Slashdot Mirror


Hillary Clinton Declares 2016 Democratic Presidential Bid

An anonymous reader writes In a move that surprised no one, Hillary Clinton has officially announced she is entering the 2016 race for the White House. According to the Times: "Ending two years of speculation and coy denials, Hillary Rodham Clinton announced on Sunday that she would seek the presidency for a second time, immediately establishing herself as the likely 2016 Democratic nominee. 'I'm running for president,' she said with a smile near the end of a two-minute video released just after 3 p.m. 'Everyday Americans need a champion. And I want to be that champion,' Mrs. Clinton said. 'So I'm hitting the road to earn your vote — because it's your time. And I hope you'll join me on this journey.'"

5 of 676 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hell No Hillary by Nyder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nope, I'm going to vote for Hillary because unlike most other person running, she isn't overly corrupt and she's not bat shit crazy. She may not be perfect, but I have more faith in her ability to lead this nation then any other candidate currently.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  2. No front page for Rand Paul? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He declared last week, and wasn't on the front page. Why not? I'm guessing it's because Paul is a favorite object of man-love here on slashdot while Hillary is a favorite punching bag. You don't get many readers in to a celebration, but you get plenty of them for a pseudo lynching.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  3. Re:Hell No Hillary by anagama · · Score: 4, Interesting

    She will raise revenue for more war and more surveillance.

    Look at this clip at 13:29 (better with context starting around 11:00) where HRC is cheerleading for the Iraq War. Her ONLY beef w/ GWB was doing tax cuts at the same time -- she openly says she wouldn't and that would leave more money for national and homeland security -- code for random foreign wars and a burgeoning NSA budget:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    So yeah, you are totally right. When she gets us into a useless random war for no fucking reason at all, she'll raise taxes. Talk about a reason to vote for her! Yummy! /sarc

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  4. Re:Almost Time by McGruber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it ends up being Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush,

    Who would move the US more to the right: Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush?

    My current thinking is that Hillary would.

  5. Re:So... by ranton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about all them deleted emails?

    Yawn.

    I am pretty liberal and I can hardly imagine voting Republican again for a while, but even I cannot understand why the email thing isn't a bigger deal. I guess that is because I am not a lawyer. From what I can tell, deleting potential evidence that you even think might be subpoenaed later is a crime. A pretty serious one. And the Republicans have been threatening to subpoena for those records since the scandal started.

    This doesn't seem like some little transgression to me. I think the Benghazi nonsense is just that, nonsense. But the email deletions literally seem like a jail-able offense to me. And honestly I think they should be. As far as I can tell the only reason she isn't in more trouble is because Eric Holder is a very political attorney general.

    I would love for someone to convince me this isn't a big deal, and considering the media doesn't cover this more I am probably just wrong about how bad it is. I thought the email scandal was ridiculous when it was just about using her private server, but the second she admitted to deleting the emails things just became far less trivial.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke