Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Medium For Storing Data To Survive a Fire (or Other Disaster)

First time accepted submitter aka_bigred writes Every year as I file my taxes, I replicate my most important financial data (a couple GB of data) to store an offline copy in my fire-rated home safe. This gets me thinking about what the most reliable data media would be to keep in my fire-rated home safe.

CDs/DVDs/tapes could easily melt or warp rendering them useless, so I'm very hesitant to use them. I've seen more exotic solutions that let you print your digital data to paper an optically re-import it later should you ever need it, but it seems overly cumbersome and error prone should it be damaged or fire scorched. That leaves my best options being either a classic magnetic platter drive, or some sort of solid state storage, like SD cards, USB flash drives, or a small SSD. The problem is, I can't decide which would survive better if ever exposed to extreme temperatures, or water damage should my house burn down.

Most people would just suggest to store it in "the cloud", but I'm naturally averse to doing so because that means someone else is responsible for my data and I could lose it to hackers, the entity going out of business, etc. Once it leaves my home, I no longer fully control it, which is unacceptable. My thought being "they can't hack/steal what they can't physically access." What medium do other Slashdot users use to store their most important data (under say 5GB worth) in an at-home safe to protect it from fire?

69 of 446 comments (clear)

  1. Best medium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oral tradition. Seriously wtf

    1. Re:Best medium by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you tried repeating a story while on fire? I didn't think so.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Best medium by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clay tablets, then. Fire actually improves their durability.

    3. Re:Best medium by robbiedo · · Score: 2

      You would need 400,000 pounds of clay per Gigabyte.

    4. Re:Best medium by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Use the tablets to build walls with. Win-win!

    5. Re:Best medium by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      And in a few 1000 years people will claim it's religious mumbo-jumbo and create fabulous stories of how we worshipped some god named IRS.

      What? What did YOU think that whole crap in Egypt is about?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. If you insist on keeping physical hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are fire rated NAS devices like the ioSafe 214 which has Synology guts.

    1. Re:If you insist on keeping physical hardware by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or for something cheaper, M-Disc in a bucket of water. Water shouldn't get significantly over boiling in a fire (as it loses its heat by boiling off), and M-Disc is rated to withstand boiling water and not degrade from long-term water immersion (they're burned not by modifying a photosensitive dye like in normal discs, but by literally etching a hard, inorganic layer)

      --
      *Kid Rock runs for Senate* Democrats: We must run Kid Scissors.
    2. Re:If you insist on keeping physical hardware by ralphsiegler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And that's folks is why extrapolating from a little book learning to try to engineer reality without experiment or experience leads to failure. A typical house fire burns at over a thousand degrees F for about half an hour. Not only will your water be gone, so will your plastic or steel aluminum bucket.

    3. Re:If you insist on keeping physical hardware by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      And that's folks is why

      And that's folks is why being an arse when you disagree with someone is usually mutually exclusive with being able to write proper English.

      The flames in a house fire can of course be "over a thousand degrees F". Most air in a burning house is below the boiling point of water. But hey, let's just assume that your bucket is sitting right on top of the ignition source of your house and somehow remains directly in flames underneath it for half an hour. Gee, what sort of analogy could we have for a large metal pot-like thing sitting on some gas stove-like flames... oh yeah, how about a pot sitting on a gas stove (whose flames can also be "over a thousand degrees F")? Because anyone who's ever put a large pot full of water on the stove (for example for canning) can tell you that it will NOT boil off in half an hour.

      And seriously, a steel bucket will be "gone"? Methinks you need to look up the melting point of steel.

      --
      *Kid Rock runs for Senate* Democrats: We must run Kid Scissors.
    4. Re:If you insist on keeping physical hardware by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      how about a pot sitting on a gas stove (whose flames can also be "over a thousand degrees F")?

      I'm not an engineer, but this does not appear to me to accurately model a house fire. I think that there is going to be a difference between being engulfed in 1000+ degree heat vs being over a 1000+ degree heat source.

      By way of example, let's say that you have a 22 quart canning pot filled with water and you were to suspend it over a Bunsen burner. That burner can reach a temperature of 2000+ degrees F at the tip of its inner cone, but how long do you think it will take that 2000+ degree burner to boil 10 quarts of water? Perhaps it will never boil?

      I think that a house fire would transfer significantly more heat to the bucket of water than a gas stove would. I frankly have no idea how long it would take for water in a bucket to boil off in a house fire, but I am confident that it would be faster than sticking a pot of boiling water on a gas range.

      Another issue with the "disk in a bucket" plan is that in dry climates, much care must be taken to maintain the water level of the bucket, because significant water loss would be expected via evaporation.

      As always, the best way to keep data safe during a fire is for the data not to be in the fire.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    5. Re:If you insist on keeping physical hardware by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the mold that would grow in such a moist environment. The fire safe (as is typical for the class) should be rated for 1500 degrees for 30minutes while keeping the inside temperature below that necessary to char paper. The walls are heavily insulated and the seals on the door in extreme heat melt and seal the interior completely.

      That's the entire point of these safes, to store paper documents and firearms including ammunition the interior temperature can't exceed a threshold within the spec'd temperature and time limit. The submitter should be able to just stick drives in the safe and not be worried about a fire as long as there is a working fire department.

  3. Offsite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is the only safe solution.

    1. Re:Offsite by Walter+White · · Score: 2

      is the only safe solution.

      Fire and possibility of other disaster is exactly why offsite backup is so important.

    2. Re:Offsite by halltk1983 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. A safety deposit box at your bank is your best and safest bet. Encrypt the drive if you're worried that someone cares enough to go Italian Job on you.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    3. Re:Offsite by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's what bank safety deposit boxes are for. Offsite, hard to break into, more or less fireproof through sheer mass, even if the building around it burns. Ask the bank about how thick the walls are, though. Class 3 is recommended (12 inches thick concrete), with additional outside fireproofing.

    4. Re:Offsite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just make sure whatever you use is in a waterproof container. A friend had a fire at their bank and the safe deposit contents were soaked. Water apparently got through the small gaps in the front due to the high pressure.

    5. Re:Offsite by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Truecrypt volume on an external drive kept in a Tupperware container in a safety deposit box that's a duplicate of the one you keep at home in a safe. It's not an Italian Job I'd be worried about it would be someone in authority deciding they needed to have a peek. Chances of a fire at the bank AND at the home at the same time are pretty far fetched. Can sub friend's home for safety deposit box easily enough and maybe even do an exchange but use a locked box so said friend doesn't decide to use it to store his p0rn!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    6. Re:Offsite by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Offsite, or fireproof stuff. Your choice."

      No, fireproof is no substitute. If you really value your data, multiple copies, at least one of them off site is the only way to go.

      But, now we are talking about fireproof... that's not an absolute concept. The fireproof is rated for temperature outside, max temperature inside (or delta from outside) and time to stand it. First aka_bigred has to know is the rating of his vault: any support that can stand the internal temperature rate is valid; if the fire goes outside the rating, think of it as lost (you might be lucky though). I can attest recovering data from DAT tapes on vaults exposed around the limit of its rate.

    7. Re:Offsite by MisterSquid · · Score: 2, Informative

      ....to do it yourself. I cut sentence short there. Slashdot should implement an edit button.

      Most users don't know it, but Slashdot actually has had an edit button since 1997.*

      It appears after you click the "Preview" button and has the label "Continue Editing".

      (* It's actually an anchor, but you get my drift.)

      --
      blog
    8. Re:Offsite by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      Two copies, one safety deposit box as otherwise mentioned here, and the other with your lawyer. If you don't have one, with a trusted relative who ALSO has the 2K+ software and/or hashes needed to rejuvenate the data, intact.

      Only offsite works. I've been through floods and fires, and curious children and pets. Only offsite works. Forget the rest. You need to test it annually in the restoration phase, too. Keep copies of the keys.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    9. Re:Offsite by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      Exactly. You can't defend against every threat. The best you can do is go with redundancy. The chances of one site being destroyed by fire, flood, tornado, or loss to burglary is slim. The chances of 2, 3, or 10 sites all simultaneously suffering the same fate is very very slim.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:Offsite by koinu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I favour off-planet. Who knows how big the fire could get.

    11. Re:Offsite by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can't beat safety deposit boxes for storing your rare earth magnets either.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Offsite by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Put descant in the tupperware box, otherwise moisture can condense over time, especially if temperature varies (A/C fails, fire etc.) You only need a tiny amount of moisture from the air in the box to ruin your drive by causing a short somewhere on the controller board.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Offsite by inasity_rules · · Score: 2

      No! Supernova safe storage media is the way to go here....

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    14. Re:Offsite by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      The orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    15. Re: Offsite by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      Depends on the safe. If it is just one of those small fire chests they will take those, if it is something like a proper large safe, they had better bring a forklift or thermal lance.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  4. Off Site by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A couple of BD-Rs stored in a safe deep deposit box or over at a relative's house.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Off Site by creepynut · · Score: 2

      Not relevant as it is an off-site backup. You lose the media, you should still have the original copy. Multiple locations is even safer.

    2. Re:Off Site by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      A couple of BD-Rs stored in a safe deep deposit box or over at a relative's house.

      My bank charges $60 a year for a box - that's less expensive than any of the online services for large quantities of data. The real costs are a function of how much data you want to backup and how much redundancy you want offsite. For instance, for the 6TB drives I'm using, to have two onsite and two offsite costs twelve hundred bucks now, which compares favorably with tape solutions. I tend to upgrade backup drives every other year and trickle down the backup drives to servers and workstations, so it's not a sunk cost necessarily.

      I prefer ZFS mirroring over LUKS aes-xts devices, the security of which entirely depends on how good your passphrase is. So don't be stupid and lazy in that regard. If your passphrase is really good, you shouldn't worry about anybody getting ahold of your drive.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Off Site by worf_mo · · Score: 2

      The medium does not need to survive a fire when you distribute the risk. Unless you are afraid that both the bank and your house/office burn down at the same time. In that case, store a few more encrypted optical discs at various friends' or relatives' places.

  5. Fire-Resistant Safe by Meditato · · Score: 5, Funny

    Drill a small hole into a fire-resistant safe where your power and SCSI/IDE/SATA/USB/ETH cables go, then put your drives in there. Won't be easily stolen and will likely survive a house fire. Googling the terms "fire-resistant safe" revealed dozens of good options.

    1. Re:Fire-Resistant Safe by sribe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Drill a small hole into a fire-resistant safe...

      That deserves a "+5 Funny"!

    2. Re:Fire-Resistant Safe by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Don't be an asshat, they just left out one thing http://solutions.3m.com.au/wps.... Believe it or not but, yes, you do routinely have to put holes in fire rated construction elements up to including 240/240/240 rated construction elements, each part related to a type of protection prevention of spread/insulation/structural soundness. So yes a four hour fire rated box in the roof space (if you think about it for a bit you will know why) with a hole for the cable, sealed with an intumescent sealant. You can readily make the box out of several layers of fire rated gypsum board and then finally clad it in metal, just add in more intumescent seals for the door (one use box). The cable of course simple connects up to your network.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Fire-Resistant Safe by melstav · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You (and other commenters) laugh at this idea,

      Admittedly, a DIY USB-connected solution will likely compromise the thermal insulation and waterproofing of the safe to some degree... But COTS USB-connected fire safes *DO* exist.

      For one example: http://www.sentrysafe.com/Prod...

  6. Store two digital copies, but keep one off-site by imccuaig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, why go for some kind of difficult or expensive solution when low tech is cheaper and safer. It doesn't have to be the cloud, it could be encrypted and stored in your desk at work.

  7. The Cloud by kromozone · · Score: 4, Funny

    >Most people would just suggest to store it in "the cloud", but I'm naturally averse to doing so because that means someone else is responsible for my data and I could loose (sic) it to hackers, the entity going out of business, etc.

    Simply strongly encrypt your data before backing it up to the cloud, you will be at no risk of hackers or anyone else gaining access that way. If you can't find a cloud storage service that you trust/trust won't go out of business, you can make your own cloud using Amazon's AWS system. The levels of security at the facilities and redundancy mean your data will survive anything short of nuclear Armageddon. Personally I'd just go with the local encryption option.

    1. Re:The Cloud by C3ntaur · · Score: 2

      you will be at no risk of hackers or anyone else gaining access that way

      I disagree. Encryption algorithms are constantly being tested and broken, and there is great incentive for that to continue. From the NSA and other governmental entities deliberately weakening the tools we use to encrypt, to as-yet undiscovered flaws, nobody can say with 100% certainty that current encryption technology will forever be secure.

      And that's the biggest problem with the cloud. Once a single copy has been posted, you no longer have a sure way to delete every copy in existence.

      --
      Loading...
    2. Re:The Cloud by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      you will be at no risk of hackers or anyone else gaining access that way

      I disagree. Encryption algorithms are constantly being tested and broken, and there is great incentive for that to continue. From the NSA and other governmental entities deliberately weakening the tools we use to encrypt, to as-yet undiscovered flaws, nobody can say with 100% certainty that current encryption technology will forever be secure.

      And that's the biggest problem with the cloud. Once a single copy has been posted, you no longer have a sure way to delete every copy in existence.

      Err. The government already has your tax details. Why would they need to crack AES to read your encrypted 1040?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  8. Offsite... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    If you plan on having the medium survive your house burning down, it'll either have to be something really exotic(CNCed cuneiform tablets?) or something boring inside a sufficiently fireproof safe (which can get costly; but are a well recognized product category).

    If it gets to the point where the fire and/or water are in contact with your storage medium, luck might save you; but the odds are lousy enough that it doesn't really qualify as a plan.

    You really should consider off-site storage. This doesn't have to mean 'in the cloud', anything that gets updated very infrequently can be dumped to some backup medium and shoved in a safe deposit box.

    1. Re:Offsite... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you plan on having the medium survive your house burning down, it'll either have to be something really exotic(CNCed cuneiform tablets?) or something boring inside a sufficiently fireproof safe (which can get costly; but are a well recognized product category).

      Fireproof safes (actually fire resistant) are not what you want to use for storing electronics or cd/dvd/bd media.

      You specifically want a fire resistant "media" or "data" safe.

      The difference is that "fireproof" safes are intended to prevent paper from charring/burning, so their design allows for internal temperatures that are high enough to cook your electronics. Media/data safes maintain a significantly lower interior temperature (and humidity), which safeguards your relatively fragile electronic hardware.

      And it's not just enough to avoid high temperatures, your safe needs to be sealed against gasses.
      In a home fire, you have all types of corrosive and unpleasant chemicals that are created from burning plastics, toilet cleaner, etc.
      Those chemicals will generally attack any metal and plastic that they come into contact with (YMMV).

      TLDR: You get what you pay for, so get the right thing.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Offsite... by ckatko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing of note, however. There's a huge difference between running temperature and temperature limits. A hard drive can sit in a very hot room and be fine, but it cannot be run in that hot room.

      If there wasn't a difference, soldering ovens wouldn't really be very useful.

  9. Bank safe deposit box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And for the really paranoid, two banks, located in different parts of the country (or a different continent).

  10. Fire Rated Safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Better check the documentation on your safe. Many are not designed to resist heat. They provide an oxygen sparse environment such that paper won't burn. Thats why you have to let them cool off afterwards, if you open them too soon the oxygen from outside hits very hot paper and it lights on fire. This is fine for paper but not so good for plastics and magnetics. Best suggestion is one or more off site storage locations, such as a bank security box or a professional storage facility. How many is determined by how much you want to spend and how "twitchy" you feel.

    1. Re:Fire Rated Safe by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Better check the documentation on your safe. Many are not designed to resist heat. They provide an oxygen sparse environment such that paper won't burn. Thats why you have to let them cool off afterwards, if you open them too soon the oxygen from outside hits very hot paper and it lights on fire.

      No.

      Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) certifications for fire are based on not exceeding a specified internal temperature (or humidity level) for a specified period of time. UL Class 350 safes, for instance, will maintain an internal temperature below 350 F, and humidity below 85%. This is fine for paper, but not for digital media. For those, you're looking for a safe (or safe + internal container) rated for Class 150 or Class 125 (150 F or 125 F), depending on your specific application.

      An airtight safe that still got hot inside wouldn't protect paper. Pyrolysis still takes place in the absence of oxygen, carbonizing any organic matter--including paper. (Heating wood under oxygen-starved conditions is how charcoal is made.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  11. not what you asked by DriveDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know this isn't what you asked, and I'm interested in hearing the answer to your question as well. But offsite is really the only safe alternative. Put copies on whatever media, then store them somewhere away from your house. If you have a place you feel is relatively secure at the office, put it there. Send it home with a trusted friend. Store it in your mom's basement (if you live elsewhere). Encrypt with a phrase you won't forget. Only a thermonuclear strike is likely to destroy all your copies, and if it does, I suspect you won't much care.

  12. Stone Tablet by penguinstorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've commissioned a stone mason to carve a backup of everything I have into solid blocks of granite. Since the type of information varies (text, photos, videos, etc) I've had the Mason translate everything to its raw binary state and carved in bit by bit (Ha! See what I did there!)

    These are stored in my living room, which is causing some difficulty in negotiating living space--but I feel that it's worth the sacrifice.

    Sure, he complains when I edit an existing document. He's hired an assistant just to keep my grocerylist.txt file up to date in the archive. I wanted to switch it to an XML structure, but I let him win that battle.

    As a recovery strategy in the even of a fire my plan is to outsource the data entry to an Indian firm and take advantage of global time zones and cheap labour. I expect to be back up and running within 7.2 years in the even of a catastrophic event, if my calculations are correct. The best thing is I've eliminated all risk of media becoming obsolete: my last archive was on a Syquest Ez 135--never let it be said that I haven't learned my lesson!

    --
    Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    1. Re:Stone Tablet by sensei+moreh · · Score: 2

      Wind and water will erode it, but that shouldn't be a problem in your living room. In the event of a fire, differential thermal expansion of individual mineral grains may cause the granite to crack - hopefully into large chuncks that can easily be restored to their original configuration without the loss of any bits. One also has to hope that any fire will not be hot enough to cause the chemical breakdown of any micas or amphiboles present in your granite. I would have recommended a more homogeneous and more chemically inert rock such as quartzite, but that would have been significantly more difficult to carve.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
  13. get a fire proof data safe... Problem solved. by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a line of fire proof safes out there that have ports that allow you to run cables into the back so you can store hard drives or SSDs or whatever in the safe... in the event of a fire, the insides of the safe should be fine.

    So... that is what I would do. I'd get some external drives, buy a data safe, and then put that next to the server where upon at given intervals the data is backed up to the externals in the fire proof data safe.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  14. Rule of three by mrivorey · · Score: 2

    Rule of three: Original copy, on site backup, off site backup. Otherwise you're not truly protected. I'd say SD cards, in a Pelican SD card case, in the safe for the local backup. Then look into an encrypted off site backup. The key is to make sure it is encrypted *before* it leaves your computer, and that the provider does not hold the key. Many providers offer this, even if it's not turned on by default.

  15. Re:Bank safe deposit box by mysidia · · Score: 2

    And for the really paranoid, two banks, located in different parts of the country (or a different continent).

    For the less paranoid.... Make sure the data is encrypted. get yourself a piece of sewer pipe.. stick the media in with some baggies of Silica gel.. cap off the ends of the tube with airtight/watertight seal, so nothing is getting in Use a post hole digger to create a hole in the backyard 3 to 4 feet deep, and bury the piece of tubing so the top is at least 36 inches down.

  16. Offsite storage by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2

    There's quite a few companies who've built their business around safe records storage.

    Iron Mountain
    Recall

    These guys will store almost anything you want to pay them to. Documents, Hard drives, Tapes, paintings.... etc They can send an armored vehicle/courier to your source location to pick up the content.

    Though if you have only a few HD, a safety deposit box at your local bank should suffice.

    Lastly, encrypt it and upload it to Amazon S3's Glacier service. Heck you could upload it to a bunch of different Regions in case all of East Coast region is nuked.

  17. Mobile backup by anchovy_chekov · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, this is not a serious solution, but the way a company I worked for years ago managed this was hilarious. One of the managers put a server in the boot of his car and had it connect wirelessly to the file servers when it was parked in the office car park.

    Because he had to reverse his car in to bring the wifi into range, the joke "I'm just backing up the data" got played every time he did it. Suffice it to say, the joke got old pretty quick.

  18. Re:Encryption + (cloud or offsite) by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tar up your files. Encrypt with GPG and a 20 character random passphrase.

    Upload to a cloud service, and put on a USB drive at work and the house of a friend and relative.

    Why bother trying to find storage media made of unobtainium that can withstand fire or flood or theft, when you can simply and easily make a copy and store it multiple times in multiple places immune to most loss events?

    FTFY.

    Multiple backups. Multiple media types. Multiple locations.

  19. Use a safe deposit box by notthepainter · · Score: 2

    Ours cost about $80 a year and is open on Saturdays. We rotate our backup drives into it monthly. Yeah, weekly would be better...

  20. I bury a USB drive below the frost line... by ssw · · Score: 2

    I bury a 2TB USB drive below the frost line. It's about 3 feet from the foundation. I use it as a Time Machine target. It's sealed in a tomato can with RTV. I used an existing through-hole (used for some ham radio gear) to connect by mac mini to the drive.

  21. Why make it overly complicated? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    To back up a few GB, why are you making it complicated?

    First, if your home fire safe is not media rated, then don't count on any media surviving a fire, the firesafe may prevent paper from burning, but don't count on it keeping any electronic media from melting or degrading. And a fire safe is no guarantee, my sister lost her house and *everything* in it -- the only thing recognizable was part of a 100 year old cast iron stove, and the remains of the brick fireplace, everything else ended up in an unrecognizable pile of debris in what was left of the basement, there wasn't even enough left of their thousand dollar gun safe to be found in the debris.

    A few GB is *nothing* -- just encrypt it and email it to yourself, set up multiple accounts with different email providers if you don't trust that Google will be around for the long haul.

    If you had tens or hundreds of GB of data, then I'd say use a cloud provider and migrate your data to a new provider if that one goes out of business. I keep my data in Amazon Glacier -- for $10/month (it's mostly old family home videos converted to digital along with a lot of TIFF photos). If I needed to recover the data all at once, I could send them a hard drive (plus a fee) and they'd restore to that hard drive and mail it back to me.

  22. Recovered IDE drive from a fire by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2
    My father lost his workshop to fire in 1999. I have in my hands a Western Digital "Caviar" 2540 IDE drive that still reeks of smoke 16 years later. The computer was wrecked, but I hooked that drive up to an IDE cable and copied all of his files from it.

    People think a fire turns everything to molton slag. There was much that survived even when the 2 cars in the garage were reduced to burnt hulks.

    Don't have any experience with such a thing with modern multi-100 Gig drives, but traditionally drives were built like tanks.

  23. Fireproof NAS by SirMasterboy · · Score: 2

    They make special NAS products that are designed to be fireproof and waterproof.

    https://iosafe.com/products-2b...

  24. Dig a hole in the back yard... by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just dig a hole in the back yard and place the USB key or whatever in a water tight container and fill it in. Encrypting it would be a good idea too, just in case the neighbors dog digs it up. For something simple, you could try an otterbox drybox. These are used for kayaking and diving and are waterproof. The only problem might be cracking during the winter. You might want to dig below the frost line or put insulation around it.

    Another option would be to get an external shed and store stuff in there in a fire safe.

  25. Re:Encryption + (cloud or offsite) by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Funny

    Better idea: Encrypt the data, stick it on SD cards, and then mail them to random people. Be sure to email yourself with their addresses just in case you ever need to get the data back. Imagine the thrill they'll get from receiving a brand new 64 GB SD card in the mail for free!

    Then again, maybe that's not such a good idea. But it is still more reliable than cloud storage. :-D

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  26. Re:Encryption + (cloud or offsite) by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    Encryption won't keep them from wiping it and using it for something else, or giving it away to the first person who asks. Again, can't tell if I'm talking about cloud storage.

  27. Not in the fire by Spazmania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most effective way for your data to survive a fire (or flood, tornado, lava, etc) is for it to not be in the fire. If you don't want to automate off-site backups then periodically drop a hard disk into a convenient bank safety deposit box.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Not in the fire by Xest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, just not one stored in Hatton Garden, London.

    2. Re:Not in the fire by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it's not off-site, it's not a backup. It's just another copy.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  28. Re:Bank safe deposit box by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    Sewer pipe? Can I sftp to a sewer pipe?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  29. Re:Cloud but hear me by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed. I use an alternative to all this: all my data is backed up on a small eeePC in my attic and send sent to a friend of mine through SSH. I have 1TB of data storage at his place, and I offer in return 1TB of data storage in my place for him to do the same.

    Sensitive stuff is encrypted so I don't care if he can see all my files. The bulk of it is pictures/personal movies in terms of size. encfs works wonders for low sensitive data, the rest can go through TrueCrypt/keepass2 encryption or even PGP.

    And it costs me zero (minus the 1TB I have reserved for him).

  30. Re:Encryption + (cloud or offsite) by __aabppq7737 · · Score: 2

    Encrypt with GPG and a 20 character random passphrase.

    FIFTY.

    Use a passphrase, not a password