AppleCare+ Now Covers Batteries That Drop To 80%
Mark Wilson writes with news that Apple's AppleCare+ plan has been updated to address one of the biggest worries that people have about products with non-removeable batteries, and that become very expensive paperweights when the juice runs out. From BetaNews: "Previously, the extended warranty only covered batteries that would hold 50 percent charge or less. Now this has been updated so that you can request a free replacement within the coverage period if your device's battery is only able to hold 80 percent of full charge. The new terms to no apply to everyone — it all depends on when you bought your Apple device. If you bought your iPhone, iPad, iPod or Apple Watch before April 10, 2015, you're stuck with the old terms. I wish this change applied to my MacBook Air, with which I'm lucky to get 90 minutes of battery power.
When people applaud Apple, design is often one of the things they applaud. How about non-removable batteries as bad design?
I bought an Android partly because I can carry a tiny spare battery, and replace it if needed, instead of carrying a charger or an even bigger battery to charge my phone.
Hence, the POS iphone's true value is about $6.49.
Value of a clueless gay apple user: priceless.
Do people choose to become clueless gay apple users? Or is it genetic?
Perhaps Apple could build usable phones that actually last a full day on their battery instead of competing for the biggest buzzword of the moment and be able to say: "Look, this is the thinnest phone on the market". It bends easily, it breaks easily, it's got an awful battery, but ei, they can state it's the thinnest phone on the market.
My battery does that. I just looked and it shows 66. I am due a new battery!
Yes.
Used to be everything got smaller and smaller. Then they realized... no, people don't really want or need small. So then everything gets bigger and bigger. No where else to go so they decide to make thinner. Why? Sorry, that's beyond me.
But if they make it thinner they can't have a replaceable batt. And it seems more and more companies are pushing the thinner and not really stating you can't replace the batt.
Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
If your MacBook Air only gets 90 minutes of runtime, you're way below the 50% mark anyways.
Go away. You are a fool.
"The new terms to no apply to everyone".
Slashdot make hard word sentence coherent, EVER?
well, yes when power management on say a new tablet means that you can run for ten hours and more continuously with the wifi and bluetooth on.
Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
when you got a laptop that boasts "up to 12 hours" of battery life - and it's from apple, so there's usually some truth to this claim - yes, you're using it wrong. i don't know if it's even possible to drain a recent mbp in 90 minutes.
90 minutes is what I get from a crusty used laptop acquired from eBay. But we have moved into a world where 5 hour battery lives are not unreasonable to expect from new machines.
Hey Mark Wilson, quit whining and just replace your battery. If you can't work a screwdriver yourself, I'm sure someone around here still knows how. You can buy replacement batteries on eBay, Amazon, or ifixit.com even comes with detailed instructions. Most models take about 10 minutes.
The replacement of batteries for most macbooks is trivial.
I have an iPhone 1; it was given to me in 2007 as part of the Apple iPhone giveaway to employees.
It is now 8 years old. And using the original battery, and not having charge or capacity problems.
The only people who care about removable batteries are the people who want to have multiple batteries so that they can replace them in order to maintain a more or less continuous duty cycle for the device.
For those people, there are cases with integrated batteries they could use as an external power source.
it just works!
fucking lemmings
I know a guy who is a big Apple fan but he won't use certain functions/apps on his phone because he wants the battery to last all day. Mostly he will not use any app that turns on the GPS.
I want to use everything on my phone and not worry about it, so unless I can have the GPS and Bluetooth on for a full day and still have a comfortable margin left to plug it in at night I'm looking for a phone with a removable battery.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
I find battery stats to be quite wrong in most cases. For one thing it is a known fact that smartphones drain the battery faster just when you are in an area with a weak or slow connection. So many variables involved it's a bit rediculous for any phone maker to make a claim on their battery life. Therefore I cannot rely on that number when dumping close to $1K on a handheld device.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
A battery that is not user-serviceable still needs some sort of wrapper. But it doesn't need a separate case thick enough to shield the battery from rough handling while out of the device.
Just because heterosexuals tend to choose Android and Windows
I thought Windows had been for metrosexuals since Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8.
This is why I NEVER buy (at least try to not buy) any portable / mobile device that doesn't have a replaceable battery. My Samsung Galaxy S5, my original Google Phone, and my Dell laptop all have replaceable batteries. I have Nokia Lumia 900 and 920 phones (compliments of Nokia where I worked until Microsoft took them over), which don't have replaceable batteries, and they suck battery life! When I went to work for Nokia, they issued me an N8 Symbian phone. It had better raw battery life, and the battery was replaceable! Unfortunately it broke when I loaded a bad SIM carrier... I would not mind if I still had it - a great phone!
The iPhone 6+ is in fact less bendable than the Samsung phones, and the Samsung phones have screens that will shatter instead of bending slightly...
But in fact the iPhone 6+ is easily good for more than a day of charge. So if you want an iPhone that you don't have to think about the battery, they already sell one.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I'm guessing you live in the US? If so, erhaps you should petition your local person of power (senator? congressman? whatever) to address the pitiful consumer laws in your country. In Europe such things are legally bound, in terms of products being fit for purpose for their intended lifetime. In the UK this is implemented in (amongst other things) the Sale of Goods Act which gives you significant ammunition in terms of demanding it be fixed for a period of (I believe) up to 5 years.
Genuinely not trying to be a smart ass; you could be in Europe and be unaware of such laws - hopefully you are. Companies, as a matter of course, will conveniently forget to mention these rights until you beat them around the head with them. But then, that's business - deny deny deny, until you're banged to rights.
I made it by 3 days and bought my wife's Iphone on the 13th. Oh lucky me. :(
My laptop's battery lasts about 4.5 hours with regular usage. However, it is about 6 years old. I will readily admit that I'm on my second battery. It was pretty obvious when my first battery died. It would quickly go from 80% to 0% within only a few minutes. I then went onto Amazon, bought a replacement for 15 dollars, and changed it out in about 30 seconds. Anything less than this is frankly unacceptable to me. Others may feel differently, but it's 2015. Let's not pretend this is a problem that hasn't been solved, even if some companies are actively working against it.
"The new terms to no apply to everyone"
Slashdot editor to no apply editingnizationlatism for story.