Slashdot Mirror


Making an AR-15 In the Wired San Francisco Office

An anonymous reader writes: Wired's writer Andy Greenberg writes about his experience fabricating an AR-15 lower receiver with the Ghost Gunner CNC mill. (That's the same device that was demoed in a Slashdot video earlier this year.) Greenberg points out that CNC millng isn't new, but reports nonetheless: "Aside from a single brief hardware hiccup, it worked remarkably well. In fact, the Ghost Gunner worked so well that it may signal a new era in the gun control debate, one where the barrier to legally building an untraceable, durable, and deadly semiautomatic rifle has reached an unprecedented low point in cost and skill."

3 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fabricating an assualt rifle in California... by random+coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Its not an assault rifle. Those have been banned nationwide since 1986, and controlled/registered nationwide since 1934.

    Semi-auto rifles are legal in California, but the state heavily regulates cosmetic features for some reason(I guess to prevent feelzbad).
    AR15's can be made legally with proper care two different ways. Heck even after NY tried to make them illegal, those ingenious gun owners came up with a way to make them fit within the law there.

  2. Re:This whole make your own gun is like the homebr by Talderas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kids want to get drunk now, not in a month.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  3. Re:Fabricating an assualt rifle in California... by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually:
    "Assault Weapon" is the term made-up by gun-control spin doctors.
    "Assault Rifle" is a US military term for a fighting rifle in intermediate caliber (not pistol, not long action) capable of full-auto and/or burst fire.

    AR-15 is (as you know) not an Assault Rifle.
    M4 is an Assault Rifle.
    They function differently, but to most folks, they appear exactly the same. This is how gun-control types inject fear, uncertainty and doubt into the debate.

    The GCA banned the manufacture of transferable "machine guns" made after May '86.
    The GCA, therefore reduces the supply-side of the equation for transferable full-autos. Transferable M-16s cost in excess of $10,000, plus the $200 excise tax to transfer them from one owner to the next.
    An individual may legally own a full-auto capable weapon provided that they pass the strict NFA (National Firearms Act) requirements and that the weapon was made before May of '86.

    IANAL etc

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org