Slashdot Mirror


Chrome OS Receives Extreme Makeover With Material Design and Google Now

MojoKid writes Late last week, Google quietly began inviting people to opt into the beta channel for ChromeOS to help the company "shape the future" of the OS. Some betas can be riskier than others, but Google says that opting into this one is just a "little risk", one that will pay off handsomely for those who crave new features. New in this version is Chrome Launcher 2.0, which gives you quick access to a number of common features, including the apps you use most often (examples are Hangouts, Calculator, and Files). Some apps have also received a fresh coat of paint, such as the file manager. Google notes that this is just the start, so there will be more updates rolling out to the beta OS as time goes on. Other key features available in this beta include the ability to extract pass protected Zip archives, as well as a perk for travelers. ChromeOS will now automatically detect your new timezone, and then update the time and date accordingly.

56 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Not a huge change. by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Honestly, the most noticeable change was that the font changed on the tabs and URL bar.

    1. Re: Not a huge change. by technosaurus · · Score: 2

      I honestly find the whole new color palate to be way too similar to the Windows8 start area crap. Companies will eventually figure out that we have diverse visual palates the way they did with taste in the 80s, unfortunately Google missed that opportunity on this go around.

    2. Re: Not a huge change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you see with the roof of your mouth? Ahh, you meant palette.

    3. Re:Not a huge change. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the most noticeable change was that the font changed on the tabs and URL bar.

      Oh gawd, this obviously means that Firefox will have to make the same change in their Chrome-clone browser. I dread it every time Google makes a change because I know it'll be in the next release of Chromefox...

  2. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by edremy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know- it's so terrible to have a sub-$200 laptop that boots in seconds and that has everything stored in the cloud so if my kids break it I can replace it trivially.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  3. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Informative

    No? Watching http://trailers.divx.com/divx_... just fine on my Acer C720; CPU hasn't bumped over over 40%.

  4. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    you're only giving google a head start on tracking your kids' every move online. not the greatest move a parent can make.

  5. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd rather pay $250 for a real laptop running an OS that has an actual software library. I'd also rather keep MY data to myself instead of storing it online where some corporation has full access to it and that requires an internet connection just to get at it.

    Some of us use computers for more than Facebook and YouTube.

  6. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    know- it's so terrible to have a sub-$200 laptop that boots in seconds and that has everything stored in the cloud so if my kids break it I can replace it trivially.

    If your kid breaks your laptop, that's accompanied by an ass whooping to ensure it never happens again, right?

    Intelligent countries with intelligent people don't treat laptops as throwaways items.

    Nor do they store their vital data in "the cloud."

    Google fanboys are not intelligent.

  7. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you mount it on your wall, sure. But a laptop on my lap fills up my field of view much more than the 40" TV in my living room does.

  8. Re: Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

    Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

    There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

  9. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by citizenr · · Score: 1, Troll

    I know- it's so terrible to have a sub-$200 laptop

    that would be nice, in reality new Chromebook Pixel is $999, £670, AU$1,320

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  10. OS versus apps versus UI by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

    You know, by now I'm used to articles in the mainstream news who confuse an operating system, applications (which may or may not ship with an operating system), and the look/feel that a particular GUI puts on both. However, a web site like Slashdot - self-proclaimed home of "news for geeks" - should be able to do a little bit better.

  11. Re: Chrome OS is a joke by EmeraldBot · · Score: 2

    Come on Stallman, no shame in posting under a name.

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  12. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Ksevio · · Score: 4, Informative

    In actual reality, I went to amazon.com, typed "Chromebook", selected OS: "Chrome OS", then sorted by price resulting in 14 models below the $200 mark

  13. JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! IS THIS FOR REAL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    HOLY MOTHER OF FUCK, is this for real?

    I've just been reading The systemd Project Forks the Linux Kernel from DistroWatch, which I presume is what you were referring to.

    This isn't an April Fool's Day joke, is it? It is dated March 30, so I have to assume that it isn't.

    Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Systemd is utterly destroying the Linux community. It's doing this so much better than Microsoft or SCO could have ever done.

    1. Re:JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! IS THIS FOR REAL? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if they just actually did that and made systemd only work with that fork, maybe, mayyybe distro maintainers would wake up and smell the coffee and tell them to fuck off.

      the systemd guys want to create a distro around the init system eventually anyways.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! IS THIS FOR REAL? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The supposed source Ivan Gotyaovich does not appear to be exist, and the "Gotya" is a bit of a hint.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! IS THIS FOR REAL? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The bigger question is thus...why would the Linux community put up with having a spreading cancer like systemd, that is run so poorly and is sticking its grubby fingers in so many places that have fuck and all to do with init (I mean now its got fricking VLC logging for Pete's sake) that an article like this is completely plausible?

      I still think the whole fucking thing smells fishier than a lesbian whorehouse, I mean has anybody read the fricking posts by these devs pushing systemd into these distros? They read worse than fucking Windows Metro fanboy posts, you got appeals to emotion, the whole "embrace teh innovaaaation!" horseshit, AND you got them banning posts that lists legitimate beefs or just throwing insults. I swear to god you change a couple words and it looks like it was written by a Win 8 fanboy! You even have supposedly "stability oriented" distros like Debian jamming this shit in, outside their own normal release practices no less, and this shit is so alpha quality that users are reporting basic troubleshooting tools don't work AND its being run by a guy that cares so much for stability he posts such gems as "can't get systemd running on ARM...shipping anyway" and they STILL take the crap and defend this bozo?

      I'm sorry folks but something sure as fuck is rotten in Denmark. After Snowden revealed their best tricks and all these articles about "how to have a secure Internet using LiveCDs" came out suddenly out of the blue we have Red Hat, a company that gets more than 85% of its revenue from TLAs no less, saying that init that AFAIK nobody was really bitching about, says "we have GOT to replace init with a big sprawling mess that will have its hooks into everything"...and all the big distros fricking CHEER? Even though its made by the same guy that replaced ALSA with a brittle as fuck sound system that took ages to fix? Well if the NSA didn't order this they really need to give Red Hat a raise and a fruit basket because they couldn't have done better if they tried!

      Remember folks they do NOT need to have backdoors written expressly into systemd, all they need is an arrogant cowboy coder (which Poettering certainly fits) that cares more about ship dates than testing and their black hats can do the rest. At the way that thing is spreading its gonna make Windows SVCHOSTS look positively dainty, I mean go to Poeterring's own blog and see his "plans" for systemd, by the time he's done the kernel will be just a VM running on top of systemd!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  14. VM Version available? by tji · · Score: 1

    I would like to run this as a secure browser in a VM that I can revert to a clean state regularly.

    The only ChromeOS VMs I've seen are very old. Anyone know of a good source for current ChromeOS as a (vmware) VM?

  15. Re: Chrome OS is a joke by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The remaining 5% makes me money. So yes, it is that important to me.

    Then don't buy a Chromebook. It is not a professional workstation. I don't have one either. But my kids do. Chromebooks are also popular with schools. They are cheap, and are difficult for students to screw up, because ... well because there is nothing on them. But if all you need is a broswer and Google docs, they are fine. You can buy five of them for the price of a Macbook.

  16. Material Designnot really suit for an OS by evolighting · · Score: 1

    both on phone and labptop

    1. Re:Material Designnot really suit for an OS by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      don't worry, they'll release something other to be the end-all UI style next december.

      yeah.. that's their fault. the problem with say android is not how it looks, it's that they keep changing the visual guideline every year to something different.

      the result is that nobody even tries to follow it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  17. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love my Chromebook. I use Chrubuntu and/or Chroots in developer mode when I'm not traveling. The ARM architecture has incidentally given me an incentive to become much better at compiling from binary. If you don't want to do that: there are plenty of x86/x64 Chromebooks to choose from.

    Every time I go to the airport I powerwash my device and reinstall from .tar.gz backups when I get home.

    ChromeOS is lovely, it always makes me a little sad when I have occasion to go back to XFCE or LXDE as my primary on-boot.

  18. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Pi1grim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >>Could you imagine a prospective employee showing up to an interview with a P.O.S chromebook instead of a macbook?

    Depends on the job person is applying to. If in the course of work his only tool is browser - then chromebook is a sign that this person knows his stuff and doesn't feel uncontrollable compultion to buy bling-bling stuff just because it's trendy and cool.

  19. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    and those are shite.

    look, you can buy a crappy windows laptop for the same price.

    which gets us to: do you want to buy a laptop that does one thing or a real laptop? with both you can use the cloud apps.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  20. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    It's not a sub $200 laptop. Labelling it a laptop is disingenuous, because laptops already have a fairly well defined meaning in people's minds from the fact that laptops have been around for 20+ years. You can run mainstream commercial games on a laptop, you can read and write standard Microsoft office documents, you can read email and share documents, edit pictures, etc.

    The "apps" that run on chromeos are toys and web pages^H^H^Happs instead of the standard software people expect, with the one exception being the browser.

    The only way to turn a chromebook into a traditional laptop is to install another operating system on the machine and use that. In other words, a chromebook is a sub $200 web browser appliance. That's nice, but I'm not sure it's worth $200ish .

  21. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Not if you already have it like that.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  22. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Or a movie coming off torrents in that format.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  23. Mmmm delicious material design by AbRASiON · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Contextless, textless, unlabelled icons I take it then?
    No separation of data using small 1 pixel width dividing lines, shading, or anything really, just one big flat white (or whatever colour they choose) mess?

    Difficulty in easily identifying data because it's not highlighted or accentuated in any particular way?
    Yep, love that material design. It's clever stuff.

    1. Re:Mmmm delicious material design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but but it's google! so it must be wholesome and good while innovating and saving the earth

        i swear the google zombies are worse than apple fanboys.

      yeah google used to be good now it is destroyed by MBAs

      who wants to sort email anyway.....

    2. Re:Mmmm delicious material design by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      We can't let that pesky "usability" thing get in the way of progress!

  24. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    laptops already have a fairly well defined meaning in people's minds from the fact that laptops have been around for 20+ years.

    Yup. A clamshell design with a screen on the top and a keyboard on the bottom. For most of those 20 years though a laptop also meant it costs half the price of a reasonable car, weighs 10 pounds, has 45 minutes of battery life and zero capability until you bought software separately from a store. Trust me, consumers HATED those things. These new devices have more Gees so are like 5 times more capable!

  25. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Out of interest, do you have any evidence that they are tracking people's every move online? I think it would be a big scandal if it were true.

    For example, obviously they scan Gmail accounts to deliver targeted advertising, but do you have evidence that if you use a Yahoo email account they monitor the content of your email?

    What about your Facebook posts, do they read those? Or your online banking sessions, do they track them?

    Or did you mean something else by "tracking your kids' every move"?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  26. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And I see plenty of sub-$200 Windows laptops, which are far more useful.

    Sure. Windows. Useful.

  27. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Ksevio · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are plenty of good options for a small laptop there. Personally I have a desktop computer that can do all the great things I want it to. For a laptop I wanted something small and light that I wouldn't have to worry about. A 13in Chromebook worked perfectly for that. I never use it for gaming or image development, usually just web browsing and email. Occasionally I'll do some development by SSHing into a Linux box, and if I really want to do something more intensive, I can remote desktop to my machine at home. It takes 6 seconds to boot, updates also take 6 seconds (and my windows are opened after), and it doesn't get loaded down with crapware. Worst case I can do a factory reset.

    Now I realize some people want a mobile primary computer and this isn't the machine for them. Judging by the tablet market, people are quite happy to get machines that do one thing, so maybe it would be better if you saw this as a cheap tablet with a keyboard and USB ports.

  28. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 1

    "New standard", hah. It's been this bad for the better part of a decade. That's part of the reason why RON PAUL was so big here.

  29. Why not merge with Android, already? by kriston · · Score: 1

    Why not merge with Android, already?
    My Chromebooks are pretty poor performers and as the months move on they get slowly worse.

    Why haven't Google already replaced the ad-hoc, stripped-down Linux distribution with their much more sucdessful other ad-hoc, stripped-down Linux distribution?

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:Why not merge with Android, already? by carton · · Score: 1

      Why not merge with Android, already?

      Android is unable to do any of the things that make ChromeOS worth buying, such as:
      - update all the devices together, with the same unbloated version, direct from Google, signed by Google (not the manufacturer), and allow developer access to run any code you want that can't be turned off by the manufacturer
      - promise updates for at least five years after end-of-sale
      - update in a painless manner, free from interrupting dialogs where the user equivocates over the update, consents to it thus accepting coulda-shoulda responsibility for any regressions in it, and then waits a long time while the device "updates". Update without rebooting multiple times and without taking a long time to reboot so that updates can be pushed ~weekly without upsetting people.
      - provide serious security (TPM-based disk crypto, TPM-based prevention of rollback attacks, seccomp-bpf, Google-signed code all the way to the read-only bootloader and a fuse to lock manufacturers out of the machine after testing is complete, cel radios that don't have access to the main CPU's RAM, a completely different style of sandbox than Android, and the possibility of using U2F security keys)
      - serve multiple users either with total isolation (the login screen), or without isolation on the same screen (multiprofile).
      - ship reliable devices based on solid reference designs that don't reboot randomly or experience weird slowdowns, battery drains, and radio lockups. Because of differentiation and openness, Android hardware is under more pressure and tends to be chaotic and uneven in quality, even on Nexus devices, compared to bog-simple cheapo intel laptops.
      - the ChromeOS user interface can assume you have a keyboard and an accurate pointing device, so it doesn't need to have excessive whitespace around touch targets, awkward text input state machines with glitchy on-screen keyboards and weird charade games.

      ChromeOS is unable to participate in the overhyped phone ecosystem where developers want to spy on the user with evercookies, manufacturers want to push differentiating bloatware on the user, carriers want to "approve" updates and use backdoor methods to lock handsets. ChromeOS (modulo this article) doesn't participate in the narcissistic-jewelry UI churn that requires a completely different skin and set of ringtones before every Christmas, so people who find that disruptive don't have to put up with it. Android provides a place where all that can happen so that Google doesn't get locked off of phones by an Apple monopoly and can pander to users who want the things that can only be delivered by paying these prices.

      There are similarities and differences that aren't essential, like ChromeOS's "web store" which has Android-style coercive permissions, or the way ChromeOS does development at an open-source HEAD while Android throws big releases over the wall, ChromeOS's efficiency at updating (it sends really well-compressed diffs), ChromeOS's efficiency at running (can open more tabs than Android in the same amount of RAM), the uncrippled version of Chrome that comes on ChromeOS vs what's on Android (the Android one isn't open source and is missing features), the DRM discrimination where videos refuse to play on "devices", the ChromeOS branding requirement that you support 5GHz wifi and an SD Card slot, etc. It would be good if they "merged" those things, taking the best from each world. These points should be merged. But the former points, it's hard to see how they can be reconciled.

      I think it's a good idea to do large engineering projects more than once, in general, to help avoid getting trapped in local minima. Engineers tend to double down on quasi-religious assumptions and become very stubborn about them, so that competition is the only way to shake them loose. I think your dismissiveness is evidence of this, and I think a lot of this recurring call to "merge" ChromeOS is rooted in one

  30. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by hattig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is someone taking a laptop into an interview?

  31. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by war4peace · · Score: 2

    Because I already own the fucking video. What would you do, convert it just because "hey it ain't fittin'"?
    I can watch 1080p MKVs on my crappy Samsung S4 Mini without a hitch, it works, doesn't consume much power (30% battery for a 2h long movie is pretty darn good) and yeah the phone resolution is crap but I don't care. I care about playing the damn video.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  32. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Warhaven · · Score: 1
    sed -i 's/kids/students/g'

    I know- it's so terrible to have a sub-$200 laptop that boots in seconds and that has everything stored in the cloud so if my kids break it I can replace it trivially.

  33. Paranoia Strikes Deep by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    You don't know anything about what you're talking about, per the usual. It looks like you've been listening to gweihir too much. There were at least two other projects looking to replace init, and half a dozen more providing some form of process tracking. Lumping two things that you hate and fear together must feel good, but systemd's development and adoptation has been a public process, and both systemd and pulseaudio offer important technical improvements (that apparently you don't understand). I realize all you do here is go off on ill-informed rants, but this one is only tangentially connected to reality; you might want to dial back the frothing a bit. I mean, you don't even use Linux — what's it to you?

    P.S. That bit about "by the time he's done the kernel will be just a VM running on top of systemd!" was hyperbole, right? Because otherwise it's so far beyond crazy that it makes me wonder if you know what those words mean.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:Paranoia Strikes Deep by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And welcome to the appeal to emotion fanboy rant, thx for proving my point. BTW noticed how you completely avoided what Lennart wrote on his blog, lets see what this "simple replacement for init" is morphing into, shall we? Lennart's own words...

      "The tasks mentioned that systemd already covers include, "init system, journal logging, login management, device management, temporary and volatile file management, binary format registration, backlight save/restore, rfkill save/restore, bootchart, readahead, encrypted storage setup, EFI/GPT partition discovery, virtual machine/container registration, minimal container management, hostname management, locale management, time management, random seed management, sysctl variable management, and console managment."

      "Tasks being worked on are support for a local DNS cache, mDNS responder, LLMNR responder, DNSSEC verification, IPC support in the kernel (KDBUS), time synchronization with NTP, better integration with containers, and many other services. "

      Think he can shoehorn anything else in there? And FYI every other replacement for init that was credible is dead or dying, the devs are running like squeeing fangirls to systemd...which is why every large Linux server admin I've talked to is already talking exit strategies and trying various *BSDs looking for the one to replace their current setup.

      Oh and you just gotta love that the Phoronix article I got his quote from felt the need to bring up as I did the comment fixing and even some of the kernel devs are getting fucking sick of showstoppers in systemd....yet its still getting rammed through....huh. Has the check cleared from RH and the NSA or is this just a freebie?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Paranoia Strikes Deep by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      Do regale me with your interpretation of what "appeal to emotion" means. I didn't address most of what you wrote, you're right. You don't really have a clue what you're writing about and I would rather have you shut up (or at least tone down the paranoia) instead of taking the time to educate you. It's not your field, you don't understand what is happening or why, it's better if you just stick to your expertise.

      If there is one point of confusion that I do want to clear up, it would be that systemd is not a simple replacement for init, and was never intended to be. Or, if you rather, the job of init was not simple and it failed spectacularly to accomplish it. With SysV init, there was no effective service management. You could start and restart services, but imperfectly, and I don't know a nice way to talk about double-forking and writing to a pidfile. That it works most of the time does not mean that it's not deeply flawed.

      The fundamental conflict here is between old-school UNIX admins who think that the OS just exists to launch user-defined scripts, and the requirements of a modern OS. No one is trying to say that having scripting access to the OS is not useful, although you Windows users seem to do without it, but the interpreter is not the OS, and Bash makes a shitty replacement for C. Even OpenRC recognizes this. It's kinda mystifying that you've jumped on the opposite bandwagon; Bash scripting is about as useful to you and your customers as tits on a boar. Can you imagine if the solution to some Windows issue was to fire up a command-line text editor and edit an init script?

      Linux needs to grow up, and so do systemd detractors. Doing things in Bash is the UNIX way, but so is cleaning those scripts up and rewriting them in C. Try some Bash scripting on for size if you think you disagree, and don't forget to double fork and write that pidfile!

      The NSA comments are baseless ad hominem. You're better than that.

      P.S. By the way, I think I've asked before, but where is your store located? Our disagreements aside, it'd be nice to know if I were ever in the area to be able to pay my respects.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  34. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Some of us use computers for more than Facebook and YouTube."

    The smugness here is pathetic.

  35. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    I downloaded it, and played it off my chromebook's SSD. If I had wanted, I could have thrown it on an external hard drive or USB stick.

  36. Re: Chrome OS is a joke by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    Unless you're taking a course in programming or programming as a professional, you don't really need a computer for computing.

    Even for learning programming, a Chromebook is good enough. At my neighborhood school they start teaching Scratch in 4th grade. It runs in a browser. For older kids, they move on to the Khan Academy programming lessons, which use JavaScript, which also runs in a browser. A "real" computer isn't needed until high school, for the 5% of the students that take AP-CS, which uses Java.

  37. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    Link me a test file to play, and I'll play it and let you know how it goes.

  38. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    Nah, then you'll come back at me with "oh no, I meant the SuperSecretUltra H264 profile, the "High 10" profile isn't good enough for the real modern world. What's with only using ASCII characters in the subtitles - everyone knows that the cost of supporting UTF-8's extended character set is essential for everyone's laptop and also going to magically kill your computer's performance."

    If you cared at all about actual real life rather than FUD, it'd be easy to link me one.

  39. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Fwipp · · Score: 2

    burden of proof is on the person who made the assertion ("chromeos pants heavily when you watch a 1080p MKV on it"). :)

  40. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Please tell... which computer and software would you use to convert a 10 GB large, 2h long 1080p video to 1366x768 in 2 minutes? Keeping embedded subtitles in is a requirement.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  41. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by war4peace · · Score: 1
    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  42. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by Fwipp · · Score: 2

    I asserted that "an obsolete video format knowing that nobody uses DivX or considers it a viable codec any more" plays just fine, and it does. :)

  43. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by war4peace · · Score: 1

    So close to 8 minutes on a top machine. Not two.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  44. Re:Chrome OS is a joke by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Absolutely no problem on my Acer Chromebook 13. 1080p60 Youtube videos play just fine, too.

    --
    Eat the rich.