Slashdot Mirror


NASA Will Award You $5,000 For Your Finest Mars City Idea

coondoggie writes with this snippet from Network World: NASA this week said it would look to the public for cool ideas on how to build a sustainable environment on Mars with the best plan earning as much as $5,000. With the Journey to Mars Challenge, NASA wants applicants to describe one or more Mars surface systems or capabilities and operations that are needed to set up and establish a technically achievable, economically sustainable human living space on the red planet. Think air, water, food, communications systems and the like.

156 comments

  1. Timing? Coincidence? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    That a week ago KSP went out of Beta?

    Time to check whether the base mods have been updated yet.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Timing? Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That a week ago KSP went out of Beta?

      Time to check whether the base mods have been updated yet.

      The conspiracy here goes further than that. Clearly KSP was designed to make people commit time on their own to training themselves as orbital pilots without the need to expose how close we are to actually going to space for some unknown reason. Based on this new information I wouldn't be surprised if they started sending people to Mars next year.

  2. Planetary magnetic field generator by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Where's my $5K?

    1. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Where's my $5K?

      On Mars.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    2. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You gotta make the core hot and turn it into liquid so it spins. You might need a battery to excite the coil.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Where's my $5K?

      On Mars.

      But only after you stay for 10 years will they let you cash the check they had JPL put inside Spirit....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      NASA says that must not be your finest idea.

    5. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Superconducting coil around the equator power by solar panels seems feasible.

    6. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely it is in Greece!

    7. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Heh, maybe in 500 years...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by delt0r · · Score: 1

      It is not quite as easy as it sounds. If we assume we want a field strength close to what earths is, ie about 65 micro T, from the radius of mars of 3390km, we would need a current of 350MA. That is quite a bit. But even worse is the force this wire is under. The tension is 77.276 GN. The total energy in the magnetic field is 6.3MW/h.

      Well it seems sort of plausible.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    9. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by Falos · · Score: 1

      To receive it, you have to spend at least one night in the manor!

    10. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      It does not have to be a one-turn coil, 350 turns would require only a MA of current, or only about 10000 times more than a big car starter motor uses! :)

      Paul B.

    11. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      To receive it, you have to spend at least one night in the manor!

      Dude... i don't know if you mean what i think that you mean,,, but i am Greek... i don't know what you think about us Greeks (don't believe the barbarous lies), but i will decline the offer... blame your pseudonym!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    12. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Surely it is in Greece!

      I start to like you - why don't you sign up for a Slashdot account? You already have one? Well, use it!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    13. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      You gotta make the core hot and turn it into liquid so it spins. You might need a battery to excite the coil.

      Battery? No, what we need are nukes, a subterranean (submarsean?) vehicle that can travel to the core to place them, and a team of misfit heroes.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    14. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      The static energy / current requirements seem plausible, but that may only be a small part of the picture. Any conductor moving in that feild - vehicles, people, ions from solar wind - will then generate an EMF and dissipate energy in the process.

    15. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Get Aaron Eckhart on the phone, stat!

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    16. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by Falos · · Score: 1

      In older movies and cartoons, inheritance of haunted estates was often held pending On One Condition as a plot device to get people inside spooky mansions for ghostly shenanigans (ie the second-in-line trying to scare protagonists away and claim the inheritance). You may have seen it parodied more recently in, say, Futurama/Simpsons.

      Or maybe your post was just a roundabout crack at the linguistic ties my handle will exhibit in various languages. Believe it or not, I had no idea it did when I picked it for an SNES RPG. But it amuses me now, if not as much as actually seeing someone make a penis in minecraft blocks, custom decals, spray tags, guild logos, spaceships, Spore creatures, etc etc etc

    17. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Very interesting this "on one condition" thing (now that you mention it, yes, i have seen it parodied, and also -i think!- remember it -very vaguely?- from some very old American movie/s)... but to be honest, as a Greek i immediately noticed your pseudonym, so the only thing i could think was... you know!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    18. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by delt0r · · Score: 1

      True, but the forces and energy are the same. ie a million superconducting wires will need a 350A current. It should be noted for 77GN your looking at something with a 5-10m diameter. So this is not small. But a bit more plausible that i originally thought.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    19. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Turns out that a superconductor won't lose that field. The items moving around the field have work done on them. But that is directly via forces on those objects. It won't suck energy out of the coil. In other words its a really big almost perfect permanent magnet. Of course this is once its all started. During start up there will be extra energy required for such dissipation effects, and well iron in the core will change things quite a bit.

      I did the calculation to show that it was a silly idea (need cables made out of magic sort of thing). But it turns out the numbers are not nearly as bad as i expected. Not easy either and probably not as practical as just making a dome. But meh.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    20. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Superconducting coil around the equator power by solar panels seems feasible.

      Could you somehow use solar wind itself to induce the current that produces the field that repels it? That kind of shield would be very useful for manned spacecraft.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:Planetary magnetic field generator by ultranova · · Score: 1

      No, what we need are nukes, a subterranean (submarsean?) vehicle that can travel to the core to place them, and a team of misfit heroes.

      We can't leave a mission of such important to misfits. This clearly requires politicians, lobbyists and corporate executives.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  3. "as much as" a whole $5K? by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    maybe a middle-schooler will win some.

    1. Re:"as much as" a whole $5K? by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      lol - that was my first thought. Add a zero and it might be worth some actual thought.

    2. Re:"as much as" a whole $5K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $05K. Done.

    3. Re:"as much as" a whole $5K? by fj3k · · Score: 1

      $05000 is only $2560. Make it $0x5000.

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    4. Re:"as much as" a whole $5K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After taxes $5k in contest winnings is only even $3k - $3.5k, depending how taxes are filed.

  4. Simple by itzly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Build the city on earth instead. Breathable atmosphere, easy resupply missions, plenty of water.

    1. Re:Simple by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Even easier... Change the name of an existing city to "Mars" and you are done...

      Oh yea, "I came home from Mars just last week.".. Or, "I'm going to Mars to live for the next 10 years."

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Simple by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Build the city on earth instead. Breathable atmosphere...

      Not for long

      ...plenty of water...

      For me to poop in

      And, you know, there's this. Mars is a warehouse, who wants to live in a warehouse? Let Amazon handle it, with Huey, Dewey, and Louie...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are a cow. A cow says moo. MOOOOOOO! Moooooooo! Mooo cow moooooo! YOU COW!

    4. Re:Simple by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Even easier... Change the name of an existing city to "Mars" and you are done...

      Oh yea, "I came home from Mars just last week.".. Or, "I'm going to Mars to live for the next 10 years."

      You're a litte bit too late for that: Mars, PA

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Simple by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Until that extinction level event rock comes cruising along and wipes out humanity because of the whole "all our eggs in one basket" thing....

    7. Re:Simple by itzly · · Score: 1

      Build an underground shelter, with sufficient supplies to last until the dust settles. Much cheaper, and much higher chance of survival.

    8. Re:Simple by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU1QPtOZQZU

      Where should we build it? On the part of the continent that gets flattened by the impact, or the continent that gets turned to lava by the thermal shock? If you can build something that would allow a breeding population of humans to survive something even a fraction as bad as that I think it'll be far more expensive than a Mars colony.

    9. Re:Simple by itzly · · Score: 1

      Build a couple, spread out over the earth. Keep in mind that small mammals were able to survive the previous huge impact by digging a hole in the ground with their paws. I'm sure we can do better than that.

    10. Re:Simple by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      They were able to survive *some* of the huge impacts. There were a few, including the one that created the moon that would not be survivable by any digging. But it's not just impacts. There are a whole host of other disasters that could take out a one planet humanity.

    11. Re:Simple by itzly · · Score: 1

      There were a few, including the one that created the moon that would not be survivable by any digging.

      That was a small planet, and it's gone now.

      There are a whole host of other disasters that could take out a one planet humanity.

      There are at least 100 times as many that can take out a fragile settlement on Mars, so by building such a place, you've increased the odds of humanity's survival by 1%. It's not worth the trouble.

    12. Re:Simple by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      So if you came down with cancer and the treatment had a 1% success rate you'd just not bother?

      No offense, but Stephen Hawking thinks it's worth the bother, and some guy on Slashdot named itzly doesn't. I'm going to go with Hawking's recommendation

      http://www.space.com/8924-stephen-hawking-humanity-won-survive-leaving-earth.html

    13. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reminded of an old episode of "The Twilight Zone", a guy builds a bomb shelter in his basement with a steel door, air filtration, food, etc. All of his neighbors laugh at his "foolishness" until news reports come in that the "the launch of missile like objects from Russia". After "negotiations" fail (IE; give us what you built) his neighbors go insane smash through his shelters door and are on the verge of assaulting/killing him and his family when over the radio there is a newsflash that the government has confirmed that it is a satellite constellation. Such a global incident would leave hundreds of millions/billions of hungry desperate people roaming the planet for years afterwards, if the masses even got a whiff that there was "salvation" throngs of them would come from hundreds of miles and beat/dig/murder/destroy/etc to the very last person in an effort to get at it. Its a little harder to build the massive infrastructure to launch an interplanetary rocket in that kind of calamity then it is to hunt down some old military/construction hardware and march to an earthbound location.

    14. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Have no imagination or ever strive for anything great because it is easier to be a lazy smart ass and get modded up in the process. Got it, thanks.

    15. Re:Simple by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Build an underground shelter, with sufficient supplies to last until the dust settles. Much cheaper, and much higher chance of survival.

      This is a good plan. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plantlife. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. Selecting survivors need not be difficult -- a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills.

      Naturally, they would breed prodigiously; there would be much time, and little to do. And, with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, society could be rebuilt. Though since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

      Mein Fuhrer, we should start planning at once!

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    16. Re:Simple by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. —H. L. Mencken

    17. Re:Simple by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Even easier, just change the name of a train station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    18. Re:Simple by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      ghost towns are cooler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    19. Re:Simple by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Watch out for those nubile females, they want our fluids!

    20. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time somebody tried an idea like that the USA happened.

    21. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are at least 100 times as many that can take out a fragile settlement on Mars, so by building such a place, you've increased the odds of humanity's survival by 1%. It's not worth the trouble.

      Wow. Can't argue with math. Oh, wait, you don't appear to know how to do any.

    22. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA has been good at times. We might still be crawling out of the dark ages were it not for their obsession with democracy (even if they don't practice it), freedom, and insanely big guns and insanely destructive weapons.

    23. Re:Simple by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Naturally, they would breed prodigiously; there would be much time, and little to do. And, with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, society could be rebuilt. Though since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

      Apart from not mentioning beer, your argument seems compelling.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. $5k??? Really, NASA? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    It occurs to me that a feasable plan for a sustainable mars colony is worth a *HECK* of a lot more than just $5K....

    Try increasing that by *AT LEAST* a couple of orders of magnitude.

    Offering only $5K for a practical idea that once successfully implemented is going to be quite frankly worth trillions of dollars is really undervaluing the significance of coming up with a workable plan in the first place.

    1. Re: $5k??? Really, NASA? by Gary+Perkins · · Score: 1

      If most of the ideas in the proposal pan out, you make it into the history books for all time. Most likely, the final plan would barely resemble anything that comes out of this, so it seems like more than a fair deal to me. This is just an example of a public private partnership in its simplest form. It'll save the government some time and money by jumpstarting the initial phase of designing a colony. And who better to lay out initial requirements than potential future colonists?

  6. Egg hatcheries by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Barsoom always needs more egg hatcheries. And air generation stations along the canals.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  7. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Here's $5,000, now do our work for us, while we blow $5billion on climate change boondoggles.

  8. Who gets to name it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they name the idea after you? That might attract a lot more interest.

  9. Ceres better than Mars by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Easier to get to, less radiation (but enough for solar panels to work), lots of water, no huge gravity well to surmount when coming home.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Ceres better than Mars by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Ceres has 1/10 the gravity of our Moon... why go to Ceres vice our own Moon?

    2. Re:Ceres better than Mars by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      2.8% of Earth's gravity might be a little bit difficult to get used to.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Ceres better than Mars by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

      Water and Nitrogen...pending Dawn Confirmation.

  10. So it'll be just like, um, the Jetsons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But with like laser guns to fight the Martians! Pew pew pew!

    Now hand over the $5000! With that much money I don't have to work at McDonalds ever again!!!

  11. Two words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hookers and blackjack.

    1. Re:Two words. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hookers and blackjack.

      In fact, forget the blackjack.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. economically sustainable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    economically sustainable? Isn't that a little far reaching. We can't do that on earth.
    Genetic engineering. That's my short answer.

  13. Surface? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My first idea is to dig in. Put the people underground, as much as possible. Put critical infrastructure underground as well. No matter how you build, or what you build with, surface structures are going to be vulnerable. Put greenhouses on the surface, put solar panels on the surface, put hazardous research and fabrication on the surface. Put the PEOPLE underground. Dig them in where they can sleep soundly, knowing that they are safe from piddling little things like storms, or meteors, or whatever.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Surface? by itzly · · Score: 1

      What's the point of going to Mars and then live underground ? You can dig a hole right here, if you want.

    2. Re:Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dig them in where they can sleep soundly, knowing that they are safe from piddling little things like storms, or meteors, or whatever.

      This really is the only option. Find a cave, crevasse, etc. make it air tight, then live in it. Fuck the storms or meteors, Mars has no magnetosphere and humans will die unless shielded from the cosmic radiation. Electromagnetic shielding technology doesn't exist, so that means thick walls of dense material, and a preexisting sub-surface feature has the cheapest and thickest walls.

    3. Re:Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear mars caves are really comfy.

      That red rock is beautiful, too.

    4. Re:Surface? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So you want to put the people underground where they'll be safe, and their source of food and fresh air (the greenhouses) where they're going to be, as you yourself say, vulnerable.

      The greenhouses need to be underground as well. So does the power generation, which means a fusion plant. Good thing they're only 20 years away, just like they were 20 years ago.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Surface? by quantaman · · Score: 2

      So you want to put the people underground where they'll be safe, and their source of food and fresh air (the greenhouses) where they're going to be, as you yourself say, vulnerable.

      The greenhouses need to be underground as well. So does the power generation, which means a fusion plant. Good thing they're only 20 years away, just like they were 20 years ago.

      You can put greenhouses above ground. Just make sure you have an underground failsafe and enough emergency reserves to make it through a disaster.

      Even then it's probably not feasible. Look how expensive it is to go underground on earth, now consider how tough it will be on Mars when you're walking around in spacesuits and have to transport heavy duty excavation and construction equipment from earth.

      More likely just put everything above ground and distributed. If an asteroid takes out a greenhouse or a house it's tragic, but it doesn't kill the colony.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Surface? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      We have natural caves on earth big enough to hold the great pyramid, so with the lighter gravity of mars, it would be expected to find even bigger caves. And then there are cave systems with hundreds of kilometers of passages.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:Surface? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Keep the greenhouses on the surface, so they can use the existing fusion plant.

    8. Re:Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they'll only have to worry about the walls and roof caving in. Which, hopefully is more under our control (proper design and manufacturing) than random chance.

      Although even at 1/3rd gravity I wonder how much raw material you need to send or mine+refine in order to build robust underground structures.

    9. Re:Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great so you've completed a geological survey and know the composition of the first kilometer of a candidate site well enough to know that digging is both: possible, practical?

    10. Re:Surface? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Don't think "underground", but soil-sheltered. There is no need for subway-tunnel construction when all you need is a radiation shield. And besides, the lower gravitation (3.711 m/s vs 9.81) makes it easier to haul rocks and dirt.

    11. Re:Surface? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Develop a drilling or excavation machine that can operate mostly autonomously (ideally, using something like industrial lasers to avoid mechanical wear on the drilling apparatus) and send one or more to Mars several years/decades ahead of when you want to send the humans. Have them drill at a downward angle into the side of a crater, and once you've gone sufficiently far then start having them dig or drill to the side. Ideally, by the time the colonists reach Mars all they need to do is install airlocks at the entrances, pump in breathable air, and maybe knock down the (hopefully thin, by this point) walls between the side tunnels so you don't have to go outside to visit the neighbors. There may be some leaks but hopefully the colonists can make some sort of cement out of the Martian dirt to plug them.

    12. Re:Surface? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There may be some leaks but hopefully the colonists can make some sort of cement out of the Martian dirt to plug them.

      Lucky you covered that last point, I was getting worried your plan was insanely risky.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. It'll take a lot more than $5000 by camperdave · · Score: 1

    If NASA wants my design, it'll cost them a lot more than $5000. For $5000, maybe I can whip something up in crayon.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:It'll take a lot more than $5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are a self-centered egoist and egocentric guy... blocking all humanity for a few bucks... you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:It'll take a lot more than $5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure NASA wouldn't pay anything at all for your plans, camperdave. Nobody really cares about your plans, as you are just some random guy and not an established figure in the field.

  15. Just recycle an existing city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am quite sure with just a few reforms, some of the underground cities used by Martians in the past can be put back into shape - there seems to be too few inhabitants left around there to claim for the vast urban infrastructure that should have been in place back them.

    1. Re:Just recycle an existing city by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I am quite sure with just a few reforms, some of the underground cities used by Martians in the past can be put back into shape - there seems to be too few inhabitants left around there to claim for the vast urban infrastructure that should have been in place back them.

      Finally, the voice of reason.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. Bio-Dome. by chris200x9 · · Score: 2

    Just watch Bio-Dome.

    1. Re:Bio-Dome. by cutecub · · Score: 2

      $5000 is not enough for me to watch Bio-Dome.

      -S

  17. That's it? by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    Only 5K?

    We're talking about NASA here people... if they are going to be that cheap in compensation for a great idea... they can go phuck themselves.

    1. Re:That's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how much their budget has been slashed lately? A mission to Mars is a pipe dream either way you slice it.

  18. Oh, I got this! by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

    First, we have to find the alien reactor...

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Oh, I got this! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, first you have to get your ass to Mars.

    2. Re:Oh, I got this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man... I'm gonna need a third hand

    3. Re:Oh, I got this! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  19. Is socialism allowed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm asking if socialism is allowed or if I get to die a painful death when I fail to pay my oxygen bill...

  20. Coal-fired power plants, obviously. by Geste · · Score: 1

    I could use the $5K, so don't steal my idea.

  21. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Yeah, really, I won't even change a lightbulb without getting a signed contract.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  22. Kudzu !!!! by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the Thunderbirds 2086 episode KUDZILLA?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  23. Nukes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because there are no nuclear weapons that can hit mars.

    1. Re:Nukes by itzly · · Score: 1

      If someone can build an underground city on Mars, they surely can bring a nuke.

      But even so, a Mars city is never going to be 100% self sustaining. At some point in time, they're going to run out of something essential that needs to come from earth.

    2. Re:Nukes by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      What makes you way that? If we can put a rover within 100 meters of where we wanted to, we can put a nuke there.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:Nukes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go watch Biodome. It is possible without a Pauly Shore.

      Ignoring the snarky comment I made, we do have the technology to make a sustainable living environment as long as there is a source of water, which we should be able to harvest on Mars. Gonna be cold up there thou. The real concern in my mind, is how will our bodies adjust. If the gravity is low, such as on the Moon or on Ceres, that will really screw us up. The lack of sunlight will also be an issue, so vitamin popping will be a required part of life unless we start to make products that aren't needed on Earth to replicate our environment's aspects we take for granted.

      I still have yet to see a better overall plan than having a small army of robots using 3d printer tech to use native materials to make buildings before we go.

  24. Tesla Energy by advantis · · Score: 1

    Give $1000 to charity (won't make any difference to Elon Musk) and give the other $4000 to whoever designs the rest of the city around Tesla's Gigafactory and Powerwall products. Unless Tesla are secretly developing oxygen systems for their already ongoing space concern.

    --
    Question for religious people: where do unrepentant masochists go when they die?
    1. Re:Tesla Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget these. Another $1000 to charity :) $3000 to go.

      The city will be 100% electric and the transportation will look more or less like it does on earth, although the production systems required (for metallurgy and stuff) might be different and undesignable off-site.

      Then add capitalism and see how fast the city goes to hell :) The guy selling the oxygen will probably the only one left. Him and his dynasty, which will work pretty much like communism (they're all family) except for when somebody steps out of line and they get to sleep with the Martians - so yeah, still like communism.

    2. Re:Tesla Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trees produce very little of the oxygen available on earth. In fact, you could remove all the oxygen they generate entirely and most people wouldn't even notice the difference.

    3. Re:Tesla Energy by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, fuck trees, the enty bastards.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  25. Monorail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It needs to have a monorail

  26. That sounds an ad for South Dakota.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why die on mars when you can live in South Dakota? They claim to have both oxygen and jobs!

  27. Inflatable by qzzpjs · · Score: 1

    Just make a huge bouncy castle and drop it from orbit. They're already good at that!

  28. Source locally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the largest hurdles is bringing all of the resources with you. If you source building materials locally, such as firing brick for bulky exterior shield walls instead of hauling processed aluminum or steel all that way with you, you can save a lot of money and space. Couple that with modern "3D-printing" building techniques that are only just being pioneered, and it's feasible to have bots construct the entire skeleton of the settlement before you arrive to install all the necessary life support equipment, etc.

  29. Technically feasible by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Here, here's a technically feasible Mars idea.

    But wait, that's not a city. Not quite. How about this. There. That was about $5000 worth of work. Pay the man.

  30. Black rock city anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask the folks at burning man. They quickly setup and teardown a huge city in an in-hospitable environment.

  31. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    That's still better than the market rate of $0.10 for 12 ideas. In fact, you'd probably go bankrupt if you offered that rate, which is why they're limiting it to the top 3 ideas only.

    Presumably the plan here is to not overlook anything "obvious" that their experts somehow didn't think of. Obviously, the actual plans in full detail will be developed by the experts.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  32. No so "hot" a planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mars is not a "hot" planet. In fact Mars is a cold desert with non-breathable air. Why would anyone want to go to Mars? I would choose the Sahara or the Antarctic before I would choose to go to Mars. Are there any fabulous natural resources on Mars that we are unaware of? Maybe. No, if I wanted to put money, time, and effort into outer planet exploration I would choose one with water, atmosphere, and a significant likelihood of harboring some form of life: Europa, Enceladus, Ganymede, or Titan. But here we have a classic example of scientists trying to find a lost key, at night, under the street lamp because that's the only well-lit place.

  33. Easy, Olympus Mons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are probably 100's of miles of lava tubes in there that could be sealed up. Plus it might be possible to tap any residual heat still in the martian mantle.

  34. City? by Translation+Error · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I want to know is where in the world the word 'city' came from in the article's title. There's nothing anywhere close to a city mentioned in the article itself, with the goal of the challenge being to 'establish a technically achievable, economically sustainable human living space'. I don't know about anyone else, but to me, that sounds like an outpost rather than anything like a city.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  35. Easy ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, you put 10,000 lawyers and politicians into a hermetically sealed bag ... you launch that bag into space.

    Once you've done that, get back to me and I'll tell you the rest.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Easy ... by qzzpjs · · Score: 1

      So, you put 10,000 lawyers and politicians into a hermetically sealed bag ... you launch that bag into space.

      We'll call it the B Ark! Just make sure we keep the telephone sanitizers...

  36. My plan -- I just saved NASA $6,666,000,000 by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "NASA is working on... the rocket expected to launch the [Mars] mission -- the Space Launch System"

    My plan:

    1. Kill the Senate Launch System and bury it in a landfill
    2. Fire everyone who thought it was a good idea
    3. Wait around a few years and play Kerbal Space Program
    4. Buy a ride on Falcon Heavy R and save a billion bucks per launch
    5. Now you can afford to haul more stuff to Mars for a city

    Thank you, I'll take the $5000 in cashier's check, Visa or Mastercard.... but definitely NOT American Express.

    1. Re:My plan -- I just saved NASA $6,666,000,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SLS maximum payload to LEO: 130,000 kg
      Falcon Heavy maximum payload to LEO: 53,000 kg

      Since maximum payload to LEO is apparently not a concern anymore, I propose even greater savings. Let's use a helium-filled party balloon and a single Estes E-class rocket motor.

    2. Re:My plan -- I just saved NASA $6,666,000,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cmon. We didn't put the damn ISS up there in one shot, did we? If it's that much cheaper per launch, you can launch several times as much total mass into leo for the same cost. That's just an engineering problem.

    3. Re:My plan -- I just saved NASA $6,666,000,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but for the cost of one SLS launch you could have 3+ expendable Falcon Heavy launches, possibly as many as six depending on how the costs line up. The true costs of SLS are still unknown but they're expected to reach a total of $22B in R&D by the time it launches its first flight.

      There's certainly pros and cons to having one big launch vs several smaller ones, but SLS is going to be used pretty much exclusively for BEO missions which makes it hard to bring down costs compared to a launch system that can economically serve comsats and LEO/ISS payloads.

    4. Re:My plan -- I just saved NASA $6,666,000,000 by hattig · · Score: 1

      I quite like the idea of a Senate Launch System.

      I hope it launches in the direction of the Sun.

  37. 3D printers! by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    The answer is 3D printers. They solve all known problems. Just 3D print a massive spaceship, then fly said spaceship to Mars and 3D print yourself a city, then 3D print a breathable atmosphere and magnetic field.

    1. Re:3D printers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget an Oculus Rift as well.

    2. Re:3D printers! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The answer is 3D printers. They solve all known problems. Just 3D print a massive spaceship, then fly said spaceship to Mars and 3D print yourself a city, then 3D print a breathable atmosphere and magnetic field.

      I understand that we'll be able to do that in about twenty years time. In the meantime, we need a short term solution in case an asteroid wipes out all life on Earth tomor

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  38. If Humanity Was Capable of Sustainability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then it wouldn't need to go to Mars in the first place.

  39. KICKSTARTER!! by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    I am going to do a Kickstarter with a $100,000 goal to be used to come up with a good idea within a year. The $5000 from NASA will represent a 5% return on the investment, which is very good these days.

    1. Re:KICKSTARTER!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! What are your credentials? I'm expecting at least 2,000 hours of Kerbal Space Program time, minimum.

  40. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by sconeu · · Score: 2

    I never change lightbulbs because it's a hardware problem, and I'm a software guy.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  41. Re: $5k??? Really, NASA? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    They're not looking for ideas - just publicity. And they've succeeded with this slashvertisement.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  42. Screw Mars! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Build a floating city in the upper atmosphere of Venus.

    1. Re:Screw Mars! by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 1

      whoops. You beat me to it. Yes, I never understood why we'd want to colonize a planet with .4G, no hope of an atmosphere, relatively resource-poor, and further away. You figure out how to keep the platforms buoyant, and you can walk around outside in not too much more than a fireman's suit and a breather mask. Be good practice for doing the same out on Saturn or Neptune.

    2. Re:Screw Mars! by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 1

      EDIT: no hope of a breathable atmosphere. Figure out how to sequester all the CO2 on Venus, you could even one day get down to the surface. We will never be able to have open-sky colonies on Mars, but doing so on Venus only requires solving a problem that we're going to have to solve on Earth soon enough anyway. For all the extra solar energy, well, that's not really even a problem from the right point of view.

    3. Re:Screw Mars! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      NASA originally planned for an Apollo flyby of Venus in the 1970's as a practice run for the Mars mission. Alas, the Apollo program got cancelled.

  43. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Standard Weiland-Yutani Terraforming station. Go for the best

  44. Evghenia is on mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First on mars!

  45. Use T-Mobile! by edawstwin · · Score: 2

    For communicating, just use T-Mobile. For the quality of the signal that I get, I can only imagine that Mars is where they place all of their towers.

    --
    I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
  46. What's an idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a) this is marketing
    b) They're asking for an idea, not a plan. I'm not going to put more than 5 hours of work into it, but if I've got a notion that I can bounce against some coworkers over lunch, yeah, that's in the order of magnitude, and $5K will pay for a pig roast for the office. .

  47. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

    Offering only $5K for a practical idea

    Well, the probably had a big budget increase!

    --

    "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  48. Build a Welfare Ghetto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about building a welfare ghetto?... These people have no money or food, or education, but they breed like wildfire and manage to maintain an ever-increasing population in uninhabitable areas contrary to the most complex logic. Don't worry about maintaining anything because these types of ghettos flourish without any maintenance already... Cops, Lawyers, Politicians, and Bureaucrats will never interfere in a ghetto which will keep overall costs down. None of these welfare people work so wages are cheap (or non-existant). Forget expensive vehicles that need special expensive fuels - stolen bicycles will work just fine on Mars. Water is not necessary if you just provide some crack or crystal meth... And if you maintain the supply of crack or meth, you can get people to do some amazing things just so they can get their next fix... If NASA puts a massive welfare ghetto on Mars and contols the drug supply, I think amazing things can happen...

    Just build a GHETTO. lol...

  49. Aquaponics + huge magnifying glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aquaponics, mostly automated system to harvest, large scale, all the food ever, 3 times. Different groups to prevent possible farm collapse (which is much rarer with aquaponics anyway)
    Insect farming as well. Easy to do, nutritious, wonderful.
    If you were to go for animals, chickens would be best, or similar animal, you get eggs and a whole bird to eat eventually.
    Fungi are an obvious good one.
    Water, purification? Maaan we got a huge ball of fire in the sky with no clouds or atmosphere of worth to weaken it, point a huge magnifying glass at it.
    But really, solar panel farm, preferably one that could be constructed with mirrors and less solar panels to keep prices down since, you know, NASA, they don't exactly have a budget. Or a budgie. NASA needs a budgie.
    Backup RNG power source or few for emergencies. Send a ship of fuel to them after they have arrived. Or before them.
    Those solar panels will need to be cleaned from dust every so often.

    We could go with commie-block tier housing, or go all fancy and have tiny houses for each person or couple.
    Having working quarters on the outsides and living on the insides is better for many reasons.
    1) You can have the working quarters colder since you will be actively working with things, and will actually be dressed up.
    2) the heat from the living quarters wouldn't be lost as much since it would float around the working quarters before it reaches the outside edge of the colonies.
    This would mean you wouldn't need to have stupidly expensive insulation. (of course, it will likely need to be to kill off cosmic radiation anyway!)
    You NEED to use the materials there as much as possible to cut costs. There is a whole planet there of resources.
    Sand can still be used to fill walls. The planet might be a massive desert of corrosion, but that is incredibly useful to fill spaces between two walls to create a thicker wall to keep out radiation and keep heat in.
    Most heat will only be lost through radiation anyway, the atmosphere isn't dense enough, fast enough, or commonly windy enough, to be a serious threat to heat loss. It's ability to rip heat from the colony shouldn't be that high. (at least, I believe it is. everything I have seen on wind would say so, I know there is stupidly fast winds due to said lack of density)
    Regardless, this sort of structure is most efficient anyway. Not like there is much to look at on Mars.
    Oh hey, a gray-ish red mountain, amazing. Oh hey, what's that, oh, just another gray-ish red mountain. AWE!

    That solved 4 problems fairly well, food, water, power and housing.
    Everything else that stems from that is gravy.
    Sure it is overly simplistic in description, but the smarter people will know how to put these together, I am just too lazy to type something more descriptive.
    'sa weekend job mate.

    1. Re:Aquaponics + huge magnifying glasses by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That solved 4 problems fairly well, food, water, power and housing.

      Everything else that stems from that is gravy.

      Clearly the lack of breathable air is just a tiny detail.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  50. Watchmen by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite structure on Mars is the giant clockwork thing in Watchmen. But I guess that doesn't quite meet the breathable air requirement.

  51. mars vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    allow gambling, alcohol, drugs, sex and no taxes on mars, and the city will build itself

  52. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It occurs to me that a feasable plan for a sustainable mars colony is worth a *HECK* of a lot more than just $5K....

    It doesn't occur to the future citizens of New New Delhi

  53. Simple by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Volunteer the entire Tea Party to go colonize Mars.

  54. Just don't, until you get a functional biosphere. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    That's my suggestion. Biosphere 1 and 2 were both failures. We don't know enough to make sustainable closed biospheres work on Earth, much less in orbit or on Mars. When we have something that lasts 10 years, we might be on to something. Until then, practice, practice, practice... Baby steps. How about an L5 or two to start.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  55. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

    It occurs to me that a feasable plan for a sustainable mars colony is worth a *HECK* of a lot more than just $5K....

    Don't worry, they're not actually looking for ideas. They have tons of ideas. They have people whose whole job is to come up with ideas. They have an army of very knowledgeable volunteers in groups like The Planetary Society who'd write detailed thousand-page treatises on solid waste recycling on Mars, in exchange for just knowing that the human race has an off-world outpost. They're not lacking for ideas.

    This contest is just a way to get people to start thinking about a serious effort to go to Mars, as opposed to the Mars One suicide fantasy mission. $15k worth of prizes is cheap advertising. And maybe, just maybe, if enough people start talking about going to Mars our eternally-opportunistic politicians will decide it's a safe bandwagon to jump on and cough up some real support.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  56. Re:$5k??? Really, NASA? by Snufu · · Score: 1

    worth a *HECK* of a lot more than just $5K....

    Don't be greedy, that's half the NASA budget for 2015.

  57. Start Digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When at first the holes will be pure research... so when they big enough start building.

  58. My idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Run a competition to scour the brains of everyone, make trillions of dollars then insult the genius who came up with the idea with a financial slap."

    Do I win?

  59. Cloud City by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 1

    Screw Mars. Cloud cities on Venus is much more feasible long-term.

  60. Venus by synaptic · · Score: 1

    We're scouring the galaxy for Earth-like planets when Earth's twin lives right next door. Sorry, but it's not Mars. We just have to adjust the thermostat a bit...

  61. SPACE 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, copy the Moonbase Alpha of course!

  62. Re: $5k??? Really, NASA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fame is something only the mentally retarded care about. The "best" idea they come up with this way is going to be a far cry from the best solution. There is a reason the phrase "you get what you pay for" exists - it's freaking true.

  63. MARS city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ask Americans they only know about cartoons and that is the limit of their interest or thinking, instead get with the only viable program MARS ONE. Their people are way ahead of America for a city on Mars. Go to their web site and just look at their designs! After all you are paying the Russians for all sorts of space related easy to build items like: rocket motors,rides to the ISS and many many others. SO USE SOOM SENSE for a big change and go with a winner for a change go help MARS ONE,

  64. About the Atmosphere... by Ryyuajnin · · Score: 1

    Mass-produce millions of fuel-inefficient cars. (maybe call Nascar about installing a track or two)
    Create huge landfills to emit lots of methane; possibly filled with garbage from earth.

    These two things combined should get the Mars atmosphere nice and dense for our fragile human bodies!

    And what ever you do, DO NOT USE RENEWABLE ENERGY! As this will no doubt rob the atmosphere of the precious greenhouse gasses needed to keep the planet habitable.