Slashdot Mirror


Opportunity Rover Reaches Martian Day 4,000 of Its 90-Day Mission

An anonymous reader writes: Let's take a moment to appreciate the incredible engineering, scientific, and planning skill that went into the construction and deployment of the Opportunity rover. It landed on Mars with the goal of surviving 90 sols (Martian days), and it has just logged its 4,000th sol of harvesting valuable data and sending it back to us. The Planetary Society blog has posted a detailed update on Opportunity's status, and its team's plans for the future. The rover's hardware, though incredibly resilient, is wearing down. They reformatted its flash drive to block off a corrupted sector, and that solved some software problems that had cropped up. They're currently trying to figure out why the rover unexpectedly rebooted itself. Those events are incredibly dangerous to the rover's survival, so their highest priority right now is diagnosing that issue.

Fortunately, weather on Mars is good where the rover is, and it's still able to harvest upwards of 500 Watt-hours of energy from its solar panels. Opportunity recently completed a marathon on Mars and took an impressive picture of the Spirit of St. Louis crater, and the rover will soon be on its way to enormous clay deposits that could provide valuable information about where we can look for water when we eventually put people on Mars. As always, you can look through Opportunity's images at the official website.

34 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    https://xkcd.com/1504/

    Also appropriate: https://www.xkcd.com/695/

    1. Re:Oblig xkcd by akozakie · · Score: 2

      Dear mods. How the HELL is the older one (695) funny?!? It's right up there with Mufasa!

  2. We can do good technology when we have the will by chipschap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's proof that we are capable of great civilian technology achievements when we have the will and the desire to invest in science and engineering instead of yet another boondoggle.

    1. Re:We can do good technology when we have the will by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes indeed. Opportunity has to stand as one of NASA's greatest post-Apollo accomplishments.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:We can do good technology when we have the will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes indeed. Opportunity has to stand as one of NASA's greatest post-Apollo accomplishments.

      ... and at a small fraction of the cost of the F-35 that still isn't certified fit for it's purpose.

    3. Re:We can do good technology when we have the will by Maow · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes indeed. Opportunity has to stand as one of NASA's greatest post-Apollo accomplishments.

      *looks at parent's nick*

      Oh, of course you'd say that.

      You're probably Opportunity itself posting here.

      I'm sure Slashdot user MightyHubble would have something to say about that.

      --
      But in seriousness, I agree with you.

  3. It's a hoax! by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course it's lasted more than 90 days. That's because Opportunity never landed on Mars. All the images are created in a secret NASA location in Nevada.

    Now if you'll excuse me I have to go monitor the Jade Helm Texas takeover.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  4. Obligatory xkcd by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://xkcd.com/1504/

    He was a lot nicer to Spirit, which had a similarly impressive run:
    https://xkcd.com/695/

  5. ...eventually put people on mars...my butt by holophrastic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yeah, that's probably a good 100 years away, if not 500. Aside from dangers like radiation, nutrition, and other oh-so-subtle big things like gravity -- each of which is likely to kill a human long before they need their first water source -- there are also dangers in the trip itself, like radiation, nutrition, gravity, the vessel, going stir-crazy, and the time itself. Before all of that, there's the money, the interest, and the law. There's the communication delay, the medical equipment that doesn't exist, and the general goodbye-ness of it all. Oh, and then there's the actual "success" part -- ten failures does not a landing make. And finally, and I can't stress this enough we aren't going to mars the day after settling on the moon; and we sure as hell aren't going to mars before settling the moon.

    So, figure another twenty years before ten humans live on the moon (the way they do on the space station now). Figure another twenty years before the moon is routinely stable, reliable, and worthwhile. Then figure fifty more years to actually give a damn about mars.

    "eventually" appears as the heading on my to-do lists too. There's "now", "today", "tomorrow", "this week", "next week", "this month", "next month", "soon", "later", and "eventually". I think it 25 years I've yet to even start even one task from the "eventually" section.

    Technology moves very quickly these days. Humans still don't. How about building a transit system that lets me get from new york to california in under EIGHT HOURS! then you can work on mars.

    1. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      How about building a transit system that lets me get from new york to california in under EIGHT HOURS!

      We've had that since the 50s...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      Well another problem is that we actually know what conditions are like there. It's one thing to ask a bunch of religious fanatics who are being persecuted in their current setting to move to someplace nominally more rustic where they'd be free to practice their heathen rituals. It's another to ask someone to leave their gravity well for a long trip to a much crappier gravity well. It's kind of a hard sell. "Yeah, Mars is a shithole with nothing but dust and more dust, but we'd like you to move there so you can scrape out a subsistence living that we'll probably lose interest in the next time the budgets come up." At least in the new world you could live off the land hunting beavers in the event the budget for new world colonization ever got cut.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by jo7hs2 · · Score: 2

      "Technology moves very quickly these days. Humans still don't. How about building a transit system that lets me get from new york to california in under EIGHT HOURS! then you can work on mars." Erm... We have one. It is called the airplane. They're operated by these amazing things called companies, for profit. New York to California is easy as pie. It's even more efficient than driving there! http://www.wired.com/2015/04/d...

    4. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by holophrastic · · Score: 2

      I'd forgotten about the infinite nuclear energy. That's going to be my new example. Especially because we very much could have infinite nuclear energy, except for about six dozen cultural issues, legal issues, and our all-time-favourite deterant of civilization advancement: perceived property values.

    5. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Informative

      How about building a transit system that lets me get from new york to california in under EIGHT HOURS! then you can work on mars.

      LAX -> EWR
      Flight Time: 4 hours, 47 minutes
      Gate To Gate: 5 hours, 14 minutes.

    6. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying we have it now, but in the 50s, all the way up to the 70s, before security theater, it could be trivially done. Up until just a few years ago we could cross the Atlantic in 3 hours. We even had the ability to travel to the moon and back, but in the words of the famous inspector, "Not anymore"

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:...eventually put people on mars...my butt by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      Yes! That's another problem! No new humans to oppress! I wasn't going to say anything, but there you go!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  6. I'm so light, I can't go on. Oh wait I can. by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty sure you are going to need a drink long before low gravity messes with you.

    Pretty much all other reasons you list as problems could be applied to a move to Wyoming, but people do that all the time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Re:I'm shocked. Shocked I say.. by The+Rizz · · Score: 2

    But then I think, no, these are the guys who launched an elderly senator who oversaw their funding into space for totally legitimate scientific inquiry ("providing information on the effects of spaceflight and weightlessness on the elderly")...

    (I know, unpopular to criticize NASA here, but just sayin'...)

    Why do you think this wasn't legitimate research? Space travel may become common in the near(ish) future for citizens, and this is the sort of thing we need to know before we get there. With all the focus on civilian space tourists coming from other space programs, it's probably a good idea for this research to be done by a group who's in it for the science, not the money. Besides, it's not like it was really just "some elderly Senator" like you're implying - it was John Glenn, one of the very first astronauts. This is someone they sent up in his prime, and spent years testing. This is exactly the sort of subject who does make it legitimate research - someone they have large amounts of medical data on both Earthside and in space from before they were considered "elderly". This gives valuable data points at different points in his life. This is exactly the type of research science NASA is supposed to be doing.

  8. mission fucking accomplished! by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 2

    It landed on Mars with the goal of surviving 90 sols (Martian days), and it has just logged its 4,000th

    Good job soldier - and NASA engineers.

    --
    Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  9. I hereby nominate ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hereby nominate the Mars Rovers for any and all honors which can be shoehorned into being something we can assign to them.

    And kudos to the people who built it and kept it going.

    Fourty-five times planned mission length is pretty damned awesome!!

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:I hereby nominate ... by kylemonger · · Score: 2

      Or it was an intentionally lowball estimate of feasible mission duration so everyone involved looks good.

      Mars is a cool, dry place; electronics and machinery love cool dry places. Drop a mobile surveyor on Venus and have it trundle around for 4000 days and I'll be considerably more impressed.

    2. Re:I hereby nominate ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bah! For a cheaper, faster, better mission with a modest initial budget it's been an amazing success. NASA put two functioning units on Mars for not all that much money (in relative terms) .. around $820 million dollars for the initial 90 days. Compared to military and other expenses ... that's chump change.

      The on-board computers are tiny by most standards:

      Spirit's onboard computer uses a 20 MHz RAD6000 CPU with 128 MB of DRAM, 3 MB of EEPROM, and 256 MB of flash memory. The rover's operating temperature ranges from â'40 to +40 ÂC (â'40 to 104 ÂF) and radioisotope heater units provide a base level of heating, assisted by electrical heaters when necessary. A gold film and a layer of silica aerogel provide insulation.

      Operating from -40C to +40C is absolutely not a "cool dry place"; it's a hostile environment. Did we mention the dust storms? And the radiation?

      We're talking about something which had to travel millions of miles, not miss the planet, not get destroyed on landing, and which has been there for 11 years and is still (to some degree) an operational unit. It's sibling keeled over five years ago.

      You go ahead and wait for something else to be impressed with, me, I'll be impressed right now.

      Because there simply isn't another thing which has ever existed which humans have made which has operated and traveled on the surface of another planet for anywhere near as long as this thing has.

      Opportunity needs to be recognized as an absolutely amazing achievement, because it absolutely is.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Re:The /. groupthink is strongly against manned mi by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Still, I have to point out that this amount of research could have been done by a motorized human in half a day. For a rough estimate, look at the path the rover traveled in these 4000 days:

    And the entire project with two rovers and five extensions has cost $944 million. The SLS program will cost tens of billions to develop and even then a launch would eat over half the budget, before you actually have any crew capsule, lander, habitat, return craft or scientific equipment. If you really did an apples-to-apples comparison on the same budget, you'd realize we're getting a very good bang for the buck.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  11. Design Life is not Expected Life by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean with all the technical miracles NASA pulled off on that mission, they somehow managed to underestimate the longevity of the mission by 45x.

    To be fair, 90 days was not, in fact, the estimated lifetime of the mission. It was the design specification of the mission. That is, each of the subsystems was designed with the specification "design a system that will operate for a minimum of 90 (Martian) days, even under worst-case conditions."

    Think of it as a 90-day warranty-- after 90 days, it wasn't expected to be dead, it was just out of warranty.

    (and note that since the engineering specification was validated by testing the subsystems to either three times design life, or testing to design life under three-sigma worst-case conditions, it would have been very difficult to design for 4000 days...)

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  12. 500 watt-hours ... per day or what? by rroman · · Score: 2

    Watt-hour is a unit of energy, not power, so the information doesn't make a sense. Maybe the author wanted to say "rover can get up to 500 watts out of his solar panels" or "It can get 500 watt-hours of energy per day"?

    1. Re:500 watt-hours ... per day or what? by chihowa · · Score: 2

      Or it can harvest at least 500 Wh more before the panels stop working. That's the most accurate reading of the statement.

      At least they referred to Watt-hours as energy. I guess that's an improvement over normal science reporting.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  13. Re:The /. groupthink is strongly against manned mi by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That research could have been collected in a day by a human being, sure.. but not before probably dozens of people died. just trying to get there.

    We send probes because they are expendable.

  14. Re:why so long by Thagg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of interesting.

    One of the big reasons that they thought it would be limited to 90 days is that the solar panels get covered in dust, and as that happens the amount of energy collected diminishes. They figured in about 90 days, based on previous missions to Mars, they'd be out of juice.

    And...for the first 50 days or so, it was going that way. And then, a whirlwind came by, and scrubbed the rover clean. This has happened many many times since. An unexpected good fortune.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  15. Hmm by koan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally I think a Martian has taken a liking to it and repairs it while it's sleeping.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  16. Shut up. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you designed something to last for 90 days and it lasts for 4000 you've over-engineered the solution. Time and money could clearly have been saved in the development and construction of the rover.

    Just shut up.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  17. Re:The /. groupthink is strongly against manned mi by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    By that logic, we could send half of Washington D.C. up there.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Re:The /. groupthink is strongly against manned mi by mark-t · · Score: 2

    If humans go to Mars it should be to do what only humans can do (like have babies).

    Except that they can't... at least not the way that they do it naturally. I recall reading somewhere that mammal reproductivity is quite dependent on the earth's gravity, and attempts have a baby outside of that environment would most likely be fatal for the fetus, assuming that the attempt to become pregnant in the first place did not outright fail.

  19. More than you know by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    wyoming has radiation?

    Hell yes! Have you measured background radiation in the rockies?

    communication delays?

    Ever tried to maintain cell signal on the way to Yellowstone?

    nothing to see, or to do?

    Once you've seen Frontier Days once...

    No medical equipment?

    I go up there all the time with no medical equipment.

    I don't know what that gravity would do to your digestive systems.

    That's why every astronaut has died immediately after return from space with even less gravity...

    I have to break character here and say - you are SUCH a retard. That's enough fun for me. You may carry on if you wish.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Simply to avoid confusion. by robbak · · Score: 2

    If they called it a 'day', they wouldn't have known if it was an Earth day or a Mars day. If they relied on calling them 'Mars Day' or 'Earth Day', soon someone would have forgotten to maintain the prefix.

    So they coined a new word to use for a Martian Day, and stuck to it.

    For other planets, I expect that the same term will be used. 'Day' for time on Earth, 'Sol' for time on the planet. That said, we don't have all that many things that would have usable 'Sols'. Mercury's days last for months, Venus' day last for longer than its year. Maybe probes on minor planets, which look like they have days around 8 hours long.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp