Slashdot Mirror


Judge Orders Dutch Government To Finally Take Action On Climate Promises

New submitter Errol backfiring writes: Although the Dutch government has promised to make sure carbon emissions are lowered considerably, they have consistently failed to take action. Dutch climate group Urgenda and Dutch citizens have gone to court to force the government to take action, and the verdict (linked page is in Dutch) is that the government must reduce emissions by at least 25% compared to 1990 leves.

This 25% cut is seen as the minimum effort needed to keep the people safe from climate change dangers. 25% to 40% is the norm in international climate policy. The verdict is also important for similar climate groups in other countries.

3 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Separation of powers or the rule of law, anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yup, as another poster said: "cue libertarian outrage" alright.

    This isn't pulled out of the court's ass. The Dutch government made promises and then tried to back out of them. Their own court has said, "No, you made binding promises, now keep them." Which is what most contract law is about, and what most sane courts enforce.

  2. Re:No such thing, it's been proven to be a hoax by hort_wort · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all about government control and increasing taxation, while giving backhanders to the oligarchs that control the planet.

    I can't believe people are falling for it. And as to those "scientists", they cost less than a single lobbyist for a real cause. The govt tells them to keep the story running or they'll lose tenure and grants. You think they care about the people when they have income for life for doing as they're told a few days of the year?

    You do realize that a scientist who actually disproves anthropogenic climate change would become filthy rich from the oil companies, right?

  3. Re:Separation of powers or the rule of law, anyone by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, given how much of Holland is below sea level (26%) ... you can kind of see that they might give a damn about rising sea levels.

    Since when the hell is it shocking that a government has an "independent legal obligation towards their citizens".

    As opposed to, what, an independent legal obligation to its fucking corporations?

    This isn't an authoritarian dictatorship, it's a rejection of the stupid idea that government doesn't owe a duty of care and concern for its citizens. That's kind of the purpose of governments, despite all the delusional rantings to the contrary we see around here.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.