Microsoft Open Technologies Is Closing: Good Or Bad News For Open Source?
BrianFagioli writes When Microsoft Open Technologies was founded as a subsidiary of Microsoft — under Steve Ballmer's reign — many in the open source community hailed it as a major win, and it was. Today, however, the subsidiary is shutting down and being folded into Microsoft. While some will view this as a loss for open source, I disagree; Microsoft has evolved so much under Satya Nadella, that a separate subsidiary is simply no longer needed. Microsoft could easily be the world's biggest vendor of open source software, which is probably one reason some people don't like the term.
Cause that is about the only person who was praising Microsoft Open Tech when it started.
Microsoft has a long way to convince me that they are committed to OSS. So far their acclaimed commitments seem to be mostly fluff with very little real substance in them..
>> Microsoft has evolved so much under Satya Nadella
That's a funny way of saying "your SQL Server and other Server pricing went through the roof"
The whole Microsoft "open source" strategy seems to be based on getting as many software applications and developers ("it's free!") to depend on the Microsoft crown jewels of AD, SQL Server and Windows Server (2012) as they can, and then squeeze cash (e.g., core pricing vs. CPU pricing) from IT departments as they try to build out a stable backend to support all these apps. That's Balmer's "developers developers developers" plan anyway...and I don't see Satya doing anything different yet.
Well, actually, not really.
Nobody ever believed them.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
..and nothing of value was lost.
US$0.02++
" shut down " in the "start" menu
They fixed that, didn't you hear? In Windows 8, the option to shut down the computer is now logically found under Settings.
Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
If I want to start the process of shutting down my computer, why wouldn't I go to a menu of things to start?
That was added in the Windows 8.1 update, actually. It's not in the original Windows 8.
Giving tools to developers for lock-in technologies
Yeah, you are right. They have only open-sourced .NET and it is now available on all major (and quite a few minor) platforms. They have open sourced the C# compiler. They have open sourced just about anything web related they are doing. So, what else should they open source? Windows? According to Microsoft that is apparently also an option they keep open.
What, specifically, are you missing?
Has Microsoft ever offered any apologies for its past evils? If not, then why should anyone trust them now? If someone goes and trusts a company that has been well proven to be untrustworthy in the past, and another person avoids them awaiting evidence of remorse and reform, then which one is the idiot?