Slashdot Mirror
Kaspersky Explains Why They Won't Say Who Hacked Them
New submitter ChannelGonzo writes: Larry Walsh at Channelnomics scores the scoop in a Q&A with Kaspersky's Chris Doggett who says it's not the Russian security company's job to figure out who is responsible for a sophisticated cyber attack on its corporate network over the past few months. "We believe that to go beyond our area of expertise and speculate on the possible sources of attacks is not in the best interest of our customers," Doggett said.
Obviously it's for reasons which have nothing to do with the truth being embarrassing.
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
again?
Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
Why not us for a change? Dammit, the Russians and Chinese don't have the monopoly on being able to hack something, ya know?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Now, now. They fucked up, but that's no reason to start name calling. It's not ok to call a security company Norton. NO matter how much they fucked up.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
1. they don't know. 2 they don't care. 3. they like it.
If I do it standing up, I am "safe", right?
This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
No, they don't, they just have a monopoly on getting caught often. We get caught less because we're better at it. It generally takes a traitor for us to get caught.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
I don't see what shooting black people has to do with any of this.