Slashdot Mirror


Feds Want To Unmask Internet Commenters Writing About the Silk Road Trial Judge

An anonymous reader writes: A grand jury subpoena, obtained by Ken White of the law blog Popehat, demands that libertarian news magazine Reason hand over "any and all identifying information" about certain commenters posting on an article published May 31st, "Silk Road Trial: Read Ross Ulbricht's Haunting Sentencing Letter to Judge." The subpoena cites a law against "interstate threats" as the reason for demanding the information, which the Supreme Court very recently decided must include real intent.

As White points out, the comments — repugnant as they are — may very well not constitute a true threat, as they aren't directed at the judge and don't detail any real plans for violence. The kicker: although it's possible to fight the subpoena, precedent suggests the U.S. Attorney's office may have the power to obtain the information anyway. However the situation shakes out, this isn't nearly the first fight over commenter anonymity and the First Amendment, and certainly won't be the last.

1 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. It's a shame by plazman30 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The "Drug War" is a sham. All it does is perpetuates violence and abuse. What Ulbrecht should have done is use his profits to hire lawyers and lobbyists to get the laws in this country changed to decriminalize the exact business he was in. Of course it would have been a huge uphill battle. The CIA and the Mob don't like competition. And the private prison system doesn't like the idea of empty cells. And considering the severity of the sentencing, I'm pretty sure the judge made up her mind long before the verdict was issued, and decided to use this man as an example to make sure no one else gets the idea of repeating his brief success.