Slashdot Mirror


Obama Asks Congress To Renew 'Patriot Act' Snooping

mi writes: President Obama has asked the Senate to renew key Patriot Act provisions before their expiration on May 31. This includes surveillance powers that let the government collect Americans' phone records. Obama said, "It's necessary to keep the American people safe and secure." The call came despite recent revelations that the FBI is unable to name a single terror case in which the snooping provisions were of much help. "Obama noted that the controversial bulk phone collections program, which was exposed by National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, is reformed in the House bill, which does away with it over six months and instead gives phone companies the responsibility of maintaining phone records that the government can search." Obama criticized the Senate for not acting on that legislation, saying they have necessitated a renewal of the Patriot Act provisions.

9 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. Thanks, Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    :\

  2. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And conservatives were worried that Obama would change everything that Bush did.

  3. Re:more govenrnment waste!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bulk data collection provides *very* useful information for people in a position to do market manipulation on wall street.

    Like, you know, politicians, who are allowed to do insider trading as per special laws that protect them.

    That's all Obama is after.

  4. Those who would give up.. by Elvii · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

    Not that it matters who I quote, or what anyone says. This and things much like it will likely get renewed, or they'll happen in secret.

    I don't have any good solutions, but it doesn't have to mean I like the idiots in government or their idiotic decisions.

    --
    This sig left intentionally blank.
  5. There is no need for the Patriot Act by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no need for the Patriot Act to exist any longer. There hasn't been for many years. The War on Terrorism is really the war on Fundamentalist a Saudi inspired Sunni Wahabi radicalism. The Patriot act should go away and the US powers that be should focus its efforts on neutralizing the Sunni-Wahabi threat by whatever means necessary.

    Unfortunately we are taking the wrong side here in helping the Saudi's eradicate a Shia Minority in Yemen. Because the American leadership is the village idiots. We're also responsible for the Sunni Wahabi's creating ISIS in Iraq because we over threw a Ba'thist regime and created a power vaccum.

    The "War on Terrorism" will end only when the Saudi's Sunni Wahabii ability to create colonies like this is neutralized.

  6. $commentsubject by Falos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [_] Because drugs
    [X] Because terrorists
    [_] Because think of the children
    [_] Because infringement

  7. Silver lining by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's probably the best way to get conservatives to let go of the Patriot act...

    1. Re:Silver lining by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm thinking the same thing. Maybe it's a ploy. After the Republican president and Republican-led House (and fairly even Senate) first passed the Patriot Act into law in 2001, having Obama support it now is the best way to have the Republicans of today reject it. Hell, you can steer the Party of No around right now just by having Obama support the opposite viewpoint of what you want.

  8. Re:STFU Obama, you're a fucking traitor!! by r_naked · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am pretty sure that they were referring to the 4th amendment (from Wikipedia):

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    Now I'm a Libertarian, and I read that as: "If you don't have a fucking warrant, then you don't get to collect SHIT. No metadata, no *actual* data, no GPS data, nothing. It is real simple, if you are trying to build a case against me, then you had better have a warrant to collect ANY data (at least that is the way it should be). In reality, there is no constitution any more -- it is just a faded memory.

    --
    -- http://anonet.org -- The internet the way it was meant to be. Check it out, you may be surprised.