Slashdot Mirror


Chromecast Update Bringing Grief For Many Users

An anonymous reader writes: Last week, many Chromecast users were automatically "upgraded" to build 32904. Among the issues seen with this update are placing some users on the 'beta' release track, issues with popular apps such as Plex, HBO GO, (more embarassingly) YouTube, and others. Google so far has been slow to respond or even acknowledge the issues brought by customers, save for the beta release mishap. If you're a Chromecast user, what's been your experience?

142 comments

  1. Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Their software never seem to leave the "beta" stage, whether labelled as such or not...

    Acknowledgement of issues is also not their forte, as seen again here. Neither is it Apple's except Apple releases pretty well polished stuff.

    I guess the conclusion is if you have the money choose Apple. If you have time choose Google. That's how they segment...

    1. Re:Google Beta by SCPRedMage · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am a Chromecast user, and I report that my Roku is working fine.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    2. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their software never seem to leave the "beta" stage, whether labelled as such or not...

      The technical term for that is "Agile".

      Continuous Integration. It's what all the cool klds do these days!

    3. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roku also messes with unnanounced remote updates. Why the fuck would they have to set my background to Star Wars?

    4. Re: Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dite un sacco di cagate! You are standing a flock of bullshits

    5. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the conclusion is if you have the money choose Apple. If you have time choose Google. That's how they segment...

      What about the problems on iOS 8 upgrade for older iphones? The clumsy Apple Maps? The antennagate?

      Apple has its problems as well, and they charge more money for it, as you mentioned. Sure you have the right to complain but I don't recall the last time apple changed a single product after user complaints. So thanks, but no thanks, I'll stick with the free google services (although I know I am giving my information away, but what the heck, apple would use it as well... we're all fucked...).

    6. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, if you ignore all the bugs and issues that i things have, then yes, I agree. It's definitely polished.

      All one has to do is go to the forums, and you'll see a swath of people complaining about bugs and slowdowns...

    7. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it would be nice if I could get Roku to keep the damn background at default and LEAVE IT THERE!

    8. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That term you use, Continuous Integration... I do not think it means what you think it means.

    9. Re:Google Beta by vivek7006 · · Score: 0

      Dumbass, there is an option for changing backgroud options. Move your ass and change it under settings menu. Jeez, how do morons like you end up on slashdot? You haven't even looked under settings options, before whining about it ...

    10. Re:Google Beta by sexconker · · Score: 0

      That term you use, Continuous Integration... I do not think it means what you think it means.

      And I don't think it fucking means anything. It's fluffy bullshit.

    11. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no surprise. Google is well known for making sweeping, unwanted changes for no reason other than to make a change. Look at how shit all of their services have become? Google Search used to find stuff, now it's all ads, paid placement and unrelated results. Gmail used to be simple and fast, but now it's slow as shit and has a bunch of annoying features like "Labels" and "Categories" that you have to disable. YouTube used to allow each user to fully customise their channels, but now every single channel looks exactly the same and artificially requires the use of Google's loser networking service, Google-.

      I used to be a fan of Google's, but they killed off any positive feelings I had about them through worthless change after worthless change. I've already replaced my Android tablet with a Windows tablet and I'll be throwing my Android phone away later this month too. Maybe I'll take a hammer to the phone like I did with the Android tablet.

    12. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to add, if you haven't encountered frequent problems with iCloud consider yourself lucky. My wife hasn't but her almost her entire family are Apple fans and some have chosen to rely on iCloud extensively. It's definitely not flawless and I personally consider it to be sporadically unreliable. I realize every online service can have issues, whether it's Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Netflix, whatever when some kind of server update or DNS problem pops up that creates a temporary stoppage it's annoying but it's just that, temporary. But iCloud just doesn't seem to be stable. It's not like Apple doesn't have the financial resources to focus on fixing it.

    13. Re:Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still can't get past "Roku" (English translation: year) as the name of a company/product for streaming video. Is it indicative of how laggy it is?

    14. Re: Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That phrase you use, 'that term you use, x; I don't think it means what you think it means'; I don't think it means what you think it means, it just marks you out as being a complete wanker.

    15. Re: Google Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My suggestion? When not using it UNPLUG IT.

    16. Re:Google Beta by HighPerformanceCoder · · Score: 1

      We had significant problems with ABC iView a couple fo weeks ago. It would display the leading advertisement, then go into an endless download loop, needing the chromcast to be power cycled. This happen 3-4 times, after which time (half an hour wasted), we gave up trying to watch that episode. Haven't used chromecast since - maybe the A/B testing is our problem?

    17. Re:Google Beta by steveg · · Score: 1

      At least with Android you get a pop-up asking if you want to perform the upgrade. And you can say "not now."

      I've been refusing to "upgrade" my phone to KitKat for a year and a half now. You do have to face the annoyance of the pop-up every 24 hours, but at least you're not forced into a regression.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  2. Chromecast = Google Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No DTS for Chromecast?
    https://code.google.com/p/google-cast-sdk/issues/detail?id=389 ... lets close down regular consumers/people posting to that thread.

    AC-3 for Chromecast was "Don't Fix" then fixed:
    https://code.google.com/p/google-cast-sdk/issues/detail?id=192 ... I would hate to work with some of these people at Google. If this is how they treat the public (the people that pay to use their stuff) then I'd hate to be alongside one of them on a project.

    1. Re:Chromecast = Google Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hate to work with some of these people at Google. If this is how they treat the public (the people that pay to use their stuff) then I'd hate to be alongside one of them on a project.

      You don't get it man!

      It's freedom!! Total freedom!!! Fuck users!!!! Finally we, the developers, stand at the helm!!!!!!

      Ever dreamed of "check-in and forget" style of work? At Google, you can.

      Ever was troubled by user feedback and bug reports? At Google, you do not even need to acknowledge the world outside!

      Unlimited possibilities!!

  3. I'm not, but on the subject of updates by ihtoit · · Score: 0

    has anyone else's Skype client stopped working with a .dll error lately?

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:I'm not, but on the subject of updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, but it can't transfer files on anything but my surface rt. all other (win 8.1 metro and regular, win 7, mac) file transfers just never complete

    2. Re:I'm not, but on the subject of updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, now what?

    3. Re:I'm not, but on the subject of updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has anyone else's Skype client stopped working with a .dll error lately?

      This is the bash Google thread.

      You want the bash Microsoft thread down the hall.

    4. Re:I'm not, but on the subject of updates by dkman · · Score: 1

      I did have one user with a skype issue. I had her reinstall skype and it was fine. I'm not sure what broke it.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    5. Re:I'm not, but on the subject of updates by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      ah, the main power coupling adjustment. Got it :)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  4. Chromecast the clusterfuck by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for a pretty large video streaming company out of Hollywood. Our chromecast implementation for our streaming player has been doing crazy stupid shit for the last two weeks. Maybe this is why. Knew I read slashdot for some reason.

    1. Re: Chromecast the clusterfuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, as if anyone who works at M-GO and posts to Slashdot has anything at all to do with the deals and policies that you despise.

    2. Re: Chromecast the clusterfuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first step is admitting it so please let's make them feel welcome when taking this big step.

  5. Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Less junk from Google you got on your systems, better off you are. Chromecast? Why do you even need it? Seriously, why?

    1. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2

      Amen. I really need a solid alternative to Chrome, that's all.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    2. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by faway · · Score: 0

      I tend to agree. I only have chrome installed because I need flash to watch TV online from Comcast. who needs more crap from people that are complicit with government spying?

    3. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less junk from Google you got on your systems, better off you are. Chromecast? Why do you even need it? Seriously, why?

      Because some people have love for the advertising company that makes it. And most of them wish it was longer so it could reach their prostate.

    4. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried DuckDuckCast, you asshat?

    5. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least they're not scumbags and human pieces of shit like the people that work for Microsoft are.

      July 31, 2012

      Microsoft (MS) began encrypting web-based chat with the introduction of the new outlook.com service. This new Secure Socket Layer (SSL) encryption effectively cut off collection of the new service for FAA 702 and likely 12333 (to some degree) for the Intelligence Community (IC). MS, working with the FBI, developed a surveillance capability to deal with the new SSL. These solutions were successfully tested and went live 12 Dec 2012. The SSL solution was applied to all current FISA and 702/PRISM requirements - no changes to UTT tasking procedures were required. The SSL solution does not collect server-based voice/video or file transfers. The MS legacy collection system will remain in place to collect voice/video and file transfers. As a result there will be some duplicate collection of text-based chat from the new and legacy systems which will be addressed at a later date. An increase in collection volume as a result of this solution has already been noted by CES.

      March 15, 2013

      SSO's PRISM program began tasking all Microsoft PRISM selectors to Skype because Skype allows users to log in using account identifiers in addition to Skype usernames. Until now, PRISM would not collect any Skype data when a user logged in using anything other than the Skype username which resulted in missing collection; this action will mitigate that. In fact, a user can create a Skype account using any e-mail address with any domain in the world. UTT does not currently allow analysts to task these non-Microsoft e-mail addresses to PRISM, however, SSO intends to fix that this summer. In the meantime, NSA, FBI and Dept of Justice coordinated over the last six months to gain approval for PRINTAURA to send all current and future Microsoft PRISM selectors to Skype. This resulted in about 9800 selectors being sent to Skype and successful collection has been received which otherwise would have been missed.

      March 7, 2014

      PRISM now collects Microsoft Skydrive data as part of PRISM'S standard Stored Communications collection package for a tasked FISA Amendments Act Section 702 (FAA702) selector. This means that analysts will no longer have to make a special request to SSO for this - a process step that many analysts may not have known about. This new capability will result in a much more complete and timely collection response from SSO for our Enterprise customers. This success is the result of the FBI working for many months with Microsoft to get this tasking and collection solution established.

    6. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chromium then?

    7. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! Google's fucked up, find some subtle segue to change the subject to Microsoft!

      Honestly you people are pathetic with your "I dont mind being fucked in the ass, at least Im not being fucked in the ass twice" like "not at all" is just not an option for you, just bend over and keep taking it then because just like Microsoft Google has a whole lot of involvement in making sure your data ends up safely in the hands of the NSA.

    8. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried DuckDuckCast, you asshat?

      I prefer BingCast

    9. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sticking with AltaCasta.

    10. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical. You are defending Enron by not talking about them in this thread. You scumbag.

    11. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cast Jeeves.

    12. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

      [Raises little flag]

      Opera is still here... Yeah it runs off Chromium... But it still runs fast and is free of a lot of the annoyances of Chrome

    13. Re:Less junk from Google is actually good by Cramer · · Score: 1

      The key annoyance of "chrome" is chrome. Opera is nothing more than a different skin on the same steaming turd. (and their devs have all but said so. They aren't happy with chromium's extreme memory consumption, but there's only so far they can go to "fix it".)

  6. Mysterious power-on by Tea-Bone+of+Brooklyn · · Score: 1

    I've found my TV and receiver on a few times when I was sure I had turned them off. I love that Chromecast can tell the receiver and TV to come on and select the proper input, but I'd prefer it limited the behavior to when I was casting something.

    1. Re:Mysterious power-on by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a function of a TV sensing a sudden state change of the HDMI input?

    2. Re:Mysterious power-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check if it's possible to disable CEC ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#CEC ) in your TV.

    3. Re:Mysterious power-on by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Mine has never turned the TV on unless I was casting something. Are you sure your TV is following the spec?

  7. Works Great. Thanks for asking. by gavron · · Score: 2, Informative

    My two ChromeCasts are working great.

    I love a good hysterical conspiracy and am disappointed not to be part of it.

    Go on, keep on making up stuff. Perhaps some of it will turn out to be true!

    E

  8. We have 5.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has become a running joke at the office. They are buggy, shitty, and mostly sitting in drawers.

    1. Re:We have 5.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It has become a running joke at the office. They are buggy, shitty, and mostly sitting in drawers.

      Plug them in and they'll work better.

    2. Re:We have 5.. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 5, Funny

      It has become a running joke at the office. They are buggy, shitty, and mostly sitting in drawers.

      Whether or not you approve of the über-casual dress code, that's still not a very nice thing to say about your co-workers.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:We have 5.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really.

  9. A/B Testing by darkain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks like Chromecast has gone the way of Google Chrome: Arbitrary and random A/B testing that you're never notified of, and no way to opt out of.

    This seriously pisses me the fuck off with Chome. The browser works great on like 20 machines, and then fucks up on one. You think it is the machine's fault, until you dig and dig and dig into vague forum posts on Google's boards. Then it turns out to be a hidden A/B test, where you have to go into the hidden Chrome settings to force enable/disable some very specific feature to get out of the that one and only that one particular test.

    This is EXACTLY what happened to my primary development machine. Chrome had a hidden A/B test for ASync DNS requests. This feature is bugged to shit and back during the test. It would lock the entire browser session (all tabs) for 30-60 seconds at a time while making only certain DNS requests.

    Another example is with the internal cache system. There was a bug for a while which would also lock up Chrome for 30-60 seconds at a time just waiting to see if a URL resource is locally cached. There was no fix for this that I could find. My resolution was eventually to have the installers handy for both Release and Beta Chrome laying around. Sometimes Release was the broken build, sometimes Beta was the broken build. So when shit got fucked up, I'd just toggle between the builds.

    1. Re:A/B Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This crap really irritates me, but I'd like to keep Chrome around for all the other, usual reasons. Any idea if anyone is maintaining a list of these setting changes as they happen?

    2. Re:A/B Testing by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      but I'd like to keep Chrome around for all the other, usual reasons.

      Why, because you like to let Google track you?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:A/B Testing by teh+dave · · Score: 1

      Why do you insist on working with that rubbish? Switch to Firefox, it is a better browser anyway.

    4. Re:A/B Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of statements are not helpful. There are always people who have perfectly valid reasons using either this or that. Just an example: Firefox hasn't been even an option last years on MacOSX for enterprise I did some consulting work for - PKCS#11 breaks the browser and there was no x264 support.

      I'm sure there are opposite cases as well. The point is - there is no option really ... sometimes.

    5. Re:A/B Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're all but beta testers in the eye of Google.

    6. Re:A/B Testing by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      We're all but beta testers in the eye of $software_company

      There, fixed it for you!

    7. Re:A/B Testing by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Looks like Chromecast has gone the way of Google Chrome: Arbitrary and random A/B testing that you're never notified of, and no way to opt out of.

      And gmail, and google maps, and pretty much everything else.

      Google's stuff, while mostly cool and interesting, is essentially perpetually in beta, subject to arbitrary changes, or simply being made to go away.

      Google products are endlessly fiddled with, with the users as testers in a lot of cases.

      I honestly don't think anybody should be surprised by this. Because I'm hard pressed to think of a single "product" (and since most of them are free betas that's debatable) which Google has never treated any differently. It's their service, you're just using it in whatever state they give it to you today.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:A/B Testing by mileshigh · · Score: 1

      We're all but beta testers in the eye of $software_company

      Correction: We're all but beta testers in the eye of $advertising_company. Ever notice that their advertising platforms rarely suffer from this kind of flakiness?

      Google's stock price would barely quiver if Chrome, Android, GMail, etc all evaporated overnight. Might even go UP like when companies announce staff cuts. Those little freebie side-projects are largely there to convince the public and Google's own employees that they're a do-good technology company. Delivering tested, bullet-proof software apparently isn't part of the agenda in that "cool" part of their shop.

    9. Re:A/B Testing by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      Because I'm hard pressed to think of a single "product" (and since most of them are free betas that's debatable) which Google has never treated any differently. It's their service, you're just using it in whatever state they give it to you today.

      You seem to be confused about their product. You are their product; the advertisers are their clients. That's the service they don't mess with. There's a reason that they don't understand why enterprise customers need Java in the browser or wish they'd stop crying wolf on every SSL cert - selling services to a business isn't their model or one that they really want.

      Probably because those customer would say "we need Java to access SuperMicro's IPMI interface on our internal networks. That's the same reason we don't want to click three times every time we use a self-signed/vendor signed cert or a cert that uses older crypto. We're on our internal network. Stop breaking stuff for no reason and fix the outstanding bugs we have open."

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    10. Re:A/B Testing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Google's stock price would barely quiver if Chrome, Android, GMail, etc all evaporated overnight. Might even go UP like when companies announce staff cuts. Those little freebie side-projects are largely there to convince the public and Google's own employees that they're a do-good technology company. Delivering tested, bullet-proof software apparently isn't part of the agenda in that "cool" part of their shop.

      No, the purpose of Chrome, Android, GMail, etc isn't to show the public they are a do-gooder technology company. It's to attract eyeballs. Android was a response to iOS - Google was worried that Apple's dominance in the area would be bad news for their mobile advertising aspirations, so they needed a mobile OS in order to retain and attract eyeballs.

      Google's products are merely an attractant to get eyeballs. When you are the product, they need to make stuff to keep you coming back. They sell advertisers access to those eyeballs.

      The whole point of their testing and adjustments is seeing if it will attract or deter eyeballs.

  10. HOAX by gavron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The OP includes a link to an IRAQ user saying he can't set up his Chromecast...

    and a 9 day old post from someone saying they're now on the beta track and google saying they'll fix it.

    Are we really to believe there's a great google conspiracy to disrupt chromecasts, and
    in a week and a half NOTHING has been discussed, but now the only two links are
    an IRAQI WINDOWS USER and someone who accidentally got into beta.

    My money is on hoax.

    Ehud

    1. Re:HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Google defense force, activate!

    2. Re:HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am shocked, shocked I tell you to hear that someone named "Ehud" is dismissive of Persians and their culture. Racist bigotry here on slashdot? Why I never! Bring me my smelling salts!

      Next you'll be telling me how horrible Jordanians are, eh Lefty? I bet they're not even circumcised, the savages!

    3. Re:HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you use google to verify the source?

    4. Re:HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Persians in Iraq? Is this a troll?

  11. slashdot needs an editorial reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cowboy neal laughing his bits off all the way to the bank

  12. Re:Works Great. Thanks for asking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Links to a couple bug reports and... that's it? Why the hell is this here?

  13. This is what happens when you hire MBAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nearly all of them are Repubicans, and they hate science and logic. They also hate people. That is the way of their kind. Expect Google to do even more to screw us over in the next few years. Their leadership has been flooded with racist pieces of shit that hate us.

  14. how can this be if Googlers are super geniuses? by faway · · Score: 1

    the journalists all claim that our beloved Googlers are super geniuses, completely without flaws. indeed I have interviewed a Google and I can assure you that their arrogance matches their Status is mega geniuses. please please don't tell me there was all vapid hype and that their egos are like inflated balloons!!

  15. Re: how can this be if Googlers are super geniuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound bitter. So you were declined for a janitorial position?

  16. Holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've called Comcast 5 times in the past 7 days because we've lost internet multiple times a day and lost our phone service one of those days as well. I scheduled a service call for tomorrow and made them give me a 60$ credit for july. Should I cancel the service call and scream at their tech support some more?

    1. Re:Holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh never mind I thought the title said Comcast not Chromecast. Fuck Chromecast it was proven cracked last year and they said they would never fix it.

    2. Re: Holy shit by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Proven cracked? It openly states it has no security I thought.

      What does cracking a Chromecast mean?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re: Holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re: Holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can Rickroll your own TV while you sit and watch in a plastic lawn chair Jesse Pinkman style? Man, so cracked.

    5. Re: Holy shit by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you need to be already on the network to use it based on the video.

      But, Chromecast had in its FAQ even that anyone on your network had access.

      They had some shot in the video of disconnecting and reconnecting to the phone, was that resetting it to search remotely? seems likely that it is possible to do that (play videos on someone else's device in range), but hardly devestating. People have TVs with IR remotes too, they can be "hacked" in pretty much the same way.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  17. What are you talking about Willis? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Among the issues seen with this update are placing some users on the 'beta' release track, ...

    Google has a non-beta release track for something?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:What are you talking about Willis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's called "Alpha".

    2. Re:What are you talking about Willis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Google conducts public, anonymous A/B feature testing in its products. I've mostly see it in UI changes to gauge user interaction. Sometimes it's done to see if a feature helps the user work faster, something you cannot determine in small user samples easily nor with simple feature completeness.

      No excuse for the bugs. New features should be rigorously tested before being user-facing, but we are all only human.

      - Former Google Engineer

  18. Re:Works Great. Thanks for asking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So because it works for you the people who are experiencing the problem are liars?

    Go fuck yourself man.

  19. App appers apping apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern app appers know Chromecast runs apps, so you have to app it by apping apps, not using Luddite updates!

    Aps!

  20. Youtube casting fatally broken. No longer usable. by DustinB · · Score: 4, Informative

    This update hosed casting Youtube from my Android phone. It constantly loses the queue. It constantly plays audio only with no video. If another user connects to YouTube the queue is lost. Users constantly booted from being connected. The currently playing box in the lower right disappears preventing any way of controlling the remote device you're casting to. There could not have been any testing prior to this release.

  21. Stick with one version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it not possible to disable autoupdate altogether, at least until there is a compelling reason to update?

  22. Re: how can this be if Googlers are super geniuses by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    He's probably been afflicted by Google bugs and the shutdown of some Google projects. With Google, you never know what will still be around tomorrow.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. Re: how can this be if Googlers are super geniuses by faway · · Score: 1

    That's a dumb response. What are you, 12 years old?

  24. Issue I got with ChromeCast why isn't it Android by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 0

    If Google is distributing Android on phones and pushing it as the next OS for everything... Why aren't they offering ChromeCasts with full and rootable Android.. now I will give them the root but Full Android is available on other devices and it makes them so much better. I got a Android 4.4 stick at a discount retailer for $14 and I have a Android Box on my bedroom TV .. both of them give me the full Android Features unfortunately the Stick didn't come with Google Play Store so im pretty much screwed on that but I can install apps from other places including Kodi.TV which is a good option for streaming from my network drive to my TV.. Why don't they give us full Android... I mean whats the deal? Aren't they all Socialists Liberal Nutjobs who redistribute Copyrighted books they don't have license to online and want to provide Free Fiber to everyone so they can sniff your stream? Why no full Android.. it makes them crappy

  25. Re: how can this be if Googlers are super geniuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was no less constructive than your post.

  26. Problems here too by bazmail · · Score: 1

    Came downstairs this morning to find the TV on and the Chromecast setup screen. Complete with new Chromecast device ID number, (e.g format ChromcastWXYZ).

    YouTube stopped working, didn;t try netflix. God dammit Google.

  27. It never worked properly anyway... by DrVxD · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...so I doubt this update will make things any worse.

    My Number One problem with Chromecast was the dumb setup procedure - the bloody thing is forever losing it's connection with my WiFi, with the only recourse being to do a hard reset and then wade through the interminable setup process again and again...

    Of course, Google provides no customer support for the thing - they just send you to a web forums full of raving fanbois who get offensive when you suggest that it's possible for any google product could be anything other than perfect.

    </rant>

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    1. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by Sir+Foxx · · Score: 2

      This is the problem I've been having for a couple of months. I no longer can get it to work through my router as it just says it can't connect. I have to do a hard reset every time now, try to hook into my wifi, then I have to cast directly to the Chromecast, which completely sucks because I now can't stream from the internet anymore. I have to download what I want to watch, then play it through videostream extension on Chrome, and cast to my chromecast. Which ones of the other options should I get to replace my Chromecast? Amazon Firestick anygood?

      --
      "I don't which is worse, that everyone has a price, or that the price is always so low"--Hobbes
    2. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't setup chromecast on Windows XP anymore so I'm stuck to the last network that chromecast was setup with. If google doesn't support XP for chromecast, why bother continuing to support chrome browser on XP?
      The setup process and registry changes are alot, so it isn't easy to get around googles setup program by manually entering the info to reconfigure the chromecast network.

      Chromecast is old, It should have 802.11AC and not 802.11g. The memory I think is only 1meg but should be higher.

      To much buffering, and doesn't play movies such as "vobs" even with videostream software. It does play some mpeg4' but has trouble with nikon camera mp4 file formats (alot of pausing) even if converted to 480/640 resolution.

    3. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      They're down to about $25 on ebay these days. How much support to you honestly think you're going to get? A heck of a lot of people have chromecasts which connect to their network just fine. So while it's possible that the chromecast is fundamentally broken, it's more likely that there's an incompatibility between your access point and the chromecast. I'd tend to suspect the AP more than the chromecast based on general experience with those vendors. Is your AP even getting firmware updates anymore? Do the updates address issues with the radio & low level functions like association & rekeying, or only high level issues like "gui doesn't load properly"? Assuming that it is an issue with the AP, how much money should google spend trying to work around the issue?

    4. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by caseih · · Score: 1

      I've never had any luck with any of these streaming stick devices. The only thing that works for me a a full-blown computer connected to HDMI.

      Of course there are bugs there too. It took Gigabyte two years to release a EFI firmware that fixed the HDMI audio bug where after turning off the TV, HDMI audio would disappear until you rebooted.

    5. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by wiggles · · Score: 1

      I was having problems because the TV was interfering with the RF signal between the Chromecast and the WAP. Here's what I did, with excellent results:

      https://productforums.google.c...

      $20 worth of cabling, and I got the thing connected via Cat5. Works great now, no disconnects anymore, and it no longer takes up a spot on wireless device list in the WAP.

    6. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had same kind of problems with my D-Link DIR655 and a Chromecast borrowed from office. The Android phone CC setup app could actually see the CC device, but the connection would just not work. And the problem with these "modern" devices is that there is absolutely no way to debug things, thanks to UX guys, the error dialogs just say "There was some connection problem, please try later again."

    7. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the DRM in hdmi really sucks, but its getting a bit more tolerant.

      5 or 10 years ago (back when hdmi was first out) video cards were too strict and the chipsets were, too. if you didn't boot things in the right order, you'd get a race condition. would have to 'reboot the monitor' after the computer started up or you would not get hdmi.

      turn off the av receiver and this might turn your tv actually off (switched ac outlet)? that might also cause hdmi to 'go away' and need your pc to be rebooted.

      finally all this got worked out, mostly; but I still see remindants of strict drm. I have amazon prime and sometimes I like to fall asleep to a documentary (many of amazon's docs are boring so its a good fit, lol). I start off watching, then I put the stereo on sleep timer and turn the video display off. if amazon is playing at the time, the audio drops out for a few seconds before coming back on again (right after I turn the display off with my remote). at first, I thought there was a bug, but later realized that a few seconds after - the audio came back on. I guess they realized that it WAS a valid use case to 'watch tv' and have the video off (no hdmi link) and yet still let audio thru (spdif out on my win7 htpc).

      its getting better but that audio drop out is still annoying and 100% not necessary. sigh.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:It never worked properly anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have slow connections and failed attempts for apps to launch (Twitch), but I was able to resolve it by picking up a small wireless AP (about the size of an old Apple Express) and created a wireless network closer to the Chromecast. It's worked perfectly since then. I wish they would release an Ethernet version, it's the single reason I won't purchase the Nexus Player.

  28. No issues here by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Chromecast + plex + Netflix + homemade db4 on the bedroom TV is our only video location. Worked fine Saturday with plex, my girlfriend binge watched some old TLC show. Will keep an eye on it.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:No issues here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None here either, we use it every day. Bought it early this year and it's never lost connection to wifi, and I've never had to reboot it.

  29. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like at least half of the people responding here have no clue what the thread is about.
    Chromecast has nothing to do with Chrome the browser. Chromecast is a piece of hardware.

    And yes, I agree, you don't NEED Chromecast, just like you don't need a TV, or a streaming services.

    But I love it to be able to pick a movie or series from Netflix on my iPad, tell it to stream it to my TV, and see my TV automatically turn on, with the right input selected, and start playing it without even trying to find where the cleaning lady left the remote emthis/em> week. And that with all necessary controls (pause, stop, navigate) available right on my iPad.

    It's also neat, when I'm watching a video on Youtube, to be able to say a a finger touch "hold it, I wanna see this on a bigger screen", and make it start streaming that content to my TV from that point on. And vice versa.

    And that all works flawlessly, so far.
    I wouldn't even noticed there has been an update if I wasn't reading it here now.

  30. What user experience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chromecast stopped working after the update, Chrome still knows about the device, but cant use it. The OSX Setup Assistant says everything is in perfect order. Google help pages basically useless and way to generic.

    Would not buy again.

  31. Why Chromecast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the benefits (for the users, not Google) of using Chromecast over something like Miracast? New TVs typically supports it or you can use e.g. Netgear Push2TV. Simple screen mirroring, no stupid per-app support needed, no Internet connection needed, no Google listening device attached to your LAN. Really, why Chromecast?

    1. Re:Why Chromecast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feature of running the whole playback app on the streaming stick leaves the 'control device' (handheld, notebook) unused thereby saving battery. I can stream hours of video over chromecast from my smartphone without losing more battery power then when I would check for new e-mails once in a while. Screen mirroring is more of a 'look mom no cable!'-feature then actually moving the playback to another device.

    2. Re:Why Chromecast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why the Chromecast was never appealing to me in the first place. I simply never "got" it.

      In your example, you talk about saving the battery in the smartphone. But if you upgrade the "control device" (replace the smartphone with a mouse, or even thirty-year-old IR remote tech) then its battery will last on the order of a year.

      And then by having the computer that is plugged into the TV run a not-weird software stack, you get reliability and diverse interoperability too.

      In every way, the Chromecast looked like a significant downgrade from the traditional approach. The only thing kind of nice about it, was that it was such a cheap (I actually do mean that in a good way) and tiny computer. But cheap tiny computers are getting pretty common anyway so you can already have your cake and eat it too. What did Google bring to the table with this, other than some weird proprietary, unmaintainable dependencies? And that's even putting it in a good light, where it's assumed to not be flakey, it works with the streams that you happen play, etc.

      Chromecast is a total loser of an idea. They could fix it and perfect it and it still won't make any sense. There are no natural use cases. IMHO.

    3. Re:Why Chromecast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a few arguments that make it 'ok', not perfect, but also not without any 'natural' use cases or 'a total loser' as you put it. A. it's damn cheap B. the ease of using a handheld to browse and select content is not always the same as on a streaming client / pc. A smart-tv app would, but I don't have a smart-tv (see point A). C. HDMI-CEC. It turns the tv on an it starts playback, with in the future control support from the tv remote (pause, seek). Not an enormous turning point in my life, but that I can say the same for the turn indicator in my car that automatically stops when I made a turn in that direction. Nice to have certainly. D. Portable I know there are a lot of alternatives, but in my situation Chromecast just works ok. Just like my Windows 7 pc and my Philips coffee maker. Calling these products 'total losers' when they aren't perfect is just childish.

  32. ...update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, my chromecast experience has been so bad that I didn't even know there was an update... It's sitting collecting dust as the screen refresh rate and responsiveness is horrible with it.

  33. Chrome updates cause more problems than they solve by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Looks like Chromecast has gone the way of Google Chrome: Arbitrary and random A/B testing that you're never notified of, and no way to opt out of. This seriously pisses me the fuck off with Chome.

    Amen brother. I used to have our company use Chrome but there was so much flakiness after updates that it became impossible to use. In our particular case weird behavior with PDFs was the straw that broke the proverbial camel's back. We use a lot of PDFs and Chrome just couldn't handle them in a sane manner, kept changing things and then it would randomly break for a user. It was always a pain in the ass to figure out why there was a problem and then then behavior would change a few weeks later. We don't have the most sophisticated group of users here and random changes in behavior are NOT helpful even if they are made with the best of intentions.

    So we're using Firefox which is the best of the alternatives. (Safari has issues and IE is just a nonstarter) Firefox has its issues too but it don't create needless tech support issues for me which is what I really care about.

  34. Why Firefox pisses me off the least by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Amen. I really need a solid alternative to Chrome, that's all.

    I keep using all the various browsers and despite its warts I keep coming back to Firefox as my primary browser. Chrome keeps "fixing" stuff that didn't need fixing and breaking it in the process. Safari has some behaviors I find annoying and (surprisingly) I run into a fair number of website that break on it. Plus Apple never seems to do Windows software very well and you can't get it on Linux. And IE isn't available on anything other than Windows even if I wanted to use it (I don't) so it's a non-starter.

    Firefox isn't perfect by any means but it is cross platform, generally stable, generally predictable, and fits my particular work style. Basically it pisses me off the least of the major browser options. It's been my daily driver (so to speak) for quite a few years now. If something better came along I'd drop it without a second thought but none of the alternatives really seem to be meaningfully better.

    1. Re:Why Firefox pisses me off the least by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Luckily this isn't the bad old days where it was just IE and netscape, today you DO have options! There is Comodo Dragon (what I use, better security features and no phone home to Google) Chromium, SWIron, and Opera which my oldest boy swears is the greatest thing ever (boy is he still pissed they quit using presto) and on the gecko side there is Firefox, PaleMoon (the other browser I use, I prefer the UI over IceDragon and it seems snappier), SeaMonkey, IceDragon, if you need really low resource there is always Kmeleon which runs really well even on a P3 running Win98SE and if you want to avoid BOTH the Chromium and Gecko engines you can go with QTWeb which is just what it says on the tin, a cross platform browser that uses Webkit and QT.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Why Firefox pisses me off the least by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

      Opera [opera.com] which my oldest boy swears is the greatest thing ever (boy is he still pissed they quit using presto)

      Don't recommend it. It all went down after they abandoned presto. Compared to the Opera I loved, the chromium version, to quote Dr. Cooper, sucks the big one. They even started rolling out silent updates, and the last one broke the bookmarks (they are gone -- you need to install a 3rd party extension to access your old bookmarks). Alienating their user base this way, they'll be gone sooner rather than later.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    3. Re:Why Firefox pisses me off the least by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually talked to the oldest today....he went back to the last Presto version and disabled updates because of them pulling shit like that LOL, once a diehard Opera user always a diehard Opera user. BTW I hear some of the ex-Opera team are making their own browser, maybe the oldest will get lucky and they'll make a new port of presto.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  35. Anectode != Data by sjbe · · Score: 1

    My two ChromeCasts are working great.

    I know this might be a shock but it's actually possible for products to break in ways that affect some users and not others. Weird I know.

    Seriously just because it works for you don't mean there isn't an actual problem. Consider yourself lucky.

    1. Re:Anectode != Data by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Judging by the number of affected people, it seems the affected people should consider themselves unlucky...

  36. Their tech support is a three ring circus by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

    I got a Chromecast for Christmas last year. Getting it set up was a major PITA. The WiFi radio was constantly loosing its mind. So in Feb. I unplugged it from the USB connector on the back of my Visio TV to re-set the radio and it killed the TV. I think it was an ESD event. I sent a message to their google groups explaining what happened. To make an extremely long story short, they asked me to send the unit back, which I did. After weeks of no response, I posted back and the comedy started when they asked me to log on to their site, pay full price for a new unit, then they would refund me when they got my failed unit back. The fact that they already had the failed unit was lost on them, and no kidding, at least 20 e-mails and half a dozen phone calls before I finally got someone not retarded on the phone. Around mid-April I tried the TV again and miraculously it turned on. They finally got a new (actually refurbed) unit back to me last week. They are in no way shape or form ready for dealing with tech support.

  37. 1.5 tears with chromecast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chromecast used to work great for streaming Netflix to my t.v., until google 'fixed' it. It has been a real PITA since the first update and I have to fuck with it constantly now to get it to work right. I doubt I will buy anyting else from Google again.

  38. Go troll somewhere else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard kuro5hin.org could use some posters, and there are numerous posts there stating hosts files don't work.

    1. Re:Go troll somewhere else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 by ac, please: You started it. Can't take what you dish out, troll? Yes.

    2. Re:Go troll somewhere else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK by schizo, Dave420 didn't post that AC, I did. Go take your meds? Yes.

  39. Chromecast?! I have a Corncast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things suck... Cornhole. Have 2, about every app will not see either unless I reboot the Chromecast and connect within the first few seconds... And that can sometimes take multiple tries. With that, you want a Corncast than runs on/over gmo fiber.

  40. Re: how can this be if Googlers are super geniuses by faway · · Score: 1

    Hardly. The media have built up Google as the perfect company. Tech people have enormous hubris because of the media and techies themselves.

  41. So how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How not to post as anonymous coward?

  42. What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!

    I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!

    (That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!

    (You stalk/harass me instead!)

    OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):

    ---

    * QUESTION:

    DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer it!

    As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk

  43. What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!

    I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!

    (That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!

    (You stalk/harass me instead!)

    OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):

    ---

    * QUESTION:

    DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer it!

    As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk

  44. What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!

    I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!

    (That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!

    (You stalk/harass me instead!)

    OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):

    ---

    * QUESTION:

    DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer it!

    As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk

  45. My Experience by bobbutts · · Score: 1

    The thing is not heavy enough to make an effective paperweight. It just wasn't something that me or anyone in my household used.

  46. Re:What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WARNING: Parent poster seems to be a weirdo, may be schizophrenic, may require medication that has not been taken. Engaging in conversation is not recommended as every dialogue will devolve into a discussion of /etc/hosts.

  47. chrome bookmark fiasco by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    Related to chormeos autoupdates are chrome browser updates. A couple of months ago I woke oneday to find that all my bookmarks where gone in chrome when I was logged in as myself on google. Furthermore they did not just vanish but rather they were all merged into my wife's account. So basically both of us had wrecked user accounts in chrome. Considing I had many hundreds of book marks carefully curated for more than 15 years across browser changes and computer systems, this was a staggering loss. I was able to export her book marks so I didn't lose them and re-import them into Safari (that was the last day I used chrome forever.) but now they are all out of order, have lots of her book marks, and have many duplicates with my old safari bookmarks. I'm still slowly organizing it.

    I'm still puzzled how that could have happened. The only clear link between these two accounts is that on at least one of 7 computers in the home, one of them we share. So obviously that must be the source. But how this mode of failure happened I'm puzzled. Without knowing that I will never use chrome again.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:chrome bookmark fiasco by Binestar · · Score: 1
      Something this important over 15 years and no backup? Frankly, your post should have been:

      Related to chormeos autoupdates are chrome browser updates. A couple of months ago I woke oneday to find that all my bookmarks where gone in chrome when I was logged in as myself on google. Furthermore they did not just vanish but rather they were all merged into my wife's account. So basically both of us had wrecked user accounts in chrome. Considing I had many hundreds of book marks carefully curated for more than 15 years across browser changes and computer systems I had a backup of everything and was able to restore. It wasted a couple of hours of mine as I tracked down the issue and resolved it, and caused me to switch from Chrome forever.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
  48. More of the same? by BytePusher · · Score: 1
    In general my experience with Google took a sharp downturn in the last quarter of 2014. Largely it seems they're riding on momentum, because they really did do some ground-breaking work. Android was an awesome answer to iOS. Not quite as slick and clean maybe, but I had no trouble with the FroYo, ICS or Jelly Bean. Lollipop on the other hand has really provided no additional functionality I felt was missing and has only served to drain my battery and randomly reboot when apps aren't crashing or freezing.

    Inbox and email tabs just hide new important emails.

    Hangouts is creepy(animations pop up here and there just to let you know someone is listening in) and the voice/video call functionality is an exercise in frustration.

    Google search seems to be gradually leading me away from the things I'm looking for toward pages of links I can't bring myself to click.

    I'm ready to switch to anything that provides something resembling quality.

  49. Re:What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tl;dr the IT version of Time Cube

  50. Response from Chromecast Community Manager by JackyGoogleCast · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hi Everyone,

    I'm the Chromecast Community Manager; I noticed your thread and wanted to respond.

    I don't know if you saw my response in our forum, but we posted the below around the Beta issue some users were seeing:

    "We've recently updated Chromecast and a small percentage of users received a debug message on the home screen. This update should not have any material negative user impact. We are pushing a fix to those impacted users shortly. If you would like to update immediately, please reboot your device (you do not need to factory data reset your device)."

    The OP posted links to our forum but if you have specific issues with the release not being addressed, please post in our forum.

    Jacky

  51. Impatient ingrates! They'll sort it t eventually! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A week and you're calling Google unresponsive? Hell, in this thread https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!msg/chromecast/DZgIOj4v_yA/lF_kjCuQC5sJ we Sony Bravia TV users have been waiting patiently for half a year to try and get the damn thing to just work without having to reboot the Chromecast each time we switch HDMI inputs!
    On the plus side, each month some female Google bot thanks us for our patience and assures us they are working on it.

  52. dave420 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" dave420 -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (See subject - Keep "Running", Forrest: Your weak, futile, & effete illogical ad hominem attacks aren't cutting it vs. your cowardice & REAL motives for harassing me on /. are exposed in it, webmaster...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Gosh, for someone that posts SO much in dave420, that link sure makes him get a "cat's got your tongue" & SILENCES him, doesn't it? LOL - yes, it does... apk

  53. "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" dave420 by ac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" = dave420 -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (See subject - Keep "Running", Forrest: Your weak, futile, & effete illogical ad hominem attacks aren't cutting it vs. your cowardice & REAL motives for harassing me on /. are exposed in it, webmaster...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Gosh, for someone that posts SO much in dave420, that link sure makes him get a "cat's got your tongue" & SILENCES him, doesn't it? LOL - yes, it does... apk