Slashdot Mirror


Siri, Cortana and Google Have Nothing On SoundHound's Speech Recognition

MojoKid writes: Your digital voice assistant app is incompetent. Yes, Siri can give you a list of Italian restaurants in the area, Cortana will happily look up the weather, and Google Now will send a text message, if you ask it to. But compared to Hound, the newest voice search app on the block, all three of the aforementioned assistants might as well be bumbling idiots trying to outwit a fast talking rocket scientist. At its core, Hound is the same type of app — you bark commands or ask questions about any number of topics and it responds intelligently. And quickly. What's different about Hound compared to Siri, Cortana, and Google Now is that it's freakishly fast and understands complex queries that would have the others hunched in the fetal position, thumb in mouth. Check out the demo. It's pretty impressive.

9 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Holy shit by rebelwarlock · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could you suck SoundHound's cock a little harder? This is the most shameless bullshit I've seen all day, and I just watched Kayne West talk for 30 seconds.

  2. Reasons to be skeptical by sideslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. This demo was likely created by an engineer or sales person with SoundHound. More impressive would be a demo by a third party journalist or reviewer without a vested interest.
    2. The impressive speed probably won't scale to the millions of simultaneous users Siri, Google Now, and Cortana support (assuming audio is processed in the cloud, which I admittedly don't know for sure).
    3. Obviously the demo uses phrases that work. I guarantee you an ordinary person will often get "Sorry, I didn't understand the question" or whatever SoundHound's equivalent is.
    4. While it sounds impressive at first blush, nobody really cares how many days it is between next Tuesday and Christmas of 2025. And that happens to be not only useless, but also pretty easy to special-case in your expert system / AI logic. So how about a demo that answers the question: "How can you make a mushroom omelette without soggy mushrooms?"

    1. Re:Reasons to be skeptical by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also good to be skeptical if this thing doesn't do all of the work on the handheld device and simply send the parsed text to the search engine or other central server to retrieve only the relevant information.

      I mean, c'mon already! I had Dragon running on a friggin' Macintosh LCII in elementary school! That thing was running System 7.1 on a Motorola 68030 with 4MB RAM. Why cant my multi-Gigahertz smartphone with 64GB storage and 4GB RAM do the basic speech-to-text locally that a 25 year old Macintosh can?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Reasons to be skeptical by Drew+M. · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually you can increase the speed of the speaking voice on Android in Settings -> Language & input -> Text-to-speech output -> Speech rate, that's what was done for this video. The recording is at normal speed.

      Feel free to test it yourself, you'll notice the results are completely different from Wolfram Alpha:
      https://play.google.com/store/...

      Just cleaning up the FUD, yes I work at SoundHound ;)

  3. Charming by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your digital voice assistant app is incompetent. ...bumbling idiots trying to outwit a fast talking rocket scientist. ...
    hunched in the fetal position, thumb in mouth.

    Do you have to be such a douche about it?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  4. Re:Yes, but can it launch Waze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I take it you don't know what a homophone is so you relied on some website to check for you?

    Because if you actually read what GP wrote you might notice that "waze" (which is not a dictionary word) sounds identical to "ways" (which is a dictionary word). Depending, of course, on how you pronounce ways. But a native English speaker (are you?) is almost certainly going to pronounce "waze" identically to "ways".

    Whether or not this would actually result in a problem with the app being slashvertised is a different matter entirely. But I hope you have a somewhat better understanding of what homophones are and how this could be seen as a problem for such an application.

  5. Re:Yes, but can it launch Waze by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Funny

    What we have just learned is that SoundHound has better comprehension than some Slashdot commenters :)

  6. Re:Yes, but can it launch Waze by saider · · Score: 5, Funny

    The correct answer is a number around 650k. This program is smarter than multiple slashdot commenters.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  7. A more honest title by r1348 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Please buy us out!"