Slashdot Mirror


Silk Road Investigators Charged With Stealing Bitcoin

itwbennett writes Two former U.S. government agents face charges related to stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bitcoin while assisting with an investigation of the Silk Road underground online marketplace, with one accused of using a fake online persona to extort money from operators of the site. Facing charges of wire fraud and money laundering are Carl Force, 46, of Baltimore, a former special agent with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, and Shaun Bridges, 32, of Laurel, Maryland, a former special agent with the U.S. Secret Service. Both served on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force, which investigated illegal activity on the Silk Road website, the Department of Justice said Monday in a press release.

37 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by Kekke · · Score: 2

    Pretty darn hard to trace, and very usable as alternative currency.

    1. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can it be hard to trace if they were caught and all their transactions were linked back to them?

    2. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had a similiar thought. This kinda throws a wrench in the idea that BTC will lead to tax avoidance becoming so common the fed gives up and abandons income tax because it is SO easy to hide what you are doing.

      These people were not exactly noobs, so people can not even claim that it was only because they did not know what they were doing.

    3. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty darn hard to trace, and very usable as alternative currency.

      Said the two investigators just before they got perpwalked in handcuffs..

      People cannot be serious. BTC is very traceable, it's in the blooming design. What do people think the block chains are for? They are a complete history of the coin. Yea, you might need a map of what wallet matches with what person, but once you can tie someone to a transaction, the mapping becomes obvious for the rest of that wallet's coins. After that it's a game of connect the dots by going back though all the publicly known block chains... It's a blooming PUBLIC transaction log, easy to trace, publicly published to the miners every time a coin changes hands. It's like a bank published every transaction processed every day by account number. Yea you might not know who is account # 2011025, but you know they transferred $1 Million to that offshore account.... Eventually you can figure out who that is.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      So why can't we trace ransomware transactions? They are always in BTC.

    5. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not impossible to trace, but it's not easy either. It's not like every bitcoin wallet corresponds to exactly one person. A person can have as many bitcoin wallets as they want. You don't need to transfer $1 million from 1 single wallet to another single wallet in order to transfer $1 million. Secondly, proving someone is the owner of a given bitcoin wallet is much harder to do than to prove a person is the owner of a bank account. You might be able to coax a banker into revealing the owner of an account. It's much harder to prove that someone knows the answer to a math problem. And in order to freeze those funds you also need to know the answer to that math problem. You pretty much have to catch them in a library with their laptop and bitcoin accounts open.

      It is possible to correlate bitcoin wallets with people given enough resources, especially if they are careless. But it's still a lot safer for criminals than any sort of traditional bank account.

    6. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by bobbied · · Score: 3, Informative

      So why can't we trace ransomware transactions? They are always in BTC.

      Who says they cannot be traced? The problem we have with ransomware is that it usually involves an area of the world where the authorities don't care so even if you trace it, nothing will be done.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by bobbied · · Score: 2

      True, but unlike hard currency BTC keeps a record of every owner it's ever had. I'm not saying it's easy to trace but as a criminal how do you propose I hide my identity? Keep a wallet for each coin? Yea that makes it really difficult to keep things straight for both the criminal and the investigator, but the rubber meets the road when the BTC is converted to hard currency. That's where you have to catch a criminal anyway, but once you have him made, it's MUCH easier to tie transactions to the criminal and really hard for the criminal to hide because the transaction records are public.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:Governments way to admit that bitcoins are... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think what this might go to show is that a lot of drug enforcement officers are corrupt and keep a lot of the money they find in drug busts. Unlike what otherwise happens with loose cash, bitcoin allowed their activity to be traced.

      That, along with the fact that a lot of police don't want drugs legalized, kind of hints that they get a lot of revenue from drug busts, while funding the busts themselves with taxpayer money.

  2. Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How convenient that misconduct of the investigators which would have a bearing on admissibility of evidence in Ulbrich criminal trial was not revealed until after his trial was over. He probably does have a few days until his 60 day deadline to appeal lapses though.

    1. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He probably does have a few days until his 60 day deadline to appeal lapses though.

      What relevance to his facilitating drug-trafficking does the prosecuting agents' unrelated misconduct have?

      Bitcoin, banknotes, or gold — whatever the pigs tried to steal — he is still guilty of a (different) crime.

      Hopefully, he and the duo of thieves will share the prison floor running into each other for years to come...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why there should be no deadline and no last appeal. There should always be room for new evidence, especially evidence of official misconduct.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What relevance to his facilitating drug-trafficking does the prosecuting agents' unrelated misconduct have?

      Fruit of the poisonous tree is its relevance.

    4. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It brings into question all evidence brought by said agents. Those agents could have framed him for all you know, to cover their own misdeeds.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There were a LOT of agents and far more evidence. I don't get why the /. crowd are so desperate to find an excuse for him. He is the sort of scumbag the police should be chasing down and sending to jail, it is sad that there are also some scumbags in the police as well, perhaps they can all share a cell.

    6. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good Luck on that. The supreme court ruling on actual innocence was split down the middle and absolutely blasted by Scalia as a "shiny new right". Yes you heard that right, being actually innocent of the crime isn't the courts job according to him.

      http://thinkprogress.org/polit...

    7. Re:Unsealed after Ulbrich conviction by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      Trust the basement-dwelling "whaaaah gubmint baaaad!" conspiracy nuts on Slashdot to bring up 'evidence' completely unrelated to the point they are struggling to make.

      'Fruit of the poisonous tree' deals with how the evidence is obtained. If, after obtaining the evidence in a legal way, an officer commits a crime by then stealing out of the evidence gathered, that still makes the evidence admissible in court. Absent any cases cited to the contrary, of course.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  3. Slip-up that got them caught by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Funny

    They tried to buy donuts with bitcoins.

    1. Re:Slip-up that got them caught by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Well that's their mistake right there. Bitcoins are used to buy bits. They should have used Donutcoins!

  4. Not good for government credibility by kaptink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not very reassuring when the investigators in such a case are themselves blatantly breaking the law to serve themselves. It makes you wonder about the other government agencies and employees looking at things such as all the mass collected survelance materials and wondering how they can use their position to their own personal benefit. Contrary of course to what the government says will never happen. I don't feel like there is much integrity. Having said that at least they got caught even though after the fact.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who cannot, sue.
    1. Re:Not good for government credibility by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      It didn't surprise me that one of the accused agents is DEA. Talk about a department with all kinds of untraceable money and seized property floating around and I wouldn't be surprised in the least if more than half the agents were skimming off the top.

    2. Re:Not good for government credibility by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      While not exactly a narcotics units in Minnesota the Meto Gang Task Force was shutdown for rampant corruption. The case mentioned in the the MPR article is just one of many examples that came out when the story broke so things like this do happen.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  5. How did they get caught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the most interesting question.

    Either some investigator who caught them is _really_ good, or the perps are _really_ stupid. They were practically handed the opportunity for a perfect untraceable crime, yet screwed it up.

    1. Re:How did they get caught? by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to take too much away from your comment, but the secret service agents were caught because they failed to pay for it. If they had just paid no one would have ever found out.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:How did they get caught? by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're an idiot.
      All transactions on the Bitcoin block chain are public.
      It is fucking trivial to trace X Bitcoins going from Wallet A to Wallets X,Y,Z to Wallets B1,B2,B3, C1,C2,C3, D1,D2,D3, etc. A 4 year old could do it.

      Identifying the owner of a wallet is fucking easy too. Anytime someone converts it to fiat currency they have to use some sort of exchange or deal with an individual willing to buy Bitcoin for cash. Every major exchange now collects and verifies personal information. Every major exchange has been tapped by the authorities.

    3. Re:How did they get caught? by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the indictment, part of how they were caught is that as part of laundering their proceeds, they tried to strongarm the payment processor Venmo, who had closed their accounts as part of automated fraud detection. Venmo was unhappy with being strongarmed, and sent a complaint to someone higher up at the agency. The agents then tried to suppress the complaint, and simultaneously retaliate against Venmo by trying to start an investigation. That attempted investigation pulled in the IRS, whose investigators thought a bunch of things looked suspicious, and dug up enough dirt to blow the whistle on the agents in this case.

      So I guess in short, they pissed off both a payment company and the IRS.

    4. Re:How did they get caught? by MechaStreisand · · Score: 2

      You're right. There's no such thing as bitcoin mixers. And there's no way for an individual to have multiple wallets so they can mix their bitcoins to hide their origin and then transfer them to a wallet from which they convert to fiat currency.

      Nope, that's definitely not possible.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
  6. We need Quis custodit custodes legislation by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Any crime perpetrated by someone held responsible for the victim or subject by reasonable judgement shall be tried and sentenced as escalated one step more severe than the normal context of the crime, according to the following list:
    infraction -> misdemeanor -> gross misdemeanor -> felony -> capital crime.

    Therefore, while "beating someone up" might be a gross misdemeanor assault in the eyes of the law, when performed by a custodial parent on their child, or a nursing attendant on one of their wards, it would be considered a felony.
    Petty theft of $100 might be a misdemeanor, but when it's done by someone in custody of the cash drawer, it's a gross misdemeanor.
    By this standard, however, sitting members of Congress and the President could be considered to be "responsible" for the entire country, and thus automatically always escalated.

    --
    -Styopa
  7. WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN? by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    n/t

    1. Re:WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN? by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      Internal affairs investigators, oversight committees, shift managers, prosecutors, defense attorneys... there are just about as many people watching the watchmen as there are watchmen themselves.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  8. Grounds for re-trial? by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean these guys evidence/affidavids would have been shquashed and unidminssible if this came out during/before the trial. Now this is corruption at its best. Les see if we can find out if the prosecutors knew about this dring the trial.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  9. Re:Same People who Made The Screenshots? by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    I always see that, sometimes even on systems I co-administer and its like....really? YOu don't even change the fucking alias so someone can't just go "gee I wonder if phpmyadmin is installed?" and go to the fucking default URL.

    I know its convinent as fuck but this is bad practice in production even if you are not running a multimillion dollar black market operation. If you are dumb enough to expose that to the internet, at least expose it with a URL you chose ffs.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  10. chain of evidence by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These two were tied up in the chain of evidence that led to his conviction, so depending on what gets tossed he has a chance here. Now he did admit that at one time he was DPR and that he had resumed work under the alias so he's probably not going to get everything overturned. But his defense was that someone else associated possibly with MTGOX was the mastermind framing him more recently.

    So what's intriguing here is that one of the investigators was doing some shenanigams with MTGOX accounts and was involved in seizing MTGOX assets. Since MT GOX started having liquidity problems right during this investigation of Silk road, it really makes you wonder if this is where some of those missing assets went.

    Furthermore the agents appear to have done things as their shenanigans came to light to obfuscate the trail back to them. This is not too far afield from ulricht's claim that someone was framing him, asking him to step in as DPR, and putting keys on his computer.

    It actually seems it's not far fetched to imagine Ulricht was telling the truth about having relinquished DPR that someone suddenly invited him back into the game as the FBI closed in. Perhaps there's some grains of truth in there somewhere. e.g. maybe one of the agents did add his bitcoin keys to Urichts computers.

    Given those sorts of conjectures it seems very reasonable he should get a new trial. He's guilty by his own admission, but maybe not guilty of everything he's charged with.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  11. I guess it's true by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    It takes a thief to catch a thief.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  12. How much cash walks away? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Forget these two guys and their bitcoin score, how much CASH walks away during drug investigations? How much is outright stolen, how much is extorted? How much is taken in product in lieu of cash?

    This is one of the most pernicious aspects to drug criminalization, the huge potential for corruption by law enforcement.

    And it's just another problem completely eliminated by legalization.

  13. Corrupt narcs? Stop the presses! by jcr · · Score: 2

    Such a thing is completely unheard of!

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  14. Re:Government Crime by component · · Score: 2

    Do you seriously believe that's what libertarians want or are you knowingly attacking a position that no person actually holds?