Slashdot Mirror


Broadband ISP Betrayal Forces Homeowner To Sell New House

New submitter knightsirius writes: A Washington homeowner is having to sell his new house after being refused internet service from Comcast and CenturyLink despite receiving confirmation from both that the location was able to receive broadband service. The whole process took months and involved false assurances and bureaucratic convolutions. The national broadband map database frequently cited by Comcast as proof of sufficient competition lists 10 options at his location, including a gigabit municipal fiber network, but he cannot subscribe to it due to Washington state direct sale restrictions.

10 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Same problem here in South Carolina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I bought my home, I was assured by AT&T that they provided Uverse up to 18mbit at my address, and the employee on the phone actually directed me to the National Broadband Map.

    After I moved in, I ordered service, and what do you know? I can only get legacy DSL at 768k. I filed complaints with FCC and FTC over the false claims and false representation on the broadband map, only to receive "thanks but we don't care" letters from both agencies, along with a courtesy call from AT&T confirming that 768k was the highest speed I could get.

    The county fiber network runs right past my house, but since AT&T was able to get a municipal network ban passed as state law in SC (fuck you very much for signing it, Nikki Haley, you steaming piece of shit), I can't connect to it (only people who have NO Internet options from a major ISP can connect to it, and since I can get 768k DSL, I can't connect to the county network).

    Fuck you AT&T
    Fuck you FCC
    Fuck you FTC
    Fuck you Nikki Haley
    Fuck you South Carolina

    1. Re:Same problem here in South Carolina by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Check the law again. Broadband is now classified as 25/3. If the language in the contracts specify 'broadband' you might be able to say ' while i do have internet acces, i dont have access to broadband as defined by the FCC.'

      --
      Good-bye
  2. Yes again by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Didn't we see this yesterday?

    Yes we did

  3. Dupe by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a repost.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  4. Re: Dupity dupity dupe dupe dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    America has no citizens. Only mindless massive consumers.

  5. Re:Easy Solution by thaylin · · Score: 3, Informative

    He specifically said no fines, that they have to provide the service as the fine.

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  6. It works in reverse too by WoodburyMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    We live in a somewhat rural area. Fiber isn't even close, and DSL service (6mbit max) only became available a year or two ago. Cable internet through Charter has been available for over a decade though, and we've had Cable TV since the early 1990's. About 5 years ago, relatives next door finally caved and wanted cable. They are literally one house before us, and equal distance from the road. (100ft or so). Every time we called they said it was not available for their address. It took 6mo of fighting, and a call/complaint to the local cable/communication oversight committee, to get them to send a survey crew (A single guy), who immediately got out of the car, looked, said "The f**k, there's no problem here you can get it" who then went on about a rant about how their database is so messed up and inaccurate.

  7. Re:4G by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Europe we have this thing called 3G and 4G which both brings you reliable wireless broadband without wires. Approx $30/month.

    ... and capped data allowances - often at very low limits

  8. Happened to me in a rich area of LA by netsavior · · Score: 4, Informative

    I moved into nice apartments in Westlake Village, California. Called Verizon, had them hook up DSL. It was fast and worked well... for 12 hours.
    My service was shut off.

    I called and they said "Service is not available in your area.

    I told them I had service yesterday, and they confirmed that I did, but that it was a mistake, and service was not available.

    We went around and around, I finally gave up after 2 hours on the phone, vowing to sign up with someone else. No other service available, and since I was at the bottom of a valley, EVEN SATELLITE was not available.

    After a few more days of phone calls and escalations, I finally straight up asked them "Is the CO/RT full and you didn't realize it until you hooked me up?" they admitted that yes it was.

    I made a deal with my neighbor, bought her network equipment and paid her phone bill every month just for letting me use her wifi.

    THEN to add insult to injury, I got a contract cancellation fee bill from Verizon in the mail, because I terminated my contract for DSL before a year was up.

  9. Re:Sounds familiar by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just describe the situation in writing and request them to install either U-verse or DSL according to their own choice immediately. Do it with registered letter with proof of delivery. Correct bureaucracy makes wonders.