Slashdot Mirror


Two Programmers Expose Dysfunction and Abuse In the Seattle Police Department

reifman writes: Programmers Eric Rachner and Phil Mocek are now the closest thing Seattle has to a civilian police-oversight board. Through shrewd use of Washington's Public Records Act, the two have acquired hundreds of reports, videos, and 911 calls related to the Seattle Police Department's internal investigations of officer misconduct. Among some of Rachner and Mocek's findings: a total of 1,028 SPD employees (including civilian employees) were investigated between 2010 and 2013. (The current number of total SPD staff is 1,820.) Of the 11 most-investigated employees—one was investigated 18 times during the three-year period—every single one of them is still on the force, according to SPD.

In 569 allegations of excessive or inappropriate use of force (arising from 363 incidents), only seven were sustained—meaning 99 percent of cases were dismissed. Exoneration rates were only slightly smaller when looking at all the cases — of the total 2,232 allegations, 284 were sustained. This is partly why the Seattle PD is under a federal consent decree for retraining and oversight. You can check out some of the typically excellent Twitter coverage by Mocek from his #MayDaySea coverage.

26 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. But they're PHP programmers!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can we trust them since /. hates PHP so much?

  2. I'm shocked ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean when the police investigate their own misconduct they find there was none?

    I'm shocked I tell 'ya.

    And the police wonder why they're no longer treated with respect, while being people who regularly abuse their power and ignore the law. All cops need to start wearing body cameras at all times. Because it has reached the point where taking them at their word is a stupid idea.

    If the police choose to ignore the law, they should be charged like the rest of us.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:I'm shocked ... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, we find that various mooks make spurious brutality claims, the vast majority of which are complete bullshit.

      The only evidence uncovered is that the PD has a robust system for reporting and investigating claims. That a small percentage find any real misdeeds could be an indication the the bar for accepting complaints is too low, as much as it could mean they don't follow through or dismiss real misdeeds. I am not saying it is one or the other, but the information presented is not enough to go on.

    2. Re:I'm shocked ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is, until the video surfaces.

      There have been enough high profile instances of police officers outright lying about what happened that I simply am not willing to assume they're telling the truth. Because often when a video shows up the police are proven to be lying.

      If the good cops can't weed out the bad ones, then it's time to treat them all like children who can't be trusted.

      In the fall of 2012, Ben Livingston (a past Stranger contributor) was the subject of a Washington State Patrol traffic stop. Livingston requested dash-cam video of the traffic stop, but the Washington State Patrol denied possessing such footage. The following year, Livingston, Rachner, Mocek, and Seattle civil rights attorney Cleveland Stockmeyer created a nonprofit called the Center for Open Policing (COP). Their first effort was to sue.

      They won, and the state patrol settled to the tune of about $23,000. "I particularly enjoyed that case," said Mocek.

      If you or I did that, it would be perjury and obstruction of justice.

      This is a police force which was already under a federal consent decree ... which means they've been acting like this for a long time.

      Boo hoo ... the poor police feel all ganged up on because they can't break the law and get away with it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:I'm shocked ... by David_Hart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is, until the video surfaces.

      There have been enough high profile instances of police officers outright lying about what happened that I simply am not willing to assume they're telling the truth. Because often when a video shows up the police are proven to be lying.

      If the good cops can't weed out the bad ones, then it's time to treat them all like children who can't be trusted.

      In the fall of 2012, Ben Livingston (a past Stranger contributor) was the subject of a Washington State Patrol traffic stop. Livingston requested dash-cam video of the traffic stop, but the Washington State Patrol denied possessing such footage. The following year, Livingston, Rachner, Mocek, and Seattle civil rights attorney Cleveland Stockmeyer created a nonprofit called the Center for Open Policing (COP). Their first effort was to sue.

      They won, and the state patrol settled to the tune of about $23,000. "I particularly enjoyed that case," said Mocek.

      If you or I did that, it would be perjury and obstruction of justice.

      This is a police force which was already under a federal consent decree ... which means they've been acting like this for a long time.

      Boo hoo ... the poor police feel all ganged up on because they can't break the law and get away with it.

      You mean like the video in the Ferguson Michael Brown shooting case: "Ferguson Police Officer Exonerated in the Shooting of Michael Brown"

      I agree that there are bad cops who lie in order to cover up their incompetence, poor police work, etc. But there are also cases where video would show that the officer followed procedure. In my opinion, Police officers should be begging for tamper resistant body cams. It helps the honest cops and would help weed out the bad ones.

    4. Re:I'm shocked ... by Hussman32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One item the media seems to dismiss is that there are almost 40 million police interactions every year. About 1.4% claim there was force used, and the majority state it was excessive. The number that has made the recent news is a dozen or so.

      I will be the first to say that 1.4% is far too much, but you can also note that 98.6% follow procedure, and all beat cops have a non-zero probability of being shot when they go to work that morning. Their job is hard (and quoting stats comparing cops to fisherman is pointless, fish don't have shotguns in the back seat).

      I have a friend whose husband was killed in the line of duty, he was stopping a warehouse robbery. It didn't make national news, and her kids grew up without their father. Yes, there are issues with the thin blue line and the recent monitoring with cell phones is a benefit, but before anyone goes around blasting cops without considering the whole picture, just imagine what it would be like if they did not protect us and serve us from the anarchy that would be there without them.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    5. Re:I'm shocked ... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Body cameras will help a little, but they won't solve the problem.

      Expect body cameras worn by corrupt cops to have serious reliability issues.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    6. Re:I'm shocked ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wonder if it's reached a point where abuse of power is regular, or if it always has been and it's only the fact that nearly everyone carries a camera.

      Read about Frank Serpico, an NYPD cop that blew the whistle on endemic corruption and graft in the 1970s. His partner, with the assistance of other officers, tried to have him killed, but Serpico survived (with a bullet lodged in his skull). Even though he is one of the most highly decorated retired NYPD officers, he still gets hate mail from active-duty cops for his testimony to the Knapp Commission.

      The only difference today is that more people carry cameras.

    7. Re:I'm shocked ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. So - let's have the video. In one case, the video proves me wrong. In the next case, the video proves me wrong again. In the next case, I see the evidence that "my side" is right. And, that's the way it should be.

      A cop's word should carry no more weight than your word or mine in a court of law. The cop should have to PROVE HIS CASE.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:I'm shocked ... by Forgefather · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really. It's not possible to extrapolate anything from that number. After all one of the biggest abuses of policing is the way that they deliver routine tickets in such volume that it financially cripples a community. Ferguson has more warrants for arrest than people and almost all of them are for failure to pay traffic fines. Living in fear of a police officer pulling you over for being over the limit by a single MPH (Yes this does happen) and giving you a ticket that will put you in debt for years (and possibly prison) is the very definition of abuse.

      Granted not all of that rests on the heads of cops. Most of it resides on the government and court system that allow loan sharks to take over the collections of tickets in a way that traps the people in debt. These agencies offer to take over collections for free but then add a service charge to ticket payed by the person cited. All of the money that the person pays goes towards that fee until it is payed off, but the fee keeps increasing with missed payments. The result is that these people are stuck in a cycle of payments until a warrant goes out for their arrest for failing to pay a ticket and then they are sent to prison.

      As the Ferguson report on policing practices said: when the city mayor asked the police chief to deliver 10% more revenue he responded "we can try."

      I'm sure that most of these stops were perfectly routine. Doesn't mean that the police aren't being abusive.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    9. Re:I'm shocked ... by tweak13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Their job is hard (and quoting stats comparing cops to fisherman is pointless, ...

      Why is using actual data on how dangerous the job is compared to other jobs pointless? Because it doesn't support your argument?

      ... fish don't have shotguns in the back seat)

      Neither do the vast, vast majority of people.

  3. Re:To think I once subscribed to this site by xombo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you think government abuses is something limited to a concern of the left then you a totally out of touch with reality and the libertarian wing of your own (assumed) party.

  4. Stay objective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the one hand, routine dismissal of serious allegations suggests protection of corruption.

    On the other hand, allegations do not imply guilt. Any criminal that dislikes being caught by the police can make such allegations.

    I will reserve judgment until the evidence is available.

  5. Re:To think I once subscribed to this site by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, look, fascists defending corrupt police forces.

    How cute.

    And though they have only combed through a small portion of the data, they say they have found several instances of officers appearing to lie, use racist language, and use excessive forceâ"with no consequences. In fact, they believe that the Office of Professional Accountability (OPA) has systematically "run interference" for cops. In the aforementioned cases of alleged officer misconduct, all of the involved officers were exonerated and still remain on the force.

    "We're trying to do OPA's job for them because OPA was so explicitly not interested in doing their own job," said Rachner.

    When the police ignore the law without consequence, someone needs to be doing something, because clearly the damned police are incapable of it.

    Sorry, but crooked cops are just criminals like the rest of them ... and they deserve the same treatment.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two Seattle programmers were arrested on alleged drug charges, and passed away while in police custody. The SPD will investigate the incident.

  7. Isn't Seattle already under a "consent decree"? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Isn't Seattle already under a "consent decree"? (That's basically when the Feds descend on a police force - ala Ferguson - because they want to clean it up.)
    http://www.seattletimes.com/se...

    And isn't there already a full body - with it's own web site - monitoring it?
    http://www.seattlemonitor.com/

  8. Re:To think I once subscribed to this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uhhh, I think it reads that all of the 11 most investigated officers are still on the force. You are applying the predicate of one sentence to the subject of the previous one. By your logic (applied to this post) the 11 most investigated officers are mixing up their sentence structure.

  9. The "and order" part. by JimSadler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Law is one thing and order quite another. My view of the cops is that they are aware that they can no longer hold the line and are in a sort of panic. What is orderly is often confusing and very subjective whereas what is legal is usually more sharply defined. Part of the problem is money. Tax payers don't like to pay taxes and as a consequence we do not require college degrees for cops. The consequence is that we end up with some pretty primitive personalities working as cops. Sloppy language results in sloppy thinking. For example police have to be instructed on how to stay safe and stay alive. But the cops on the receiving end of the training falsely translate that training into an idea that they must have absolute safety. Absolute safety is not available for any type of employment much less being a cop. That is why we are seeing cops that are a bit quick to get violent and their training amplifies the problem. For example if they shoot a suspect one time should they really be trained to keep shooting until the subject is down and not moving at all? The public is also at fault as in days gone by any person who ran for any reason was subject to being shot so very few people tried to run. Now running from cops is common and the cops do not shoot simply because a person is running and that exposes cops to a lot more risk. And these three strikes laws cause a lot of violence as well. A bad guy has nothing to lose by running if a third incident will get him life without hope of parole. Cruel and unpleasant jails also assure and create violence as resisting arrest is sort of logical if one is about to be dropped into some kind of degrading hell pit. There is plenty of guilt to go around and as much guilt falls on the tax payers as upon the criminals.

  10. Re:Libertarians are to the right of Republicans by mc6809e · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Saying Libertarians are "far-right" is like saying sqrt(-1) is more positive than zero.

  11. Re:The Elephant in the Room by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All this talk about the police, and how bad they are. Sure, there are some bad ones, but on the whole, I do not fear the police. It is the niggers I fear. THAT is the conversation this country needs to have. Why the niggers are completely out of control, and what needs to be done about it.

    Maybe if you stopped calling them niggers, they'd be nicer to you. Know what I mean, asshole?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  12. Re:To think I once subscribed to this site by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "criminals or otherwise people on the police radar."

    And, in this day and age, just what does it take to show up on "radar"? For instance - DHS has stated that "extremists" includes veterans, Christians, survivalists, sovereigners, on and on and on. Oh - note that it's not just "Christian fundamentalists" anymore, but "Christians" in general. Funny that one - all the gays are clamoring to be accepted into the churches - which makes gays extremists now too!

    I'm on the "radar" multiple times. I don't even try to get through an airport. I'd have to kill someone.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  13. Re:Libertarians are to the right of Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    By an objective, international standard, US politics falls right of center.

    That means that what an American describes as "right" is actually far right, what an American describes as "center" is actually right, and what an American describes as "left" is actually center.

    Hopefully that clarifies things for you. It's not that there's a global conspiracy to describe things as further right than they actually are. It's that your perspective, as an American, makes things appear that way.

    That being said, American neoconservatives and "libertarians" are both far right, by an objective, international standard.

  14. Need more data by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only evidence uncovered is that the PD has a robust system for reporting and investigating claims.

    That's not quite true - the evidence suggests only that they have a robust system for reporting and recording claims. I've not seen any evidence to suggest that they robustly investigate them and the OP claims that there is evidence of them using unnecessary force and racist language without repercussion which, if substantiated, would be clear evidence of very poor investigation.

    I completely agree that having a large fraction of claims refused is not evidence that the system is not working. It does suggest that the system should be investigated to understand why there are such a lot of dismissed complaints because either cops are having to endure a lot of frivolous discipline cases or they are getting away with serious misconduct. Either possibility is bad but the statistics provided do not distinguish between the two cases.

  15. Re:To think I once subscribed to this site by nbauman · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are any number of abuses that can go on behind the shield, cops can be among the best criminals because they know the job and know how not to get caught, they know forensics etc etc etc. There are dirty cops out there and unfortunately in this day and age the good ones are the minority. I don't think cops in Seattle with dysfunction and abuse is a localized problem to either the department or the region, it is a national problem.

    Not only that, but when they do get caught, they get a free pass from their fellow pigsxxxx cops who refuse to arrest them, from the district attorneys who refuse to prosecute them, from judges who pretend to believe blatant lies, and from the juries who talk themselves into believing blatant lies.
    http://www.vice.com/read/testi...
    Testilying: Cops Are Liars Who Get Away with Perjury
    February 3, 2013
    By Nick Malinowski

  16. Re:Libertarians are to the right of Republicans by chihowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Authoritarians, of both the "left" and "right" wings, love to use government force. The authoritarian-libertarian axis is completely unrepresented in the left-right political spectrum.

    Almost all of the politicians in DC are somewhat, to extremely, authoritarian. Most citizens are considerably less authoritarian than our politicians and many citizens are very libertarian. As long as everybody is totally obsessed with the left-right dichotomy, though, and assumed that the other wing embodied authoritarianism, we'll keep getting more and more authoritarians in our system.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  17. Re:To think I once subscribed to this site by haruchai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "especially since Rodney King, which made it en vogue"
    En vogue?
    Rodney King did not make a fucking fashion statement; he got the shit beaten out of him like I'd never seen before by several officers, who punched, kicked, and Tasered him with several dozen baton blows thrown in for good measure.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body