Slashdot Mirror


StarTalk TV Show With Neil DeGrasse Tyson Starts Monday

An anonymous reader writes: Neil DeGrasse Tyson of StarTalk Radio and Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey has a TV show starting on Monday, April 20, at 11 p.m. ET/10 p.m. CT on NatGeo. Based on Dr. Tyson's prominent podcast of the same name, the hour-long, weekly series infuses pop culture with science, while bringing together comedians and celebrities to delve into a wide range of topics. Each week, in a private interview, Dr. Tyson explores all the ways science and technology have influenced the lives and livelihoods of his guests, whatever their background.

11 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. solution by fche · · Score: 2

    Solution there, it seems to me, is to create a watchable program.

  2. Re:So this means..... by kwiecmmm · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cosmos wasn't a series. It was like a mini-series, it ran its course and was done.

  3. I'm kind of sick of this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a big interest in physics and cosmology, etc, and generally fall asleep listening to some lecture or talk of some sort, be it Feynman or Susskind or what have you.

    All NGT (and guys like Lawrence Kraus or Bill Nye) talk about are themselves, or how stupid everybody else is who isn't balls deep in Al Gore's ass with the climate change deal. It's the most asinine and shallow of political discussions.

    It's annoying, because I'd love to hear about astrophysics (that's his job, right?) or string theory in Kraus' case.

    Quit mixing pop culture and science, it dumbs it down and makes people I respected once look like

  4. Re:So this means..... by taustin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Other than devoting 2/3 of the first episode to anti-Catholic propaganda. (And it's not like there aren't plenty of true bad things one could say about the renaissance age Church. He just didn't use any of that, and focused instead on outright fabrications.)

  5. You aren't the audience by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a big interest in physics and cosmology, etc, and generally fall asleep listening to some lecture or talk of some sort, be it Feynman or Susskind or what have you.

    .....

    Quit mixing pop culture and science, it dumbs it down and makes people I respected once look like

    These kinds of shows aren't for people who fall asleep every night listening to lectures. These kinds of shows are for the people who think Taylor Swift is the greatest singer/songwriter of all time, or can name everyone in the newest season of Dancing with the Stars but can't name the top people in government. The idea is to get people who aren't normally interested in science to at least think about it, to develop a rudimentary understanding of how science works (scientific theory, how scientists think, etc) and why the world around them is the way it is. Even a simplistic understadning is better than no understanding at all.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:You aren't the audience by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Replace "science" with "football" in your assertion of what people should do, and explain why your rendering of what's important is objectively better, beyond being better for massaging your own ego.

      Sure. I played football from elementary school all the way through college. My wife knows nothing about the sport but I want her to watch it with me. I don't start talking about different offensive formations like pistol, shotgun, spread, or when to use a 4-3 instead of a 3-4 defense. I start with basics, give her a rough idea of who everyone is and what they do so she can follow along while I can pay more attention to the "tactics" of the game. I fail to see how this is a bad thing (or "massaging my ego"-nice ad hominen by the way), and is precisely how you go about bringing in people that are completely unfamiliar with a topic. If you tailor a tv show about science to the people with a Master's degree or higher level of understanding then you miss out on a lot of people.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  6. Re:I woke up today... by OakDragon · · Score: 2

    I love how someone modded it "Informative."

  7. Re:So this means..... by Algan · · Score: 2

    The catholic church, by itself, probably delayed the scientific progress of humanity by at least a couple hundred years. I think it deserves a little bashing now and then.

    --
    If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
  8. Re:deflate gate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Judging from the way he not only prematurely used what turned out to be incorrect data but also botched the basic physics of "deflategate" maybe infusing pop culture with science isn't his strong suit.

    OMG. A scientist came up with a conclusion, published his conclusion along with the methodology he used to arrive at that conclusion, someone read what he published and found an error in his methodology, and he came back and said "oops, I made a mistake, here's the correct answer". Oh, the horror.

    No, I think that's absolutely the way to infuse pop culture with science. He inadvertently demonstrated how publication + peer review yields better results than simply saying "here's the answer"

  9. Re:Sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Michio Kaku is one of the only people who is more annoying than Tyson.

  10. Re:So this means..... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

    That sounds like "Cosmos" is cancelled then.

    Too bad, as it was the best thing on TV.

    It *was* the best thing on TV... when Carl Sagan did it. In the time and place that the original series ran, it was a refreshing and needed mixture of education, propaganda, and philosophy. Yes, propaganda, and that's not a bad thing, considering that most folks at the time had no awareness of the impacts mankind was wreaking on their environment, or the dangers that the then-escalating Cold War posed to humanity.

    Nowadays, people are on forced-empathy overload of a sort... everywhere they turn for entertainment, they're bombarded with preaching. Eventually, it turns one off to the idea, then makes one hostile to it - especially when it's being pushed from every orifice of the media, you know?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?