Slashdot Mirror


Gen. Petraeus To Be Sentenced To Two Years Probation and Fine

An anonymous reader writes: Petraeus, a now-retired U.S. Army General, has already agreed to plead guilty to a criminal misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material. As part of the agreement with prosecutors filed in March, the government will not seek any prison time. Instead, Petraeus will agree to pay a $40,000 fine and receive two years of probation, according to court documents. The recommendations are not binding on the federal judge who will preside at the hearing Thursday afternoon in Charlotte.

21 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Haha FTA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Snowden done a truly patriotic service, never mind his intent (who knows) but this General was only after pussy before he BETRAYED US!

  2. Thank God!!!! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a second I thought a member of the elite was actually going to be significantly punished, but these wise prosecutors have preserved the Aristocracy from shame!

    Now, let's get about castrating Edward Snowden!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re: Thank God!!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the general protection fault has to pay almost what, 5% of what he made by selling out his country?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. The more this happens ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more this happens, the more it looks like Snowdon is a vendetta for embarrassing the powerful by doing what is, more and more, looking like the right thing.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  4. Should be used as precedent for sentencing Snowden by timrod · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think this case should absolutely be used as precedent when and if they sentence Edward Snowden. I think a two year suspended sentence, followed by a Congressional Medal of Freedom would be an appropriate sentence.

  5. Good thing he didn't download a bunch of pdf's by musmax · · Score: 2, Funny

    but only provided national security info to his floozy for sex.

  6. Re: so....why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Petraeus' case is generally contrasted with those of Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden. Manning spent a long time in questionable conditions that some suggest were intended as duress, all for leaking computer data that exposed a US war crime. Snowden is in de facto exile for exfiltrating data that revealed the means by which the US government illegally spies on its citizens and the extent of their previous lies denying it. Petraeus got a slap on the wrist for leaking classifed information to a woman with whom he was having an affair. The two former leakers were punished for revealing the government's crimes, while the latter stayed out of jail despite giving classified info in exchange for sex.

  7. Re: so....why? by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Petraeus is a part of the elite. The elite don't get real punishments. Now remember who your masters are, and beg them not to punish you for your impertinence! Oh, and Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  8. Summary overlooks a couple of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. He was leaking classified information to his mistress who was also his biographer. Like top-secret stuff.
    2. When an investigation ensued, he lied to the FBI about leaking the material to his mistress.

    Martha Stewart lied to the FBI about insider trading tips and got at least 5 month in a prison camp.

    1. Re:Summary overlooks a couple of points by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like top-secret stuff.

      Sensitive Compartmented Information, actually, which is far beyond the Top Secret information revealed by the whistleblower Manning. Guess which one is getting probation and the other is getting to spend 3+ decades in prison?

  9. Re:not binding by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    If we're talking about the number of kicks to the nuts he should receive, we can start talking.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Different Set of Rules by Kunedog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think we will find there is one rulebook for punishing people like Snowden, and another for VIPs like Petraeus. And yet another (very thin) one for super ultra-VIPs like Clinton.

    1. Re:Different Set of Rules by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Until someone snaps and takes the law into his own hands. That's the inherent dangers of an unjust justice system: People losing faith in it.

      That is actually very dangerous to the stability of a state.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Different Set of Rules by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      We know that Snowden and Petraeus both leaked classified material, but I'm inclined to say that someone of high rank and responsibility should be punished more than a contract sysadmin for doing the same thing.

      Petraeus has pled guilty to leaking classified material, and we all know Snowden did. I've seen no indications that Clinton did anything on the same scale, or a mention of any law she appears to have broken. (Other secretaries of state have used private email for official purposes; it was only made illegal a year after Clinton left).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Different Set of Rules by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only as long as we still have something to lose. You have to be careful not to take that away, or else it's game over for you.

      You cannot win a war against someone who doesn't mind losing it because he CANNOT lose anything.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. dishonourable discharge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He should get dishonourable discharge as well and no pension.

  12. Re:so....why? by grcumb · · Score: 4, Informative

    We get a lot of articles here that people say don't belong on Slashdot, but I usually side with them being good articles. "Stuff that matters" and all that, personal freedoms, general interest to nerds, etc. But this one...no, I'm just not seeing it. Nothing to do with personal freedoms, nothing to do with computers, nothing to do with public policy, absolutely zero effect on any of us, even those of us in the USA. It's just political celebrity news.

    Except that his indiscretions were discovered because his electronic cloak-and-dagger skills weren't what he thought they were, and that the FBI discovered this in an electronic dragnet, and that he, the director of the CIA, disclosed state secrets to his soon-to-be-jealous lover, which constitutes a greater potential breach of security than Snowden and Assange combined....

    But aside from that, yeah, no relevance to the life of the average geek. None whatsoever.

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  13. Motivation and punishment by duckintheface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden disclosed illegal activity on the part of his employer and the US government. He should be protected by the whistle-blower law. Petraeus gave classified material to his biographer (and lover). In addition to displaying his machismo to his female, he was also trying to provide background info for the book about him. Petraeus was motivated by self-serving benefit. Snowden was doing a service to his country. In a just world, Petraeus should be the one hiding in Russia to avoid life imprisonment or a death sentence.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
  14. I haven't heard what the lady did with the info by Streetlight · · Score: 2

    Where did the secret stuff given to the mistress go? Was it shared with certain governments not allied with the USA? Could it be treason? And the punishment for treason is pretty serious for a soldier - a firing squad.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  15. People at the top pay? by Sarius64 · · Score: 2

    Sandy Berger got probation, community service, and a $50,000 fine I bet he didn't pay. Petraeus received essentially the same.

    Funny that normal civilians and enlisted people get decades plus for the same crime.

  16. It's Hillary's turn now, right? by acoustix · · Score: 2

    Gen Petraeus had a handful of documents in his desk. Hillary had tens of thousands of government emails stored in her own server and then wiped it without any government oversight.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson