Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Nationals Accused of Taking SATs For Others

Vadim Makarov writes: Fifteen Chinese nationals living in the U.S. have been charged with creating an elaborate scheme to take U.S. college entrance exams on behalf of students. For the past four years, the accused provided counterfeit Chinese passports to impostors, who sneaked into testing centers where they took the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), the Graduate Record Examination (GRE), and others, while claiming to be someone else, according to a federal grand jury indictment. Special Agent in Charge John Kelleghan for Homeland Security Investigations of Philadelphia said: "These students were not only cheating their way into the university, they were also cheating their way through our nation's immigration system."

220 comments

  1. Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The SAT is one of the most useless measures of knowledge or capability the world has ever seen. Standardized tests don't work, they've never worked and we know they don't tell us about a persons true intelligence. So if China wants to take a SAT for me, go ahead.

    1. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because you suck at every test you take doesn't mean they're worthless. Quite the reverse, actually.....

    2. Re:Hilarious! by luther349 · · Score: 1

      so true you see this bs at jobs now.

    3. Re:Hilarious! by buddyglass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disagree.

      SAT scores correlate closely with measured IQ, and, when taken together with high school grades, are a decent predictor of success at university. I do think that article discounts the extent to which the SAT can be "gamed", though. Of course, if you get a high score because you spent hours studying the SAT in order to get a high score then that also measures something. Maybe not intelligence, but "ambition" and "self-discipline". Which, of course, also contribute to success at university (and in the job market).

    4. Re:Hilarious! by nbauman · · Score: 1, Troll

      Of course, if you get a high score because you spent hours studying the SAT in order to get a high score then that also measures something. Maybe not intelligence, but "ambition" and "self-discipline".

      Authoritarianism. Following orders. Lack of creativity. Willing to accept the system even when it's wrong.

    5. Re:Hilarious! by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the SAT is really that useful of a test. However colleges seem to use them for entrance criteria, as a number is easier to evaluate than judging a person on the whole.
      But if they are willing to cheat on the SAT test to get in, I don't think colleges really want people of such questionable moral caliber to enter the school.

      My experience with Chinese students, this isn't too surprising, they are far more willing to cheat, than take the consequences of getting a low grade. That is why when they show statistics showing where China is succeeding, I really question it, because their culture seems to want to win, with the actual objectives of the grading as not important. A Sr.Year computer science major the student was the curve breaker on the tests. Went to me asking how in C++ can he use decimal numbers (the answer was using the float data type, which we learned about on day 3 in the freshman class, and had used such a data type all threw the program. Made me realize, this student was either cheating technically (threw nefarious methods), or cheating himself (Only test prep, once the test is done, it brand dumps out of the system). Because in anything practical he was useless.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you suggest? Base it all on college essay and list of organized extracurricular activities? Those are even more useless in measuring either capability or knowledge. Maybe grades?

    7. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SAT is a measure of education. If the imposters are that well educated, the US should WANT them. Young, healthy, well educated. In today's world you want as many of them as you can get.

    8. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      SAT and IQ tests certain domains that are predictive of intelligence and achievement but don't gauge the most important intelligence for life: social intelligence

      much as you can have as autistic savant/ asperger's individual who can play 12 games of chess in his head but doesn't know the difference between the price of a candy bar and a car, the rest of us also have small mental domains where we are geniuses, but in other domains we are idiots. all of us. for those who attach much value to topological manipulation or word memorization, tested intelligences, real life will come as a shock when someone else who isn't "smart," according to traditional testing methods, achieves highly and surpasses the "smart" individuals, because they are able to perceive, communicate, and manipulate in the social sphere of life at a more advanced level

      social intelligence is the real iq, the real true intelligence, and the most crucial and vital mental skill you can have in your life. the rest are pathetic sideshows. there are math professors who can't balance their checkbooks. see the problem?

      btw, i scored near perfect on my SAT and very highly on my IQ tests. i attach no self-worth to either. they are cute little games, sandboxed kiddie stuff, not my sense of meaning in life. anyone who attaches meaning to their SAT scores or IQ tests is, in all serious, an idiot

      I have no idea. People who boast about their IQ are losers.

      - Response upon being questioned as to his IQ, in interview with Deborah Solomon "The Science of Second-Guessing", The New York Times (12 December 2004).

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/S...

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    9. Re:Hilarious! by gatzke · · Score: 2

      You can game university classes too. Pay someone to write your papers or even sit in for you in tests.

      We try to have individual accountability, but people that don't want to work in class often expend limitless effort to get around our defenses.

      I would like to think that these efforts eventually catch up with the perpetrators in life.

    10. Re:Hilarious! by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      "Cheating" isn't what I meant by "gaming". I meant devoting significant time to improving one's "test-taking skills" and/or specifically studying the SAT. I suspect the incidence of outright cheating on the SAT is actually pretty low. Not "zero", but fairly insignificant relative to the total number of test-takers.

    11. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Measured IQ is bullshit. Asimov wrote a great 30 page essay on the topic.

    12. Re:Hilarious! by buddyglass · · Score: 2

      If there were a way to objectively measure "creativity" I suspect it would also correlate (weakly) with SAT scores, since creativity typically requires a modicum of intelligence. This research suggests a rough threshold of 120 IQ to support "high-level" creativity.

    13. Re: Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see them grade other people's work. They literally check whether the solution is an exact match to the solution manual, since that is what a correct answer is in their system.

      But hey I guess it "works" since they're doing so well. Makes you wonder about the system, though.

    14. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India foreign nationals do this as well. They take advantage that they all look the same to U.S. natives.

    15. Re:Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2

      Well my IQ has been tested at 141 and yet I failed almost every standardized test I've been put through here in Ontario, that being grade 3, grade 6, grade 9 and grade 10.

    16. Re:Hilarious! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Authoritarianism. Following orders. Lack of creativity. Willing to accept the system even when it's wrong.

      In other words, perfect preparation for your working life.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SAT is one of the most useless measures of knowledge or capability the world has ever seen

      Sour grapes. What's a better metric, the ability to get your post modded up on Slashdot?

    18. Re:Hilarious! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      And apparently you don't understand what "correlate" means, either.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    19. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't be too impressed about "social intelligence". Sure, a minimum of it is necessary - those chess-playing autists gets nowhere.

      Intelligence though, can gets you jobs in engineering or academia that simply isn't available to others - no matter how much social intelligence they have. Social intelligence can make you a leader, but won't help you make the right decisions. Hence, stupid presidents do stupid things. Hitler had social intelligence enough to gain a lot of power - then he fought a war with too many enemies and lost.

      The more successful leader types know their own limitations and use expert advisors - and listens to them. Experts that are overriden on a whim are not useful, and neither is the leader employing them.

    20. Re:Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Correlate: have a mutual relationship or connection, in which one thing affects or depends on another.

      It was used correctly :-)

    21. Re:Hilarious! by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Authoritarianism. Following orders. Lack of creativity. Willing to accept the system even when it's wrong.

      The skill: "willingness to accept the system, even when it's wrong, and game it for your benefit" is central to engineering, accounting, law, and finance. Almost all of the goof jobs outside of medicine.

      Children expect life to be fair. Adults accept that the world is imperfect, and work for success within it (not to say it's not also worth trying to change the bad parts, but in the mean time do something useful with your life).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Hilarious! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      perhaps correctly, but also vacuously. your "counter-example" only applies if the connection is perfect, which is not implied by a correlation.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    23. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SAT and IQ tests certain domains that are predictive of intelligence and achievement but don't gauge the most important intelligence for life: social intelligence

      Well it may not show how well they party, but the SAT has a large essay portion that does gauge how well students are able to communicate their knowledge (they may not have had it when you were young). And isn't this important? The essay portion is getting even more substantial in about half a year. College admission boards also look at extra-curricular activities, personal essays, letters of recommendations, and perhaps personal interviews.

      I actually work on weekends at a Chinese-American SAT preparation center. I realize the idea of the business shows a flaw in the SAT (people with money are able to take a class that raises their scores). That said, I see a lot of students, and there's basically no doubt that the students with the top SAT scores are also the ones who are the most intelligent and best able to form a coherent explanation, and generally the most prepared to go to a top university.

    24. Re:Hilarious! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The same is true of university exams. My undergraduate exams, for example, mostly required that you answer two of three questions per exam. To get a first (for people outside the UK: the highest classification), you needed to get 70%. Most questions were around 40% knowledge and 60% application of the knowledge. If you could predict the topics that the examiner would pick, then that meant that you could immediately discard a third of the material. To get the top grade, you needed to get 100% in one question and 40% in another. This meant that you could understand a third of the material really well and understand another third well enough to get the repetition marks, but not the understanding ones and still get the top grade. This meant that you could study 50% of the material and still do very well in the exams, as long as you picked the correct 50%. And some of the lecturers were very predictable when setting exams...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    25. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

      having social intelligence is not a magic cloak of perfection, it is merely the most important kind of intelligence in terms of all the types of intelligence in regards to your success or not

      and then you go off on a tangent about leadership. off topic, but i'll follow regardless:

      you've given me examples of leaders making stupid decisions according to your judgment outside of the domain of leadership. so what. they're still the leader. that's the point. the skill of obtaining and retaining leadership has nothing to do with listening to engineers or academics. it's about being the person making the decision

      The more successful leader types know their own limitations and use expert advisors - and listens to them.

      nope. you're imposing an outside judgment of quality that has no meaning to the domain of what leadership is and how it works

      whatever decision they make on other aspects of society because they have power: correct, mediocre, or absolutely destructive, doesn't even matter. if they can sway enough idiots with enough passion to retain power, that's all that matters. mao's great leap forward was beyond stupid, it was a tragedy of the death of millions. so what? he was still the dude in charge. making a decision that would cost him his leadership would be the real failure of leadership

      that's the definition of success according to the parameters of being a leader: obtaining it, retaining it. that's it. that's the only yardstick to measure quality

      actually advancing society, humanity, technology, science: who fucking cares? you are imposing an outside judgment of success that actually has no value in terms of success in that actual domain

      whatever the academics in the ivory tower see or think or perceive, their opinion: who gives a fuck. does it mean i get more power? no? whatever

      if you're a chemist, and you discover an amazing new catalyst, you're successful according to that domain: chemistry. but according to the guy who cleans your equipment, you're a dismal failure because you keep a messy lab. is his judgment of your success or lack thereof somehow magically more important than what you've achieved in the domain of chemistry?

      likewise your judgment of what success is in leadership: an outside measure according to parameters that have no impact on obtaining and retaining leadership, is without merit

      address the fundamentals of the domain to make a judgment call on success or failure in that domain

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    26. Re:Hilarious! by One+With+Whisp · · Score: 1

      SAT scores correlate closely with measured IQ, and, when taken together with high school grades, are a decent predictor of success at university.

      Wow, SAT scores correlate with and predict several equally worthless and meaningless numbers? Truly incredible.

    27. Re:Hilarious! by dj245 · · Score: 1

      The SAT is one of the most useless measures of knowledge or capability the world has ever seen. Standardized tests don't work, they've never worked and we know they don't tell us about a persons true intelligence. So if China wants to take a SAT for me, go ahead.

      If non-Chinese nationals are doing this, don't you think Chinese nationals are doing this too? Everything is for sale in China. Would it bother you if you or your children didn't make it to your preferred university because a cheater beat you out?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    28. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      yes, while the guy who does good on his SAT is usually also socially intelligent as well, as you say, my point is that the guy who does poorly on his SAT but is socially intelligent, will be more successful in life, and is more intelligent according to the most important measure, than the guy who has stellar SAT scores but can't persuade or impress for shit

      there are people who think, for example, an amazing ability to manipulate complex topological shapes in your head means you're somehow a more intelligent person or will be a more successful person than a guy who can't do much math at all, but is charismatic

      that's my point here

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    29. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I hired a programmer (this was years ago) who must have had someone take the entrance exams for him. He could not speak well, he could not write worth a damn, and knew almost nothing that we would consider the typical metrics. But the kid could code. He could code like a son-of-a-bitch. Fast, even if he henpecked the keyboard, and I never found a single flaw in his maths or programming. I paid him very well and he spent his money on Star Wars toys (and the likes) to populate his office. It was awesome and one of the best choices I ever made. Nobody else would have hired him. I think he would be called autistic today and probably ADHD. Give him something constructive to do and he would work through the night on his own. I had to give him cab money or drive him to and from work (or get another person, paid - thank you, to do so if they wanted to make the extra overtime).

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    30. Re:Hilarious! by Apocryphos · · Score: 1

      You just said a leader's success criteria is {staying a leader} and a chemist's success criteria is {creating better chemistry}.

      I think you got a little carried away with your lecture. Obviously, the success criteria for a leader is advancing his power by improving the aggregate power of the group being led. Of course bad decisions that degrade the performance of the group are failures of the leader.

      Just like a chemist who accomplishes nothing but retaining his job is not a successful chemist.

    31. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      Of course bad decisions that degrade the performance of the group are failures of the leader.

      absolutely wrong. failure of leadership is failing to achieve or failing to hold on to the position of leadership

      if the entire society goes to shit, but you retain leadership, you're a successful leader

      Just like a chemist who accomplishes nothing but retaining his job is not a successful chemist.

      no. a chemist who makes a discovery is a successful chemist. whether or not his lab is clean has no bearing on his status as such. to say he has dirty beakers does not mean he has failed at chemistry. just like you saying a leader failed to do {X} or {Y}, which has no bearing on him actually obtaining or retaining leadership, somehow magically has any meaning. it doesn't. you're just projecting your agenda onto an outside domain, and expecting that to matter for some reason, when your agenda really has no meaning as to whether or not a leader succeeds or fails

      again, you are applying judgments on parameters that have nothing to do with the actual success or failure of the job

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    32. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's as simple as this. There's plenty of socially intelligent people with shitty jobs. There's plenty of people with crap social skills who are very successful at their jobs. Honestly I think there's a very weak correlation between social skills or career success, except for the extreme cases.

      Anyway, so what? Universities are in the job of teaching stuff. SATs are for finding the people most capable of being taught. Even if social intelligence is a great gauge of future success in life, it's outside the entire equation of what colleges and education do.

    33. Re:Hilarious! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Disagree.

      The Slate article makes some good points. On the other hand, I almost stopped reading at this nonsense:

      In a four-year study that started with nearly 3,000 college students, a team of Michigan State University researchers led by Neal Schmitt found that test score (SAT or ACTâ"whichever the student took) correlated strongly with cumulative GPA at the end of the fourth year. If the students were ranked on both their test scores and cumulative GPAs, those who had test scores in the top half (above the 50th percentile, or median) would have had a roughly two-thirds chance of having a cumulative GPA in the top half. By contrast, students with bottom-half SAT scores would be only one-third likely to make it to the top half in GPA.

      This tells me almost nothing about a test's effectiveness, other than it can differentiate pretty well between "high-achievers" and "total morons." I could probably come up with a "test" that could satisfy this stat by talking to each student for a minute.

      But hey, I gave the Slate article author the benefit of the doubt, so I tracked down the actual article he cited in this paragraph, which provides data summarized in more helpful and less dubious ways.

      You can read that article, if you like, because it presents a much more nuanced picture. Long story short: correlation of SAT/ACT performance with college GPA is at a level of 0.53. That's exactly the same correlation (0.53) of high school GPA with college GPA. Meanwhile, high school GPA and SAT/ACT performance correlation with each other is 0.58.

      Unfortunately, I can't seem to find a more thorough analysis in this article about where the mismatches occur. THAT would be really interesting. What are the characteristics of students who get high GPA in high school but low SAT scores -- how do they perform in college? And the reverse: high SAT, but low GPA? That's the only way we could actually tell how much information the SAT is actually adding... but alas, most such analyses don't look at the data that way.

      Also, college GPA isn't everything. You also need to, well, FINISH college. According to that cited article, turns out high school GPA is a much better predictor in this regard than SAT scores. Having a better high school GPA gives you an odds ratio of 3.77 to actually graduate college, while having a high SAT has odds ratio of only 1.3. (This isn't mentioned in the Slate article, which only notes how high SAT correlates with graduation -- well, yes it does, but nowhere near as well as high school GPA.)

      Anyhow, you can take from this what you will. I've read a number of such studies on SATs, and my conclusion is a little different from the Slate guy. Yes, SATs are correlated with college achievement. But so are some other things too (like high school grades). In borderline cases, having the SAT score may help with an admissions decision, but is the level of correlation high enough to justify letting student A in with an SAT score of X, while rejecting student B with an SAT of X-50? That's really the kind of question we need to ask if we want to justify the rampant use of SAT scores in admissions.

      And I'm not sure if any research out there really can answer that question well. Certainly not most of the citations in the Slate article, which focus on broader correlations, and definitely not the Slate article itself, which cites some stats that barely qualify the SAT as useful as if they were truly revelatory.

      SAT scores correlate closely with measured IQ

      Here's the other problem -- the SAT was originally designed as a proxy for IQ, more or less. But over the past few decades, each

    34. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 2

      To pick the more obvious...

      Threw and brand... Through and brain...

      Are you sure you went to college and didn't cheat? Oh, perhaps you are Chinese?

      Also, your experience may be true but it may be biased and bigoted and only you know the truth. My experience in college was was the opposite. Chinese, Asians in general, appeared to work hard to get very good grades. I, of course, attended a very good institution and did so many years ago so things may have changed or may have been different at your institution. Like I said, your experience may be true or it may be that you colored your own perspective based on your biases. Bigotry is not always intentional, nor are biases - of course.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    35. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of socially intelligent people with shitty jobs. There's plenty of people with crap social skills who are very successful at their jobs.

      if you're socially intelligent, you know you don't need to stay in a shitty job. therefore, your example is incoherent

      likewise, show me someone who is not socially intelligent and successful, and i'll show you someone operating in the same domain who is socially intelligent and yet even more successful, due to being more socially intelligent

      for example, programming is in demand so programmers can be very successful, even the ones with shitty social skills. but within that domain, those programmers who are also socially intelligent are yet even more successful

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    36. Re:Hilarious! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      the SAT has a large essay portion that does gauge how well students are able to communicate their knowledge

      Many colleges ignore the essay portion of the SAT, because it has not been shown to indicate much of anything. Scores on the multiple choice portion of the test, on the other hand, are more highly correlated with academic success in college, and financial success after college, than any other measurement. So, of course, they are the biggest factor in the admissions process at most universities.

    37. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the kid could code. He could code like a son-of-a-bitch. Fast, even if he henpecked the keyboard, and I never found a single flaw in his maths or programming.

      You realize that's the sort of aptitude the entrance exams are designed to test, right?

    38. Re:Hilarious! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Well it may not show how well they party, but the SAT has a large essay portion

      I don't remember an essay portion on the SAT. Is this a new thing (as in the last 25 years)?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    39. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? How do you explain high correlation between standardized scores and future achievements? The correlation is not 100% but is higher compare to any other objective criteria. I am not saying SAT is ideal, but standardized tests are necessary.

    40. Re:Hilarious! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I meant devoting significant time to improving one's "test-taking skills" and/or specifically studying the SAT.

      I am not sure I would consider that "gaming". Before I took the SAT, I read a book on "How to Ace the SAT". The "tricks" worked, but they were not really "tricks", but broadly useful skills in critical reasoning. For instance, all through school, you are taught how to find the right answer. But for the SAT, it is useful to be able to see that an answer is obviously wrong, and that is a very useful skill in life. I also learned the skill of dimensional analysis, where instead of doing a lot of math to see if the number is right, just take a few seconds to see if the units are right. Another "trick" was to learn several hundred key vocabulary words. Knowing those words made me a better reader, and a better writer, able to express nuances that someone with a weaker vocabulary could not. So the book didn't just help me raise my SAT score (by several hundred points), it also made me a better educated person.

    41. Re:Hilarious! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Measured IQ is bullshit. Asimov wrote a great 30 page essay on the topic.

      Asimov has a measured IQ of about 160. Do you think you would recommend an essay written by someone with a measured IQ of, say, 80?

    42. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 0

      How true... I can get an excellent grade on ANY subject when the format is essay. You can do this in the three, four, or five (or more) paragraph format. You can blow it up with useless stuff if they want 10,000 words or something similar. What you DO need are good grammar/creative writing skills. Essays are NOT a good metric for those who can do this.

      Restate the problem in your own words.
      Tell them what you are going to tell them.
      Tell them what your OPINION is.
      Tell them HOW the two relate.
      Restate the problem in different words and include your opinion where applicable.

      Any of those paragraphs can be made into a number of other paragraphs. Weasel words, critical thinking where applicable, and opinions are the key. I have the time and the interest in assisting my fellow man so I will take a few to give you/us an example:

      ---
      "Today we have {this} as a proposal/situation. {This} needs to be changed and I am going to offer a solution based on how I think about {this}."

      "It is this author's opinion that we will find {this} to be true..."

      "I feel that this will impact {this} in a negative/positive manner."

      "Other people MAY feel that {this} solution I am propose could be better solved by doing {this}, {this}, or {this}."

      "I see the sense in {this} but still feel that {this} is the best solution because of {this}." Where the latter {this} == reasons or perceived evidence. "I believe/understand..."

      "Additionally, I strongly believe that {this} would result in {this} and I think this is wrong/right because of {this} and I think that {this} is the proper solution."

      "Furthermore, I believe that {this} conclusion/solution would have {this} as a result."

      "While other people may believe that {this} is not the best solution I disagree because {this}, I am quite certain, is the most ideal because of {this}."

      "Thus I conclude that {this} was the initial problem and I have proposed {this} I expect {this} as the outcome and {this} is why I feel that way."
      ---

      You can make it as long or as short as you need to. Very seldom are word-count overages penalized so be careful but do not worry too much. This will net you a solid score regardless of the subject so long as you can write well and can use a little critical thinking. You do not even need to know the subject so much as to be familiar with the terms (which you should be due to a well rounded education or a simple observation of educational media including the news).

      This has worked well regardless of where I have had to use it. There may be exceptions but I have yet to find one. I have given outlines to family and friends and they have all been successful following something akin to the above used example.

      Tada! You just managed to get into college AND you will do well in a number of courses. I do not need payment but if you do end up with a decent job then I ask that you pass it on to the needy not just in the form of taxes but with your time, heart, and money.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    43. Re:Hilarious! by m00sh · · Score: 1

      I don't think the SAT is really that useful of a test. However colleges seem to use them for entrance criteria, as a number is easier to evaluate than judging a person on the whole. But if they are willing to cheat on the SAT test to get in, I don't think colleges really want people of such questionable moral caliber to enter the school.

      My experience with Chinese students, this isn't too surprising, they are far more willing to cheat, than take the consequences of getting a low grade. That is why when they show statistics showing where China is succeeding, I really question it, because their culture seems to want to win, with the actual objectives of the grading as not important. A Sr.Year computer science major the student was the curve breaker on the tests. Went to me asking how in C++ can he use decimal numbers (the answer was using the float data type, which we learned about on day 3 in the freshman class, and had used such a data type all threw the program. Made me realize, this student was either cheating technically (threw nefarious methods), or cheating himself (Only test prep, once the test is done, it brand dumps out of the system). Because in anything practical he was useless.

      You cannot use floats for decimal numbers since floats are approximate types.

      In banking, you would never use float to represent money, which are decimals.

    44. Re:Hilarious! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Well my IQ has been tested at 141 and yet I failed almost every standardized test I've been put through here in Ontario, that being grade 3, grade 6, grade 9 and grade 10.

      IQ tests measure intelligence. School exams measure knowledge. They are not the same thing. Next time, trying reading the textbook and doing the assignments. Since you were unable to figure this out on your own, the IQ score may have been a fluke, or maybe your name was mistakenly put on the wrong answer sheet.

    45. Re:Hilarious! by Wargames · · Score: 1

      A good leader leads to a good place. A bad leader to a bad place. Often a very good leader will make great personal sacrifices. How can a leader that leads to bad place be successful?

      In a flock of seagulls or a bike peloton, the leader pulls until he can no longer pull well, then moves back so a fresh leader can arise, that way the group, including the leader, gets to the destination. In these cases the pack chooses the destination.

      Leadership is not about power. Leadership is about getting there. A good leader takes you where you want to go.

      --
      -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
    46. Re:Hilarious! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I don't think colleges really want people of such questionable moral caliber to enter the school.

      Why not? Many of these people will go on to be very successful CEOs, lawyers, politicians, and investment bankers.

    47. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      where a leader takes society has no meaning

      whether or not a leader obtains and retains leadership does

      you are talking about subject matter that has nothing to do with the topic of being a good leader or not

      what is the value of a guy with good ideas for society who has no power?

      get the power. then we can talk. if you can't do that, you are not a good leader nor a bad leader. you're simply not a leader. you simply don't matter on the topic

      stop injecting an unrelated judgment on an unrelated parameter into the subject at hand

       

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    48. Re:Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      No, the SAT test is used to determine over all performance and one of those metrics is raw intelligence. After I failed the grade 6 standard test, I was given the chance for a redo, but in a different style that was hands on and verbal, I aced it in the top 1% of all results. If I failed the standard test but aced the special test, that goes to show one case where the standard test failed. Now I'm one result out of million, but how many other student are being screwed because the test just doesn't work?

    49. Re:Hilarious! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The SAT is one of the most useless measures of knowledge or capability the world has ever seen. Standardized tests don't work, they've never worked and we know they don't tell us about a persons true intelligence. So if China wants to take a SAT for me, go ahead.

      The SATs aren't for measuring intelligence. They're for measuring approximate education on a standard scale. That's their entire purpose - because if you're trying to compare two people who are from two different schools, how can you tell if candidate A's grade of a B+ makes him a better or worse student than candidate B's grade of a A in the same class? Assuming the same curriculum, that is. Is B better than A? Is there grade inflation going on (extremely common)?

      In Canada, provinces have provincial exams - which basically test students on the curriculum material. All students take them to get their final mark for the course. There have been many cases where a student may score A/A+ on the course, and only a C on the provincial exam. A few cases have happened where they maybe score a C in class, but A-/B+ on the exams because the teacher grilled them hard, marked them hard and probably churned out better students.

    50. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life is hard. There isn't always an alternative to staying with a shitty job. People with pretty good social skills but a shitty resume and a lack of academic intelligence generally don't have alternatives, and have to content themselves with the other benefits of social intelligence (perhaps, a happy family life).

      Of course there's no study that can confirm that one way or the other, but look into you heart. You know it's true. You're over-stating the importance of social intelligence. It's a good thing to have, but it's just a part of a whole.

    51. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well i do mark people down if they repeat the question.

    52. Re:Hilarious! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you get a high score because you spent hours studying the SAT in order to get a high score then that also measures something. Maybe not intelligence, but "ambition" and "self-discipline".

      Authoritarianism. Following orders. Lack of creativity. Willing to accept the system even when it's wrong.

      In other words, ability to succeed in the real world working at a job.

    53. Re:Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I live in Ontario and I can tell you that our tests are a joke, they really only test if you can work your head around the broken logic presented in badly worded questions in an attempt to see if you can provide an unrealistic answer. I was allowed to redo the grade 6 provincial standard test because I failed it, on the redo I was allowed a specialized test which was given orally and using hands on work. I aced it, top 1% of all marks, so don't tell me the tests work, they don't, they never have. I know I'm only one person but it happened to me, I wonder how many other people fall victim.

    54. Re:Hilarious! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I would like to think that these efforts eventually catch up with the perpetrators in life.

      I suspect these catch up to the perpetrators in the college years. I can see such cheating working in large undergraduate classes, but have a hard time seeing it working later on once they get to upper division courses. By then, class sizes are smaller, teachers get to know their graduating class members and have the same students in several classes across multiple semesters. Unless there is some complacency going on such as the school wanting the football player to pass and putting pressure on the teachers, I have a hard time seeing it being a reliable method for getting a degree.

    55. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ability to pay for a prep test. Yep, definitely measures something important here...means.

    56. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have dyslexia?

    57. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      social intelligence is the real iq, the real true intelligence, and the most crucial and vital mental skill you can have in your life. the rest are pathetic sideshows. there are math professors who can't balance their checkbooks. see the problem?

      First of all, balancing a check book is not social intelligence. Secondly a "math professor" is exactly the sort of person it would take to automate the balancing of checkbooks for society as a whole, removing one more tedious and ultimately unnecessary task from our responsibility.

      No the SAT is not a good measure of intelligence, but it is not because it fails to capture social intelligence.

      Einstein was bad at arithmetic. Most people misunderstand this to mean that he was bad at math. Nothing could be further from the truth. Math is for creative people, arithmetic is (now) for machines (thanks to those creative people).

      Yes social intelligence is important to personal success like a working liver is important to personal success. Since it is exceedingly common, it is rightly ignored as a necessary component to success (like the near infinite number of other potential deficits).

      Other forms of intelligence that are far less common in humans, are more widely recognized due to their rarity. It's supply and demand.

      Why do we value genius in mathematics and physics, etc higher than social intelligence?

      Why is the price of gold higher than price water per weight/volume/particle, even though water is essential to life and gold isn't? Why do gold panners keep the useless gold and throw away all the life sustaining water?

      It's the same reason.

      If half the people on the planet were math geniuses, then we wouldn't even need to teach it in school. Kids who flunked out of college would get dead end mathematician jobs for minimum wage.

      But that's not how it is. Kids who flunk out of college still have enough social intelligence to deal with customers and take directions from a boss, and sense when other people are pissed. This skill is valued (i.e. they find jobs that actually pay money), it's just not highly valued.

    58. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      That's like saying a good chemist, is one who can best trick his boss into thinking he is doing useful work.

      A leaders job is to lead the group to as good an outcome as possible (i.e. it is the task that the leader was chosen to do)

      A leader who is only good at remaining the leader, isn't a good leader, he/she is a good Narcissist.

      A narcissist is a person who is obsessed with attaining power and prestige. Doing this well is what makes one excel at narcissism.

      Plenty of people elected to be leaders are actually only good narcissists. This is a flaw in society, not a reason to change the definition of "leadership".

    59. Re:Hilarious! by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The SAT doesn't exist to gauge one's future success in life. It exists to determine eligibility for college admission. The kind of people who can do well on the SAT are the kind of people who can learn they stuff they'll be taught in college, presumably - which does not, for better or worse, generally include social skills.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    60. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Actually success in life is about excelling at skills that are in high demand. If you can manipulate complex topological shapes in a way that many people find desirable, then you will probably be successful.

      If you are charismatic in a way that isn't in high demand, then you probably won't be as successful as the math guy.

      I have plenty of charismatic friends who are unemployed because they have no other skills. They are fun to hang out with though.

    61. Re:Hilarious! by smithmc · · Score: 1

      In statistics, that is *not* what correlation means. Two phenomena can have a high degree of correlation without either one having a causative effect on the other.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    62. Re:Hilarious! by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Success at university is meaningless and worthless? I think there a few engineers, doctors, lawyers, educators, etc. who would disagree with you.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    63. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      In my experience, it measures the strictness of one's parents. My sister wanted to do better on the SAT and enrolled herself in a class. It was full of Asian kids who were forced to go to SAT classes on a Saturday by their parents.

      I am a person who owes a great deal of my success to the pressure to succeed from my mother. I certainly don't under estimate the value of having a parent like this, but I don't think most people consider this a skill, but rather a circumstance.

      I don't think measuring a child's parent's willingness to push them to success is a very good indicator of future success, but it's better than nothing.

    64. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It is important to rephrase it and not just repeat it verbatim. Wrapping it in a paragraph is also good. I did point out that there are exceptions and you may be one. I suspect I could write a passable essay for anything you would typically ask of your students regardless of the subject. It is not difficult and the method has proven successful many times over. It requires a good/decent knowledge of the language, it only requires a minimal knowledge of the subject. It is a poor metric by itself but can certainly be used objectively if done properly or sanely.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    65. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Any aptitude test I have taken, from the ASVAB to GRE, has been much less focused. In fact, I have never seen one that is specific to programming in all of my years in academia. Every one I have taken has included a number of fields of study actually.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    66. Re:Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      That was right from the dictionary, so if it's wrong then call Websters.

    67. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Of all the things you should learn as a computer science student, remembering the way to define a floating point number in a particular language isn't really that important.

      I suppose you are either an idiot or a cheater if you allegedly spent a lot of time programming in c++ and don't know what a float is, but hopefully your time was spent learning the concepts (hard) rather than specific language syntax (trivial).

      Also no one uses floats anymore. You are supposed to use doubles. Even most 32-bit architectures often have 64-bit FPUs. There are still a few occasions why you might still use a float instead of a double, but if you don't know what they are then you shouldn't use it.

      I have met lots of people who understand the theory of computer science, but can't actually make anything. I know way more people who know how to "code", but don't know any of the theory and therefore suck at developing software. Both skills are important, but it seems one skill is best learned by going to a university and the other is best learned from googling language tutorials.

    68. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Pointing out spelling mistakes in this way is an ad hominem attack.

    69. Re:Hilarious! by digsbo · · Score: 1

      only you know the trewth.

      FTFY.

    70. Re:Hilarious! by eulernet · · Score: 1

      You give too much importance to charisma and persuasion, in other words manipulative skills.

      Sure, if you need to sell something, it may be useful, but from my experience, I noticed that people having high social skills don't really care about others.
      They care about themselves, because they are too focused on their own importance.
      And in companies, they tend to become managers, but it's the workers that really produce something.

    71. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Decimal numbers (base 10 numbers) are different than numbers with a "decimal point" (real numbers).

      You would not want to use floating point numbers to represent quantities which require absolute precision. (although floating point numbers usually can represent whole numbers as well as binary fractions with absolute precision.

      In fact there are probably lots of good representations of money that use floating point numbers. What they lose in precision, they gain in flexibility.

      You probably wouldn't use a float to represent $USD with whole numbers of cents (although you could to it without losing precision if you had to by using a float to store the whole number of total cents).

      But for many representations of money, it's important to track very small fractions of cents (i.e. $46468464684648686868.4747 and $0.0000000000000223974), and this is quite impractical to do as a single integer. Often the ability to store values on very different scales is more important than having absolute precision in a very small range of numbers (e.g. 0 - 2^32 - 1).

    72. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    73. Re:Hilarious! by slew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Although it's true that many colleges ignore the SAT essay, but multiple choice portion of the test is *not* highly correlated with academic success. The highest correlation is (sadly) family income, followed by weighted/normalized high-school grades (e.g., not GPA, but a weighted GPA), and only then standardized tests. Also above a certain high score (~1400/1600 on the SAT), there is nearly no correlation at all with higher scores and educational and post-educational outcomes (and yes I used to work with admission committees for a university that cooperated with other highly-selective university to compile statistics on this subject over many years back in the '80s).

      The idea that the SAT matters is a myth propagated by the Educational Testing Service (ETS) corporation. In fact the creation of the competing ACT test was prompted by the fact that the SAT origins were an *aptitude* test (that can draw it's lineage from the US army IQ testing recruits in WWI) , not an *achievement* test (testing things that you should learn in school).

      Colleges wanted an achievement test, but were dismissed by the ETS, however because of the use of the SAT in ivy league schools, the University of California signed on in 1960 and made the ETS/SAT into a juggernaut. Now because of discontent by UC and other schools on its predictive value, the ETS has changes the SAT twice in 10 years, which in its latest form, now looks more like an *achievement* test (like the ACT was).

      Of course there is open debate in higher education on even requiring tests like the SAT or ACT. For example this study tracking 123,000 students over 33 universities found only minimal correlation of academic success with even submitting SAT scores to the school to evaluate (let alone what the score actually was).

    74. Re: Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you think of it as a set of fun puzzles and do it for fun, like some people do crossword puzzles or brainteasers.

      I did quite well without studying. Then I studied because I actually enjoyed it, and scored even better.

      Doing something because I enjoy it hardly makes me uncreative or authoritarian.

    75. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you've just condemned the society the person is in, not the person's intelligence or character. indeed, there are people of great intelligence stuck in shitty jobs the world over. only because their society is so shit there is no path for them to improve themselves, through no fault of their own. people of truly exceptional social intelligence then probably quit anyway and start a revolution

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    76. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Now that was funny. Good show, good show.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    77. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      there are people of great social skill and malicious intent, and people of great social skill and good intent. you confuse intent and ability. if you can't tell the difference you're only announcing your own lack of social skills

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    78. Re:Hilarious! by slew · · Score: 1

      Well it may not show how well they party, but the SAT has a large essay portion

      I don't remember an essay portion on the SAT. Is this a new thing (as in the last 25 years)?

      The SAT was redesigned in 2005 to eliminate the stupid analogies, add reading comprehension, free-form math, and added another section to test essay writing to test sentence/paragraph formation and general grammar (now scored on a 2400 point scale instead of a 1600 point scale).

      They are re-redesigning the test again this year to make the essay optional (back down to 1600 points) and changing the grading of the essay to actually have some content of the essay factor into the score (in the 2005 version of the test, you could have scored perfect on the essay by writing total fictitious nonsense as long as it was grammatically and logically correct), eliminating the penalty for guessing (to match the ACT), and adding more achievement testing (also to match the ACT).

    79. Re:Hilarious! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      No, the "are you sure you went to college" part is ad hominem. The spelling errors are very much factual, non-debatable, and are not ad hominem attacks. When, not if, I call you an idiot that is an ad hominem attack, idiot. Are you sure you went to college? If so did you take any Critical Thinking courses? Are you just parroting what you read online because you want to fit in? ...

      This is why none of us, including you, should be throwing stones like I did above. Not even I *should* be throwing stones - even in jest - even if I did include salient commentary. I do think the commentary here would be much sparser without it, however. But... Rock fights are not beneficial to anybody.

      Anyhow... This is the point where you take your toys and go home... Really, no, take your toys and go home.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    80. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    81. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Informative

      that may be the status quo, but the status quo is a failed concept

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      Q. Other insights from the data you’ve gathered about Google employees?

      A. One of the things we’ve seen from all our data crunching is that G.P.A.’s are worthless as a criteria for hiring, and test scores are worthless — no correlation at all except for brand-new college grads, where there’s a slight correlation. Google famously used to ask everyone for a transcript and G.P.A.’s and test scores, but we don’t anymore, unless you’re just a few years out of school. We found that they don’t predict anything.

      What’s interesting is the proportion of people without any college education at Google has increased over time as well. So we have teams where you have 14 percent of the team made up of people who’ve never gone to college.

      Q. Can you elaborate a bit more on the lack of correlation?

      A. After two or three years, your ability to perform at Google is completely unrelated to how you performed when you were in school, because the skills you required in college are very different. You’re also fundamentally a different person. You learn and grow, you think about things differently.

      Another reason is that I think academic environments are artificial environments. People who succeed there are sort of finely trained, they’re conditioned to succeed in that environment. One of my own frustrations when I was in college and grad school is that you knew the professor was looking for a specific answer. You could figure that out, but it’s much more interesting to solve problems where there isn’t an obvious answer. You want people who like figuring out stuff where there is no obvious answer.

      this is about GPA, not SAT, but they take home is that scores on academic tests are shit, because the "academic environment is an artificial environment". it focuses on skills that don't really help in the job. colleges need to change what they value, because what they value does not adequately prepare people for life

      also:

      Q. Other insights from the studies you’ve already done?

      A. On the hiring side, we found that brainteasers are a complete waste of time. How many golf balls can you fit into an airplane? How many gas stations in Manhattan? A complete waste of time. They don’t predict anything. They serve primarily to make the interviewer feel smart.

      Instead, what works well are structured behavioral interviews, where you have a consistent rubric for how you assess people, rather than having each interviewer just make stuff up.

      Behavioral interviewing also works — where you’re not giving someone a hypothetical, but you’re starting with a question like, “Give me an example of a time when you solved an analytically difficult problem.” The interesting thing about the behavioral interview is that when you ask somebody to speak to their own experience, and you drill into that, you get two kinds of information. One is you get to see how they actually interacted in a real-world situation, and the valuable “meta” information you get about the candidate is a sense of what they consider to be difficult.

      On the leadership side, we’ve found that leadership is a more ambiguous and amorphous set of characteristics than the work we did on the attributes of good management, which are more of a checklist and actionable.

      We found that, for leaders, it’s important that people know you are consistent and fair in how you think about making decisions and that there’s an element of predictability. If a leader is consistent, people on their teams experience tremendous freedom, because then they know that within certain parameters, they can do whatever they want. If your manager is all over the plac

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    82. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      A leaders job is to lead the group to as good an outcome as possible (i.e. it is the task that the leader was chosen to do)

      the guy who is focusing his effort on getting a good outcome for society has no time to maintain his leadership. so someone else leads

      A leader who is only good at remaining the leader... he/she is a good Narcissist.

      i agree. and? so what. yes, absolutely: leading societies is the work of truly gifted and screwed up people. demagogues. this is a problem about human nature, but that doesn't make the problem magically. the problem is baked into how we function as social groups, there is no avoiding it

      you seem to live in this insulated ivory tower that doesn't know, understand, nor accept certain unfortunate but unavoidably true aspects of human behavior. your concept of an ideal leader will always, always, wind up being some guy who works for the actual leaders. the actual leaders are the guys who spend most of their tiem acquiring and maintaining their leadership. playing a game that you dislike, but who cares if you like it. the game is part of your reality. that you don't like it doesn't make it go away

      you don't bother acknowledging that the game of jockeying for control and keeping it is the real subject called leadership, and the entire domain you call leadership is actually a separate sideshow that comes after and is subservient to the real topic at hand: the ugly ways leadership is acquired and maintained

      welcome to reality. acknowledge it. then form your opinions

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    83. Re:Hilarious! by russotto · · Score: 1

      "Social intelligence" is just a classic weak point for those who are intelligent in the usual 'g' way. Therefore, those who want to keep the smart people down latch on to that as "the most important thing" -- "your ability to solve hard problems means nothing next to my ability to schmooze with others".

      People with high social intelligence include politicians, pointy-haired bosses, "bros", Kardashians, and salespeople.

    84. Re:Hilarious! by russotto · · Score: 1

      there are people of great social skill and malicious intent, and people of great social skill and good intent. you confuse intent and ability. if you can't tell the difference you're only announcing your own lack of social skills

      Someone with better social skills would have tried poisoning the well more subtly than that. Anyway, great social skill and malicious intent typically go hand-in-hand; psychopaths are known for their social skill. This is because things like having a conscience get in the way of treating people like tools to be manipulated.

    85. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using floats for decimal values (e.g. currency) is wrong in most cases. Floats are for real values.

    86. Re: Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can game employment, too. I'm currently getting paid to sit on a toilet and post anonymously to Slashdot.

    87. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      No, the "are you sure you went to college" part is ad hominem. The spelling errors are very much factual, non-debatable, and are not ad hominem attacks.

      Actually the "are you sure you went to college" is an insult.

      The pointing out of spelling mistakes (while factual) as a way to discredit an argument is an ad hominem attack along the lines of "This person's argument is no good because he is not intelligent"

      When, not if, I call you an idiot that is an ad hominem attack, idiot.

      It's only an ad hominem attack in the context of making/discrediting an argument, otherwise it's just an insult.

      I'm not throwing stones. I didn't try to insult anyone (as you appear to be doing). i am just pointing out what I consider to be a juvenile debate tactic.

    88. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spelling is not a metric of determining intelligence. Okay then... You win.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...

      Whistle while you work.

      KGIII

      (Posting as AC which means I probably won't see a reply. I would not post AC but /. is insane and says I have been a bit too prolific with my posting. Absolutist ninnies.)

    89. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy who is focusing his effort on getting a good outcome for society has no time to maintain his leadership. so someone else leads

      I think you are thoroughly confused on what "leading" is.

      When someone says "Michael Jordan or Phil Jackson lead the Bulls to a championship", are you confused as to what that could possibly mean?

      How do you get a championship by merely remaining the leader of a team?

    90. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is providing an anecdotal counterexample and claiming it to be superior. Of course the line "Chinese, Asians in general, appeared to work hard to get very good grades" is simultaneously bigoted, as is shown by the counter-evidence in this news article, and when interpreted differently in complete agreement with the jellomizer. One can work hard to get very good grades while not working hard at all to learn anything.

    91. Re:Hilarious! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      it is useful to be able to see that an answer is obviously wrong

      In another place I was just discussing this very thing with someone; he insisted that process of elimination was cheating.

      instead of doing a lot of math to see if the number is right, just take a few seconds to see if the units are right

      Related skills - ballparking - high eighties times low nineties will be close to 8100, and last digit analysis - blahblah4 times yada3 must end in 2.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    92. Re:Hilarious! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you assume all leaders are sociopaths, than it follows they would use the maintain power definition.

      The real question is 'good for who?'

      Was Stalin a good leader? He died in power, but ran his nation into the ground and required his people to be cannon fodder to save it, at all.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    93. Re:Hilarious! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Circular reasoning.

      There are a ton of socially intelligent idiots. Their life usually sucks, once they lose the 'pretty factor'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    94. Re:Hilarious! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Hence, stupid presidents do stupid things.

      Oh man I wish I were a stupid president. I could engineer for a small lifetime and not get a salary as high as a "stupid president's" retirement pension let alone their actual salary while in office.

      Give me social intelligence any day.

    95. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you took the SAT in the past few years, you were given 200 points for just showing up, so don't be too happy about your score.

    96. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that describes the current POTUS perfectly.

    97. Re:Hilarious! by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I did, and here is the definition they came up with:

      http://www.merriam-webster.com...
      http://www.merriam-webster.com...

      Didn't see your (inaccurate) definition there, so maybe they already fixed it.

    98. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standardized tests in Ontario, at least when I had them, were not knowledge tests, they were a lot more like IQ tests (at a younger age they even had an IQ score output). The results were not part of your marks at the end of the year, specifically because they didn't test knowledge.

    99. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      okay, you don't like that stalin was a leader, he didn't deserve it

      i agree with you

      but how are you going to change that?

      welcome to an ugly aspect of your reality

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    100. Re:Hilarious! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you're changing the goalposts

      we were talking about leaders of nations, and now you are talking about the unrelated honorific applied to sports stars

      so if you're changing the subject, i'll take that as your intellectually dishonest way of conceding my point here

      i'm glad i've been able to show you something about your world. it's ugly. it's unfortunate. but it's reality we have to deal with

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    101. Re:Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could barely tell what the guy's argument was, because his grammar and overall communication skills were so bad.

      Ad hominem or not, I don't expect smart arguments from people who can't form coherent thoughts.

    102. Re:Hilarious! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1
      Type it in Google, define: correlate

      correlate
      verb
      verb: correlate; 3rd person present: correlates; past tense: correlated; past participle: correlated; gerund or present participle: correlating
      kôrlt,kärlt/

      1.
      have a mutual relationship or connection, in which one thing affects or depends on another. "the study found that success in the educational system correlates highly with class" synonyms: correspond to/with, match, parallel, agree with, tally with, tie in with, be consistent with, be compatible with, be consonant with, coordinate with, dovetail (with), relate to, conform to; More informalsquare with, jibe with "postal codes correlate with geographic location" antonyms: contrast establish a mutual relationship or connection between. "we should correlate general trends in public opinion with trends in the content of television news" synonyms: connect, analogize, associate, relate, compare, set side by side "we can correlate good health and physical fitness"

      noun
      noun: correlate; plural noun: correlates
      kôrlt/

      1.
      each of two or more related or complementary things. "strategies to promote health should pay greater attention to financial hardship and other correlates of poverty"

      Origin
      mid 17th century (as a noun): back-formation from correlation and correlative.

      So I'm still not wrong.

    103. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I'm not changing any goal posts. The concept of leadership doesn't only apply to nations. The fact that you appear to think it does, highlights how/why your definition is wrong.

      Thanks for showing me how ugly the world is, I would have never known without some random person on slashdot simply stating that fact. /s

      As I have repeatedly said. I am not even debating whether the world is ugly or not (despite your continued belief that I am). I am contesting your use of the word "leadership".

      You are confusing a common quality among leaders with the defintion of a leader.

    104. Re:Hilarious! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      His argument seems to be something like "Chinese people get ahead by cheating. Here is and example of one experience I had with an incompetent cheating Chinaman as a supporting argument."

      I think it is possibly to destroy this argument without ad hominem attacks (i.e. cheating in a debate).

  2. in all fairness, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    all asians do look alike.

    1. Re:in all fairness, by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      I think it is similar in reverse when Asians look at Caucasians?

    2. Re:in all fairness, by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      The worst problem is when schools started demanding photo ID for SATS to "stop" this confusion, only to not realize that quite a few asian people have identical names too, particularly after they have been anglicized. How many Tommy Chen's have I known in my life? Well over a hundred. The only difference was SSN, which of course, isn't on most ID.

    3. Re:in all fairness, by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I think it is similar in reverse when Asians look at Caucasians?

      It is not who you are, but who you spend time with, that determines this. If you are Caucasian, but grow up attending a school with lots of Asians, then you will have no problem telling them apart. I lived in Shanghai for several years, and when I first arrived, I had a hard time remembering faces. By the time I left, the neural nets in my brain's face recognition module had been reconfigured. Today, I live in San Jose (more Asians than whites) and I have no problem remembering faces.

    4. Re:in all fairness, by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I may sound a bit racist or ignorant here but, trust me, I am not... Really... I am not.

      Let me start by saying that I am 1/4 black. I have spent time living in urban areas. I spent eight years in the military where there were many people of races other than white. My family is urban and many are totally black on that side of the family. I have spent more time with them, living with some for some time even, and have observed that many (certainly not all) initially look the same until you have become familiar with them. I have not found this to be true with white people and this is, I believe, because they typically have a number of different characteristics while still being considered white. Hair, facial structure, some skin tone, and other easily observable traits. Using the black people as my example the vast majority have brown/dark hair, are dark skinned (some variation), wide noses, etc.. These are racial traits which are more prevalent in those who have more melanin and likely for the same reason they have more melanin.

      They are not all the same nor are they different people. They/we think just like the rest of the world - with a balance of pros and cons in their situations, just like the rest of the planet. People like to make assumptions but they, the poor inner-city people of any color, may be situationally challenged they are not (by any means) mentally challenged. Their vocabulary may be different than your/our own but this is no different then "y'all" or "you'uns." It is no different than an accent from a New Yorker or an accent from a Texan. It is no different than Anglicized words nor is it different than local colloquialisms. See the island and swamp people in the Mississippi Delta for another good example.

      Some may view a portion of my post and assume the rest (we shall see) but I implore you to read the post critically, entirely, and make no assumptions. It is not, nor am I, racist towards black folk. A knee-jerk reaction is not called for. I do couch the racist bit because I honestly have a knee-jerk reaction with Germans and Japanese (I have watched too many WWII documentaries) but my logic circuit kicks in, during these situations, and I immediately recall that these persons are persons and not at all accountable for the atrocities and that my own country is just as guilty. While my initial thinking is certainly racist (in the above situation) I immediately correct it and then go out of my way to ensure I am not judgmental in deed and, ideally, in thought. What may be fun is seeing how many folks only read a portion of what I wrote and make assumptions based on that. I am assuming that they do not read this if such happens.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:in all fairness, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is similar in reverse when Asians look at Caucasians?

      I wonder (being white) if there is? As in terms general caucasians seem to have more variation in natural hair color.

    6. Re:in all fairness, by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      I mentioned this to the wife a few weeks back. That off the top of my head, all non-caucasian races seem to have black hair. Full stop.

    7. Re:in all fairness, by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      My mom is Chinese (born and raised in Hong Kong). She has a much easier time differentiating Caucasian faces than Asian faces.

      I have literally heard her say "All Chinese people look the same", when she failed recognize someone. I don't think she knows this is considered a racist thing to say. To her it is just reality.

      I am not saying the example of my mom proves anything about whether Chinese faces are actually objectively more similar than Caucasian faces.

      What I am saying is that the relative inability to recognize faces of a certain race or ethnicity, and acknowledgement of this, shouldn't be conflated with racism.

      I might suggest saying something more like "Chinese people all look the same to me", thereby acknowledging the deficit of the subject, rather than making the statement a descriptive claim about the object (chinese people).

  3. Reminds me of my youth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    To an AF entrance exam for a friend's brother. He coulda been a nukular engineer. He wound up working the motor pool. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    1. Re:Reminds me of my youth by jandersen · · Score: 1

      ... nukular engineer ...

      "Nukular" indeed; *sigh*.

    2. Re:Reminds me of my youth by war4peace · · Score: 2

      I guess a whooosh is in order.
      (but in all fairness, you're right, it should be "nucular")

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re: Reminds me of my youth by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      It's 'nuculer'. Sheesh.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re: Reminds me of my youth by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It's 'nuculer'. Sheesh.

      This all started with President Eisenhower. He mispronounced the word during several speeches, broadcast on radio and TV. Since back in the 1950s, most people were not familiar with the word, they picked up his mispronunciation.

    5. Re: Reminds me of my youth by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      When I pronounce it that way, I'm intentional.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  4. Nothing wrong with cheating the State by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People, who — like myself — have grown up under oppressive governments, see nothing wrong with cheating the State. They would not cheat a friend nor even a stranger, but government institutions are fair game. Moving to a free(er) country, we don't necessarily change that attitude.

    Of course, the growing oppressiveness of American governments is not helping...

    This is not meant to provide an excuse to the accused, but merely to explain, where they are coming from.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but merely to explain, where they are coming from.

      That's in the article:

      China

    2. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The SATs and GREs are not state tests. They are run by private companies.

    3. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In USA big corporation are running the state so by proxy they are state run...

    4. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What growing oppressiveness? If anything, the US is becoming less oppressive. Gay people are moving toward equal rights, and the insane war on marijuana users seems to be coming to an end. We're marginalizing the religious authoritarians more and more every day.

    5. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a foolish wingnut wrote your sig mi. You might want to do something about that. You wouldn't want people to think you're one of those lackwits, would you?

    6. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SAT exams are not just for govt institutions. So you are not cheating govt but you are cheating a fellow who was denied admission.

    7. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by KGIII · · Score: 1

      -1 Does Not Fit the Narrative...

      Seriously, we are an oppressed people living in a police state with the government seeking to completely remove our freedoms and to hand them over to the businesses that paid them to be elected. Because, you know, you can live on campaign funds after election and lobbyists can pay politicians and politicians can keep that money without being noticed and, another thing, they will all get C-level jobs from the lobbyist's corporate overlords later on in life.

      Fuck Poe...

      I am the 1%, I am the 99%...

      Also, you are Hitler. Godwin needs an invite too.

      *sighs* A grain of salt is trivial to acquire.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say a shrinking middle class is its own form of oppressiveness.

      -LaurenC

    9. Re:Nothing wrong with cheating the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, it's the capitalists who are oppressive. The government has yet to seriously infringe on my rights, but I fight constant battles with my employer, my internet provider, several financial institutions, car dealerships, and all kinds of local merchants and service providers who want to separate me from as MUCH money as possible.

      They are not trying to throw me in jail or execute me (so, to keep things in perspective, America aint that bad), but they are more than happy to make me a wage slave, and make me waste hours navigating their shitty customer service departments. They dont care if I have money to get that surgery I need, or if I have to take a second job to make ends meet.

  5. Mildly ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I find it mildly ironic that China's lengthy history of testing for public servants dating back millennia means they basically invented standardized testing...so they probably also invented cheating on standardized testing.

    1. Re:Mildly ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, exactly the opposite of irony as it is just what you would expect.

  6. Finger prints by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Just have a little ink pad at the desk where the tests are handed over... and have them put their left or right thumb print in a box next to the signature.

    Then when you scan the documents in, capture the thumb print and enter it into a database.

    If the same print shows up multiple times under different names then you know you have an issue.

    Easy peasy.

    I think I'm with Kin Jong Il when I say that I'm... so... roanry... why are people so stupid. Why can't them be intelligent... like me. :p

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Finger prints by jo7hs2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They already have you put your prints on the LSAT, actually.

    2. Re:Finger prints by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      There you go. So... we have a solution. Execute.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Finger prints by will_die · · Score: 2

      Took one of the high end security certifications a few weeks ago and they required that my photo be taken. That was printed on the pass certification and according to the test watcher sent up to the corporate office.
      Since it took multiple times until the software accepted the photo I am guessing they also do identification check.

    4. Re:Finger prints by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      If cheaters have gone through that length to cheat by faking a passport, biometric data isn't that difficult to fake either if the cheaters are willing to give theirs away for reproduction. It is just an additional technology to the cheating process.

    5. Re:Finger prints by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The fake passports don't need to pass an expert audit. You're not even getting a bored customs agent to look at it. You're getting an SAT TA to look at it... and they're not paying attention. They don't know how to spot a fake passport.

      A fake finger print can be done but it is harder than faking a passport to pass someone that isn't looking for fake passports, doesn't know what a fake passport looks like, isn't trained for it, and doesn't have an established protocol for dealing with fake IDs of any kind.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:Finger prints by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I suppose that is another way to do it. if the face recognition software is decent that would be fine as well.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    7. Re:Finger prints by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Duh. Obviously future lawyers are much more likely to be cheaters. Or they would be trying to get an honest job.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Finger prints by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I agree, entirely. This should be an easy thing to do with little cost and little room for error (and trivial oversight if there is an error). I have not taken the LSAT (IANAL) and such was not on the GRE nor the SAT way back when the Sun was young. It was not on the ASVAB either. Why yes, yes you CAN call me 'Doctor.' I would prefer it if you did not. The few times I have allowed it to become commonly known amongst my associates/acquaintances I have been asked medical questions.

      "I am not that kind of doctor but do you need some maths done?"
      "You may not that kind of doctor but I am sure you know a lot. Could you still look at..."
      "I never went to med school."
      "You must not be a very good doctor then!"

      *sigh* I only wish that the above was fabricated. This has, nearly verbatim, happened a number of times. I really should have associated with smarter people but you can not control who the host invites to the party.

      Thus it is generally a well-kept non-secret. I am also not egotistical enough to want to be called a doctor nor do I wish to append my name with Ph.D... That is just silly talk for egotistical people who are more concerned with the status than they are with their work.

      I have always wanted to reply with how I did my practicum at a hospital for discrete random variables that are irrational and worked to find non-functioning integers for the Mandelbrot set... It does not have to be logical, I just want to see the look on their faces. I never remember it in time though. I can only imagine that it would result in a question about how long I think it will take for my research to solve cancer, all cancers, and how much it will cost.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:Finger prints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to take credit for Shakespeare's solution?

    10. Re:Finger prints by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      All Chinese fingerprints look the same...

    11. Re:Finger prints by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Well, historically doctor just meant expert. It had nothing to do with medicine. I think you could be a construction doctor or a pastry doctor. It goes back to Rome.

      So I'm a little torn there. I'm okay with titles. I just think lots of people deserve them if anyone gets them.

      If you are a master of accounting or a master of computer networks then why not give them a title as well? It seems reasonable to me.

      Society should teat the people that make thing "work" with more respect. And those people are the experts. The "docÄ"res".

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    12. Re:Finger prints by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Be specific in what you're referring to... I was unaware they were taking people's finger prints to validate identity in Elizabethan England. *rolls eyes* ... ACs... I sometimes think you all collectively share the same brain cell... and it is ill.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  7. What is all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In China cheating your way into school, cheating your way through school, and cheating your way to a degree is perfectly normal. Anybody who does not do this is looked down upon as being dumber than a Greek who goes to a hospital and does not realise he has to bribe the doctor before he has any hope of getting his big bleeding open bone fracture treated.

    1. Re:What is all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know many Latinos in my area that share drivers licenses. One girl that even went to court as another girl for a traffic ticket she got.

    2. Re:What is all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this might explain their counterfeit culture. Perhaps Chinese in most professions are simply too fucking uneducated to do anything but copy, because they cheated their way in?

  8. Wait for further developements by Trachman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There were decades of twisted testing. Within graduate education world, I have personally met a large number of chinese nationals who barely could speak or write English, yet had perfect scores. Every graduate school knows this phenomena and this is the reason why certain asian related biases were formed. No doubt many of them are very smart people, but some just could not learn the language even in 3 or 4 years.

    Many graduate schools no longer pay significant attention to certain test and yes, unofficial quotes have been created to counter numerous candidates with perfect scores.

    I am waiting for further developments: perhaps a listing of thousands of people who benefited from imposter exam takers will be announced.

    1. Re:Wait for further developements by khchung · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Within graduate education world, I have personally met a large number of chinese nationals who barely could speak or write English, yet had perfect scores.

      Are you sure they also cannot READ English? Because READING is all you need to get perfect scores in GRE.

      I have met plenty of Chinese who can't speak or write English worth squat, and can't understand English spoken by the average American such as in the movies (cuz their teacher back in China mispronounced most of the words), BUT they can READ just fine.

      Reading is the only thing you can learn with only a dictionary and extreme discipline to study.

      --
      Oliver.
    2. Re:Wait for further developements by retchdog · · Score: 2

      It used to annoy me that the Chinese applicants to my program had a separate admissions group comprising exclusively Chinese professors.

      It still annoys me, but I realized that it's necessary since every single one has perfect test scores (including the TOEFL as you point out, which is just hirarious), glowing carbon-copy letters of recommendation, and a near-identical statement of interest. There's very little information to make a decision on a formal level, so you need to make best guesses based on province and other culture-specific cues.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    3. Re:Wait for further developements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many graduate schools no longer pay significant attention to certain test and yes, unofficial quotes have been created to counter numerous candidates with perfect scores.

      I was informed by several schools that my near-perfect score was actually counted higher than a perfect score for that reason.

    4. Re:Wait for further developements by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I examined their post and I am not sure if they hired a Chinese international to write it for them. I think they probably should not be throwing stones with all the windows that certainly surround them. I, of course, should not be throwing stones either. Rock fights are of no value. Bullets are just little rocks that can be thrown faster and more accurately.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Wait for further developements by digsbo · · Score: 2

      I had the sense that the Chinese students at my college formed a group in which a few males learned English and effectively segregated their female members away from interacting with the American students (no idea if this is common). so, for them, not really a matter of cannot learn the language, but more like "don't want to integrate, especially to allow the females to integrate". It worked OK until a professor required an oral presentation, which I'm certain was at least somewhat intentionally done to deny the Chinese students an easy "A".

    6. Re:Wait for further developements by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      A Chinese friend and I were discussing Chinese women.

      He told me I shouldn't bother. Any Chinese woman I could get anywhere with had already learned English and was ruined. Might as well just date Americans.

      His wife has been living in America for over 20 years and speaks no English, his kids speak unaccented Cantonese.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to play that card, but I've been hearing how my employer(s) can hire a PhD from China or India at half the price of an America or that we have to allow the, "cream of the crop," to enter the USA. But all I've heard about the education system from these two counties is that it's okay to cheat, in fact, it's expected in an apparent attempt to show you're serious about succeeding. And that's what its really about, succeeding at any cost. Glad to be so close to retirement and then I won't have to deal with this crap.

    1. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to play that card, but I've been hearing how my employer(s) can hire a PhD from China or India at half the price of an America or that we have to allow the, "cream of the crop," to enter the USA. But all I've heard about the education system from these two counties is that it's okay to cheat, in fact, it's expected in an apparent attempt to show you're serious about succeeding. And that's what its really about, succeeding at any cost. Glad to be so close to retirement and then I won't have to deal with this crap.

      Yes, please keep underestimating the Indians and Chinese, just like how the Americans have ridiculed the Japanese for years, all the way until they overtake you and left you behind. That way, it would be too late for your kids to try to catch up.

    2. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Glad to be so close to retirement and then I won't have to deal with this crap.

      You will NOT come out of this unscathed. None will. What will you do when inflation hits and thus marginalizes you life savings? What happens when -not if-, the US becomes insolvent. In fact, paying down the national debt is mathematically near impossible; or so it was last year. It hasn't exactly improved a year later.

      I'm reminded of the saying. What cannot go on forever, won't!

      Sorry AC, both the young, middle aged, and elderly are about to get get fucked badly. In different ways of course, but fucked none the less.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name literally any metric by which Japan has "left America behind." Birth decline by social outcasts maybe?

    4. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name literally any metric by which Japan has "left America behind." Birth decline by social outcasts maybe?

      -Electronics industry
      -Automotive industry

      There you go.

    5. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and when the GOP guts medicare and medicaid. Making you get work to get a group plan that let's you have a plan with out the pre existing conditions BS.

    6. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      ...it's okay to cheat, in fact, it's expected in an apparent attempt to show you're serious about succeeding. And that's what its really about, succeeding at any cost.

      So really, we should be importing our executives, not our engineers.

    7. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Also zombies...

    8. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Japanese auto industry is coasting on it's reputation. Honda and Toyota have both lost it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      The problem of Asians cheating is probably not as bad as the problem of Americans not even giving enough of a shit to even try cheating. If Asians represent the drive for success at any cost, Americans represent the lack of drive for success at all but the lowest costs. Asians are cheaters like how Americans are lazy moochers living off the wealth created by our ancestors. They are generalizations with a grain of truth.

    10. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      It's true that Honda and Toyota don't have much interesting going on beyond the new Civic Type R and the FRS (Which is actually a re-badged Subaru.). There are, of course, those rumors of a new Supra, but I'll believe that when I see it. And that airbag issue is just disgraceful.

      Mazda, Subaru, and Nissan however, are all putting out vehicles that are innovative, fantasic to drive, and every bit as reliable as Japan's reputation for quality would lead you to believe.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    11. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the entitlement system is going to get gutted or it's going to collapse since the current system is completely unsustainable.

    12. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.
      There's no sense in accepting this as the way of the world. Hire Western and you at least know you have some assurances about quality. Hire Chinese and you either get a diligent robot or a dirty cheat or both - neither of which inspire..

    13. Re:Ah, this is why we need H-1b VISAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work with both Indians and Chinese. I would say there isn't much to worry about. The Chinese are industrious, but have no sense about quality and will cut corners anytime they think no one is looking. The Indians like to boast, so if you listen to their talk you might get worried, until you realize that it's just talk and they completely incompetent and won't accomplish anything.

  10. They shoulda just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    came across the border in Texas, much easier, and can do multiple times. No passport needed.

  11. Look-a-like-a-chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all look a like.

  12. prints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the serious exams (LSATs, MCATs) required thumbprint?

    1. Re:prints by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      They do; but, calling the LSAT serious is somewhat comical. It is wildly mocked in legal circles as being almost pointless. To use a car analogy, in terms of usefulness in carrying an obese family of four, the SAT is to a mid-size sedan what the LSAT is to a Vespa scooter. I've taken this collosal waste of time and money. I got a sufficient score to get into law school with no preparation.

    2. Re:prints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SAT is to a mid-size sedan what the LSAT is to a Vespa scooter

      You didn't do so well on the analogy portion of your SAT, did you.

  13. nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    British Columbia had the problem of Chinese immigrants hiring others to take their driver's license test for them. It took yeas to try and sort out the cheters that had bought their driver's license this way and re-test them.

    BUT, don't make the mistake that this sort of abuse is just a Chinese thing. Every race has members that will game the system for their benefit. It's just part of being human.

  14. It's a terrible method, but the best we know... by sirwired · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The SAT/GRE/etc. are terrible ways of selecting students; they can be specifically prepped for, students can cheat, they exclude otherwise-worthy students who don't "test" well, etc. But for better or worse, they are about the best available.

    An "ideal" admissions method could somehow magically select the "best" students, but as any person who interviews and hires people can tell you, is rather difficult to do well. And impossible to do well on a mass scale. Employers, who have a huge vested interest in hiring only employees who will "work out" (given the utterly ridiculous costs of bringing somebody up to speed in a new workplace) haven't been able to figure this out yet. Colleges, who have a much smaller cost for admitting mediocre students, certainly aren't going to perfect this skill.

    Given the cost/time/scale constraints of a better process, heavily weighting admissions decisions on SAT scores is not the worst compromise that could be made.

    1. Re:It's a terrible method, but the best we know... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The SAT/GRE/etc. are terrible ways of selecting students; they can be specifically prepped for, students can cheat, they exclude otherwise-worthy students who don't "test" well, etc. But for better or worse, they are about the best available.

      The GRE is the graduate one. It's about the worse method in existence for selecting PhD students, and certainly not the best available. I'm not claiming it's perfect, but the system we use in the UK which is somewhat more ad-hoc is very substantially better.

      Then again, we have some grade obsession in that the EPSRC (who by the way are literally clowns: office uniform includes red nosesand floppy shoes, I'm led to believe) won't fund a PhD for someone with less than a 2:1. While there's a weak correlation with grades, some of the smartest people I've known didn't get a 2:1.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:It's a terrible method, but the best we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The GRE is the graduate one. It's about the worse method in existence for selecting PhD students, and certainly not the best available.

      The GRE does not "select" Ph.D. students - at least not at any major accredited institution in the US that I am aware of.

      The GRE *does* set the minimum bar for entry into a graduate program. The general GRE is indicative of how well an applicant can read, write, and reason, and how proficient they are at math and logic. Subject-specific GREs are indicative of how much of the subject matter an applicant retained through their first four years of college. (Not all accredited programs require subject-specific GREs for admission.)

      Ph.D. students are selected via Ph.D. preliminary exams. These are subject-specific exams that generally test whether you learned anything specific to your subject during your undergraduate education. You usually only get one or two chances to pass them. If you fail on these exams the highest degree you can earn from the program administering the exam is a Masters.

      When I took the prelims (electrical engineering) it was fairly complete. (I studied all of my undergraduate material for three months prior to taking it, so by the time I took the exam it was fairly easy.) I've since heard they've reduced the difficulty of the exam but I'm not sure what the rationale for that was.

    3. Re:It's a terrible method, but the best we know... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Yes, so GREs are necessary to get into a PHD program since they are the first cut. And again with the prelims, they're better, but a PhD is not exams, it's research, and exam at that point exams are just testing completely the wrong thing.

      Anyway the American PhD system has more wrong with it than just exams.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:It's a terrible method, but the best we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The SAT/GRE/etc. are terrible ways of selecting students;

      Why do you say that? There's a strong correlation between grades and SAT scores. It is by far the best way we have of judging a good candidate.

    5. Re:It's a terrible method, but the best we know... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      People can't get away with "not testing well" forever. Life is full of tests (both implicit and explicit). At some point "not testing well" is equivalent to incompetence. If you are super brilliant, but unable to summon this brilliance when it matters, what good is it?

      Not to say that testing can't be improved. The benchmark for a good test is how accurately it reflects reality. It's not impossible to have good tests. I have taken many good tests in college. They are usually open book, and require you to provide something beyond what a google search could provide. I'd say that "not testing well" in this sort of scenario just means you are less well equipped for life.

      I would say that it is possible to "not test well" for the SAT, given how detached from reality it is, except that it is also pretty easy, and most kids with good educations should be able to kill it, even without any specific SAT prep. The problem is dull kids doing well on the SAT through meaningless test preparation (i.e. prep to test well), which ideally wouldn't be possible with a good test.

  15. china is teach the test / solo work done as group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    china is teach the test / solo work done as group

  16. Ok So What About by g0bshiTe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fuckers that had these people take their exams? Should there not be some type of penalty for them as well?

    I mean imagine if you'd do this and that person went on to become a CEO? Wait nevermind, I see where I went wrong, this is completely acceptable behavior for CEO's or politicians.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:Ok So What About by PPH · · Score: 1

      I mean imagine if you'd do this and that person went on to become a CEO?

      The person you are standing in for is probably the son of some PLA general. And you still have relatives in China. So you will be returning and the general's idiot kid will be attending Harvard. And going on to be a CEO.

      So, yes. This is typical executive behavior.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  17. He was an ITT technician... by moorley · · Score: 1

    So will that be the next can do ad for ITT? We only hire the hidden talented and capable...

    HAHAHAHA!

    --
    "Don't fear death... fear not living..." -me :)
  18. Remember this story by tomhath · · Score: 2

    The next time you read yet another news article comparing the rate of anything across different countries. It doesn't matter what the rate is; infant mortality, math proficiency, whatever. They're all reported by the various countries and the numbers are whatever the country wants to report.

  19. SAT, high school, and college grades mean nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Posting anonymously for the obvious .

    I went to a tier one school for my city. All of the "smart kids" went there. However, my grades we so so. I graduated with a 3.3 GPA. I took the SAT three times. I was never able to break 500 on the math section. Strangely I did do a solid 600+ on the other sections. I never considered myself smart since it took me longer to actually learn things. My saving grace was public speaking ability and love of computers.

    I went to a 3rd tier college masquerading as a 1st tier school (most schools in New York State do this) and got a comm degree because I had some goofy idea of being a TV producer in Hollywood. That dream imploded after I realized how miserable that lifestyle is. I graduated college with a paltry 3.3 GPA. That was on coasting and apathy.

    I was fully prepared to join the military because if the super smart kids can't get jobs, why would me the 3.3 comm grad even get a real job?

    At the last minute before I handed in the OCS papers, I got an interview at a very large company doing support and development for an internal proprietary app. Apparently my part time work at the on campus IT department meant something. My first real job out of college got me $60k a year. I moved to a big city. I worked the job for three years and recently they've promoted me to a new position making $105k a year. I paid off all of my student loans in the first three years by living frugally.

    Meanwhile, all of those kids I knew who had better grades and scholarships than me are up to what nowadays? The majority of them got back onto the educational conveyor belt going to med or law school. The few success I know went into tech. Everyone else is up to their necks in student loan debt.

    TL;DR, grades, SAT scores, and school do not mean anything in a deflationary economic environment. The traditionally "intelligent" don't succeed because they don't know how to hustle. Hustling or "selling skills" are far more important than some bubble test. When I look to hire new people, I look for the ones with interesting life stories. They're the ones that get it. Not some millennial with a gender studies degree.

  20. Got nothing on the Cubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This place being what it is, there's bound to be an attempt to paint this as related to the culture of the cheaters. But never forget that the quote "If you're not cheating, you're not trying" was made famous by Chicago Cubs player Mark Grace.

    1. Re:Got nothing on the Cubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the quote was older than Mark Grace

  21. This reminds me of a song I once heard: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't sit next to me just because I'm asian. By the bruce lee band.

  22. Imagine an all white country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... wouldn't that be AWFUL. For non-whites... They'd have to live around their own kind, which would be just awful for them, wouldn't it.

  23. Re:SAT, high school, and college grades mean nothi by retchdog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, you are "some millennial with a [communications] degree".

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  24. just kiddin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah.

    The most famous of them is called - (Mike Ross) and is notorious for taking LSATs for US students and scoring quite high ;)

  25. more of a negative indicator by peter303 · · Score: 2

    If you dont get at least 650 on the Quatitative, then you wont do well in STEM. That test is pretty basic.

  26. once you start, can you stop? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    A paper was retracted in the prestigious Science Journal yesterday because a grad student had faked the data for it. This was discovered by others analyzing the data and trying to reproduce it. Cheating endemic in school, but you cant fake your way in the real world.

    1. Re:once you start, can you stop? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      What about politicians? This is not a joke. I am serious enough to ask. I think they may be an exception to your statement and that you may have overlooked them accidentally.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  27. they also invented meriotocracy by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Middle class Chinese could become comfortable civil servants if they did well on tests. This was the original aim of the SAT, as a gateway for the middle class into prestigious colleges. (Rural Chinese couldnt afford te time for the heavy memorization to take the tests.)

  28. plenty US test cheating scandals by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Teachers and administrators in Atlanta were sentanced to jail for altering test sheets on a massive scale. Rare that they have court cases.
    A few years back a New York guy took tests for fellow students for a fee. paid his way through college before get causght. I forget his sentence.

    1. Re:plenty US test cheating scandals by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The guy that took the bar exam for Ted Kennedy confessed some years later.

      He was disbarred. Ted kept his place in the Senate.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  29. Great... by Translation+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we have Chinese grade farmers.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  30. A Good Solution by u19925 · · Score: 1

    The SAT exam centers should take candidate photos as well. When reporting your score, it will also provide a link where institution can verify student photo.

    1. Re:A Good Solution by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      At least scan in whatever photo ID the test taker is showing up with.

    2. Re:A Good Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who knew that there were so many 5'4" Asians on NCAA basketball scholarships.....

  31. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't be too impressed about "social intelligence". Sure, a minimum of it is necessary - those chess-playing autists gets nowhere.

    This chess-playing autist earned $380,000 at Google last year, not including GSUs (stock). Paid off the mortgage on my $1.5M house in the good part of Mountain View. Can't believe it took me 6 years from date of purchase, but I didn't want to sell any stock to do it.

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      congratulations on being an exception...

  32. This is news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that was common knowledge by now. A lot of times, this is done by/with rich kids.

  33. To the people who think this is not serious... by tlambert · · Score: 2

    To the people who think this is not serious... these tests are also used to determine who does or does not get scholarships.

    A full ride scholarship means you do not pay for tuition, books, or even living expenses, if you live in a dorm. Lesser scholarships may only cover tuition + books, or tuition.

    Still, given all the bitching about student loan debt: consider that these people, *minimally* get out with one year less of loan debt.

    If they can additionally either keep their grades up themselves, or have someone do it for them, they can keep renewing the scholarship, and graduate with zero loan debt, compared to the rest of the schlubs who are coming out with a quarter million or more in student loan debt.

    Further, fraudulently obtaining a scholarship this way means one less scholarship for a truly academically gifted person, who ends up paying the freight themselves, and if they do not come from a silver spoon background, it means they graduate with debt they would otherwise not have had. Even if they are a silver spoon case, they've lost the time value of money spent out of pocket, which translated to a smaller inheritance/trust fund/whatever.

    This is, in fact a big deal. We are talking really large amounts of money here.

    As a final consideration, this: the people taking these tests over and over for different people each time: they've had a *hell of a lot* of practice at this point. They are likely very, very good at it.

  34. Re:SAT, high school, and college grades mean nothi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares, I make six figures while the traditional "smart" kids are saddled with $35-50k in debt working for some a pittance. My favorite is a Cornell engineer who graduated top of his class and now makes $45k even after three years of work. Lets not forget the law school kids who took on an 100k extra in debt for the privilege of being glorified paper pushers.

    Grades mean nothing when you have no life direction which is the problem most students have. Nothing of value was lost either, I can't stand working and employing the nitwits coming out of colleges these days.

  35. How do you disentangle the effects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scoring well on the SAT gives you the opportunity to go to a good college. And getting a good GPA from a good college gives you the opportunity to get a good job. But there are people who are quite successful doing neither. So the question is if you disentangle the effects of the opportunities does getting a good SAT score actually mean anything.

  36. It figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you go to get your phone unlocked, to buy goods unavailable anywhere else in the country, to do dubious, dodgy transactions?

  37. Re:SAT, high school, and college grades mean nothi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "TL;DR I got lucky and someone took a chance on me despite my average grades, average test scores, and below average university program. Now that I'm experienced, I refuse to consider people like my younger self for employment. *pulls up ladder behind self* "

  38. Cheating?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how when a person exploits a loophole, it's considered cheating. When a company/government does it, it's "savvy"

  39. unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately FTA is unsurprising. Cheating in uni is so rampant that it is, at times, funny. I saw a third year EE asked what Kirchoff's laws are, and he and drew a blank. He'd done no work in the last five or six months, and literally could not remember the two equations that we used almost every day in almost every class, at one scale or another, explicitly or not.

    The worst is those who know a language that the teachers and TAs do not. The open talking in exams was really distracting. I could not believe that they were not being reprimanded or expelled. There was a low hubbub in most exams, with occasional rare exceptions: exams in a gym I remember being much quieter, cheating was still really easy to see and moderately distracting, and occasionally a prof would print individualized exams. Core courses never did.

    I was not impressed.

    So TFA does not surprise me either.

    Posting AC since some of those are now managers!

  40. LMAO: Figures - you're a mere "PHB"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: NOW, I've got your "number down" - you're clueless!

    * That explains everything about you now, lol... makes sense!

    As to your "business acumen" - do you actually HAVE a degree in it? I do. As to you? Hell - I truly SERIOUSLY doubt it!

    Especially after my having to SCHOOL YOUR DUMB ASS on it here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Regarding your idiotic "it's OK for MS to lose money" & clue:

    NO, IT'S NOT DUMBASS!

    New NEWS/NewsFlash - Upper Mgt. & Boards of Directors have a FUDICIARY DUTY TO STOCKHOLDERS TO KEEP IT COMING IN + TO PRODUCE GROWTH, stupid... NOT to "tolerate" loss makers (like you obviously are with that line of UTTERLY CLUELESS BULLSHIT out of you!)

    APK

    P.S.=> That's for your line of bullshit to me here the other day, prick -> http://linux.slashdot.org/comm... & THANK GOD I don't have to put up with bullshitters like YOU anymore, having decided to run my own SUCCESSFUL business instead years ago... apk

    1. Re:LMAO: Figures - you're a mere "PHB"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derp... I am an Applied Mathematics graduate (yes, a Ph.D) who started his own business modeling traffic before they even thought about doing it on a computer. I have a Masters in EE from the same, highly reputable, institution. We, and I mean I as well, built much of our hardware ourselves back then. I am since retired. I sold my business for more than I can ever spend and am happy for it.

      So, yes, I am every bit a PHB but you are still insane. (Note that I do not debate the use of the hosts file. In fact I have contributed to the MVPs Hosts File in the past. That does not make you sane, nor should it. Embrace your insanity and keep on doing what you are doing you shining star, you!) Really, shine on you crazy diamond.

      KGIII

      (Posting as AC which means I probably won't see a reply. I would not post AC but /. is insane and says I have been a bit too prolific with my posting. Absolutist ninnies.)

  41. Not Cheating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The students involved are "leveraging their core competencies" in an "innovative" manner, using "right-sourcing" and achieving "synergies" in a dynamic "marketplace" in order to remain "globally competitive".

  42. How is this a crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a crime. Lying to a business isn't illegal.

  43. Are you also a licensed & degreed... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am every bit a PHB but you are still insane." - by KGIII (973947) on Friday May 29, 2015 @05:07PM (#49801895)

    See subject: Psychiatric sciences pro? If not, you've just libeled me (and, you're not by your own admission, per your ALLEGED credentials, you're not) - smarten up!

    * For a guy who has those types of degrees, allegedly?

    Man, you really should watch what you say, & THINK before speaking - it's not intelligent otherwise!

    However: It shows YOU may be a "wee bit" insane actually, & being a 'pot calling a kettle black' hypocrite - you're not considering the consequences of your actions... for some, doing THAT is the very defintion of insanity.

    "(Note that I do not debate the use of the hosts file. In fact I have contributed to the MVPs Hosts File in the past. That does not make you sane, nor should it. Embrace your insanity and keep on doing what you are doing you shining star, you!) Really, shine on you crazy diamond." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29, 2015 @05:07PM (#49801895)

    Sorry man - Wrong: I'm not crazy here.

    Apparently, you are, per "The insanity defense reflects the generally accepted notion that persons who cannot appreciate the consequences of their actions should not be punished for criminal acts" from -> http://legal-dictionary.thefre...

    PLUS, again: Your business saavy NEEDS WORK http://slashdot.org/comments.p... since losing money != good business for the reasons I noted there AND BUYBACKS are fueling fake growth lately...

    * Glad to hear you're intelligent enough to use a custom hosts file though. It's your 1 saving grace in my eyes... + I 'fixed' your words quoted placing your REAL NAME into them, since you posted ac THIS time, for posterities' sake!

    APK

    P.S.=> Still - Not only are you an ADMITTED "PHB", but you're also not very smart for doing that (for a guy who has some smarts per your alleged credentials) - I've seen that before from 'book smart' folks though who don't have a lick of sense in "the streets" or life... apk