Slashdot Mirror


US Blocks Intel From Selling Xeon Chips To Chinese Supercomputer Projects

itwbennett writes: U.S. government agencies have stopped Intel from selling microprocessors for China's supercomputers, apparently reflecting concern about their use in nuclear tests. In February, four supercomputing institutions in China were placed on a U.S. government list that effectively bans them from receiving certain U.S. exports. The institutions were involved in building Tianhe-2 and Tianhe-1A, both of which have allegedly been used for 'nuclear explosive activities,' according to a notice (PDF) posted by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Intel has been selling its Xeon chips to Chinese supercomputers for years, so the ban represents a blow to its business.

25 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Hello? The 21st Century Calling by gtall · · Score: 4, Funny

    So China is somehow incapable of buying the chips through a 3rd party? Maybe we could sell the Department of Commerce to China...nice regulatory agency, cheap, bit of wear around the edges and maybe a bit dated but it would fit well within China's Stupidity Index for Chinese What are Involved in Security against...errr...for the People.

    1. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like Lenovo?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly.

      "You aren't allowed to sell Xeon parts to but you are still allowed to ship millions of them to Lenovo. And if a couple pallets of CPUs fall off the back of the 747... well, whatyagonnado?"

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by Kagato · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure the Chinese Gov't would be more than happy to have the US Gov't check the serial numbers on those Xeon chips to tell were the source is. Obviously not. As long as the chips are allowed to be exported to China for general business use I don't see any way for the US to control it. At best whatever quasi Gov't agency in China has to buy through a 3rd party and falsify some paperwork

      It's not like China doesn't have FABs and engineers that could make a similar CPU. What Intel fears the most is this will kickstart some national pride that's going to end with gov't funded R&D to make high end CPUs and GPUs.

    4. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not like China doesn't have FABs and engineers that could make a similar CPU. What Intel fears the most is this will kickstart some national pride that's going to end with gov't funded R&D to make high end CPUs and GPUs.

      You are wrong. The Chinese do not have the FABs. In fact no one else but Intel has FABs at that node. Everyone else is like 2 years behind and the Chinese FABs are like 6 years behind. There are export restrictions on advanced lithography equipment and the only litho manufacturers are in the US, Europe and Japan. Namely Ultratech, ASML, Canon and Nikon.

      Their chip design is over a decade behind the west. Just look at Longsoon or the licensed ARM processors companies like Mediatek manufacture.

    5. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you somehow incapable of understanding how export control laws work? If they're banned from certain US technology and for purpose, then any route around that through any 3rd party would be illegal.

      Aaand... China cares about that why?

      "Yes, we'd like to order 33,000 ThinkStation P700s, please? Yes, two E5-2697's, please. No, no OS. No memory either. Also no storage. Video card... hold on, let me ask our chief res... er... office manager... Okay, yes, how many Tesla K80's can you fit in one of those? Let's go with that, then. Do you take UnionPay? No? Hmm, gold bullion? Wow, rough checkout process here! Paypal? Great! Oh, can I get a tracking number when you ship it? Thanks."

      Are you somehow incapable of understanding that you can't magically stop someone from getting milk while continuing to sell them live cows?

    6. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      If China can acquire the parts illegally somehow, they can of course use them. Export control laws theoretically prevent that, but ...

      In terms of all the posts saying China already builds these systems at Foxconn, they're not entirely correct. China builds the motherboards and the systems, but the processors are, in the case of high end machines, often populated elsewhere. At this moment I can't say for certain, but in the past we've had moments where we could not populate them in China and had to have US factories populate them, then at other times they were OK for China and they did it. This really only concerns certain Xeon parts, not even all of them.

      I couldn't care less if we block China, I'm all for it for reasons entirely unrelated to national defense. My usual mantra is "fuck China", but it is possible to do and we're hearing noise only because of inconvenience.

    7. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by cheesybagel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well they are. The design is made in the USA or Israel and the manufacturing is done in Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, Israel, etc. The list of sites is here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

      Costa Rica is where Intel does wire bonding and puts the metal head spreader on the chip. Wire bonding is labor intensive so cheap labor is important to make it cost effective. It is not where they manufacture the chip. Malaysia is where AMD does wire bonding and attaches the metal heat spreader.

      Intel and AMD usually say 'diffused in XXX' which is the hard and export restricted bit, and 'assembled in YYY' which is hand labor intensive non-export restricted bit.

    8. Re:Hello? The 21st Century Calling by Zak3056 · · Score: 2

      Frankly, I doubt Lenovo even has a license to buy Xeon chips.

      What kind of chips do you think they put in thier servers and workstations, Doritos?

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  2. Soon this will be impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someday soon, the US will be unable to bully people into this kind of bullshit. Soon enough, it will make more sense economically to say "Fuck US" and pull out. This can't happen soon enough.

    1. Re:Soon this will be impossible by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      1.1 GHz. Two integer and two floating point pipelines. 7-stage, 40-bit physical address. 8 KB L1 cache, 96 KB L2 cache. These are worse specs than those of a 32-bit AMD Athlon processor from 1999.

      But hey it has 16 cores. They are manufacturing it at 65 nm after all. Intel uses 14 nm right now:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6...

      That's four manufacturing process generations behind what Intel uses. It you assume Moore's Law happens every 18 months this would be like using a six year processor even if they had bleeding edge processor design. Looking at the specs of their processor shows their design skills actually are even worse than their manufacturing skills. Like I said AMD had a better core design than that in 1999. That's 16 years ago.

    2. Re:Soon this will be impossible by Uecker · · Score: 2

      Yes, it is still no match, but you are confusing specs with design. If one looks at the values from the TOP 500, it doesn't seem to perform bad. In the LINPACK benchmark it comes much closer to the theoretical value than other systems. To me, this is a sign of a very good design. The processor is said to be inspired by alpha. My point is: China is already building supercomputers using their own processors... They are catching up.

  3. Re:Awesome job guys! by slykens · · Score: 5, Informative

    If (yeah, I know) the Chinese are developing nuclear bombs, this will hold them up for maybe a couple of years.

    China has been a declared nuclear weapons state since 1964.

    They are doing what we are doing now - modeling how the weapons work because many of us agreed not to physically test them any more over twenty years ago.

  4. Actions have consequences. by pla · · Score: 3, Funny

    "US: No more supercomputer simulations for you!"
    "China: Okay, we'll just go back to actual above-ground nuclear testing"
    "US: But you signed a test ban!"
    "China: Come and stop us."

    This seriously cannot end well. China already has a large arsenal of nuclear weapons, this goes so far beyond the scale of our pissing contest with Iran as to make it almost laughable (if it didn't potentially involve the world ending in a nuclear holocaust).

    1. Re:Actions have consequences. by nojayuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually China's nuclear arsenal is a fraction of the US and Russian arsenals. It's about the same size as France's (250 - 300 warheads) but China doesn't have a deployable ballistic missile submarine fleet to provide the sine qua non of the Big Boys, a guaranteed second-strike retaliatory capability. They're working on building that capability but it's not operational at the moment.

      China has signed but not yet ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) but its last shot was in 1996 after 45 tests in total. The only other nation in the Big Five who has not ratified the CTBT is the US who stopped testing in 1992 after firing off over 1000 devices.

  5. Re:So, were are they assembled or fabed? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    In other news, AMD stock goes through the roof.

    You're acting like China won't still be able to get their hands on a stack of Xeons any time they want to with Lenovo and Foxconn both sitting inside their borders. Plus, AMD can't deliver anything close to Xeon performance, much less at the same power rating. Nobody wants to dump 10MW into a computer room and then evacuate that heat if they can do the same job in 6MW with 2.5x the performance*.

    Looking at this really should shed some light on where high-end computing sits right now - AMD isn't even in the top 50, and anyone building nuclear weapons number crunchers doesn't give a damn about price.

    * Intel Xeon E5-2699V3 averages 24601 on CPUMark in 145 watts TDW, where AMD FX-9590 8-Core scores 10273 on the same benchmark, in 220 watts.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  6. Yet more proof the legislators are clueless by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its very depressing that the democratic process can fail badly enough to not only put but keep clearly incompetent judges and politicians in complete control of legislating on stuff like this that they clearly don't understand.

    There needs to be an active mechanism in government that weeds incompetence and ignorance out of the system.

  7. Re:Awesome job guys! by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

    If I recall, as plutonium ages, helium builds up in the crystal lattice. This might have a performance impact on the weapon yield. I'm not sure if the cores are ever smelted back down and reformed to deal with this problem; if it's even a problem in fact. Haven't a clue. Other than old stockpile simulation testing, I'm not sure what else could be the point in all this.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  8. Re:LOL ... Apple! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    Intel fabrication plants are mostly in the US, with one in Israel, one in Ireland, and one in China (apparently a 65nm process plant, so definitely not their most cutting edge stuff). Yeah, surprised me too when I looked it up.

    Then I thought a bit about it, and it's perhaps not so surprising. The last thing Intel wants is to lose their edge in the *process* of making those chips. Considering that it probably costs them up to $10 billion to set up a fab plant, labor costs probably aren't exactly the big expense there. As good as the Chinese are at cloning technology, it seems pretty unlikely they'd be able to clone the latest chips so easily unless they new the tech for the latest low-nm processes, and from what I can see, Intel isn't giving them the opportunity.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  9. Well, China IS a little bit scary. by Theovon · · Score: 2

    Nothing on the magnitude of North Korea or Iran. Not even on the same order as Russia. But it's clear that China is not in the global market for altrustic purposes. They're an economic superpower, and they're going defend that. They're unlike to attack the US, though. But mostly beause they sell most of their products to us, not for any other reason. If I were in the Chinese government, I'd be scared of North Korea and want to maintain a defense.

    So the US DoD and DoC have to weigh the slight risk of China deciding some day to come in and take over the US against the more immediate benefits of China drawing NK's attention away from us and being part of the general defense against NK's batshit craziness.

  10. Re:So, were are they assembled or fabed? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exactly right - Intel's development fab is in Hillsboro, Oregon. They get the fab process working there, and then document the hell out of it and reproduce that billion+ dollar facility in their production fabs around the world - Costa Rica, Philippines, Malaysia, etc. Then they tear out the inside of the development fab and start over for the next generation. Periodically they need a bigger building footprint, so they build another dev fab next door and assign the previous dev fab to be a production fab at that node for products until they're done with it.

    That would be what this campus does.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  11. Re:just buy amd or clone them from the factory in by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

    That would require a fab in china with Intel's process & capabilities. So far that doesn't exist in China (or Korea).

  12. Re:just buy amd or clone them from the factory in by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    That would require a fab in china with Intel's process & capabilities. So far that doesn't exist in China.

    But this ensures that it will happen sooner than it otherwise would. America will have regulated yet another industry out of existence. A decade from now, we will look back, and consider this to be just as stupid and counter-productive as the cryptography ban of the 1990s.

  13. Re:Huh.,.wait... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    I think all of the chips I've bought from Intel have been made in Malaysia or China.

    Intel is actually substantially bizarre in their practices. The chips themselves are made in the US billion dollar fabs. Then very carefully packed into shipping containers and shipped to Malaysia, where they are removed from the shipping containers and inserted into the production packages. And then shipped to China and Taiwan to be put on boards (and small amounts back to the US to be sold retail by NewEgg).

    Why the chip packaging step isn't so completely automated that it can be done for peanuts on site at the fab, I'm sure I don't know.

  14. Re:just buy amd or clone them from the factory in by goarilla · · Score: 2