    29. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Is it knee jerk, or is it watching what other companies have done ...?

      Why should you be outraged at Uber because of what other companies have done? Uber is doing nothing wrong here. They are not sharing any data without explicit, informed consent. If other companies are not doing that, shouldn't you be outraged at them? If you really, really want to be outraged at Uber, because of something they might theoretically do someday, wouldn't it make sense to wait until you have an actual reason? The world has lots of actual problems. Wouldn't it make more sense to focus on one of them, rather than getting outraged about a hypothetical problem that isn't even real?

    30. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Google and FaceBook give you "free" services but take it out of your ass. So yes, you're whoring yourself out to them for cheap.

      But with Uber you're still paying for the service. They're not going to start giving you free rides in exchange for mining your data. So you're still getting fucked, but you're paying them for the privilege. That's not a john, either. The john pays for it, but he wants the fuckening.

      Is there a word for that even? Where you pay somebody and they unwelcomingly shag you? Only thing I can think of is "taxpayer."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    31. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that they are US companies will get the EU coming for them. Anti-Americanism sells and keeps judges and politicians in power.

      Look how often Google and MS get called on the carpet. The EU is likely just waiting and gathering evidence before shutting them down for good.

    32. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by plopez · · Score: 1

      And they don't even kiss you first.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    33. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is there a word for that even? Where you pay somebody and they unwelcomingly shag you? Only thing I can think of is "taxpayer."

      Nah. I don't know your situation but I get, or have received; roads, schools, fire protection, cheap food, clean water (unheard of in many places in the world), airports, railway travel, national parks, national forests, state forests, public parks, heavily subsidized university education, cleaner air, cleaner water, and public libraries. By pooling my tax money with others I we use our combined cash to create a civilization. Which is why I hate tax cheats and dodgers, they are parasites.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    34. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Far more of your money is wasted by pork than tax cheats and dodges.... By sheer numbers your hate should be directed at federal pensions and military spending, not people trying to avoid paying for all the pork. From my perspective, you are looking at the wrong side of the equation.

      --
      Good-bye
    35. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by biojayc · · Score: 1

      You search on google. You click links. Links lead yo pages that have Facebook like buttons. Facebook learned that you visited the page. Facebook has already prescraped the page and classified its content. Facebook now can show it in your feed. Or. You search on google. You click a link. That page has google ads. Google knows that you visited it. Google bids on facebooks ad exchange and sometimes wins the auction. Ads show up in the news feed. [Also works for any other advertising platform other than doubleclick(Google)] Or. You search on google. You click a link. The page has third party trackers that generate user lists that they sell. Facebook buys said user list. Facebook matches you in the list, and shows you a related ad. Most likely its the first one. What is certainly not happening: You search on google. Click no links. You go to Facebook and see a related ad in the news feed.

    36. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by biojayc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, was on my phone and forgot that slashdot requires formatting. So double post with better formatting.

      You search on google. You click links. Links lead yo pages that have Facebook like buttons. Facebook learned that you visited the page. Facebook has already prescraped the page and classified its content. Facebook now can show it in your feed.

      Or.

      You search on google. You click a link. That page has google ads. Google knows that you visited it. Google bids on facebooks ad exchange and sometimes wins the auction. Ads show up in the news feed. [Also works for any other advertising platform other than doubleclick(Google)]

      Or.

      You search on google. You click a link. The page has third party trackers that generate user lists that they sell. Facebook buys said user list. Facebook matches you in the list, and shows you a related ad.

      Most likely its the first one.

      What is certainly not happening:
      You search on google. Click no links. You go to Facebook and see a related ad in the news feed.

    37. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      roads

      Awful and getting worse.

      schools

      !!

      fire protection

      I'm with you on this one. So that's one thing the Romans have done for us.

      cheap food

      Ugh. The Future Of Food, pls. srsly.

      clean water

      Frack that...

      airports

      Complete with institutionalized sexual abuse

      railway travel

      There would be more, but the government allowed the automobile companies to buy up and shut down profitable railway and streetcar lines to quell competition.

      national parks, national forests, state forests

      They spent more preventing people from going there during the "shutdown" than it costs to keep them open. And don't get me started on mismanagement of BLM land, which is what, a quarter of the country? By eye, anyway.

      heavily subsidized university education

      With money lent at dramatically above the rates the banks are charged, making the people a profit center.

      cleaner air,

      The EPA is a curious beast which only occasionally exhibits a spine and which is almost completely toothless.

      cleaner water

      See above

      and public libraries

      Pretty good, although there's some severe privacy problems regarding records retention when it comes to access to modern media. So the Romans have done two things for us, eh?

      Which is why I hate tax cheats and dodgers, they are parasites.

      The worst cheating is written right into the law, I hope this is what you mean by 'dodgers'.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by theburp · · Score: 1

      Given Ubers track record, do you really think they care about the law?

    39. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The problem is you can't avoid paying for the pork without avoiding paying for the essential. The more mature way of dealing with that situation would be to keep paying, but change the system. If you can't change the system, giving up and not paying makes you lazy, not part of the solution.

    40. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's a knee-jerk reaction because you are assuming what Uber will do without any evidence beyond the actions of others. I doubt you'd like being judged by the actions of other people as it would probably be highly inaccurate judgement - the exact same logic applies here. Screaming and sobbing about some slippery slope or the actions of other companies isn't helping anyone, let alone you.

    41. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Well they should if they don't want to be on the receiving end of massive fines. It's not like their cab service where they're fighting cities and towns.

      Europe has strong and clear-cut data protection laws that require explicit consent and limit the data that may be kept on a person to that needed. If Uber sell or aggregate data without good cause in the EU they'll be digging their own grave.

    42. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by bulled · · Score: 2

      It's a knee-jerk reaction because you are assuming what Uber will do without any evidence beyond the actions of others. I doubt you'd like being judged by the actions of other people as it would probably be highly inaccurate judgement - the exact same logic applies here.

      And yet this is largely how the world works. Good on you if you can completely avoid judging others based on what you have seen entities "like" them do in the past.

      Screaming and sobbing about some slippery slope or the actions of other companies isn't helping anyone, let alone you.

      Because there is so much screaming and sobbing here. Commenters are simply pointing out that given shareholders, you should expect the company to run rough shod over user privacy if it is profitable. Lying to yourself about this fundamental truth isn't helping anyone, let alone you.

    43. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so we finally see where all this is going. Moving that much closer to the New World Order.

    44. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Ghostery supposedly blocks third-party scripts and cookies such as the FB like button.

      2,3 I block ads, so I'm referring to the semantic or keywords in the post from the pages that I liked, that the newsfeed algorithm decides to show me. The scary thing is it also correlates to some of my forum posts by account registered using another email address. I am guessing IP + User Agent as the fingerprint. I think it would take some time to do a controlled experiment to verify. Anyway if it is true then it is extremely invasive and Ghostery is next to useless.

      IIRC it works without me clicking any links, if I could verify this, whatever mechanism it uses, it's the same as Google selling consumer data.

    45. Re: And now, things get Ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >New World Order
      Fuck off, you nutjob.

    46. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by plopez · · Score: 1

      Most of what you complain about is due to insufficient tax revenue or due to Congressional attempts to actually interfere with good governance and good stewardship. As the other poster said, move to a country without a strong government such as Somalia or Mexico. Just watch out for the gangs, militias and death squads. A few taxes are a low price to pay for the benefits of civilization.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    47. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by plopez · · Score: 1

      "You get discounts on other goods and services."

      So that is what you call CEO perks, bonuses, and severance pay.....

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    48. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most of what you complain about is due to insufficient tax revenue

      BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      We have enough money to fuck with other nations' politics, bomb brown people, and build jets that nobody needs. You're full of shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Easy, because Uber didn't invent these concepts. They are a me too company in the datamining space trying to follow the herd. So we *know* how this is going to end by looking at how other companies behave. Grow up.

    50. Re:And now, things get Ugly. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      The fact that someone argues that someone else benefits from their data being used improperly does not in any way change the fact that their data is being used improperly.

  3. You are to uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the unexpecting viewer is to goatse.cx.

    Did I get that right, mensa people?

    1. Re:You are to uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Ah, IQ, the metric which people use to devise employment tests, because people with high IQs do better in employment. Go go gadget circular reasoning!

      I'm not sure what depth of stupidity manages to believe that human intelligence can be reduced to a repetitive, simplistic shape-matching exercise.

      (disclaimer: I apparently have an IQ of 158. But god fucking knows I'm as average as can be.)

    2. Re:You are to uber by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Did I get that right?

      No, you got it wrong, because you didn't RTFA. This is an optional service for people with both an Uber and a Starwood account, that want to link them, and give explicit permission for them to be connected. This isn't being forced on anyone, and Uber is not sharing your data without your informed consent.

    3. Re:You are to uber by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

      (disclaimer: I apparently have an IQ of 158. But god fucking knows I'm as average as can be.)

      That's obvious from the fact that you forgot to mention the scale used and the test. ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:You are to uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Ah yes, though the average IQ is 100, somehow the average IQ on the internet is 160. So congrats, you're 2 points below the internet average. The funny part is though that an IQ of 160 puts you in what, to top .1% of the human population? I can't remember the exact number. It is enlightening to know that only the top .2% or so of the human population uses the internet though. /sarcasm

    5. Re:You are to uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...IQ so high it wraps and shows negative...says

      What goatse.cx is to the unexpecting viewer.

      Do I have to fix all of these!?

    6. Re:You are to uber by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      "This isn't being forced on anyone" - because it's in pilot phase, and they haven't yet had their lawyers and PR folks work out how to slip it past people without them knowing/caring. They're also trying to float the idea of it being a "feature" temporarily, to try to come up with a way to convince people it's a value-add (much easier than hiding it). Eventually though - maybe in as little as 6 months - it will be forced on everyone. Of that, you should be certain.

  4. And treat the new market the same by kooky45 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They say they'll operate like Google and Facebook, but they'll do the same as they've done with taxi regulations; ignore the rules. Don't be suprised if we hear about data protection regulations being flouted because Uber are "just a car sharing company, and not a marketting giant".

    1. Re:And treat the new market the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you use 'but'? Do you think that Google and Facebook follow the rules? Noob.

  5. the ... information they know about me and you by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good thing I don't use Uber, then!

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re: the ... information they know about me and you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But where is love for Uber? There has been a lot of Slashdot people talking up Uber. I wonder what those same people are thinking now. Personally I never liked Uber to begin with because they are breaking laws instead of trying to work with city governments.

    2. Re: the ... information they know about me and you by plopez · · Score: 1

      It is much harder to love someone when you realize one day they gave you a virus. ;)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  6. Hang on a minute by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Did anyone using this service expect anything less? The data created by the company is another product that can be consumed.

    I used to love being a free person, now I'm a data product to be bought and sold, much like a slave.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Hang on a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nothing like being a slave. If you were anything like a slave, you'd be tied to a post and whipped until you bled for saying something disrespectful about your masters.

      Comparing your mild annoyance at the thought that a company that you don't have to do business with could sell your data to a third party to slavery is incredibly offensive.

    2. Re: Hang on a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reddit is over there, son. This is Slashdot. We don't get our panties all twisted over very reasonable uses of words that you social justice weenies have deemed to be "offensive".

    3. Re:Hang on a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not always true. I've been reading up on society in ancient Rome. It wasn't uncommon that a literate and learned individual might sell themselves into slavery to someone rich who was not literate or learned for some amount of time. They would offer advice and provide services such as letter writing for some amount of time and would then gain an inheritance of sorts. They would then be able to live the rest of their lives in comfort after that period was up. These people were typically treated quite well as their masters appreciated and trusted their advice on things. Then there was also the gladiators, who were mostly individuals who sold themselves in to slavery as well. After all, it was the equivalent of being a rock star today. And contrary to the movies, you preferred your gladiators to not be killed. It was expensive to train them.

      Now obviously, that's pointing out some of the nicer portions and ignoring the nastier portions which you described which were all to common, especially if you were a field slave. But it should be remembered though often it was brutal, it wasn't always. I personally think it's important to remember because otherwise you might think what was the good is now some new idea, start allowing it, not realizing that it was the behavior which created all the barbaric behavior which is typically associated with slavery.

    4. Re: Hang on a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reddit had plenty of wingnuts like you who derp about your hatred of modern people too. You are not a smart person.

    5. Re:Hang on a minute by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Comparing your mild annoyance at the thought that a company that you don't have to do business with could sell your data to a third party to slavery is incredibly offensive.

      People that hide behind the freedom of anonymous speech I fight for to criticize me, offend me. Go an write a letter to your duly elected representative you are wasting your time here.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  7. Uber Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ubers app records location not just when you're using its service, it tracks you always. Uber is part owned by Google, Google also track you always. Lots of companies track your details, from the contacts in your address book, your locations, your messages, the URLs you visit, the search terms, what porn you like. Your bank transactions, your medical details, your identity details, all are sold under the category 'business records'. Your relationships, your family, romantic and sexual links. Where you shop, your loyalty cards, what you buy, your politics, your campaigns, your journalism.
    Your business secrets, your job, your CV, your LinkedIn account, your Facebook account, your email, your messages, your SMSs.

    All that data is made available to NSA and GCHQ as business records, including all your government records. Those agencies are not passive, JTRIG the UKs attack agency creates false allegations, rigs polls, fakes emails, and HAS ATTACK GONE AFTER BRITS, they decided 'hackivism' would be a valid target, and went after UK script kiddies.

    https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

  8. If you're surprised by magamiako1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're an idiot, plain and simple.

    Selling "Customers as a service" is the big, new economy and every single "startup" and "app" coming out of places like Y Combinator in the past few years has been about nothing more than selling your information. Every mobile app, every mobile game. Every "CHECK OUT THIS FREE NEW THING!" For example, Life 360. Think they're offering this for free? Life360 is currently valued at $250M. Facebook paid a few billion for WhatsApp Messenger.

    You're a complete moron if you haven't been watching this.

    1. Re:If you're surprised by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      This isn't new. Data aggregators have been operating since before ARPANET existed. Every electronic transaction you make is sold to private brokers for a little extra profit and there are zero regulations on what they do with that data.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:If you're surprised by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      This isn't even old..

      Every prescription you get from a pharmacy.
      Every ticket you get from the cops.
      Every loan, credit card, house, boat, car, truck or Real Doll that you ever purchase.
      Every pack of bubblegum that you buy with anything other than cash.
      Everything you buy in a supermarket.
      Everything you buy at WalMart, Target, TacoBell and the porn shop down the hall.*

      Hell, likely everything you buy from your drug dealer is aggregated.

      But all of this is dwarfed (so to speak) by the overlords of Mountain View - this old stuff doesn't even begin to worry me compared to what is afoot:

      Three Databases for the Credit Card houses under the table,
      Seven for the Fortune 500 corps in their halls of stone,
      Nine for the Government TLAs, never to die,
      One for Google on his dark throne
      In the Land of Mountain View where the Shadows lie.
      One Database to rule them all, One Database to find them,
      One Database to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
      In the Land of Mountain View where the Shadows lie.

      * Note to self - next time stick with murdering a bad meme from some '80s rock band instead of a bad meme from the '70's hippie culture.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  9. Re:Yes but what about sexism in FL/OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Offtopic, cunt.

  10. Welcome to the 21st Century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Privacy will be the new luxury commodity of the 21st century. Seriously, it takes a shitload of time and thought to secure even the slightest bit of privacy these days. The biggest leak point of personal information are definitely smartphones. They haven't matured to a point where they would be as "easily" configurable as PC's and hence users usually haven't got the slightest clue what the phone is doing with all their data. I mean, a great example would be my smartphone's built-in weather widget: why the fuck does it need to access my text messages and e-mails every few hours?

    1. Re:Welcome to the 21st Century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I mean, a great example would be my smartphone's built-in weather widget: why the fuck does it need to access my text messages and e-mails every few hours?

      Maybe so it can find out if you've sent any texts/emails that describe the weather ?

  11. The EU will be all over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A tax avoiding Luxembourg company breaking EU data privacy laws wont end well.

  12. Re:Yes but what about sexism in FL/OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never offtopic. Must talk about sexism in FL/OSS at all times.
    Triggering.

  13. The new Thai Gem scam by monkeyxpress · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Haha. Anyone who has been to a South East Asian country knows all about this. You get a cheap price for the taxi and then spend half the day at the driver's cousin's Gem store on Silom Road trying to convince them to take you to see the real Giant Buddha. It's funny how you add a splash of paint and some suits to a scam and everyone thinks the western world is 'advanced'.

  14. Poster might be reading too much into this by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone who is an SPG member and generally keeps tabs on what new promotions Starwood runs, this is anything but news. Starwood has over the past year or two, as a general strategy, struck up this kind of relationsip with a ton of companies.

    - Starwood partners with Caesars Entertainment, where your SPG profile and your Total Rewards profiles can be linked. This means that loyalty shown at Caesars casinos can help you at Starwood hotels, and vice-versa

    - Starwood also partners with Delta, where your SPG profile and your Skymiles profile can be linked, in a simmilar capacity - you can earn both skymiles and SPG points for Detla flights and for hotel stays.

    - Now, they are doing the same with Uber... same story as above.

    Obviously these companies are going to share customer data. However, if you think Starwood has the infrastructure built, capacity or talent to data mine Uber for what restaurants you go to and target hotel promotions, I think you have a bit higher expectations of them than I do. The much more immediate use of these types of partnerships is to encourage cross-brand loyalty for both companies.

    1. Re:Poster might be reading too much into this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read TFA. "Uber can run the same program with airlines, restaurants, nightclubs, bars – every time you go from point A to point B in an Uber, “A”, “B” or both represent a new potential consumer of your data."

      Starwood's not getting what restaurants you go to. Uber's going to sell that data to other clients. Starwood's just their first 'big data' customer.

  15. Pretty much illegal in EU I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the right of rectification, and the right to privacy, good luck with Uber trying to pull that in EU. If they think they got problem, wait until the prevacy minded folk in the EU crush them.

  16. Name Change by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Well, it's time to change their name to Unter. See ya assholes.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  17. Honestly ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anybody who says they didn't see this coming is a complete fool.

    This kind of crap was the goal all along.

    They're a non-taxi taxi company who has non-employee employees who aren't covered by any rules, who has to justify a billion plus in valuation, and want to sell you data.

    Everything about this company has been sleazy from the get go. Suddenly becoming a big-data company was entirely predictable.

    Just another greedy technology company, claiming to be innovative, mostly skirting around the rules they claim don't apply to them, and wanting to use their access to your cell phone to sell data about you ... because that's where the real money is.

    These guys have always sounded like a sleazy player. Maybe their "customers" will wise up. And maybe their drivers will too. The product has always been data.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  18. Free rides now? by Theovon · · Score: 1

    So how that Uber is going to make all this money from location data, are they going to give free rides? It seems unlikely, but it's possible that the revenue stream from subscribers to their database could exceed the operating costs for fuel, paying drivers, and other overheads. If they give free rides, they may be able to side-step some of the taxi laws, because they're not profiting directly from the riders.

    1. Re:Free rides now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free rides would never be an option. If anything, the cost of the ride would be doubled. Then there would be a 30% discount for agreeing to "share" your information. That way you pay more and get data fleeced.

  19. NSL's for everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big data you say? Well then...you're getting a NSL...think of the children!

  20. The advantage of a cab is..... by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    private cash only transactions.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:The advantage of a cab is..... by plopez · · Score: 0

      Moderated 'insightful'? Seriously? To me it is blindingly obvious.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:The advantage of a cab is..... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Moderated 'insightful'? Seriously? To me it is blindingly obvious.

      Welcome to modern society.

      The banks addict them to using a card (gotta get those points) but they act all hurt when the merchant raises prices because of credit card fees. Allow all kinds of draconian laws to be created to fight "teh terr'sts" but act like its the end of the world when this is used to curtail something they enjoy.

      Hypocrisy isn't just in fashion, it's become a way of life.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  21. It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should men with unpopular or "forbidden" views be excised from the opensource movement and "not allowed" to contribute, in a manner similar to that which is done in employment?

    It depends... are you Hans Reiser posting from prison? If so, I think the answer to the question is probably "yes".

    PS: Killing your wife is pretty sexist...

    1. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It depends... are you Hans Reiser posting from prison? If so, I think the answer to the question is probably "yes"."

      Why? What does that have to do with his code. He had every right to kill his wife. She fucked another guy. Read deuteronomy.

    2. Re: It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, that was mikhail, aka mikeeusa, one of the worst game makers ever.

      he'd like to rape an 8 year old kid, because not even anime characters would touch him with a tentacle.

      now he is all crybaby because nobody likes his shitty "game". but its not fun. he has no friends, he has never played that crap multiplayer.

  22. Why is google listed? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Why is google listed?

    They aggregate and anonymize the data before they sell it; it's just statistical information at that point.

  23. Uber is shit by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I never did believe for a minute they were nothing but full of shit. I was right. Where I go is nobody's business but mine.

  24. The Shearing Economy by epine · · Score: 1

    Ugh. All your base R belong to us.

    Avec optional appositional phrase:

    means that Uber can, and is, on its way to becoming a Big Data company

    Sans optional appositional phrase:

    means that Uber can on its way to becoming a Big Data company

    With proper parallelism:

    means that Uber can become, and is on its way to becoming, a Big Data company

    With more visual help to pair the distal commas:

    means that Uber can become—and is on its way to becoming—a Big Data company

    As it happens, I listened to an EconTalk episode last night dating back to July 2014, which is mainly about Uber.

    Michael Munger on the Sharing Economy

    This happens to be the audience-favourite EconTalk episode from 2014.

    I've never been as much of a Mike Munger fan as many listeners of the show, but I actually thought this episode was well done. It's about 59m30s longer than what fits in an SMS message, so that makes it fairly clear that this episode is not preaching to the Uber choir. It's for those of us north of 30, whose lives are so dismal we sit around and listen to other people converse about how old and dismal we've all become.

  25. Uber is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just another evil corporation bent on ripping off the public .... no good can come of this

  26. Uber Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are just doing everything the wrong way, aren't they?

    Like, just when I think things can't get worse for them, they go and make things worse anyways.

  27. Uber Assholes by kheldan · · Score: 1

    That's what they should change their company name to, to be more in line with reality.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  28. No More Uber For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple as that. Deleted.

  29. Well, as long as they're "One Of Us"... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    ...the big boys will probably leave them alone.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  30. So, move to Somalia already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, move to Somalia already. Or China and enjoy their EPA-less environment.

    Learn some fucking history.

    Or run for office. Or become an investigative reporter. Or do a Snowden.

    But stop fucking bitching because things are not perfectly fairy-land, and take a look around, and appreciate how fucking good you have it.

    And pay your fucking taxes. And smile when you do that.