Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft-Backed Think Tank: K-12 CS Education Cure For Sagging US Productivity

theodp writes: On May 6, notes think tank Brookings, the Department of Labor released labor productivity data showing that output per worker fell by 1.9 percent during the first quarter of 2015. But fear not — the Metropolitan Policy Program of [Microsoft-backed] Brookings says K-12 computer science education is the cure for what ails U.S. productivity: "So how can the United States reverse this trend? First, states, metropolitan areas, and school districts must recognize that basic digital literacy is no longer sufficient preparation for the 21st century workforce. Familiarity with higher-level skills such as coding will be critical as the role of technology continues to grow. The 60-plus school districts that have partnered with [Microsoft-backed] Code.org have already begun to move in this direction. By introducing students to computer science fundamentals early on, Code.org and its partner districts will help get more people on pathways to well-paying jobs in computer programming and other fields." Creating a national K-12 CS and tech immigration crisis was proposed as Microsoft introduced its 'two-pronged' National Talent Strategy to increase K-12 CS education and the number of H-1B visas at a Brookings event in 2012. While creating a K-12 CS crisis fell to Code.org, fanning the flames of a tech immigration crisis is the purvey of [Microsoft exec-backed] FWD.us, the PAC formed by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, which recently sent an email blast warning U.S. citizens they're in 'A Gigantic Global Talent War', adding that China and India citizens are "just laughing [at the US], saying it's so easy to pick from you guys... we just take all the talent."

37 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... is any level of western education going to make it cost-competitive to those at the distant ends of the ethernet cable? Better to help them improve their lifestyles such that they insource to western neighborhoods...

    1. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      is any level of western education going to make it cost-competitive to those at the distant ends of the ethernet cable? Better to help them improve their lifestyles such that they insource to western neighborhoods...

      That's a shockingly insightful question for a /. FP! There's two separate issue here, if most of the good jobs in the future are something to do with automation (as seems likely).

      How do we make life better here by ensuring we have our share of people who can code - at least code enough for some other technical specialty once everything it? We definitely need to make CS as much a core subject as math, Few people are professional mathematicians (the recent fad in "data science" notwithstanding), but for decades previous most of the good jobs required at least basic math, for cost-benefit analysis and so on. Now simple coding is the same way: it's becoming important to decision making across new professions every year.

      Separately, is this all a race to the bottom? Million-dollar houses in Bangalore say no. The average price of a 3-bedroom house there is over $250k, has been for a while - more than many places in the US. It takes time for developing nations to develop, emerging economies to emerge, but it does happen. And it's terrific for the world that it does - we have no special moral right to a better standard of living than anyplace else where CS grads want a job, and it's not a zero-sum game. Until we reach the Singularity, we're not going to run out of tasks to automate.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:How... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as people can live on less than 1/2 the wages in these areas, the US workforce will never be able to compete. For instance, a pound of rice or a loaf of bread costs less than $0.50. And when you consider that they're comparing equivalent lifestyles, not the average lifestyle in each area, that wage disparity grows even larger. Now, in a truly global economy, we (US folks) would buy up all this cheap rice instead of our very expensive rice. Why doesn't this happen? Because we're not in a global economy, obviously.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MS and Zuck don't care. Their agenda is to saturate the market with qualified candidates, thereby commoditizing all computer work, be it programming, admin, or support roles. This drives down the price of employees. They won't be happy until you're working for minimum wage and no vacation, or just outright owning you as a slave.

    4. Re:How... by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't you find it... questionable that so much corporate welfare and education reform is solely to create widgets for Microsoft to use? Of all the education reforms I could think of, adding coding to a core curriculum that mismanages so many other things seems questionable, although I applaud Microsoft's benevolence with tax money they aren't paying.

      Certainly biotechnology is also an expanding field for the future. Do American workers have a solid basing in science to fulfill those needs? Prostitution also seems to be a growing field. Are American workers ready to accept the challenges?

      Maybe it would be nice to consult the general public about education reforms they would like to see, especially since they are the one's primarily paying for it. I'd personally like to see logic introduced into the core curriculum so maybe more voters would be able to call bullshit on initiatives like these.

      It also gives people a solid basing to pursue coding if they wish.

      Oh, in passing, has their been a study on CEO productivity recently? While it is wonderful that worker productivity is of such great importance to require furrowed brows over a 2% drop, my own think tank suggests that loss can more than be made up for by eliminating much of the corruption in business and government, so we won't have to endure further rounds of "nice economy you've got there. It would be a shame if something were to happen to it".

    5. Re:How... by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thing is, when I went to school... mumble, mumble years ago, there was a basic computing courses available, as well as a computer lab with instructors overseeing it that taught basic coding and other bits if they saw you putting in the effort to learn.

      But there was also music classes, art classes, PE, etc. I'd be had pressed to say a computing course served me better than the art course, but imagine some think tank arguing that art education should be reintroduced so people could better understand relationships, abstract thinking, and non-verbal communication.

      Not nearly as sexy without the implied "or else you will be scuttled for a cheaper body in India".

      Anyway, now all that has been replaced with the advisor to the advisor to the assistant manger of the vice principal, and everyone being very sage about how to best spend other people's money, and near hysterics about how a 2% increase in taxes will collapse the economy. But only for them. If you have to pay more, well that a just sacrifice for the good of our tax structure in Nevada.

      So after gutting the educational system, now it's a Big Problem, and requires immediate money so you can finance being a plebe to them for ever.

      Fuck 'em.

    6. Re:How... by scamper_22 · · Score: 2

      I think this whole education solves all is a giant hail mary wish.

      I'm in Canada and this is all we hear as the solution as well. Economy is going down, jobs leaving... invest in education.

      Yet, where are the results? Nortel collapse. BB not doing too well. Skilled foreign workers programs. Can anyone tell me why we waste all this money on Western education if we're just going to import our skilled labor? If they can do the work, maybe all this spending on education is a waste. Seems they can spend much less and get good people.

      You look at the US as well. Ok, some great companies in the US. No doubt about it. Here's a small hint to people. The US has over 300 000 000 people.

      Heck, here's some perspective. Silicon Valley can't even provide prosperity for California. Just let that sink in. These guys talk about technology and education bringing prosperity to a whole country. Yet, it can't even bring prosperity to a single state.

      Globally there's probably 6 or 7 billion people. Are we all going to be coders? Seriously...

      Software and technology definitely gets people some jobs. But it pales in comparison to hundreds of millions and billions of people. But of course, rather than deal with this reality, our leaders just say... somehow if we pour enough into education, magic will come out and bring back the 1990s or whatever.

      It's all they can think I guess.
      I don't have all the answers, but we put way too much thought into education and far too little into everything else.

      Germany is a huge powerhouse. They also have a big industrial policy. Ditto for China. And China has huge state firms and state lending.

      I'm personally just sick of the education solves all problems that dominates North America. Where the hell are the results of all these?
      Again, I'm not saying we don't need an educated populace. It's just does not solve the problem of jobs/prosperity.

      I liken it to the great myth of solving healthcare costs. Only politicians and even people like to trot out that prevention will fix healthcare costs. It sounds nice, prevention is low cost and you won't need expensive surgery.

      Of course, the data doesn't support that.
      http://www.cbc.ca/news/technol...

      Basically, most costs are in old age anyways. In the big picture, unhealthy people are actually cheaper to treat because they die sooner.

      Instead of dealing with the reality of old age costs, and the nasty debate of that (rationing, death panels...), we all just throw a hail mary at prevention.

      Education sounds similar. A giant hail mary to solve a problem it can't.

  2. aw, c'mon, man by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Funny

    it'll all be robots before this idea works.

  3. Why limit to just CS education? by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is pretty obvious to me that our country's productivity and economy in general will improve if we improve CS based education. But that is simply because increasing education in general will help our economy. There are very few ways a country can actually invest in its economy in the long term. Improving education. increasing funding of both private and public research, and improving infrastructure are the only ways that come to mind.

    So while improving CS education is a great idea, I see no reason why it needs to be singled out.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because Microsoft and Facebook want and abundant (and therefore cheap & expendable) workforce.

    2. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by eclectro · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are very few ways a country can actually invest in its economy in the long term.

      You mean besides dealing with the grotesque wage inequality that we have now?

      People always thought that deflation (worse than inflation) would happen when a large quantity of out of work people would be unable to buy things, leading to a collapse in prices. But it can also happen through wage stagnation where people are working, but because their wage and buying power do not increase, they simply do not have the means to be consumers and grow the economy. So you end up with the same surplus of goods and services that people are unable to buy, leading to deflationary price collapses. People also put off marriage when they are poor, and there are less consuming families also. Think of an economic drought, just like California has a water drought.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Computer education is pointless. Why be trained in any profession if that profession is going to end up extinct in the areas that need employed people to patronize the local businesses, pay the taxes, and so forth?

      If they were serious about making a sustainable economy, they'd ditch the whole drone-level skill training program and focus on how to start your own business and thus avoid the layoff treadmill. After all, isn't that what we're told? The only job that's safe is the one you make yourself?

      That means teaching kids at an early age how to meet prospective clients (this does not come naturally or easily to us introverts), negotiate favorable contracts (ditto), manage the various legal and financial aspects of running a company, manage staff - for those who washed out on the whole run-your-own-company deal, and ... if you're fortunate, learn a constructive skill to sell in whatever spare time remains.

      That's basically what the local business dynasties do anyway. They're brought up learning how to lead, how to negotiate, how to deal with people, then sent to schools of like-minded people so that they'll have all the right connections.

    4. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      No, it is not obvious. Since 1995 we are used to 3% productivity gains, and a general slowdown in innovation means it is harder to squeeze more work out of each person.

      Email, word processing, instant messenger, desktop sharing, video conferences, and piles of other stuff that are now commonplace did not exist most places. Sure there were precursors back to the 70's, but I'm talking widespread adoption of all of those and more.

      America's productivity is largely due to 50 hour work weeks, and if you measure output per hour, 37 hour weeks take the top 2 spots (year old data).

      Increasing education isn't going to give Americans the ability to do 50 hours of work in 40 hours, and innovation from overseas isn't going to just stop at the water, so its not like there is a magical productivity device that America lacks.

      Increasing education is incredibly vague, and your understanding is lacking, so "obvious" just means "after little thought and no consideration of alternatives, the only idea that occurred to me."

      http://business.time.com/2013/...

    5. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      You can't always have "productivity gains", just like you can't always have a rising stock market. If people are moving from full-time to part-time jobs because of scaled-back demand, of course how much each worker produces will drop. Also, they're forgetting about the oil glut's impact on the economy - people are spending less on gas so you're going to have a drop in GDP even if productivity stays the same.

      Of course, the people pushing "moar koderz" are the ones who will benefit the most, with the downward pressure of wages in the sector.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      It would be like if an airline backed think tank suggested piloting and aviation repair education as a cure for the sagging economy.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  4. China and India citizens are "just laughing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China and India are hellholes. If we try to match them, the US will be one as well.

    1. Re: China and India citizens are "just laughing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. If China and India really were just picking from us, why is it that seemingly every Chinese and Indian citizen wants to leave his home country and head for the U.S. or Europe? Likewise, why isn't there a deluge of people in the U.S. and Europe wanting to move to China or India?

      Zuckerberg's argument is so asinine and entirely self-serving that I seriously doubt anyone in the U.S., as ignorant as average Americans are, believes it.

  5. Why bother? by fredrated · · Score: 2

    We now know that virtually all productivity gains go to the top 1%, there is no incentive to increase productivity if it all goes to our masters.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. Before we try to whip our kids harder, we should probably give them an incentive to work in the first place.

      The American Dream used to be "work hard, climb the ladder, be successful, grow rich". That dream's over. Working hard only means that your boss gets rich. You stay poor.

      The new American Dream is "buy a lottery ticket and hope to get run over by a rich guy so you can sue them". Because that's sadly the only way left for anyone who doesn't already belong to the self proclaimed elite to get rich.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before telling someone about the American Reality, please visit reality first.

      Wealth for the lowest 50% has stagnated or dropped. With inflation, that means the bottom ~3/4 are stagnant in buying power or dropping. Growth has only been for the richest few.

      And that "wealth gnerational passing" is why: someone who happened to be born to wealthy parents will find it easy to get rich. The opportunities are taken by them. There aren't any left for those who weren't born to rich parents.

      And because that wealth is passed on to people you popped out, you will hoard it, because it is currently power and position, and it will remain that merely for existing: no need to spend that power and reduce your position. And your children will get it, so best to keep building it up higher, because there's only one of you, and several kids to divvy it out on. And taxes are bad, because that money is being STOLEN FROM YOUR KIDS!!! So tax (especially inheritance tax) is an abomination unto the lord.

      So money is being hoarded. The government makes money not on tax, but on the MOVEMENT of money.

      But those with wealth are not spending it. It would reduce their power and position, and deny their progeny that power when they inherit (if it were deserved, they wouldn't NEED the money: they'd have made that or more well before you died. they'd only need it if they were worthless bags of water that don't deserve to wipe counters). Those without money spend it all (plus some, but that's borrowed from rich people, who skim off the extra, being a "trickle up" of REAL economics), but don't have much, so tax revenue goes down.

      The wealthy have power and position (wealth, in a capitalist system). They will veto a rise in THEIR taxes.

      So the less powerful (wealthy) must be taxed. Including those at the bottom end.

      So they have less and less to spend.

      Money slows yet more. And it cycles around again. A death spiral only ending when the rich bastards find out how much money is worth when you let the society that defined its worth be destroyed.

    3. Re:Why bother? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      In the US at least, productivity & real wages moved steadily up in lockstep from the end of WW2 to 1970. From then on, the former has more than doubled, the latter has been flat. Somebody must be pocketing the difference.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. World's worst career by eclectro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To encourage a kid to go into a CS is a mean thing to do. Congress will continue to fall over themselves ever expanding the H1B program. Companies will love them right when they get out of college, but they will not pay above a certain salary - the same way a fast food joint doesn't. Then when they reach 40 years old they will be thrown on the human waste pile for not having "current" skills or not willing to put in 80 hour weeks with Mountain Dew and Hot Pockets. Like all the other recent college graduates are or newly arrived H1Bs. Then they'll be lucky to get a $10/hour job at a call center or target.

    If you love a kid, encourage them to become a plumber. if they want to do programming, it can be the hobby that they can do out of love for an open source project.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:World's worst career by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not may of those high paying programming jobs exist, while every home/business requires a plumber. Plumbing is a five figure to six figure job.

      There is at least one high paying software developer job for every highly skilled software developer. That is why no one knows a highly skilled developer who they would kill to have on their team who is unemployed.

      Even in the Midwest you will hit a six digit salary by your early 30's. There is a ceiling of about $150k that very few even qualified developers will ever cross (again based on the Midwest) simply because there aren't enough Director / VP / CTO jobs to go around. But very few professions have max salaries that even reach six digits, so I really don't see what software developers have to complain about.

      Developers often compare themselves to lawyers, doctors, or investment bankers, but they don't realize there is an army of public defendants, general practitioners, and unsuccessful traders who make no more than your average software developer. The ones making $300k+ per year are likely not much more numerous than the software entrepreneurs making similar money. And the lawyers, doctors, etc. making that much money are often essentially small business owners, not simple salaried employees.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:World's worst career by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Plumbers can work fewer hours for the same pay. They also have better job security (unions and obligatory certification).. And they can't be outsourced to India or eastern Europe for 1/4 the pay.

      If your job can be off-shored by someone who thinks it will save money, you have no job security. Ask all the people laid off by Microsoft and IBM.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:World's worst career by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      Congress will continue to fall over themselves ever expanding the H1B program

      Why aren't these traitorous bastards strung up by their balls and used as piñatas?

      Because the ones on one side say "We gotta *get* those evil people who disagree with us! The ends justify the means!" and the ones on the other side say "We gotta *get* those evil people who disagree with us! The ends justify the means!"

      And the low-info morons treat ideologies like sports teams instead of educating themselves with some history and making choices based on principles, reason, & logic.

      How about coming together on things we can agree on? That always seems to fall by the wayside. For the vast majority, we have far more moral/ideological values and principles in common than we do differences.

      And our squabbling over teams...err...political parties and labels, along with making choices based on interests rather than principles, is precisely why things keep getting worse.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    4. Re:World's worst career by Immerman · · Score: 2

      >If by 40 and you can't make your way into management or have the talent to become a senior-level programmer leading projects, then you deserve to fail.

      Why? Why shouldn't there be a solid career path for "good enough" individuals, as there is in most fields?

      Look around your building. How many "normal" employees are there? How many managers and senior staff? 10 to 1 maybe? So, what happens to the other nine programmers after the best one gets the "higher" job? It's not like they can get a job elsewhere - every other business is in exactly the same situation. If half the working population is over 40, and fill 100% of "higher" jobs, that will only employ 20% of them. What are the other 80% supposed to do? Or more importantly, why should they enter a career path knowing there's an 80% chance they'll be thrown to the curb once their most exploitable years are behind them?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  7. "Sagging Productivity" by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Who is making this shit up? And why is anyone believing it?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I think it's the same source that keeps telling us that our economy is shrinking and that we have to take another pay cut to keep it afloat.

      Oddly that economy problem does not affect management bonuses negatively. Quite the opposite. But we have to pay them well and increase their bonus, you see, because they're the only thing that keeps our failing economy afloat. Let's all pray for them. Or to them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Talent of what exactly? by AqD · · Score: 2

    Yes I know they're good at math and CS scores and more willing to accept longer work hours and less payment, but what else? There is no world-class software company or any organization of the field in China or India, except the Chinese cyber army maybe. And so far they haven't made anything significant yet, commercial or open-sourced.

    What kind of talent are they looking for exactly? How many of those H-1Bs could possibly be helpful in key areas such as Microsoft Research, the kind of place which actually needs talents to run? Or they're just looking for cheap programmers to write stupid facebook games?

  9. Yeah, it's our CS education by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    I'm going to go way out on a limb here and suggest that the endemic problems with the US educational system extend somewhat broader and deeper than "we don't teach kindergartners to code".

    --
    -Styopa
  10. Simple explaination: we're tired by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    ...output per worker fell by 1.9 percent during the first quarter of 2015.

    Because the current/remaining employees are being ridden hard and put away wet. Employers are squeezing what they have, instead of hiring, to be "competitive" - even though profits are up and shareholders are happy. Or it could be because of things like this: Georgia Businessman Refuses to Hire Until Obama Is Fired (there are others):

    Bill Looman, owner of U.S. Cranes LLC, said he is fed up with the bad economy and D.C. politicians who do nothing to solve the problem. So until there is a change of leadership, his company trucks will bear the message: “New Company Policy: We Are Not Hiring Until Obama Is Gone.”

    Or that that the top priority of Mitch McConnell and the GOP was/is to make Obama a one-term president (which didn't go so well) and prevent any successes for the President or the Democrats - instead of actually working to fix the Economy. (Yes, the Dems are a problem too, but mainly because they're inept, not actively evil, hostile and uncaring toward those who are not rich, old, white and male - like the Republicans.)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  11. Talent War? It's Class War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computer Science Programs aren't the cure for much of anything -- so stop trying to make them out to be. By doing so, you are DOING ACTUAL HARM to our already broken education system and to the students who will be subjected to these asinine policies.

    You want to know what ails US productivity? Being raised by over-protective parents who are scared to death of being thrown in jail if they so much as let their children walk to school unattended, much less play outside on their own, who are given rewards and told how special they are for just showing up at the soccer match, are told to be busy little worker bees at school, to get good grades if they want to have a career, who then go to college, put themselves deep in debt to pay for that education and find that that MBA that they thought would make them just like Gordon Gekko and wealthy beyond belief has netted them a job as a "Sales Representative" at Comcast.

    And after all that, they watch as the costs of rent and groceries keeps going up year after year. And that they are struggling to survive in a society that treats it's unemployed and homeless as pariahs. A society where the Local Governments are creating more and more Municipal Infractions with higher and higher fines to charge them with and even sending people to jail over non-payment of debts and/or subjecting them to predatory "payment programs" via private companies who manage to turn a $100 fine into a $1000 profit. A society where their very employers are charging higher and higher prices for goods and services locally, while they practically give away their products "emerging markets" all in the name of globalization -- while laying off their co-workers and either off-shoring operations or importing H1-B workers who live in a corporate squat house. A society where Martha Stewart is thrown in Camp Cupcake for acting on a stock tip given by a friend over dinner -- but where the DoJ chooses not to prosecute practically the entirety of Congress for Insider Trading for acting on the litany of illegal stock tips given by Lobbyists on a daily basis -- where that same Congress then passes a law legalizing Insider trading for them and them alone

    And then it really sets in -- everything really hits home. They finally get a crystal clear understanding of what the term "wage slave" means. And that yes -- they are indeed a slave and it's no laughing matter or petty issue. Because you find you are an actual fucking slave. Tied down by shackles made of debt, credit ratings and the need to get by in a society that does not take care of it's own, were they are not equal under law, where the law is against them while giving a complete pass on the crimes of the wealthy and where it's "I got mine, go get yours you lazy slob" while the Corporations and Government work hand in hand to squeeze every last bit of money from the lower classes until there is nothing left but the ultra-wealthy and "the scum"

    And that's where this Think Tank supports -- cracking the whip -- telling scary stories, making it us against them -- all in an effort to get kids to work harder, to give more, do more and to do it all for less.

    So can you blame the current work force for languishing? For not giving a shit if the company that employs them is as successful as your Board and Shareholders wants it to be? And if this "Think Tank" gets it's way -- who will they blame when this next generation, not content to merely languish in apathy chooses to rise up and seek the blood of their oppressors? Because that is exactly where things are going. Because that is where society has always gone under similar conditions. Because that's where things always go when the greedy short sighted fucks finally take things too far

  12. Re:Sold! by careysub · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Brookings analyses have increasingly been up for sale. Not surprisingly it is taking up this pro-Microsoft, pro-Gates agenda after the Bill's foundation became their biggest contributor.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  13. Smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is NO shortage of technology talent in the United States. The lies propagated by prominent technology companies like Microsoft and Facebook are so they can fire more older workers and hire immigrants at bottom basement wages to replace them.

    As for productivity declining, maybe that is because the economy is better now so that workers don't feel so compelled to work their asses off just to try to save their jobs. Also, productivity has increased substantially over the past decade or two, whereas wages have stagnated or even declined for the middle class. Something has got to give.

    Don't believe these jerks from Microsoft and Facebook. They are just trying to kill off more jobs for older workers in order to give those jobs to immigrant workers.

  14. Re:"Sagging Productivity" Explained by drcesteffen · · Score: 2

    At the beginning of every downturn in the economy, the companies make do with fewer employees by either not filling open positions or by laying people off. So the productivity goes higher since measurable-output/employee = productivity and measurable-output takes awhile to be impacted by the loss of the employees. We say that changes to the measurable-output lag behind changes in the number of employees. This is partially because other employees, who know their current job well, put in extra effort to do the job of the missing employees. Eventually, the employees doing 2 jobs reach burn out or find another job and leave the company. At that point, the measurable-output drops dramatically resulting in a corresponding drop in productivity. The company then hires two people to replace the employee they lost who was doing the two jobs resulting another large drop in productivity. I am not an economist, but I don't think productivity is a very useful indicator.

    Productivity may also drop when you hire two new college graduates or two H1B visa employees instead of one older experienced programmer.

  15. Re:Pretty sure this has been tried before. by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    Yep, when I was in elementary/middle school (late '80s / early '90s), there were Apple ][s everywhere. There was a big "computers in schools" push, grant money made it nearly free for a school to get them, so they all had them. I am not sure how effective it was at "improving productivity of the workforce" though.

  16. Different IT Skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work in IT and am highly sought after. Have been for many years. Same with lots of people that I know. Recruiters are pulling them out of college with incredible offers.

    The difference is a specialization in Linux, website management, and database administration (LAMP, Hadoop, Cpanel, PostGre, etc.).

    Windows admins are a dime per dozen and they know it. Someone moved their cheese and they are failing to adapt.

    Unfortunately, Windows skills are what all of the teachers are pushing. It is time for the high schools, colleges, and universities to teach skills that are relevant and sought after by employers.