Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Technique To Develop Single-Molecule Diode

Posted by timothy on from the micro-management dept.

William Robinson writes: Under the direction of Latha Venkataraman, associate professor of applied physics at Columbia Engineering, researchers have designed a new technique to create a single-molecule diode, that has rectification ratio as high as 250, and 'ON' current as high as 0.1 microamps. The idea of creating a single-molecule diode was suggested by Arieh Aviram and Mark Ratner who theorized in 1974, which has been the 'holy grail' of molecular electronics ever since its inception to achieve further miniaturization, because single molecule represent the limit of miniaturization.

35 comments

  1. The limit? Not really. by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard about an inventor that made a machine that could shrink objects. Nearly lost his kids in his backyard, too.

    --
    Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
  2. The limit of miniaturization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, they used to say that the atom was indivisible too. Never say never.

    1. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Indeed, gap geometries can be made that have rectifying properties at the quantum level. How small can nothing get?

    2. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the size of whatever is on each side of your "nothing".

    3. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      The atom *is* the indivisible unit of matter. You have atoms of some element... let's use Fe. Once you divide an iron atom you no longer have iron, but *subatomic particles* which no longer comprise matter, neutron stars and bose-einstein condensates notwithstanding.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    4. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      By that logic molecules are indivisible as well.

    5. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      No. Think again.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    6. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a goup of A is divided until only A remains it is still A

      If a single A is devided untill it is no longer A but instances of B then A no longer exists.

      looks like the logic is valid for "A=atom , B=subatomic particle" aswell as for "A=Molecule, B=submolecule particle (atom)"

    7. Re:The limit of miniaturization? by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      By that logic, so are you.

  3. No mention of frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to know if these things will motor fast enough to directly rectify visible-light frequencies for use in nano-antenna based solar cells

  4. Molecules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Huh? A silicon wafer is essentially a perfect crystal and therefore a single molecule. Without saying how large their molecule is this is meaningless. (I suppose I could try reading the article. Nah.) I'd say a single atom is the ultimate limit. (Without resorting to impossible physics.)

    1. Re:Molecules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the definition of a molecule.

    2. Re:Molecules by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      No, the term "molecule" is not used for atoms bound in crystals (either ionic or covalent), metals or glasses.

  5. Re: GIMP-Win project wasn’t hijacked, just a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think hes trying to submit an article

  6. Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to overcome the issues associated with asymmetric molecular design, Venkataraman and her colleagues—Chemistry Assistant Professor Luis Campos' group at Columbia and Jeffrey Neaton's group at the Molecular Foundry at UC Berkeley—focused on developing an asymmetry in the environment around the molecular junction. They created an environmental asymmetry through a rather simple method—they surrounded the active molecule with an ionic solution and used gold metal electrodes of different sizes to contact the molecule.

    It's "single-molecule" only because the work is now done by the electrodes, which have become much more complex.

  7. Ratio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "rectification ratio as high as 250"

    Shouldn't a rectification *ratio* be 250:something?

    1. Re:Ratio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rectification ratio = maximum-to-minimum-current-ratio = Rm / Rc + 1, where Rm is the characteristic leakage resistance and Rc is the characteristic resistance of the physical diode.

  8. Limits? by Millennium · · Score: 1

    Is one molecule truly the limit? Certainly it is as long as we view the various components of electronics as discrete objects: you can split a molecule, but this results in smaller molecules (of different types, but molecules all the same), so miniaturization becomes a race to see who can make the smallest molecules act as the different kinds of components.

    But the integrated circuit allowed for many components to be combined into a single discrete object. Does physics allow for the possibility of doing this on a molecular scale: a "molecular integrated circuit", where individual atoms within a molecule act as components that affect how charge flows through the molecule's chemical bonds?

    Obviously, our technology is not at the point where such a thing could be created. It may very well require molecules to be assembled atom-by-atom. What I'm asking is physics as we currently understand it allows for the possibility of such a molecule.

    1. Re:Limits? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Obviously, our technology is not at the point where such a thing could be created. It may very well require molecules to be assembled atom-by-atom.

      That doesn't actually preclude our doing it, although we won't be able to do it with a robot arm any time soon. (Would love to be wrong.) It might be possible to do it with biotech, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Limits? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You could go smaller. P-orbitals are largely independant: You might be able to get one atom to be part of three diodes at once, with the individual orbitals becoming components. It'd be silly-unstable though, you'd have to keep the thing on helium cooling and try not to whisper too loudly nearby.

    3. Re:Limits? by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1

      The ideal first target is probably memory. That is a circuit that is made from the same few elements banged out billions of times. If you can make a crystal out of memory elements, then you would be able to have enormous memory densities. You could have a mole of bits for a few hundred grams of material.

      The barriers are enormous. We will have to re-invent every part of a circuit at smaller scales The main barrier is probably getting the money to do the research, because it will take many decades to do this before we start getting any money back, whereas if we improve the packing density of silicon circuits by (say) 10% then we get a huge savings world-wide straight away.

      There are other possible products. It would be a lot easier to make a molecular equivalent of tape. The tape might be made of square molecules such as porphyrins, with some magnetic component at the centre, and reactive groups at the corners so it forms into a ribbon or tape with sprockets at the edge. This tape would assemble itself. We would then have to make a reader, but that might be possible without full molecular circuitry. This is not as neat as the solid-state molecular circuit solution, but things like this might be useful stepping stones on the way.

  9. Only ONE Molecule? by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm going to need a smaller soldering iron.

    1. Re:Only ONE Molecule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like you missed it, but this has been a problem since the invention of the integrated circuit in the 1950s.

  10. the real importance of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real importance of this story is that it pushes slashdot's SJW agenda; the lead is A WOMAN PHYSICIST!!!!

  11. tiny keyboard by wasteoid · · Score: 1

    The keyboard must be tiny!

  12. single molecule represent the limit of miniaturiza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No scientist here, but I thought the limit was an Atom?
    For example, A Boy and His Atom by IBM

  13. Re:single molecule represent the limit of miniatur by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    gaps with certain shapes can rectify at the quantum level also, I'm calling BS on the lower size limit too

  14. a couple million microdiodes a stack by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and 4 or 5 rectifier stacks to power a linear amplifier for ham radio. those microdiodes better be damn cheap.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  15. Depends on the size of the molecule. by Wargames · · Score: 1

    World's largest molecule: 250 million atoms / 10 nanometers:
    http://www.newscientist.com/ar...

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  16. this is a week old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was there another single molecule transistor invented this week?

  17. Terahertz frequencies would enable nantennas by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Nantennas can't compete with photovoltaic cells because current diodes can't operate at terahertz frequencies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

    Hope this tiny diode can finally jumpstart the nantenna industry, and kick off an efficiency race with the PV industry. That would be fun times!

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.