Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Will Be Featured In BBC Film 'Grand Theft Auto'

New submitter requerdanos writes: Former attorney and professional troll Jack Thompson is set to become a major motion picture figure, played by Bill Paxton, in the upcoming film Grand Theft Auto. According to Cinema Blend, "Paxton is in line to play Jack Thompson. A Miami lawyer, Thompson came into the public eye by frequently blasting Grand Theft Auto, creator Rockstar Games, and video game violence in general. Before that, he was known for attacking media companies who promoted both hip hop and sex. In 2008, allegations of professional misconduct, including harassment, defamation, intimidation, and false statements led to Thompson being disbarred."

9 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that they will portray Thompson in a positive light... or maybe just in the headlights of a car trying to run him down

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  2. We lucked out by gnaarly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jack Thompson was a man. That was the #1 winning point.

    1. Re:We lucked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having briefly interfaced with the entity known as Jack Thompson, I can absolutely confirm that it was not a man. It is a Crazy Fucker.

    2. Re:We lucked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's all remember the good old days when people laughed at censors from the radical right.

      These days everybody either cowers from the censors from the radical left (developers) or cheers them on (media). It's apparently the progressive thing to do to dress old bullshit in new gowns.

    3. Re:We lucked out by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but what took Thompson down was not online harrassment, twitter trolling, or IRL threats of violence/rape/etc - it was clear-headed dissection of his poor arguments and the legal sanctions against his own atrocious behavior. In short, he was given enough rope to show himself up as the idiotic demagogue he is/was. Twitter trolling, sending pizzas to his house, and other Anon-style pranks may have made people feel better, but they probably had no positive impact in the court of public opinion. At the very least, that sort of behavior wasn't going to convince anyone that didn't already hate him.

      On the other hand, what about Anita Sarkeesian? Can we really say she's been responded to in any sort of rational way? No, what the public sees is a bunch of juvenile attempts to shout down a critic. We're not even talking about how inappropriate rape or death threats are, we're talking about how counterproductive it is to let the conversation change over to that, rather than pointing out how she's wrong, her criticisms are overblown and uninformed, etc. Hell, I would never have even heard of her if it wasn't for the threats and harassment, because THAT'S the story the media keyed in on.

      That's why her accusations stuck, not because anyone was evaluating them on any merits, but because a bunch of trolls turned it into a conversation about her being attacked, which caused people to take her side. I'm sure it helped that she was in the role of "feminist critic under attack" rather than "overly litigious lawyer" and thus much more sympathetic in nature, but the ultimate point is that the Gamergate trolls' behavior isn't just objectionable on its own merits, it's also proved rather counterproductive.

    4. Re: We lucked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're joking, right? Her videos have been absolutely demolished by anyone who spends more than 3 seconds thinking about them. Some of her examples have been entirely debunked - she simply made up facts to back her argument.

      Of course, you probably never heard of any of this because of the incredibly persuasive response to those debunking her bullshit: misogyny!

    5. Re:We lucked out by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People who at rationally generally get treated rationally. People who foam at the mouth and freak out at everything/everyone that disagrees with them get treated as the nutcases they are.

      Anita is not a rational actor, therefore is not treated as such. Anyone who calls up someone's boss to get them fired for daring to disagree on a public forum is not a rational person.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Re:Jack Thompson is a piece of shit by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was reincarnated in the form of Anita S.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  4. Re:Can't wait! by Kemanorel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bill Paxton was amazing in Independence Day!

    Will Smith was in Independence Day, not Bill Paxton...

    Aflek was the BOMB in Phantoms!

    --
    Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.