Slashdot Mirror


US Bombs ISIS Command Center After Terrorist Posts Selfie Online

HughPickens.com writes: Brian Everstine writes at Air Force Times that U.S. intelligence officers were able to locate and bomb an Islamic State command center based on a photo and comments in social media. "The [airmen are] combing through social media and they see some moron standing at this command," said Gen. Hawk Carlisle, commander of Air Combat Command. "And in some social media, open forum, bragging about command and control capabilities for Da'esh, ISIL, And these guys go 'ah, we got an in.' So they do some work, long story short, about 22 hours later through that very building, three JDAMS take that entire building out. Through social media. It was a post on social media. Bombs on target in 22 hours."

Carlisle was careful to not go into great detail about the how the information was gathered and what additional effort went into targeting those bombs. It's easy to imagine that in addition to the information gleaned from the initial post that the Air Force used satellite and drone reconnaissance data. It's also possible that U.S. intelligence could have actively engaged with the original poster in order to draw out information. Attackers and researchers have shown time and time again that simply asking a target for information—either by posing as a trusted individual or using carefully created phishing attacks—works even better than fancy information-stealing digital attacks.

5 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. So, anyone else see a problem here? by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone else considered the potential implications of "terrorist posts geostamped selfie, gets bombed"?

    I predict we'll see "swatting" taken to a whole new level.

  2. Re:Next time turn off geo tagging by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, they just stand outside things they want to blow up and rather than actually having to do all the hard work just take a selfie with gps coordinated in the exif and post if to facebook with "ISIS new headquarters" at the description/title/whatever.

  3. Re:but reporting about it is just as bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Assuming the story is true. It could be a good cover story for some other type of intelligence gathering. Plus if you can get Daesh to stop using social media, it could be a good thing.

  4. Re:but reporting about it is just as bad... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first thoughts are
    1. Secondary story to cover a primary tool being used, which they do not want to expose. Kinda like 'giving carrots to pilots' was a cover for development of radar
    2. Striking fear into an enemy, which prevents them from using a primary recruiting tool
    3. Wanting to trumpet successes while programs are facing restrictive laws in Congress, the Courts and public opinion

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  5. Re:Good. by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we should bomb anybody who takes a "selfie".

    And we should torture the person who came up with that word.