Slashdot Mirror
Firefox 38 Arrives With DRM Required To Watch Netflix
An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from VentureBeat: Mozilla today launched Firefox 38 for Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android. Notable additions to the browser include Digital Rights Management (DRM) tech for playing protected content in the HTML5 video tag on Windows, Ruby annotation support, and improved user interfaces on Android. Firefox 38 for the desktop is available for download now on Firefox.com, and all existing users should be able to upgrade to it automatically. As always, the Android version is trickling out slowly on Google Play.
Note that there is a separate download for Firefox 38 without the DRM support. Our anonymous reader adds links to the release notes for desktop and Android.
Good to see they're working on the important stuff, rather than fixing bugs. No wonder their market share is rising so fast. Oh, sorry, I meant sinking.
All these gpl tards talking about freedom and yet they don't want users to be able to have the option(freedom) to choose a drm plugin to use for a service like Netflix on linux. If you don't want DRM just uninstall or disable it. This is why Linux Desktop(android is for phone) is at 1% usage because people can't stand the limitations that are imposed by RMS cult following tards.
And their way of thinking is hypocritical because in their mind IT'S OKAY to download and upload movies/music without permission from the content owners, BUT!!!! not okay when somebody does not release source code of their software product that contains gpl code because to the gpl tards that is stealing from the community. Fucking double standard.
I can only conclude that the issue is not that you don't want to use that capability, it's that you don't want anyone else to be able to use that capability. The contradiction in wanting "open culture" to deny some users options that they desire never crosses your mind, does it?
Wanting "open culture" to not be destroyed by those who promote "closed culture" instead is not a contradiction.
In this case, yes it is.
If you are attempting to argue that the very existence of "closed culture" is what is destroying (incorrect tense included) "open culture" - well you are about 50 years late to that lost battle.
Under that definition open culture was destroyed long long ago with zero hope of ever existing again.
If you are not arguing that point, then you are either contradicting yourself at best, or lying/trolling at worse.
Being an additional (optional at that) feature you don't have to use, I don't understand why you would invest a non-zero amount of work in changing from one DRM-capable browser to another DRM-capable browser only to not use the DRM features, when you could instead invest exactly zero work and not use the feature at all.
If you are not capable of resisting the urge to type "netflix" into your browser, your problem isn't the web browser you are using, but is much deeper in your mental abilities.
If you actually are capable of not typing "netflix" into your browser, then this new feature will go unused and thus it won't effect you what so ever by being there.
I have to seriously question your motives and intent here since it seems you are only trying to push your personal preferences onto the rest of us despite our personal preferences.
If such behavior is OK by you, then by the same logic you shouldn't care that we are forcing our personal preferences onto you, no?
What a whiney bitch you are. "Everyone else should suffer because of my pet philosophical concern that doesn't actually matter." Get the fuck over yourself you useless twat.
Yea, all those Netflix users, are just such a small user base, that they add no legitimacy to DRM at all.
After all, 10,000 lemmings can't be wrong![*]
Unlike all those GNU fans who, who seem to complain the fact that Firefox actually needs a VGA display to work.
Ah yes, random, and totally incorrect digs at GNU will totally support your point.
[*]yes the lemming thing is a myth, but the point stands.
SJW n. One who posts facts.