Slashdot Mirror


Students Win Prize For Color-Changing Condoms That Detect STDs

New submitter PJ6 writes: Three students attending the Isaac Newton Academy in the UK won the Healthcare Category of the Teen Tech Awards, for their idea to use antibodies to create color-changing condoms to recognize STDs. They say the material, which is still in the concept stage, will turn green for chlamydia, yellow for herpes, purple for HPV, and blue for syphilis. The BBC reports: "The boys said they still have to test the science and feasibility of their idea. They want to work with a university on the science and say they've already been contacted by a condom company which is interested in working with them on developing the concept further."

33 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Must it be a condom? by briancox2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about just a small sample bit of test material that is packaged with the condom?
    As it stands you'd have to dip it in before you got the feedback. I'd prefer the feedback up front, I would think.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    1. Re:Must it be a condom? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2
      You missed:

      still in the concept stage

      That means it's just an IDEA. Well, hell. I want an award for my idea of a thing just like a Star-Trek replicator, except it makes really cool sparkly FX when it operates.

    2. Re:Must it be a condom? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an even better idea! How about a condom that kills all known STDs while you're doing the deed. That's a much better idea than one that just changes color. It can have enzymes in it. I predict the whole STD thing will be history within a decade.

      Please send my prize to the usual address...

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Must it be a condom? by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Just supply a few smaller versions of the condom that are finger sized. Then you don't need the dip test on the real thing.

    4. Re:Must it be a condom? by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why limit it to just STDs? Or even just to diseases. How about cure all medical conditions. Should be pretty easy thing to accomplish.

    5. Re:Must it be a condom? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because when you're getting laid the last thing you want to do is pull out (or be pulled out of), discovered the condom broke and is now a rainbow of colors.

    6. Re:Must it be a condom? by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because traditions have gone out the fucking window in favor of getting laid as quickly as geographically possible. ...

      Yeah, they went out the window a couple thousand years ago. But please continue believing that your imaginary society ever existed.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re: Must it be a condom? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Three years ago when my organization convened in Reno, one of our speakers was a local madam who explained how this works.

    8. Re:Must it be a condom? by CaptQuark · · Score: 2

      Ummm... Will it change different colors if the STD is detected INSIDE the condom or OUTSIDE? Which partner are they testing?

      --

  2. Lot of test. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeo. They need to do lots of tests. Lot and lots of tests.
    They are now looking for female vilunteers to help them out.

    1. Re:Lot of test. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      I just hope theyre not thinking of doing automation tests :) Performance and Penetration testing should be interesting though!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re: Lot of test. by LazyBoot · · Score: 2

      I have 2 words for you "control group"

    3. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, the whips and chains might be a dead giveaway...

    4. Re: Lot of test. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Wish I had mod points for this AC.

    5. Re:Lot of test. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

      A Sybian?

      Don't ask me how I know about them.

    6. Re: Lot of test. by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      the Domination community also has that problem, and you AGREE with Me DON'T YOU, You Little Sniveling Twink

  3. "Win Prize" by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    Who cares that they won a prize? They did something useful and nerdy. Can't we just be happy about that? #slashdot

    1. Re:"Win Prize" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a bit of an odd prize, because all they did was suggest an idea. No working prototype or anything like that, just "wouldn't it be good if..."

      In fact the idea might be a bit half-bakes because by the time the antibodies have reacted (and BTW how do you keep them alive for months or even years in the packet?) the condom will probably have been discarded. It's also rather anti-social and possibly illegal to perform medical tests on someone without their consent, which seems to be the point of this thing otherwise why not just provide a more traditional testing kit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:"Win Prize" by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

      Actually that's good. Now I get to develop a competing product. Of course I will need to do a lot of testing. At least, that's my story and I'm sticking it.

      I know I'm milking it, but if at first you don't suceed ,,,

    3. Re:"Win Prize" by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only I had sent in my concept of a condom that miraculously kills all those diseases and also HIV, cancer and the common cold, I would have won.

      There is nothing useful or nerdy here.
      Neither the product nor any of it's features are currently possible.
      There is no invention, no science, no ingenuity here, just an idea.

      Ideas are a dime a dozen, it's being able to implement those ideas that matters.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  4. Add one more colour by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Funny

    Red for stupidity.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  5. Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just to be clear, they haven't invented jack shit. It's just a "concept". These three kids made a presentation of "Wouldn't it be great if..." and won a prize. It isn't science, it's creative writing.

    1. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All professional jealousy aside, though, Da Vinci is often credited with "inventing" the helicopter, submarine, etc. Sometimes "just a concept" counts as an invention.

    2. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Just a concept" are a dime a dozen. It's the execution that counts.

  6. Re:I thought the point was protection? by magusxxx · · Score: 2

    No, for the same reason you're not also 100% protected from pregnancy.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  7. Re:I thought the point was protection? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well you get to have sex. Pull out. Look at the color of the condom and say "Good thing I wore this you skank whore."

  8. False Positives? by darkain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, the science hasn't even been tested yet... So, what is this, just hopeful, wishful thinking? What is the false positive rate? More importantly, what other chemicals trigger a false positive?

    Remember that "date rape testing fingernail polish" that went super viral? Awesome in theory, horrible in practice. Milk causes a false positive with it. How many drinks nowadays contain some form of milk? Rumchata and White Russians both come to mind instantly. [in before "in soviet russia" joke]

  9. Re:Turn Your Head And Cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    We used to call them vibrators, but selfie stick is OK too, I guess.

  10. Re:fully half baked by Kester1964 · · Score: 2

    Firstly, the condom will not only work on females it will also work on males as well. So the woman will also be able to request that the man wear the condom she has in her purse just in case she gets lucky.

    Secondly, you were still going to have sex with her/him without the STD detecting condom, right? Now, if the condom changes colour, after you had sex, you can still visit your doctor or local STD clinic for treatment the next day without waiting until your next test and thus help reduce the spread of STDs.

  11. Re:fully half baked by sound+vision · · Score: 2

    The idea is great. Currently someone has to go to a clinic, have a test administered, then wait a couple of weeks for the results. With this condom, you can get an early indication of... issues. For me, if it changed color, that would be a good indication that I will never have unprotected sex with this person and would know to disconsider them as a long-term partner.

    Really, your post gives the impression that you don't know much about how sexual relations work. Using a condom with someone who potentially has an STD does not "defeat the purpose", it is the purpose. It allows you to have sex with someone whose infection status you're unsure of, without getting the infection. If you know someone is clean, you don't need to be dealing with condoms in the first place.

    I won't pretend to be some kind of playboy, but it should be apparent that most relationships start out more like 1-night-stands than arranged marriages. There's usually not a formal interview process including STD test before the first sexual encounter. Hell, there's barely time to even get a condom on. This product would be a godsend for slowing the proliferation of STDs. Regardless of your strategy for obtaining sex, that's going to benefit you.

  12. Huh? This doesn't make sense by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This material, which is still in the concept stage..."

    That's ridiculous. How is this different than sitting around bullshitting with your friends about how cool it would be to have flying cars? "Wouldn't it be cool if you had a condom that changed color when an std was present?"

    And hey, look at that, they've already picked the colors!

    This is absurd for so many reasons.
    1) as most people familiar with condoms would recognize, when a condom's in full use it's quite frequently dark and/or not exactly exposed to where you can see it.
    2) I'm not really interested in using my dong as the dipstick, no matter what it's sheathed in. I'd really rather know the STD status *before* the dick goes in
    3) considering the really rather astonishing materials science behind the construction of condoms, it's not like one can easily mix in additives - anything that's going to be part of the latex but isn't directly contributing to strength is going to be a weakness. And what are its ongoing effects on the latex over the long shelf-life and sometimes difficult storage conditions (ie wallet for far too long)? You going to use such a condom if the failure rate is 2x-3x that of normal condoms?
    4) the "magic" substance that changes colors in the presence of an STD has YET TO BE INVENTED.

    Christ.

    --
    -Styopa
  13. Re:Huh? This doesn't make sense by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    "1) as most people familiar with condoms would recognize, when a condom's in full use it's quite frequently dark and/or not exactly exposed to where you can see it."

    BOOM - my invention is to make the colors glow in the dark. Hold on while I call my patent lawyer...

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  14. inside or out by Punko · · Score: 2

    Is the colour meant to display for the condition of the wearer (which could be a display in advance of coitus) or for the condition of the partner (which is a display after coitus)?

    Folks seem to be focusing on the partner's condition here. I think this idea would be far more valuable to the partner. Here put this on and we'll - hang on - blue plus yellow means clamidia and the clap - sorry fella - no joy for you. Warning of impending risk is far better than - hey wow, she's was really loaded up with bugs.

    A raincoat will keep you dry in the rain, checking the weather may keep you from going out in the rain in the first place.

    --
    If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands