Slashdot Mirror


Senators Demand CIA Director Admit He Lied About Spying On Senate Computers

blottsie writes with a link to a story at The Daily Dot which begins: CIA Director John Brennan lied when he denied ordering agency employees to search Senate computers to trace a leak. Frustrated with his unwillingness to admit the obvious, three Senate Democrats on Friday called on Brennan to admit that his agency crossed the line. The Senate Intelligence Committee was preparing a report on the CIA's Bush-era torture programs when the spy agency discovered that the committee had somehow acquired an internal CIA report on the program. To determine how the report had leaked, Brennan ordered CIA officers to pry into the computers used by committee staffers. The heart of the story is in the letter in which the Senators call for Brennan to 'fess up, also linked from the story. Drawing from that letter: When you were asked publicly about the CIA's search in March 2014, you denied that any improper access had occurred, stating that "As fas the allegations of, you know, CIA hacking into, you know, Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth. I mean, that's -- that's just beyond the -- you know, the scope of reason in terms of what we could do." The reports of both the Inspector General and your review board demonstrate that this denial was at odds with the facts.

In June 2014, senior officials from the FBI, NSA, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence all testified that it would be inappropriate for their agencies to secretly search Senate files without external authorization. To date, however, there has been no public acknowledgement from you or any other CIA official (outside the Office of Inspector General) that this search was improper, nor even a commitment that the CIA will not conduct such searches in the future. This is entirely unacceptable.

29 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Boohoo, crocodile tears. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how the spying is only bad when it's done against politicians. Against the plebes, it's perfectly fine. I'm shedding so many crocodile tears for them.

    1. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've got to realize though, that those congressmen are our constitutional representatives. They represent the power of the people in this democracy. If the CIA can get away with spying on Senate computers then that's it. They really are above the law. They can literally do any damn thing they want to. It's kind of like Julius Caesar crossing the Rubicon. The CIA director should get his dick stomped on. In fact 2 or 3 years in jail for him would do the country a world of good. If no one gets in trouble for this then you can mark it as official. The Republic is dead, all we have is a farce.

    2. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      No one of any importance will get in trouble for it.

    3. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by chihowa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're putatively our representatives, but it's becoming more and more obvious that they actually aren't in any way representing us. Perhaps it's time for us to all stop pretending that the emperor is wearing clothes and get about fixing our system.

      Anyway, they're currently in the process of renewing a law which supposedly authorizes spying on US citizens (while simultaneously complaining about being spied on), so the constitutional basis of any of this is questionable. Pretending that throwing a bureaucrat in jail, even if he is high ranking, will save our republic is a little silly.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You've got to realize though, that those congressmen are our constitutional representatives. They represent the power of the people in this democracy

      I think the OP is referring to the fact that the NSA lied to Congress and the American people when asked about spying, not on Congress, but on the American people:

      U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore: Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of Americans?"

      James Clapper: "No, sir."

      Wyden: "It does not?"

      Clapper: "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently, perhaps, collect, but not wittingly."

      (watch for yourself)

      Some Republicans have said He should be fired. Obama said he misspoke.

      One might think he should have been arrested. Instead, they arrested the lawyer who asked him why he lied..

      We've seen this double-standard applied recently-- no one arrested for torture except the CIA Whistleblower. Leakers getting huge sentences unless their rank is high enough.

      If the CIA can get away with spying on Senate computers then that's it. They really are above the law.

      They've gotten away with much much worse already. (I started adding links but there are hundreds of them...)

    5. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by chihowa · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're talking about Clapper's NSA lying to Congress about spying on US citizens. That's blown over and nobody cares about that. This story is about Brennan's CIA spying on Senators. This is a totally different situation and is completely unforgivable.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    6. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Funny how the spying is only bad when it's done against politicians. Against the plebes, it's perfectly fine. I'm shedding so many crocodile tears for them.

      I think this was a lot worse.

      The public keeps the senate in line and the Senate keeps the CIA in line. When the CIA oversteps its bound the Senate is the club the public uses to knock them back in line.

      When the CIA spies on the Senate they're trying to take away your club.

      You at least have the option of voting out a bad Senate, how do you vote out a bad CIA?

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You at least have the option of voting out a bad Senate, how do you vote out a bad CIA?

      I can? Since when? Big money and incumbent advantage makes this highly unlikely in almost all but very few cases.

    8. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You want facts? Challenge accepted!

      How about Lobbyists Now Spend More on Congress Than the Government Does, think that is for shits and giggles? Or Study shows revolving door of employment between Congress, lobbying firms, or even better you can go and see the sellout of the week right here!

      You see THAT is why your "vote" is nothing but a sham, its because if you "herp derp, vote the bums out" they just walk across the street and become the lobbyist that buys the guy you just voted in! Saying you can do squat with voting, or blaming the public for how things are is like making you try to "win" your weekly paycheck by being forced to play 3 card monty with a street hustler and then blaming YOU for not getting paid because "if you tried real hard you should find the lady!"...no you won't, the game is rigged, and playing a rigged game and expecting to win? Its a suckers bet.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might not like Congress, hell you might not even like your representative but most people do. Individual senators and rep's have approval ratings in the 60-90% (very high) range with their constituency. The overall congressional approval rating is so low because everyone doesn't like the people everyone else picked, not because they hate their own.

      This is something pretty scary. The CIA basically violated the separation of powers and ignored and actively opposed congressional oversight. These are prime tenets of our system. Throwing those checks and balances and oversight out and we are one step away from a dictator running things out the CIA office. Government leaders can't just decide they are going to stop worrying about those constitutional limits on power and doing whatever they want.

      The most infuriating part of this is that Congress already has the power to punish him. They CAN hold him in contempt and refer him for prosecution for lying under oath. The problem is they won't, because that could endanger national security or some such bullshit. So they write a stupid letter and ask him to admit he broke the law while they wag their finger at him when they should be voting to hold him in contempt.

      In summary, though this is a huge concern I have a hard time getting worked up about it when Congress won't use the power it already has to punish him for lying and breaching the separation of powers. Hell, they could de-fund his position and bar the government from paying him a salary if they wanted to be real dicks. They have numerous ways to punish him but they won't and that's the scariest thing of all. Someone breached a basic tenet of our government, lies to Congress and invalidates congressional oversight and the people with the power to punish him won't do it.

    10. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by Endymion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      enhanced interrogations

      Stop using the CIA's euphemisms - it's called torture.

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    11. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Torturing people is something you'd think is unforgivable but the only one jailed for anything related to that was the whistleblower who refused to torture anyone. So unforgivable has had the bar shifted to somewhere around the ninth circle of Hell, and this thing that should not be forgiven already has been.

    12. Re:Boohoo, crocodile tears. by sgt_doom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But it goes so far even beyond your excellent comments which I fully agree with: the entire 9/11 script from start to finish was handled or coordinated by just several people with the CIA: and primarily Alfreda Bikowsky (Silverstein), who never disseminated the hijacker data to the FBI, and ordered others not to, then lied to Congress about the CIA's torture program, and knowingly tortured innocent men to elicit false confessions. And her husband over at Foundation in Defense of Democracies is involved with the publication of books attacking anyone who questions the official 9/11 conspiracy theory!

  2. But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you have nothing to hide, dear Senators...why worry about it?

  3. Re:Not unacceptable at all by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Informative

    That sentence is straight from the letter from the Senators. Why is it inappropriate to include the Senators' words?

  4. Re:So what? by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    Yeah, he lied. Why not? Congress is a bunch of spineless whores, there to grub up the money and do what they're told by whichever puppetmaster has his hand shoved up their ass at the moment.

    Besides, what are they going to do about it? Make another speech? So what?

    They can defund the CIA or particular CIA programs if they want. If there's one thing the CIA hates about Congress, it's the fact that they have to get a new budget from them every year--they can't plan multi-year operations without having contingencies for different funding levels, etc...

    Most of Congress may be spineless, and all of it pretends to be spineless, but it is not powerless.

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The world is always changing and always will be. It will always be a power struggle between various groups and if you quit, you loose. Look at German culture in current times. Parliament has many glass windows to represent 'if you want know what we are doing, come and look inside' (as it was described to me when I did a tour of the city). The vast majority praise Snowden for doing the right thing.

    There is corruption in all systems and a lot in America. You need to fight it and get behind this call for the truth because things can and will get worse if you dont. You need to chip away at the system and continually try to make it better. The more people who take an interest and talk about issues the better. This one may be a war of words but the outcome will renew an important precedant.

  7. Re:Not unacceptable at all by cavreader · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Senators are a bunch of morons and are the last group that should ever complain about someone lying. They are experts at prevarication and give unambiguous answers that always leave room for them to back track. Only a very select committee of Senators are privy to anything relating to classified US intelligence matters and that committee is responsible for determining what information can be safely released to the entire Senate. Any Senator claiming they did not know about certain intelligence programs or operations should first go after their fellow Senators on the foreign intelligence committee and ask them what they know and then go after the particular intelligence agency. This investigation was not being conducted by this intelligence committee. The vast majority of Senators and staffers do not even have the necessary security clearances needed for access to certain classified information about US intelligence programs. In this particular case the CIA discovered the Senate had possession of an internal CIA report that had not been legally obtained through the proper channels. The CIA could attempt to justify it's actions by claiming there had been a security leak (which there was) and they were investigating how the Senate got a hold of the document in question. The first logical step in the investigation would be obtaining proof the document was actually on the Senate computer system. The Senate constantly wastes time on these types of conflicts while doing nothing that would actually help the country and the people who put them in office. The Senate is more dangerous to the US public than the CIA and NSA combined. And the feckless Senators will do nothing of consequence in this cat fight because they are just barely smart enough not to get into a full blown conflict with agencies capable of destroying their political careers. After all the CIA has had a lot of practice changing governments around the world using subtle and not to subtle means. The Senate and the CIA deserve each other.

  8. memory by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is relevant. In today's news:

    Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper wasn’t lying when he wrongly told Congress in 2013 that the government does not “wittingly” collect information about millions of Americans, according to his top lawyer.

    He just forgot.

    “This was not an untruth or a falsehood. This was just a mistake on his part,” Robert Litt, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, said during a panel discussion hosted by the Advisory Committee on Transparency on Friday.

    “We all make mistakes.”

    Get that? The goddamn Director of National Intelligence just "forgot" that they're collecting information about millions of Americans. It takes balls to get up in front of a congressional committee and say that shit. "We all make mistakes". Yes, we all make mistakes. I accidentally left my keys in the back door once. But forgetting about data collection efforts on millions of Americans? "We all make mistakes" doesn't quite cover it. But the senators? They're made because they're just figured out that the NSA treats them just like the rest of us. So they're gonna get all up in John Brennan's grill but let the NSA get off with a warning, billions of dollars in increased black budget and maybe a little tug job in the basement of the Capital for the effort.

    http://thehill.com/policy/tech...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. Re: by chihowa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The precedent that's being renewed here is that it's all well and good to fuck with the common people, but doing the same to VIPs is unacceptable. It's funny that you mention Germany, as this exact same scenario played out there when Merkel was completely fine with German citizens being spied on, but threw a shit fit when it surfaced that she was being spied on as well.

    The only outcome of this is the further solidification of our two-tier society where different rights exist for the ruling class and the hoi polloi.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Of course the CIA didn't spy on Senate computers.. by grnbrg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    CIA: Hey, MI5.... Can you do me a favour? I'll owe you one.
    MI5: Sure, what do you need?
    CIA: Can you skim through these PCs and look for evidence of this thing I'd like to know about?
    MI5: Sure, no problem.

  12. Re:Liars and traitors. by davester666 · · Score: 2

    I believe they would describe it as "Serving our country."

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  13. Charge him and prosecute him... by NormAtHome · · Score: 3

    If he lied under oath and there's proof that he did then charge the bastard with perjury and put him on trial and make an example of him to show that you can not lie under oath to congress and get away with it.

    1. Re:Charge him and prosecute him... by dunkindave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If he lied under oath and there's proof that he did then charge the bastard with perjury and put him on trial and make an example of him to show that you can not lie under oath to congress and get away with it.

      There's a reason you almost never see anyone charged with perjury for testifying before a congressional committee, and not the one many here will offer. Legally, it isn't enough to show that what they said was wrong. To prove perjury you need to show beyond a reasonable doubt that they knew what they were saying was not true (plus a few more requirements). And since these people live in a world of constantly seeing and reviewing mounds of conflicting information, proving they knew what they were saying was wrong, and that it wasn't just a mistake, gets very hard. Even if there is evidence they were told one thing, there can easily be evidence they were also told the opposite by someone, and then the issue of reasonable doubt pops up. They may have lied, but reaching the legal requirement for a conviction of perjury can be almost impossible, so don't necessarily blame the officials for not bringing charges when they don't think they will get a guilty verdict.

    2. Re:Charge him and prosecute him... by NormAtHome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There may be practical problems prosecuting people who have obviously lied to congress but the fact is that if people do and there are no consequences then that sends a clear message to anyone in the future that they can lie and there will be no repercussions.

  14. Re:Liars and traitors. by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

    Seems like an awfully close correspondence with"To serve Man"?

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  15. No... by Etherwalk · · Score: 4, Funny

    The CIA would not have a foreign power search US Senate computers even for plausible deniability.