Slashdot Mirror


World's First 1 Megawatt All-Electric Race Car

New submitter MotoJ writes: A Latvian company has announced plans to race a one megawatt all-electric race car. It has a 50 kWh lithium-ion battery pack and is propelled by six YASA-400 electric motors. It provides 1020 kW (1368 hp) and a top speed of 260 km/h. It has a real chance to become the first overall winner of the Pikes Peak International Hill Climb competition with an electric vehicle. That's something to look forward to and curious who will pilot this machine. The race is on June 28, 2015. The same company has an equally interesting all-electric off-road racer.

106 comments

  1. Not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There have been plenty of 1MW electric cars built prior to this one. There is a company named Evnetics that makes a controller called the Shiva, it's capable of 1.2MW continuously, and there have been numerous drag cars built with it capable of exceeding the 1MW level in bursts. I've also run across EVs using multiple Zilla 2ks which have an output exceeding 1,000KW.

    This may be the first AC motored car to exceed 1MW though.

  2. 3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by cpotoso · · Score: 0
    3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then?

    Battery is dead...

    1. Re:3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dammit! You beat me to it!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Pikes Peak is only 12.5 miles.

      3 minutes of max acceleration is a lot of go time.

    3. Re:3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then?

      Battery is dead...

      Yea....in a straight line with no turns........but not the case here......

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    4. Re:3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then?

      Battery is dead...

      Yea....in a straight line with no turns........but not the case here......

      You better hope so. If you drive 3 minutes without turning in the Pike's Peak Hill climb you're either going real slow or about to die.

    5. Re:3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      How many KWs of energy does it take to climb Pike's Peak? If my figures are right, if they take 10 minutes, then it would be about 25 KW just to lift the car straight up the 1.5 kilometers, not taking into consideration the twists and turns, wind resistance, etc.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many knots of distance does it take to get to 200 degrees?

  3. Re:Amazing! by cachimaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Three minutes at 1400 HP is no small feat.
    The Bugatti Veyron fuel tank last about 10 minutes at full power, and it's only 1000 hp.

  4. Electric motors have insane power to weight ratio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... Its that pesky issue of energy storage!

    Traditional ICE systems have it easy with the absolutely mind-boggling amount of energy that can be found in an ordinary tank of fuel. Who cares if you waste 80-90% of your energy heating the atmosphere when gas is a few bucks a gallon?

  5. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    A Bugatti Veyron is going 252 mph compared to this golf carts laughable 161 mph.

  6. Re:Slow by TWX · · Score: 1

    I don't think that you and I have the same definition of race car. 'cause there are a lot of race cars that don't even get close to 160mph.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  7. Re:3 Minutes by almitydave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    with 1MW power, the 50KWh battery would be dead in 3 minutes at full throttle.. jeez.
    Roughly equivalent to a gasoline car with a 2-gallon tank... lol. (1 gal=33KWh)

    Do all these people posting 50kWh/1020kW 180s comments not understand racing? Or hybrid drive systems? Or Mountain roads? As TFA mentions, the Pikes Peak course contains over 150 turns, so you'll be off throttle or at partial throttle most of the time, especially with that much torque available, and regenerative braking will give some of it back.

    Or perhaps the race car engineers that are building the race car don't know anything about the race they're building it for. That seems likely. /sarcasm

    --
    my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
    I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  8. Re:Electric motors have insane power to weight rat by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not as bad as you imply, and newer engine designs are pushing the efficiency further as well. This doesn't mean that a reciprocating piston engine is incredibly efficient, but there's no sense in fabricating numbers to support a point either.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  9. Lativian Mountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were hiking in the Latvian Mountains
    Our Sherpa dropped our corkscrew down a crevasse
    Had to live on nothing but food and water for three days
    --had the man shot

    Firesign Theater

  10. Re:Slow by avandesande · · Score: 1

    The only way to hit 160mph at Pike's Peak is vertically.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  11. Not the same. by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 4, Informative

    After the Sierra Club litigated to get the entire course paved, it's no longer the last holdout of Group B racing, and especially an electric misses the point of dealing with the altitude changes. An overall lap record at Nürburgring would be more impressive.

    It would be more fitting to do a hard rest of all records from 2011 onward, as the elements that made it truly unique are about gone, and now it is just another technical road course instead of a nightmare of changes packed into 13 miles.

    Any subsequent victory is just less impressive.

    1. Re:Not the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With it paved now the AWD cars don't have such an advantage.... Thats the true intention here. Everyone hates purpose built AWD cars except the people who own them. Now idiot Corvette owners will brag about getting near the time of a purpose built AWD 400hp/liter race car.

      In reality the only cars worth getting serious about are AWD cars yet it seems every course that had dirt or gravel is being legislated to change due to "safety" or better phrased "2 wheel drive cars sucking and calling it unfair".

    2. Re:Not the same. by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      One of the good things about Pikes Peak is that they didn't try to even the field with millions of rules, but instead just created new classes to make it more accommodating for everyone. One of the best parts was watching the big rigs scramble up the mountain even if they were only competitive against themselves. Seeing a semi tear up the road at you in a great cloud of dust was awe-inspiring.

      As power increases past insane into truly insane, AWD starts to make more sense as the only practical way to get that much power down. It's just that instead of having the AWD tuned to contend with everything from sleet, gravel, tarmac, and controlled drifts, it's another variable in weight/power, which, again, I think misses the whole point of the race.

    3. Re:Not the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. A race track up Pike's Peak, once paved, is exactly the same as the 1,000 other race track's up Mountain's like Pike's Peak. The track up Mount Kilimanjaro is impressive. So is the one up Mount Everest. Hopefully, they won't pave those tracks or they'll be as dumbed down and easy as the Pike's Peak hill climb. *sigh* I'm gonna go watch some NASCAR and pine for the gool ol' days.

    4. Re:Not the same. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, the electrics do NOT miss the point of altitude change. It is the ICE owners that refuse to recognize that altitude should not matter to the car. Basically, the EVs are about to take the records and destroy them since the electrics are so much quicker than ICE cars.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Not the same. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Agree. A race track up Pike's Peak, once paved, is exactly the same as the 1,000 other race track's up Mountain's like Pike's Peak. The track up Mount Kilimanjaro is impressive. So is the one up Mount Everest. Hopefully, they won't pave those tracks or they'll be as dumbed down and easy as the Pike's Peak hill climb. *sigh* I'm gonna go watch some NASCAR and pine for the gool ol' days.

      In his autohagiography, 'The Confessions of Aleister Crowley' he writes that when Europeans first started trying to climb in the Himalayas they basically had to actually learn to mountain-climb for the first time; all the mountains in the Alps were well marked, almost paved footpaths up the mountains with no challenge at all. No-one knew how to climb the mountains in the Himalayas, it was entirely new. (Yes, Aleister Crowley was a pioneering mountaineer).

      How about a race up an arbitrary mountain, picked at random from a hat a few days before the event, with no limitations on entrants except that they be powered by wheels in contact with the ground.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:Not the same. by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      Pikes Peak has had a long history with aviation testing. Prior to accurate modeling, the only way to know if an engine would work at altitude was to risk failure at 10,000 feet, or drag the engine to the top of a mountain for testing. One of the first roads in the US to go that high was the Pikes Peak Highway, and the race and aviation tests followed soon after. The two go hand in hand. Indeed, there is a monument to Sanford Moss at the summit, as he midwifed turbos into aviation use.

      While interesting to see what electric cars will accomplish, it is out of context with the history of the race. Saying altitude should not matter to a car neglects that the same electrics couldn't compete if the race were held in the dead of winter. Or that ALL of them will be towed to the race by IC engines.

    7. Re:Not the same. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Agree. A race track up Pike's Peak, once paved, is exactly the same as the 1,000 other race track's up Mountain's like Pike's Peak. The track up Mount Kilimanjaro is impressive. So is the one up Mount Everest. Hopefully, they won't pave those tracks or they'll be as dumbed down and easy as the Pike's Peak hill climb. *sigh* I'm gonna go watch some NASCAR and pine for the gool ol' days.

      Dude, you missed a couple!

      other race track's up Mountain's like
      Hopefully, they won't pave those track(')s
      pine for the gool ol' day(')s

      Gotta be consistent! ;-)

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    8. Re:Not the same. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      First off, cool about moss. I have been at the peak (just there last summer) a few times and have not see the memorial. I will have to look for it next time.

      Secondly, Tesla does JUST FINE in the arctic circle, in nothern Finland, Sweden, and Norway. Why do you think that cold will impact a car here? The ONLY way that it would impact it, is if the battery is cold. However, nobody starts a race with a cold engine, so, you do not have to have a cold battery.
      As to bringing the vehicle in an ICE, that is true FOR THE MOMENT. While I am certain that EV trucks will be out in 5 years, I doubt that they will be the norm for hauling race cars around.

      Regardless, I have little doubt that within 2 years, EVs will make a HUGE impact on all racing tracks. Heck, a swappable battery on EVs will make it so that not only does the vehicles have the enormous torque of EVs, but also a quick change in the pit. And going up pikes peak will no doubt belong to EVs shortly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Re:Slow by almitydave · · Score: 4, Informative

    260 kph in real units is only 160 miles per hour

    Which is plenty fast for Pikes Peak. When Sebastian Loeb set the record with his 900-hp car, his maximum speed on course was 150mph.

    --
    my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
    I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  13. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F1 229.8 mph
    Nascar 228 mph
    Indycar 241 mph
    CART 256 mph
    LeMans 251 mph
    V8 Supercar 194 mph

    This golf cart's 161 is a joke.

  14. Re:3 Minutes by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

    with 1MW power, the 50KWh battery would be dead in 3 minutes at full throttle.. jeez. Roughly equivalent to a gasoline car with a 2-gallon tank... lol. (1 gal=33KWh)

    Um...the car won't be going full woody all the way up the mountain. Due to the large amount of torque that the motors will likely be putting out, the driver will probably be feathering the throttle pretty lightly.....so it won't use that much power all at once...

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  15. Re:Amazing! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    I've heard it's tires only last about 12 minutes at that speed? Sounds like a safety measure to me. :)

  16. Doomit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was i the only one reading this as:

    A Latverian company has announced plans to race a one megawatt all-electric race car. ?

    Now i'm sad that we will not see the glory that is DOOM.... ; _ ;

  17. Re:Slow by almitydave · · Score: 3, Informative

    Source

    And here's the onboad video, which is pretty amazing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y20CLumT2Sg

    --
    my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
    I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  18. Re:Amazing! by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Informative

    It has the power to go as fast as the Bugatti, but (apparently) not the gearing. At 161mph it'll be using a heck of a lot less than 1MW, so the battery should last much longer than 3m.

    The extra power *will* give it crazy acceleration even up steep inclines, which is far more useful on Pike's Peak than pure top speed.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  19. Binary units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    1020 kW, that's almost 1 MiW!

  20. Re:Amazing! by dpidcoe · · Score: 2

    252mph in a straight line. Unless they're drag racing or on a course with lots of long straightways where that speed is actually obtainable, I'd imagine the low end torque from the electric car will probably help keep the average speeds pretty close.

  21. Re:Slow by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    Let's see how fast any of these cars make it up pike's peak. Apparently you have never heard of gearing.

  22. Re:Slow by Charcharodon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My motorcycle tops out at poky 187mph, but then again it only takes it 9 or so seconds to get there.

    In a NASCAR or a Formula 1 race you might be right about 160 being slow, but this car is being designed for a race that is 12.4 miles long with 150 turns in it. I doubt there'll be much opportunity to get above 100mph much less 160.

    It will shine in two aspects. Electric cars are not affected by altitude. Gas burners get weaker the higher they go, turbo and superchargers can only do so much high up in the mountains. The other place will be coming out of the before mentioned 150 turns. Electric cars may not be able to beat down gas cars for top speed, this is typically due to having only 1 gear rather than a lack of engine power, but they absolutely destroy them on the hole shot. It will have 150 opportunities to take advantage of that acceleration. The gas burners won't know what hit them.

  23. Re: Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch the video of the mountain this car is designed for, and you'll never see the speedometer reach those speeds

  24. Re:Slow by almitydave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So? It's not an oval racer. It's built to a performance envelope defined by a specific event. The factors that are important here are acceleration, downforce, and mechanical grip; not top speed. Looking at the sketch in TFA, it's clear by the presence of the front wing that they're targeting massive downforce, which eats into top speed by creating drag.

    --
    my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
    I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  25. Re:Amazing! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

    Its tires. my god. Why do i keep doing that =/

  26. Re:Amazing! by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, it's an interesting analogy, because as you push performance with any technology, the less practical that feat becomes.

    For example the Veryon can go 252 MPH, but only for about 12 minutes before it runs out of gas. Then you have to stop to put another 100 liters of gas in the tank. You'll also have to replace the $42,000 tire set because they've only got three minutes of life left in them.

    I actually find the Formula-e races fun to watch, even though the speeds aren't that impressive the driving skill required is. Fan boost, however, is a total crock.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  27. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Formula E is biggest joke in the world. I can't wait until it's eventual demise. I will stick to REAL racing with REAL cars.

  28. seems heavy - it's mostly battery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a custom-built open-cab one-seat hill-climb racer that only needs a range of twenty kilometers, and it still weighs as much as a first-generation Prius?

    With no need for combustion engine or radiator, and a carbon-fiber body on a custom frame, I'd expect it to be hundreds of kg lighter.

    Each Yasa-400 is only 24kg, so that's not it... maybe it's the batteries? 50kWh => nearly ten times the battery capacity of the Prius, whose battery weights 80 kg. So yeah, nearly 800kg right there, and that's 2/3 of the car's total weight!

  29. Kill two birds with one stone by magarity · · Score: 2

    curious who will pilot this machine?

    How about if Google Car's auto driver races the electric car up Pikes Peak?

    1. Re:Kill two birds with one stone by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Jeremy Clarkson was sacked from Top gear so.

      Way to ruin a show.

  30. Re:Amazing! by Tokolosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    And if you run it back down from the top of Pike's Peak, it is recharged and ready to go again!

    Try that with a gasoline-powered car.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  31. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My motorcycle tops out at poky 187mph, but then again it only takes it 9 or so seconds to get there.

    Wow! 9 sec to 187 MPH requires an average acceleration of almost exactly 1g all the way to 187 MPH. I stand in awe. Nice tires also - their coefficient of friction would have to be have to be at least 1.0 for two-wheel drive to do that (more for only one wheel drive.)

  32. Whatever. by fullymodo · · Score: 1

    Call me when someone makes a 1.21 Gigawatt electric race car.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one eyed man still has no depth perception.
  33. Re: Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASCAR also turns right.

    Pikes peak is still a joke now that it's all paved.

  34. Re: Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASCAR was at Martinsville this week, top speeds were under 100 mph.

    Apparently there is more to racing than straightline max.

    And FWIW, they try to keep speeds under 200 even at the fast tracks.

  35. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Leobs car tops out at 260ish kph BECAUSE IT"S FUCKING GEARED THAT WAY LIKE THE ELECTRIC RACER. Put different gears in and the EC will go a fair bit faster. Oh BTW, some of the fastest race cars on the planet - Group B - had lowish top speeds. But they got there reaaaaaaaaaaaal goddamn quick.

    You are a fucking idiot with no idea about cars.

  36. Re:Amazing! by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    We forgive you. Acknowledging the problem is the first step to curing it.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  37. Re:Amazing! by mspohr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think a big WhOOOOsh!! is in order here.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  38. Re:Amazing! by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 0

    Only 11 more step's to recovery! Arrrggh, I'm back down to step 12 again!

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  39. Re: Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thin air cuts into the power of ICE powered cars, battery power remains constant. The altitude change is what makes pikes peak such an engineering challenge.

  40. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention Pikes Peak is open class. ANY of those F1 or LeMans cars could race, and yet even when the course resembled this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEuZG37gFdM

    top speed was 130Mph or so.

    Top speed is not how you win this. Not dying and great acceleration is.

  41. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "golf cart" has almost twice the peak torque of the wimpy engine in the Veyron.

  42. Re: Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm agreeing with you. That right turn is as perilous as anything on Pike's Peak, and Allmendinger won Watkins Glen last year with an average of 90 MPH! Compare that with the pathetic average of 87 (KPH? MPH? who knows honestly?) of Loeb's (again, hack) 87.47 (so really 80 whatevers) average at Pike's Peak. Further, Pike's Peak is paved now while Watkins Glen and all the other NASCAR events are asphalt which is MUCH more difficult to maneuver. Allmendinger at Pike's Peak would probably average 220-230 MPH. From what I understand, NASCAR drivers are BANNED outright from Pike's Peak since they would make everyone look stupid.

  43. Re:Amazing! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Which will NOT help you win the pike peak race.
    What wins that, is great driving combined with great torque for quickness. br

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  44. Re:Amazing! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    yeah, go ahead.
    In less than 5 years, anybody that owns an ICE car (save something like a Rolls) will find that it is next to worthless.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  45. EV runs are going to be interesting this year by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    No doubt, we will see a Tesla Dual on the track. That is night and day above the one that set the 12 minute EV production run. I would not be surprised to see this monster and a Model S owning the top 2 records.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  46. Re:Slow by BradMajors · · Score: 1

    Yes, pretty amazing. People are standing right next to the road where race cars are travelling at up to 150 mph.

  47. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. What a P.OS. my 250hp turbocharged Miata can go faster than 150mph.

  48. Re: Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like someone who's upset that his gas-powered tech is being obsoleted. It's ok, it happens to all technology. Don't get religiously attached to it.

  49. Re: Amazing! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    If only the energy storage was practical. Gasoline has a GGE conversation of 33.41 kWh/gal. Reduce that to 1/4th as an ICE (running on gasoline) is only 25% efficient with the fuel.

    If I can have a nuclear powered electric vehicle, I'm sold!!!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  50. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, another wildly optimistic prediction from the Space Nutter WindBourne. Tell me, where is the money going to come from for people to afford these cars? Where is the infrastructure going to come from to support charging all these electrical cars?

    Did you see the price of gas lately? Let's check back in 2020, shall we?

    My predictions are as follows:
    1) No one will be on Mars, or even the Moon.
    2) There won't be any fewer ICE cars on the roads and they will still have value.
    3) You'll still be a moron.

  51. Re: Slow by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    NASCAR, some gay American race where they go round an oval track? Pathetic, F1 is real racing, NASCAR is racing for redneck incompetents who can only turn one way.

  52. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen FWD Hondas with 4 cylinder VTEC engines do 200mph. Top speed is a measurement often trotted out by car noobs as the end-all be-all of performance.

    Here's a hint: it's not.

  53. Re:Amazing! by EETech1 · · Score: 1

    This always helps...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  54. Idiots the lot of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because I don't reply to every idea does NOT make that idea acceptable and therefore implementable. That's a problem with you. You are too numerous, that being a reason why you are all murderers and are therefore being culled. Maybe you can make the job easier.

  55. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, pretty amazing. People are standing right next to the road where race cars are travelling at up to 150 mph.

    So? People are standing right next to the road where race bikes are traveling at 200+ mph - (Isle of Man) Average is higher than measly 150mph

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  56. Re: 3 minutes of glorious acceleration... and then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is KW your personal notation for kWh ?

  57. Re:Amazing! by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    You deserve kudos for recognising it as a mistake. Sadly this puts you in a select group of English-speaking nations the world over. :(

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  58. Re:Slow by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2

    Just think, you'd be in charge of the fastest race car on the planet if it could be powered by arrogance!

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  59. Re:Slow by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    I'm not really into motorsport so that vid was new to me. I watched all eight and a half minutes of his run, absolutely transfixed. The level these drivers operate at is simply stunning to observe, thank you for the link.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  60. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1MW power, the 50KWh battery would be dead in 3 minutes at full throttle. Electric cars are not affected by altitude. Gas burners get weaker the higher they go, turbo and superchargers can only do so much high up in the mountains. The other place will be coming out of the before mentioned 150 turns.

    cbse 12th result 2015

  61. Battery seems insuficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are they going to pull this off with only 50KWh battery? The altitude difference between the finish and the start is 1509m and the potential energy increase of 1200Kg (car) + 60Kg (driver) from start to finish is almost 52KWh. All this without calculating any energy losses.

    1. Re:Battery seems insuficient by raxx7 · · Score: 1

      You've got your math wrong somehow.
      1509 meter * 1260 kg * 9.8 m/s = 18 MJ = 5.2 kWh.

  62. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think anyone really takes the opinion of someone who watches cars drive around as a hobby very seriously. An electric golf cart is an entirely more utilitarian good than anything that you vicariously derive enjoyment from due to adequate lack of local stimulation. I think there is a car race on somewhere. you better go watch it now because it matters.

  63. Re:Slow by deadweight · · Score: 1

    This person is apparently unaware of racing that isn't at the salt flats. There are entire classes of racing cars that don't go 150 even.

  64. Re:Slow by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

    While you have a commendable grasp of physics, I think you are underestimating motorcycles. The OP might be hyperbolic if he has a stock motorcycle, but if he owns a competition drag motorcycle he is likely telling the truth. Also motorcycle tires have a peak COF of around 1.2, roughly the same as car tires.

  65. Re:Slow by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    So? Go out to Road America in Elkhart Lake, WI and you can see the crazies on their motorcycles at similar distances as well as other vehicles depending on the event (indy, various SCCA events. GT events, etc).

    --
    Time to offend someone
  66. Re:Slow by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Honestly, modern Pike's Peak race is kinda lame. Full tarmac start to finish, sadly boring grip driving.

    Tip your hat to the old pre-2011 Pike's Peak which was mostly gravel road with some tarmac when driving was far, FAR more intense. Here's the legendary Ari Vatanen run in the 405 T16 from the 1990.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Featuring some crazy stuff like driving that monster of a car with one hand while shielding eyes from the sun glare with another through turns at high speed.

  67. Re: Amazing! by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you don't factor in that almost all race cars that do Pikes Peak have turbochargers that are capable of shoving more air in the cylinders than they can handle.

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  68. Re:Slow by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    Do you have a different gear box? 5 speed Miatas are gear limited at 125...

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  69. Heatsinks by iwaybandit · · Score: 1

    At least one aspect of an electric car is affected, cooling. As altitude increases, the efficiency of heat-sinks decreases. I hope they added some over-sized cooling fans, Apple didn't.

  70. Re: Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought those rednecks only did left turns for prize money?

  71. Re:Slow by jjbenz · · Score: 1

    My Friends and I go to the motorcycle races at Road America every year, quite a good time.

  72. Re:Slow by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Do people still put up the "Stoppie Here" stop sign shaped signs on the back corners for the victory lap showboating?
    I haven't been out there for the motorcycle races in years but that was fairly common the last time I was out there for them. I got some nice photos of some of the better ones.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  73. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're saying he is an English-speaking nation?

  74. Re:Amazing! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Ah, the mightywind that is afraid to be up front.
    First, Multiple studies in the US show that we have PLENTY of power to charge 100% of our vehicles. Of course, that depends on 25% or less being done in the daytime. But hey, do not let facts get in your way.
    Secondly, the charging infrastructure is already in place in America. All of our homes have electricity. As to long distance driving, Tesla will have the nation wired for high speed charging by end of 2017.
    Here is a better map of what is going on at this time.
    Third, in 2 years, Tesla will have a car that costs less than 35K, without the subsidies, does over 200 MPC, and is still high performance along with high quality. Why would anybody want to buy POSs when you have such a car? The answer is, that only idiots like you will.
    Fourth, once demand rises for that kind of car, you can bet that used cars will plummet in value.

    Still attached to the kock brothers pants? Gas prices are a NONE issue. Electric cars car are coming down in price so much that ICE cars will be too expensive to own at $2.00/gal.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  75. Re: Amazing! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Energy storage is NOT a problem with EVs. The price was.
    The hybrids and POS like I3 and Leaf go with very little distance so that they they can keep their profits up. Tesla has it right in making cars with swap-able batteries in which the primary battery has 200-250 MPC. Next year, Tesla will introduce a pack that you can rent that will allow you to get 400+ MPC, which is perfect for distance driving.

    Now as to the costs and efficiency, EVs blow the doors off ICE. There is a reason why you can get nighttime electricity at .06/KWH through more than 95% of America. You charge the car at nighttime, and most every car drives less than 100 Miles / day so this works.

    BTW, most EV drivers fully support Nuke reactors. We NEED good base-load power systems.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  76. Engine sound? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Doesn't say if they'll have a motor sound or it'll just be like a fast golf cart. Would be really humorous if it had engine noise.

  77. Re:Slow by hughankers · · Score: 1

    Yes, pretty amazing. People are standing right next to the road where race cars are travelling at up to 150 mph.

    So? People are standing right next to the road where race bikes are traveling at 200+ mph - (Isle of Man) Average is higher than measly 150mph

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    I'm an Isle of Man TT marshal. Specifically I'm the Deputy Sector Marshal for Cronk-Y-Voddy Crossroads where the superbikes flash past at around 180mph less than 2 feet away from the spectators!
    Current TT absolute lap record holder Bruce Anstey set an average lap speed of 132.298mph In the 2014 Superbike race.

    More to the point of the electrically powered racing theme of this thread, the TT festival also includes a single lap (37.74 mile) race for electric powered bikes called TT Zero and this race was won in 2014 by John McGuinness on a prototype Mugen Shinden setting a record breaking lap of 117.366mph average speed.

    Compare that to this single lap demonstration run by rally driver Mark Higgins in a stock Subaru Impreza WRX STI at a very similar average speed to the electric bike. ICE engined bikes still hold a huge advantage in terms of range and a smaller advantage in terms of absolute speed, but the gap is closing.

  78. Re:Slow by jjbenz · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen any of those lately. I'll check when I'm out there at the end of May.

  79. Re:Electric motors have insane power to weight rat by dave420 · · Score: 1

    25%-30% efficiency in the engine isn't great, and that doesn't include the inefficiency of the fuel production/transportation.

  80. Re:Electric motors have insane power to weight rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dave420 where's the engine you made? It isn't. You're no expert.