Slashdot Mirror


D.C. Police Detonate Man's 'Suspicious' Pressure Cooker

An anonymous reader writes: Yesterday evening in Washington D.C., police officers on routine patrol spotted an unoccupied car parked near the National Mall. They deemed it "suspicious," and took a look inside, where they found a pressure cooker. They also claimed to smell gasoline. The officers called the bomb squad, and at 7:45pm they initiated a controlled detonation of the car's contents. Afterward, a search of the car found no evidence that it contained explosives or any other hazardous materials. The car's owner was located and arrested for driving on a revoked license.

62 of 461 comments (clear)

  1. did they damage the car? by Chirs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and if so, did they reimburse the guy?

    1. Re:did they damage the car? by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They broke the rear window and blew up the pressure cooker outside the car. Reimburse? No, they didn't reimburse him; instead they arrested him for operating a vehicle after license revocation, just to cover up for their incompetence. Obviously if a car belonging to someone has moved, it must be that person who moved it, right?

    2. Re:did they damage the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Paranoia, it's what terrorists want. It looks like they have thoroughly and completely beaten the government of the USA.

    3. Re:did they damage the car? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously if a car belonging to someone has moved, it must be that person who moved it, right?

      Well, sure. If he told the investigators that he drove it there... which is not entirely out of the realm of possibility. But that doesn't fit it with the "every cop is an incompetent boob running around crushing the liberties of the citizenry" theory, does it?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:did they damage the car? by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      ...did they reimburse the guy?

      They will, likely to an exorbitant extent once he gets a good attorney and sues. The cops are going to have a lot of fun explaining to a judge and jury why they broke into the guys car and blew his stuff up. Especially in view of the fact that they were dead wrong to do so.

    5. Re:did they damage the car? by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The terrorists are the Federal Government of the United States; their enemy is We the People

    6. Re:did they damage the car? by jvkjvk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh boy are you misguided.

      You can certainly unintentionally confess to a crime. Never talk to the police except through your lawyer.

    7. Re:did they damage the car? by adolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never talk to the police except through your lawyer

      ...especially when it involves a pressure cooker.

    8. Re:did they damage the car? by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's funny how there's more than one kind of terrorism, right?

      Terrorism is by definition actions meant to spread fear; it doesn't HAVE to be violent. It doesn't HAVE to be done by muslim extremists. It just has to make people afraid.

      Like the risk of having the police blow up (the contents of) your car because they (claim they) can smell gasoline. On a vehicle propelled by gasoline.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    9. Re:did they damage the car? by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      The vastness of your ignorance is astounding, the government of the US has indeed rounded up hundreds convicted of no crime. They have indeed used violence, threats, mass surveillance to subjugate the populace. They have indeed forsaken the guarantees in the Constitution of due process, warrants, trial. Pry your head out of your ass

    10. Re:did they damage the car? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      > stupidity on the part of a few cops doesn't mean
      > we're living under ISIS.

      When those cops go unpunished it means we're moving in that direction. I'm not saying that the sky is falling and it's for sure we'll get to the point where it's that bad. But we do have a serious problem with increased militancy on the part of the police and a lack of accountability for their misconduct. And it's not out of line at all to call their pattern of abuse to reigned in and to have the abusers punished.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    11. Re:did they damage the car? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can certainly unintentionally confess to a crime. Never talk to the police except through your lawyer.

      Thank you, Mister Rockefeller, but what about all the poor schmoes who don't have a lawyer on retainer? They shouldn't have to worry about being shaken down by the cops, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:did they damage the car? by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I've dealt with a lot of cops over the years. Most of them were okay but there have been a few that were obviously stupid and at least one that was a bully. It happens. I doubt these guys were trying to make anyone afraid. They are most likely just over zealous guys who let their paranoia and the brainwashing they've been given overcome whatever common sense they had. Don't try to make it into something it's not. Years ago, back in the 60's at a place called Kent State the Ohio National Guard shot 4 people to death at a demonstration. It wasn't terrorism either, it was a fuck up by a bunch of scared, half trained guys with poor leadership. Fuck ups happen and that's what this was. Naturally enough, when they realized they fucked up they looked around for a way to cover their ass and saw the guy had a revoked license. Of course they locked onto that. The end result is what you need to look for. This guy will still have his head on his shoulders when he gets out of jail. Don't attribute to malice that which can be blamed on stupidity.

    13. Re:did they damage the car? by ultranova · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't attribute to malice that which can be blamed on stupidity.

      The problem is, stupidity is sufficient. The police don't need to be actively malicious if their institutional culture - "the brainwashing they've been given" - constantly prompts them to perform unfair and destructive actions.

      Also, you're wrong. "Naturally enough, when they realized they fucked up they looked around for a way to cover their ass and saw the guy had a revoked license." Yes, it's perfectly natural to sacrifice a bystander to save your own skin. It's also not something you can blame on stupidity. It's deliberate, selfish cowardice.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. No pressure by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you can't take the pressure, you shouldn't be a cop.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:No pressure by intnsred · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, and accurately summed up decades ago by Orson Welles when he said, "A policeman's job is only easy in a police state."

    2. Re:No pressure by Strange+Quark+Star · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess they just needed to let off some steam.

      --
      There is no sig.
  3. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...an odor of gasoline was detected"

    In a fucking gasoline-powered car. Where do they find these geniuses?

    1. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...an odor of gasoline was detected"

      In a fucking gasoline-powered car. Where do they find these geniuses?

      The pressure cooker should not have resisted arrest.

    2. Re:Okay... by SpankiMonki · · Score: 4, Funny

      The pressure cooker should not have resisted arrest.

      Handles up - don't shoot!

    3. Re:Okay... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      In a fucking gasoline-powered car. Where do they find these geniuses?

      Sure, but a pressure cooker? What is this, the 70s? Does anyone use them in 2015 for anything _except_ bomb construction and cooking meth?

      "Presto Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker (Large) - Customers who bought this item also bought: 'The Al Qaeda Manual' (Kindle Edition) / Potassium Nitrate (5kg) / Casio F-91W Digital Watch / '100 Things to do Before you Die' (Paperback - used from $0.01) / Pseudoephedrine (100 tablets) / 'The Little Book of Calm' (1 Collectible from $9.96)."

    4. Re:Okay... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are awesome for cooking potatoes and stews.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:Okay... by tibit · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't know much about how to cook, then. Do you think that suddenly, what has worked for cooking in 1970s, doesn't anymore?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:Okay... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cooking is subject to trends, if you haven't noticed. Clunky 70s housewife equipment is out of fashion, to say the least.

      Umm, while you may call it "clunky," pressure cookers are decidedly in fashion as an appropriate tool used for the right purposes. The cool, hip tech-savvy cooks use them along side their sous-vide machines and blowtorches for a number of important kitchen tasks.

      Need examples? Nathan Myrhvold's Modernist Cuisine (2011), one of the recent "bibles" of molecular gastronomy, lauds the pressure cooker, in a list of "invaluable modernist tools" called it "a must-have; essential for stocks, tendering tough grains and seeds," and also noted its usefulness for sterilizing in various kitchen tasks. (For some specific home applications, see, for example, here.) Harold Blumenthal at The Fat Duck restaurant found that stocks made with pressure cookers were both faster and better-tasting once they understood the effects of diffusion laws on stock making. And here's a whole blog on Slate about their comeback.

      I could go on. Pressure cookers may have been "out" a decade ago, but now they're back "in" again... best time to update your kitchen fashion files.

  4. I did not know... by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You need a license to own a parked car? Was he seen "operating" the vehicle?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:I did not know... by DeBattell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They revoked his license and then arrested him for driving on a revoked license.

    2. Re:I did not know... by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Washington DC is about 50% black. I'm pretty sure they have drivers licenses at about the same rate as other places.

      Why don't you take the race baiting to another site?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:I did not know... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2

      And if you're trying to move a pressure cooker around, it's probably 14 years too late to do so on public transportation...

  5. Not pointless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Especially if the cops revoked the owner's driving license just to accuse him/her of something or other.

    And was the owner also the driver? It would have been nice for TFS to mention that.

    1. Re:Not pointless... by kheldan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty much this. "We fucked up and embarassed ourselves, so we're going to take it out on you because we can". That's what it reads like. Was the guy who owned the car black, too?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:Not pointless... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      Pretty much this. "We fucked up and embarassed ourselves, so we're going to take it out on you because we can". That's what it reads like. Was the guy who owned the car black, too?

      So you are saying that California is a racist police state?

    3. Re:Not pointless... by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      Especially if the cops revoked the owner's driving license just to accuse him/her of something or other.

      Not to burst your paranoid bubble, but the cops can't just revoke drivers licenses in the United States. Generally speaking, your drivers license can only be revoked or suspended after convictions for certain serious traffic offenses, a combination of convictions for minor traffic offenses, or failure to pay renewal fees when your license expires. A handful of jurisdictions allow the cops to physically take your license when you're cited for DWI; the actual suspension thereof generally occurs at your first court appearance.

      In this instance they haven't released any of the back story, but it would seem that the guy was driving on a suspended or revoked license, which is a crime most everywhere in the World. It's a tough one to get away with in the day and age of license plate readers but if you're gonna attempt it you're probably best advised not to park your car on the Mall in Washington DC.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Not pointless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not a crime to have your car parked somewhere if you have a suspended/revoked license

    5. Re:Not pointless... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To the best of my recollection, there is no legal parking on that section of 3rd Street, NW or SW, near the National Mall. If you illegally park your car near the US Capitol Building you should probably expect some scrutiny. If you have a pressure cooker inside in the day and age of improvised explosive devices you should expect further scrutiny. Is the latter bit "fair?" Maybe not. But it's reality in this era.

      If the police don't investigate an illegally parked car near a sensitive structure they're grossly negligent. If the investigation reveals you broke the law to get the car there, well, you're going to get charged. If this gentleman was driving on a suspended license it was only a matter of time before he got charged anyway; he just managed to do it in a high profile fashion, vs. the thousands of idiots doing the exact same thing that get picked up in a more mundane fashion every day of the week.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Not pointless... by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but it would seem that the guy was driving on a suspended or revoked license

      He was not caught by police driving on a suspended driver's license: his car was parked at the time, so there should be no probable cause to arrest.

      Someone else can still drive the vehicle for him.

      Also, the police should have to pay for replacement of his vehicle and replacement of his pressure cooker, before he can be arrested. As I see it, right now: so far: the police have committed the bigger crime, which is wanton destruction of property.

    7. Re:Not pointless... by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, given the area described, it was parked more or less in front of the Capitol Reflecting Pool, which is not an area where people tend to park and sit for long periods of time.

      Really? Then why was there a parking meter there?

    8. Re:Not pointless... by russotto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever heard the expression, "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should?"

      Yeah, usually from authoritarians who think it's perfectly OK to enforce laws which they couldn't be bothered to actually enact.

      Fucking common sense says don't park your fucking car a block away from the United States Capitol with anything inside that could be misidentified as an explosive device.

      Like its gas tank?

      It also says you should keep your drivers license current and in good standing.

      It was revoked. Did you know that in the District of Columbia, the Mayor or his representative can revoke your license for any reason at all, and the only appeal is to the Mayor?

      You think they just cited him for that offense without checking to see that he was actually operating the vehicle?

      Sure, why not? Now they can leverage dropping that charge against his not filing a lawsuit for the damage to his car.

      He's not getting the book thrown at him in any of the media accounts I've read, he's getting the same treatment he would have received if he was pulled over for a routine traffic stop.

      I don't know about you, but I've never been pulled over for a routine traffic stop when I wasn't driving.

    9. Re:Not pointless... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Whoops, wrong article.

      Are you sure about that? Politico had an article on how GOP Catholics (oxymoron?) felt uncomfortable with the current pope's policies on global warming and Israel. Someone posted a long comment about how California was a failed welfare state with cherry-picked links to conservative "news" articles from several years ago. As a moderate conservative in California, I found the post very offensive. Seems like some posters don't have anything to add to the discussion, just toss in California as a monkey wrench.

    10. Re:Not pointless... by sed+quid+in+infernos · · Score: 2

      "I don't know what shops are at the mall his car was found at, but I would imagine that they sell pressure cookers." The "shops" at the mall in question (that is, the National Mall) sell bottled water, sodas, and ice cream bars. Plus cheesy souvenirs, hats, and t-shirts. Also, the shops are tiny trailers or pushcarts. I suppose the gift shops at the Smithsonian might count here (though I think that's stretching a point), but I haven't seen pressure cookers at any of them.

    11. Re:Not pointless... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Do you think quoting my post line by line makes you sound like less of an absolutist idiot? "

      Just accept the fact that he buried your ridiculous post, line by line, and exposed you as the idiot that you truly are :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:Not pointless... by russotto · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Did you know that in the District of Columbia, the Mayor or his representative can revoke your license for any reason at all, and the only appeal is to the Mayor?" No. Could you please point us to the law that authorizes mayoral driver's license revocation? (I'm betting you can't.)

      You lose. DC Code 50-1403.1(a) and (c).

    13. Re:Not pointless... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Do you know what you call a person who tries to convince you that is perfectly acceptable to react in completely irrational ways at the mere sight of every day occurrences? That person is called a terrorist (and I neither use the term loosely, nor in the same way a govt. propagandist would use it)

      Pay attention, once again: Don't spread bullshit memes that promote irrational fear. If you continue to do so, you are a terrorist. Again, this has nothing to do with any country, government, political, or theological allegiance or lack thereof.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:Not pointless... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Republicans don't like the fact that Democratic Governor Brown put a tax increase on the ballot in 2012, a majority of voters voted yes (55.4%), and the state budget has a budget surplus this year and next year. That doesn't fit the doom-and-gloom narrative that California is on the verge of an economic collapse.

    15. Re:Not pointless... by russotto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gasoline doesn't explode, it burns. Of course, as our resident expert in IEDs and Constitutional Law, you already knew that, right?

      Pressure cookers neither explode nor burn, unless you pack them with explosives. Gasoline vapor mixed with air, however, explodes. If you want to make a car bomb, you don't need a pressure cooker. Ask Dateline NBC.

      In New York State you can get expired registration and/or inspection citations while your car is parked.

      Yes, but you can't get driving on a suspended/revoked license citations while the car is parked. There's a difference: expired registration/inspection applies to the car, revoked license applies to the driver. If my license is revoked, it's still legal for me to allow anyone else with a valid license to drive my car, and it is still legal for the car (assuming its registration and inspection remains valid) to be parked on public streets where parking is permitted. (There was a meter in front of the car, so parking was clearly permitted at least some of the time).

    16. Re:Not pointless... by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's reality in this era.

      FUCK YOU and FUCK YOUR "THIS ERA" BULLSHIT!

      You know what the reality of "this era" is? The reality is that we as Americans are safer (from all types of crime, including "terrorism") than at any point in history, and that DHS or other "anti-terrorism" jackbooted thugs have had NOT ONE GODDAMN THING to do with it!

      The reality is that some terrorists got lucky ONCE, and shit-for-brains sheeple like you are letting the authoritarian powermongers in our government use that as an excuse to flush our civil rights down the toilet. Knock it off, dipshit!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:Not pointless... by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right, because having a car parked with an item in it that is sold at most department stores and kitchenware stores is reasonable cause to blow up someone's property. And I guess everyone better start driving electric cars if they don't want the police to blow up their stuff too.

      And sure driving with a revoked license is illegal, but the car was parked. Now the person involved may have been stupid enough to say he drove it there, or the police might be making that up like they often do. It'd be nice to be in a country where the word of a police officer could be trusted, but the US isn't such a place - and no not all police are going to make stuff up to protect themselves but enough have and then not been charged with filing a false report that it's rational to not trust any of them. Just like when the 8 year old says "no I didn't I eat those cookies" when found next to the now empty cookie jar it's rational to not just trust them at their word.

    18. Re: Not pointless... by slasher999 · · Score: 2

      Correct! A car parked in that location, unattended, with a pressure cooker inside and a smell of gasoline warrants further action. No problem whatsoever with this. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.

    19. Re:Not pointless... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2

      I agree it was probably overkill on the part of the police and it's hard to feel sorry for them when they are under the impression the law doesn't apply to them

      FTFY

      Get off your high and mighty horse of justice. In many jurisdictions it's very easy to get your license revoked, and you won't necessarily know about it until it's too late (not saying it's necessarily the case here). There's also the fact of if he didn't admit to the police that he had driven himself there, there'd be reasonable doubt to say that someone else drove for him in his vehicle. He didn't have to tell the police anything. "You have the right to remain silent" applies even before you're placed under arrest.

      In the case of not knowing about one's licence getting suspended/revoked, an anecdote that can be extrapolated into many other scenarios: I had a speeding ticket that I was using a lawyer to fight. At that point all communication between the parties goes through that Lawyer. He was handling it and was given multiple court continuances. Unfortunately, the bureaucracy that handled tickets in that county didn't log the continuances of trial and extend the date of the ticket to match, like they're supposed to. Next thing I know, I'm getting a letter that I'm in contempt of court and as a result my license was suspended. I received that notification letter 15 days after they applied the suspension, and luckily the route I traveled to and from work at that point is normally devoid of police forces. I notified my lawyer, who told me not to worry about it and if I ever run into a problem, tell the police nothing and call him straight away. He called the court and explained what the solicitor's bureaucracy had done, and provided the court with all the communication documentation between him and the Solicitor's office(telephone recordings of attempted contacts times and all associated letter correspondence). He wound up getting the contempt of court removed and was given a set firm date for the solicitor's office to make a settlement by or else the case would be summarily dismissed. Even after the solicitor dropped the ticket, it still took the bureaucracy 2 months to stop sending me contempt of court notices, which my lawyer accepted but reassured me that firm judgement was placed in my favor, providing me a copy of the letter of dismissal to keep in my car as an amendment to my license in case it was ever re-suspended due to the mishandling of the county. The letter of dismissal had the same case number as the suspension flag indicating that the license was reinstated by court order and the DMV was behind in their processing. Using the state's DMV site, I was able to confirm that through the ordeal, my license was suspended twice. As a safeguard I now check the status every month to make sure that the ghost of tickets past has truly stopped haunting me.

      The point of that story was simply this: It's very easy to fall on the wrong side of the law even when you're following the letter of the law. Yes, I allegedly broke the law by speeding 12 miles above the posted limit. It was never confirmed in court, and I had GPS tracked and vehicle computer recorded evidence to the contrary on top of time discrepancy evidence (time on the ticket was three minutes after the time printed on my receipt from Burger King ten miles back on the road, which called the calibration of the radar in general into question). Officially, I've never broken the speeding law. However, it was during the course of legal procedure that I fell outside of the law, even though the entire fault of my suspended license lie on the bureaucracy alone for not following procedure. Of course, whose head rolls when the bureaucracy fucks up? Only the victims'.

    20. Re:Not pointless... by russotto · · Score: 3, Informative

      You didn't read 50-1403.1(c) (concerning non-residents), obviously.

  6. Re:Mental Note by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your license is revoked, don't drive with a pressure cooker.

    If your license is revoked, don't store a pressure cooker in your parked car.

  7. Re:i feel sorry for the poor guy. by maliqua · · Score: 2

    about the same time when we regressed 10,000 years and began fearing any unknown object as it may be the end of our civilization as we know it.

  8. Re:i feel sorry for the poor guy. by itzly · · Score: 4, Funny

    blowing up peoples personal property because they have a pressure cooker.

    Well, apparently it was an explosive pressure cooker, because they managed to detonate it.

  9. Re:Background checks by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

    Please don't give them any ideas.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  10. re by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 2

    the BIG question is
    "WHAT WAS IN IT !!!!"

    i cook sauerkraut and sausage in mine for outdoor get to together's

    and THAT keeps unrefrigerated in the car for a LONG TIME

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
  11. Re:Huh? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    Any tank should work. A scuba tank for instance. There are no real laws regarding the transportation of compressed air, whereas there are laws regarding the transportation of various gases - inert or otherwise. So, grab a scuba tank, stow that on your back seat where it is clearly visible, and stow some flippers and a bouyancy belt in the trunk, out of sight.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  12. The arrest by davidwr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Assuming the cops had good cause to check his license, assuming there is little or no doubt about him driving with an expired license (maybe he foolishly admitted it, or maybe he was caught on camera), and assuming the offense is one that routinely results in arrest (vs. a ticket-and-tow as some jurisdictions do) then it's a good arrest.

    Without evidence that a motorist with a revoked license would typically only be ticketed (and towed), or lack of evidence that he was the driver, it's premature to claim that the arrest was done to cover up the other issue. The only legal tie between the two is that the suspicious car - or perhaps the driver's claim that the car was his car - gave the cops probable cause to check his license for validity. Other than that, they are separate and should be treated as such.

    Now, does there need to be an independent investigation to determine if these cops used prudent judgment (vs. "looking for trouble" "judgement") - yes. If they were not acting prudently, does the police dept. need to issue an apology and pay damages? Yes.

    Memo to self:

    If I drive a car without a license and park it, and I see police activity around my car, call a lawyer and have HIM arrange to recover the car.

    Memo to self #2:
    If my license is revoked, call a cab.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  13. Re:i feel sorry for the poor guy. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Careful attention to terminology is important. In point of fact, they use an explosive charge of their own, carefully configured and arranged in a manner which they hope will touch off any explosive contained in the pressure cooker. Of course, the police spokesman used outlandish terms in her press release. They "disrupted" the pressure cooker? Jesus - I've never heard a military man use the term "disrupted". It's far more accurate when we say, "We blew it to fuck!"

    In point of fact, the cops detonated their own charge, but failed to cause an explosive reaction within the pressure cooker. Maybe they should have used a bigger charge?

    Idiots. Everywhere you look these days, idiots. Juvenile minded fools, trying to act like important people.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  14. Re:And here we go by davidwr · · Score: 2

    Pressure cookers have also been used to cook delicious meals economically and quickly. That's actually why they're called pressure cookers.

    So have cars.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  15. Re:Okay... horseshit by RDW · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you want to encourage people to think those of us using them are out to hurt someone?

    You're doing the harm.

    The risks of terrorism and illicit drug production are only two of the risks of allowing this dangerous 'dual use' technology to be sold on the open market! A far more insidious problem is the destruction of essential vitamins in the pressure cooking process. Some of these are required for higher brain functions, like the ability to parse textual data for abstract meaning. In one recent study, over 70% of regular pressure cooker users were unable to detect irony, satire or even obvious jokes in posts on internet forums. The end product may be delicious but, like cannabis or Snapchat, the long-term effects on the developing brain can be devastating.

  16. Re:I was wondering the same thing... by weilawei · · Score: 2

    What? I've never owned one with a clear lid. They've always been solid metal. You don't typically make pressure vessels out of glass. You're thinking of a crock pot/slow cooker.

  17. Petri Dishes?! Bioterrorist, huh? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

    Maybe culturing some schedule I mushrooms?

    When achieving sterility is outlawed, will all the outlaws become sterile?

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion