Slashdot Mirror


Construction At SpaceX's New Spaceport About To Begin

schwit1 writes: SpaceX has begun prepping the construction sites at its private spaceport in Brownsville, Texas. The county has begun work on a road to where the spaceport command center will be, and SpaceX has established its construction headquarters in a double-wide trailer there. It is expected that actual construction of the command center will begin in August, with the launchpad construction to follow. The expected cost for building the entire spaceport: $100 million. Compare that to the billions the Russians are spending for Vostochny, or the billions that NASA spends on comparable facilities.

57 comments

  1. Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by jpapon · · Score: 0

    I don't see any point in looking at the estimated cost of a project that hasn't even begun yet.

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    1. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by itzly · · Score: 2

      Vostochny isn't finished yet either, so in that case, they're comparing estimate to estimate.

    2. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't see any point in looking at the estimated cost of a project that hasn't even begun yet.

      What if it comes in on budget?

    3. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The bigger problem I see is that in the budget for Vostochny isn't just the bare bone cosmodrome, but whole supporting infrastructure, including city for 30,000 people. If Musk is able to build the same thing for $100 millions, that would be indeed interesting. However, I'm not holding my breath.

    4. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I don't see any point in looking at the estimated cost of a project that hasn't even begun yet.

      Construction is not the actual beginning of a construction project.

    5. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I don't see that SpaceX is trying to build a Vostochny-scale complex. Nor do they need one at present.

    6. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by Teancum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      left the US with no manned launch capability and no heavy lift rockets Let's hope history will not repeat itself.

      What is to compare here? This is a private launch facility that will likely never see any crews launch from this location, as it will be mainly commercial communications satellites and a few other commercial payloads that will be flying from Texas. It is also being built with mostly (but certainly not exclusively) private funds with the idea that the company building this facility will use it to earn a healthy profit from its activities.

      There is no history to actually repeat in this situation, other than following the history of other commercial launch endeavors that simply went bankrupt. SpaceX, on the other hand, seems to be profitable and doesn't show signs at the moment of even struggling to make payroll. Far from struggling to make ends meet, they are doing some serious capital expenditures to expand their existing business. This launch facility in Texas is proof that SpaceX plans on increasing their launch rate considerably over the next decade or more.

    7. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Luckily SpaceX didn't have to build Brownsville.

    8. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, SpaceX didn't rebuild Brownsville.

    9. Re:Compare an expected cost, to an actual cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any point in looking at the estimated cost of a project that hasn't even begun yet.

      What if it comes in on budget?

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, tears come from my eyes!

  2. "billions the Russians are spending for Vostochny" by Nutria · · Score: 2

    Billions of roubles doesn't count.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  3. Secret ICBM base by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is not a spaceport.

    It is actually a secret ICBM (Intra Continental Ballistic Missile) base that is being built to defend Texas* from the likes of the Jade Helm 15 plans**.

    * Although if Texas has Chuck Norris, why would they need a secret ICBM base for defense?

    ** Jade Helm 15*** being the plans that were dictated to the chief KIO (Kenyan-In-Office), by the UN in order to suppress opposition when the veil is finally lifted off the global climate change deception. And I am pretty sure that the Illuminati dictated those plans to the UN.)

    *** 15 in base 23**** is 28 in decimal and Texas was the 28th state - so Iowa better watch out for Jade Helm 16!

    **** 2+3=5 and there are 5 permanent members in the UN security council.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Secret ICBM base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You used base 23 and didn't bring Michael Jordan into it? The only titles Houston won in any sport and Dallas Cowboys' last Super Bowl win were when Michael Jordan disappeared for 2 years.

    2. Re:Secret ICBM base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found your post funny, however, for too many your ridiculous connections will be solid proof their paranoia is justified.

    3. Re:Secret ICBM base by Mirar · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris deployment program,

    4. Re:Secret ICBM base by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      This is really very funny but the sad thing is that somewhere on the internet people are going to talk about this as a serious subject...
      I really hope that you are intending this to be a joke.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. Lost luggage by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    They are already building the system to make sure your luggage gets lost at least half the time. Sorry, it looks like your bag was accidently put on the 7:05 flight to Venus.

    1. Re:Lost luggage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it didn't end up on the red-eye nightflight to Venus...

      I'll see myself out.

  5. Every project has cost projections by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I don't see any point in looking at the estimated cost of a project that hasn't even begun yet.

    Speaking as someone who does such cost estimating professionally, I can assure you that EVERY project like this has the costs evaluated long before anyone breaks ground. A company would have to be insane to not have conducted the due diligence on every aspect of a project of this scale. They have to evaluate if there is a satisfactory ROI. They have to have some sort of idea what it ought to cost so that they can know how things are going. They have to budget the money. Of course there will be cost variances but you can't even begin to manage a project like this unless you have some idea what it should cost.

    1. Re:Every project has cost projections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say "EVERY project like this", what kind of project are you referring to? Just projects that aren't paid for by taxpayers? The F-35 is an example of a taxpayer-funded project that has gone way over budget.

    2. Re:Every project has cost projections by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who does such cost estimating professionally, I can assure you that EVERY project like this has the costs evaluated long before anyone breaks ground.

      Right, then in the case of projects receiving public funding, they subtract a percentage to make it palatable before presenting it. :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Every project has cost projections by sjbe · · Score: 1

      When you say "EVERY project like this", what kind of project are you referring to?

      I mean every project with more than a trivial amount of capital required. EVERY project. Public, private, doesn't matter. Building a warehouse, a building, an assembly line, or a machine? There will be a budget and capital analysis along with an ROI analysis if a profit is involved. If you are talking more than a few tens of thousands of dollars (and often less), odds are someone has done a financial analysis on it. It would be very unusual for such an analysis to not be done.

      The F-35 is an example of a taxpayer-funded project that has gone way over budget.

      The only thing you can be certain of in any budget is that it is wrong. The only question is by how much it will be wrong. Some budget are very close to reality, others not so much. Some are created in an honest and earnest attempt to be correct and conservative. Others are disingenuous bits of garbage barely worth the paper they are written on. The F-35 is a pretty much textbook example of a budget gone wrong.

    4. Re:Every project has cost projections by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who does such cost estimating professionally, I can assure you that EVERY project like this has the costs evaluated long before anyone breaks ground. A company would have to be insane to not have conducted the due diligence on every aspect of a project of this scale. They have to evaluate if there is a satisfactory ROI. They have to have some sort of idea what it ought to cost so that they can know how things are going. They have to budget the money. Of course there will be cost variances but you can't even begin to manage a project like this unless you have some idea what it should cost.

      Oh, there will be plans. Realistic plans? Well.... I've worked in a supporting role to some fairly big projects and there's a few things that strike me:

      1) Huge projects generally have the biggest uncertainties. It'd be easy to think the opposite, the bigger the stakes the more sure you want to be that you're right but that's not really the case. While small to medium projects have some rather tangible goals under current conditions, the huge ones generally involve more conjecture on where the company, market and technology is going and is heavily mixed up with the corporate strategy. In addition they're a lot more one of the kind, unlike smaller projects where you have a lot more guidance and experience on how similar projects have been.

      2) Huge projects typically involve a lot of major decisions that may be a boon to some parts of your organization while negatively affecting others, obviously this a major factor in political decisions but also internally you get a lot of actors who act in their own interest rather than the business as a whole, for example because it plans to eliminate or centralize some functions or focus on some technologies, products, services and locations in favor of others. Don't expect your SQL Server guru to be happy for a move to Oracle or vice versa.

      3) As a consequence of points 1) and 2) above, you often get a lot of bad data as input. In particular, you tend to get a lot of overly optimistic estimates of costs, schedules and quality or that casually neglects to mention related costs that it is likely to incur and that are hard to fact-check while sales and savings are wildly exaggerated. Naturally the other side is equally biased in the other direction, so real neutral assessments are hard to come by. It doesn't help that the time scale is such that by the time failure is obvious many of the ones who made the decisions have left for other jobs or retired.

      What's even worse is that in many cases the people who grossly oversold their position are the ones rewarded because it's incredibly hard to back out of a high visibility project, it's expensive and it makes the executives who agreed to it incompetent. Lesser projects and their owners/managers have the chance to be chewed out by their superiors, but when it goes all the way to the top you're way more likely to throw good money after bad to keep the project going rather than wave the white flag and declare it a miserable failure. That's how you get overruns of hundreds of millions of dollars and up.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  6. Comparisons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The expected cost for building the entire spaceport: $100 million. Compare that to the billions the Russians are spending for Vostochny, or the billions that NASA spends on comparable facilities.

    Well, Vostochny is a 551sq km site. That's bigger than the city of Brownsville, let alone Boca Chica.

    I don't think it is prudent to compare them, the facilities are likely to be quite different in scope. You might as well comparethe cost of the Vehicular Assembly Building to whatever they build in Texas.

    It will be like comparing Grapes to Watermelons.

    1. Re:Comparisons? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I believe grapes are more tasty than watermelons.

      Comparison successful.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  7. Tornado risk by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

    The tornado risk has tripled at the site. At least until permanent structures replace the doublewide.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Tornado risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mobile homes == tornado bait

    2. Re:Tornado risk by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    3. Re:Tornado risk by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Too close to water for the tornado to form reliably. So either the tornado/waterspout would have to form a mile or so out either way and then head to the launch site. Not very likely.
      http://www.homefacts.com/torna...

    4. Re:Tornado risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that whoosh noise wasn't the tornado

  8. Re:"billions the Russians are spending for Vostoch by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, rubles count you!

  9. pints, pounds per inch^2, double wide trailer... by Mirar · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you have so many funny units to pick from over there.

  10. Wow by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0
    So Spacex is making something comparable to NASA's facilities for that little outlay?

    Color me a little skeptical.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  11. New Mexico already has a newspaceport by goombah99 · · Score: 0

    Why are they building in Brownsville when a couple hundred miles away in New Mexico there's a shiny new space port that's not in use?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:New Mexico already has a newspaceport by disposable60 · · Score: 2

      875 miles from Brownsville to Las Cruces, which has no ocean/gulf into which to drop things that fall off.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    2. Re: New Mexico already has a newspaceport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted a site where they could use over water launches is most likely.

      Alternative sites were considered on the East Coast and Puerto Rico.

    3. Re:New Mexico already has a newspaceport by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Because SpaceX is using the New Mexico spaceport.... too!

      That facility is mainly going to be used for R&D testing of their recoverable rocket systems, such as what they've been doing at their Waco facility with the Grasshopper series of flights. At the moment, they are hoping to use one of the rocket cores built for a regular flight and doing the reuse testing in New Mexico... with the much higher altitude flight clearance they can get in New Mexico which simply isn't permitted in central Texas.

      Besides, the spaceport in New Mexico is mainly built for sub-orbital flights and doing stuff like launching the Virgin Galactic space planes. Who said it isn't in use?

  12. They should name the spaceport Brownsville Station by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    And this of course would be their anthem:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    .

  13. love.it. by trybywrench · · Score: 1

    If I could quit my job and follow SpaceX around like the old dead heads followed Grateful Dead I would. I've said it before but anytime I feel like hot shit I go watch some SpaceX videos and then I'm back to my humble self. Those guys are badasses.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    1. Re:love.it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're rockets. They go up, they come down. Do you also feel like hot shit when a Boeing or Airbus takes off and lands???

  14. Queue the Visitors by thedonger · · Score: 1

    Oh my god! The space port is to let them in, not us out!

    I would like to extend this olive branch and a hardy handshake to our new...Lizards?

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    1. Re:Queue the Visitors by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2
      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    2. Re:Queue the Visitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Cue", dumbass. What blows my mind is that somehow you people always manage to spell "queue" properly!

    3. Re:Queue the Visitors by thedonger · · Score: 1

      Goddammit. That's what I get for not Googling it.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    4. Re:Queue the Visitors by thedonger · · Score: 1

      "Cue", dumbass. What blows my mind is that somehow you people always manage to spell "queue" properly!

      Uh, I meant, put them in a line?

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    5. Re:Queue the Visitors by Punko · · Score: 1

      Queue is also correct, if one considers that when visitors enters any kind of port, they tend to form a queue.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    6. Re:Queue the Visitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OLIVE bRanch and a HARDY

      still half works ;)

  15. It looks like the real deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the US is going to have 2 East facing launch facilities.

    "The facility and infrastructure construction at the command center area would include two launch control center buildings, two payload processing facilities, a launch vehicle processing hangar, two radio frequency transmitter/receivers, generators and diesel storage facilities, roads, parking areas, fencing, security, lighting and utilities, and a satellite fuels storage facility, according to the project’s environmental impact statement."

    They are doing this part first because the launch pad is the easy part.

    It's outstanding that it is a commercial operation.

  16. Wow, such nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "spaceport"!!! I guess "upper atmosphere port" isn't as catchy? But "space" port!!! Wow, we're weeks away from the United Federation of Planets now!!!!

  17. Dammit, a real spaceport should be located by QilessQi · · Score: 1

    in the desert. And it should be a wretched hive of scum and villainy.

    1. Re:Dammit, a real spaceport should be located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the desert. And it should be a wretched hive of scum and villainy.

      There's a reason a spaceport should be in the middle of a desert -- lots of open space. If you build it and the spaceships come, the scum and villains will follow and make the wretched hive. These things don't just happen, you know.

      IOW, this is not the wretched hive you are looking for. Yet.

  18. Spring Break by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Might add some nice fireworks to the South Padre Island spring break.

  19. Lies, damn lies and cost projections by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Right, then in the case of projects receiving public funding, they subtract a percentage to make it palatable before presenting it. :)

    Oh they're much more clever than that. They'll tinker with the underlying assumptions, cost of capital, expected returns, net present value, and more. You'll find it stuffed with more BS than a cattle farm. Government budgets are notoriously full of bogus assumptions and outright fabrications because they know nobody who gives a damn is really going to read them and even if they did most wouldn't understand it anyway. Pretty much every financial projection you have ever read about is wrong - the only question is whether their model was even close. I've done my share of them and it's really hard to get them right - borderline impossible really. You're really just hoping to get a model that is close enough to be useful.

    Sad thing is that good financial analysis is super important and really hard to do well. Some of the brightest people I know do it for a living and are pretty good at it but unfortunately even a talented and honest person will come up with inaccurate models because the real world is just that hard to predict. Unfortunately a lot of people doing financial modeling are neither talented nor honest.

  20. Why Texas? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Why Texas? ZERO REGULATION. Hell, your fertilizer plant can nearly wipe out a town, and the fine ends up being about the same as a speeding ticket (as workers are as expendable as LOx).

  21. There will be plans and they will be wrong by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Oh, there will be plans. Realistic plans?

    You'll note I never mentioned realism or accuracy. Those things are not always possible and frequently are dis-incentivized. There will be plans and financial projections but only an idiot would take them at face value. The ONLY thing that will be completely correct to say about the plans is that they will be wrong. Maybe by a little, maybe by a lot but they will be wrong.